Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Garrett M. Street is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Garrett M. Street.


Journal of Animal Ecology | 2015

Space‐use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model

Tal Avgar; James A. Baker; Glen S. Brown; Jevon Hagens; Andrew M. Kittle; Erin E. Mallon; Madeleine T. McGreer; Anna Mosser; Steven G. Newmaster; Brent R. Patterson; Douglas E.B. Reid; Art R. Rodgers; Jennifer Shuter; Garrett M. Street; Ian D. Thompson; Merritt J. Turetsky; Philip A. Wiebe; John M. Fryxell

Movement patterns offer a rich source of information on animal behaviour and the ecological significance of landscape attributes. This is especially useful for species occupying remote landscapes where direct behavioural observations are limited. In this study, we fit a mechanistic model of animal cognition and movement to GPS positional data of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou; Gmelin 1788) collected over a wide range of ecological conditions. The model explicitly tracks individual animal informational state over space and time, with resulting parameter estimates that have direct cognitive and ecological meaning. Three biotic landscape attributes were hypothesized to motivate caribou movement: forage abundance (dietary digestible biomass), wolf (Canis lupus; Linnaeus, 1758) density and moose (Alces alces; Linnaeus, 1758) habitat. Wolves are the main predator of caribou in this system and moose are their primary prey. Resulting parameter estimates clearly indicated that forage abundance is an important driver of caribou movement patterns, with predator and moose avoidance often having a strong effect, but not for all individuals. From the cognitive perspective, our results support the notion that caribou rely on limited sensory inputs from their surroundings, as well as on long-term spatial memory, to make informed movement decisions. Our study demonstrates how sensory, memory and motion capacities may interact with ecological fitness covariates to influence movement decisions by free-ranging animals.


Journal of Animal Ecology | 2015

Wolves adapt territory size, not pack size to local habitat quality

Andrew M. Kittle; Morgan L. Anderson; Tal Avgar; James A. Baker; Glen S. Brown; Jevon Hagens; Ed Iwachewski; Scott Moffatt; Anna Mosser; Brent R. Patterson; Douglas E.B. Reid; Arthur R. Rodgers; Jen Shuter; Garrett M. Street; Ian D. Thompson; Lucas M. Vander Vennen; John M. Fryxell

1. Although local variation in territorial predator density is often correlated with habitat quality, the causal mechanism underlying this frequently observed association is poorly understood and could stem from facultative adjustment in either group size or territory size. 2. To test between these alternative hypotheses, we used a novel statistical framework to construct a winter population-level utilization distribution for wolves (Canis lupus) in northern Ontario, which we then linked to a suite of environmental variables to determine factors influencing wolf space use. Next, we compared habitat quality metrics emerging from this analysis as well as an independent measure of prey abundance, with pack size and territory size to investigate which hypothesis was most supported by the data. 3. We show that wolf space use patterns were concentrated near deciduous, mixed deciduous/coniferous and disturbed forest stands favoured by moose (Alces alces), the predominant prey species in the diet of wolves in northern Ontario, and in proximity to linear corridors, including shorelines and road networks remaining from commercial forestry activities. 4. We then demonstrate that landscape metrics of wolf habitat quality - projected wolf use, probability of moose occupancy and proportion of preferred land cover classes - were inversely related to territory size but unrelated to pack size. 5. These results suggest that wolves in boreal ecosystems alter territory size, but not pack size, in response to local variation in habitat quality. This could be an adaptive strategy to balance trade-offs between territorial defence costs and energetic gains due to resource acquisition. That pack size was not responsive to habitat quality suggests that variation in group size is influenced by other factors such as intraspecific competition between wolf packs.


Ecosphere | 2015

Selection for forage and avoidance of risk by woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) at coarse and local scales

Madeleine T. McGreer; Erin E. Mallon; Lucas M. Vander Vennen; Philip A. Wiebe; James A. Baker; Glen S. Brown; Tal Avgar; Jevon Hagens; Andrew M. Kittle; Anna Mosser; Garrett M. Street; Doug E. B. Reid; Arthur R. Rodgers; Jennifer Shuter; Ian D. Thompson; Merritt J. Turetsky; Steven G. Newmaster; Brent R. Patterson; John M. Fryxell

The relationship between selection at coarse and fine spatiotemporal spatial scales is still poorly understood. Some authors claim that, to accommodate different needs at different scales, individuals should have contrasting selection patterns at different scales of selection, while others claim that coarse scale selection patterns should reflect fine scale selection decisions. Here we examine site selection by 110 woodland caribou equipped with GPS radio-collars with respect to forage availability and predation risk across a broad gradient in availability of both variables in boreal forests of Northern Ontario. We tested whether caribou selection for forage and avoidance of risk was consistent between coarse (seasonal home range) and fine scales of selection. We found that local selection patterns predicted coarse scale selection patterns, indicating a close relationship between the drivers of selection at both spatial scales.


Ecosphere | 2015

Characterizing demographic parameters across environmental gradients: a case study with Ontario moose (Alces alces)

Garrett M. Street; Arthur R. Rodgers; Tal Avgar; John M. Fryxell

Population-level demographic characteristics as estimated by standard logistic growth models (i.e., carrying capacity and intrinsic growth rate) should vary with changes in habitat quality and availability of resources. However, few published studies have tested this hypothesis by comparing population growth rates across broad bioclimatic gradients, and fewer still the carrying capacities of those populations. We used time series data on moose (Alces alces) population densities based on aerial census and hunter harvest data for 34 management units across Ontario to estimate local carrying capacities and intrinsic growth rates. These population parameters were then regressed against associated habitat covariates for each management unit to assess how moose demography changes across a broad gradient of productivity, habitat abundance, and timber harvest. Moose carrying capacity was found to increase with increasing forest productivity as measured by ΔNDVI and the proportion of mixedwood stands in the forest. Both variables are plausibly indicative of high quality forage abundance for moose. Moose carrying capacity decreased with the proportion of forest stands harvested for timber annually, suggesting that immediate removal of forest stands and increased access by hunters temper maximum population size. Maximum rates of population growth by Ontario moose did not vary predictably with any of the landscape covariates tested. These findings contribute to our understanding of changes in demography across broad geographic and bioclimatic gradients and suggest that crude population estimators may be derived based on known habitat preferences and resource availability without a priori knowledge of animal abundance.


American Biology Teacher | 2013

And So it Grows: Using a Computer-Based Simulation of a Population Growth Model to Integrate Biology & Mathematics

Garrett M. Street; Timothy A. Laubach

ABSTRACT We provide a 5E structured-inquiry lesson so that students can learn more of the mathematics behind the logistic model of population biology. By using models and mathematics, students understand how population dynamics can be influenced by relatively simple changes in the environment.


Canadian Journal of Zoology | 2014

On the adaptive benefits of mammal migration

Tal Avgar; Garrett M. Street; John M. Fryxell


Canadian Journal of Zoology | 2015

Habitat selection following recent disturbance: model transferability with implications for management and conservation of moose (Alces alces)

Garrett M. Street; Lucas M. Vander Vennen; Tal Avgar; Anna Mosser; Morgan L. Anderson; Arthur R. Rodgers; John M. Fryxell


Journal of Wildlife Management | 2017

Comparing resource selection and demographic models for predicting animal density

Garrett M. Street; Arthur R. Rodgers; Tal Avgar; Lucas M. Vander Vennen; John M. Fryxell


Ecosphere | 2017

Landscape‐level wolf space use is correlated with prey abundance, ease of mobility, and the distribution of prey habitat

Andrew M. Kittle; Morgan L. Anderson; Tal Avgar; James A. Baker; Glen S. Brown; Jevon Hagens; Ed Iwachewski; Scott Moffatt; Anna Mosser; Brent R. Patterson; Douglas E.B. Reid; Arthur R. Rodgers; Jen Shuter; Garrett M. Street; Ian D. Thompson; Lucas M. Vander Vennen; John M. Fryxell


Oikos | 2013

Modeling forage mediated aggregation in a gregarious ruminant

Garrett M. Street; Floyd W. Weckerly; Susan Schwinning

Collaboration


Dive into the Garrett M. Street's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tal Avgar

University of Alberta

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna Mosser

University of Minnesota

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brent R. Patterson

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Glen S. Brown

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James A. Baker

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge