Garry J. O’Leary
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Garry J. O’Leary.
Crop & Pasture Science | 2012
James Nuttall; Garry J. O’Leary; Nirav Khimashia; Senthold Asseng; Glenn J. Fitzgerald; Robert M. Norton
Abstract. Under a future climate for south-eastern Australia there is the likelihood that the net effect of elevated CO2, (eCO2) lower growing-season rainfall and high temperature will increase haying-off thus limit production of rain-fed wheat crops. We used a modelling approach to assess the impact of an expected future climate on wheat growth across four cropping regions in Victoria. A wheat model, APSIM-Nwheat, was performance tested against three datasets: (i) a field experiment at Wagga Wagga, NSW; (ii) the Australian Grains Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment (AGFACE) experiment at Horsham, Victoria; and (iii) a broad-acre wheat crop survey in western Victoria. For down-scaled climate predictions for 2050, average rainfall during October, which coincides with crop flowering, decreased by 32, 29, 26, and 18% for the semiarid regions of the northern Mallee, the southern Mallee, Wimmera, and higher rainfall zone, (HRZ) in the Western District, respectively. Mean annual minimum and maximum temperature over the four regions increased by 1.9 and 2.2°C, respectively. A pair-wise comparison of the yield/anthesis biomass ratio across climate scenarios, used for assessing haying-off response, revealed that there was a 39, 49 and 47% increase in frequency of haying-off for the northern Mallee, southern Mallee and Wimmera, respectively, when crops were sown near the historically optimal time (1 June). This translated to a reduction in yield from 1.6 to 1.4 t/ha (northern Mallee), 2.5 to 2.2 t/ha (southern Mallee) and 3.7 to 3.6 t/ha (Wimmera) under a future climate. Sowing earlier (1 May) reduced the impact of a future climate on haying-off where decreases in yield/anthesis biomass ratio were 24, 28 and 23% for the respective regions. Heavy textured soils exacerbated the impact of a future climate on haying-off within the Wimmera. Within the HRZ of the Western District crops were not water limited during grain filling, so no evidence of haying-off existed where average crop yields increased by 5% under a future climate (6.4–6.7 t/ha). The simulated effect of eCO2 alone (FACE conditions) increased average yields from 18 to 38% for the semiarid regions but not in the HRZ and there was no evidence of haying-off. For a future climate, sowing earlier limited the impact of hotter, drier conditions by reducing pre-anthesis plant growth, grain set and resource depletion and shifted the grain-filling phase earlier, which reduced the impact of future drier conditions in spring. Overall, earlier sowing in a Mediterranean-type environment appears to be an important management strategy for maintaining wheat production in semiarid cropping regions into the future, although this has to be balanced with other agronomic considerations such as frost risk and weed control.
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing | 2014
Eileen M. Perry; Elizabeth Morse-McNabb; James Nuttall; Garry J. O’Leary; Rob Clark
This study explored the relationships between moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) NDVI observations with both measured and simulated fractional green cover (FGrC), leaf area index (LAI), and above ground biomass (AGB) for dryland wheat in Australia. A total of 37 paddocks in north-western Victoria, Australia, were sampled during 2003-2006 for AGB at anthesis, and for FGrC, NDVI (from an active optical sensor), and AGB during 2012. The 2012 FGrC and NDVI measurements were fitted to MODIS NDVI, resulting in positive, linear relationships when the MODIS NDVI values were ≤ 0.80. Measured AGB was also positively, linearly related to MODIS summed NDVI, resulting in an overall R2 of 0.81 and root mean square error (RMSE) of 1397 kg/ha. Crop simulations were run for the fourteen paddocks from 2003 to 2006, and six paddocks from 2012. Four crop phenological points were selected to extract corresponding NDVI and simulated crop parameters: emergence, peak LAI, the mid-point between emergence and peak LAI, and anthesis. Linear models were fit between the MODIS NDVI and simulated values of FGrC, LAI, and AGB. Overall, the highest R2 values corresponded to using all of the dates for FGrC (R2 = 0.82) and AGB (R2 = 0.92), and anthesis dates for LAI (R2 = 0.74). For FGrC and AGB, the RMSE with simulated parameters were comparable or better than the equivalent results from the in situ measurements (note that there were no LAI in situ measurements to compare with). The results support the notion for extending the value of the MODIS NDVI using crop simulation models. The combination of remotely sensed and simulation data might offer regional maps of spatial AGB and ultimately grain yield, which would have high value for research, resource management, policy, and potentially, crop management.
PLOS ONE | 2018
Shihab Uddin; Markus Löw; Shahnaj Parvin; Glenn J. Fitzgerald; Sabine Tausz-Posch; Roger Armstrong; Garry J. O’Leary; Michael Tausz
Through stimulation of root growth, increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) may facilitate access of crops to sub-soil water, which could potentially prolong physiological activity in dryland environments, particularly because crops are more water use efficient under elevated [CO2] (e[CO2]). This study investigated the effect of drought in shallow soil versus sub-soil on agronomic and physiological responses of wheat to e[CO2] in a glasshouse experiment. Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Yitpi) was grown in split-columns with the top (0–30 cm) and bottom (31–60 cm; ‘sub-soil’) soil layer hydraulically separated by a wax-coated, root-penetrable layer under ambient [CO2] (a[CO2], ∼400 μmol mol-1) or e[CO2] (∼700 μmol mol-1) [CO2]. Drought was imposed from stem-elongation in either the top or bottom soil layer or both by withholding 33% of the irrigation, resulting in four water treatments (WW, WD, DW, DD; D = drought, W = well-watered, letters denote water treatment in top and bottom soil layer, respectively). Leaf gas exchange was measured weekly from stem-elongation until anthesis. Above-and belowground biomass, grain yield and yield components were evaluated at three developmental stages (stem-elongation, anthesis and maturity). Compared with a[CO2], net assimilation rate was higher and stomatal conductance was lower under e[CO2], resulting in greater intrinsic water use efficiency. Elevated [CO2] stimulated both above- and belowground biomass as well as grain yield, however, this stimulation was greater under well-watered (WW) than drought (DD) throughout the whole soil profile. Imposition of drought in either or both soil layers decreased aboveground biomass and grain yield under both [CO2] compared to the well-watered treatment. However, the greatest ‘CO2 fertilisation effect’ was observed when drought was imposed in the top soil layer only (DW), and this was associated with e[CO2]-stimulation of root growth especially in the well-watered bottom layer. We suggest that stimulation of belowground biomass under e[CO2] will allow better access to sub-soil water during grain filling period, when additional water is converted into additional yield with high efficiency in Mediterranean-type dryland agro-ecosystems. If sufficient water is available in the sub-soil, e[CO2] may help mitigating the effect of drying surface soil.
Nature plants | 2017
Enli Wang; Pierre Martre; Zhigan Zhao; Frank Ewert; Andrea Maiorano; Reimund P. Rötter; Bruce A. Kimball; Michael J. Ottman; Gerard W. Wall; Jeffrey W. White; Matthew P. Reynolds; Phillip D. Alderman; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Jakarat Anothai; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J. Challinor; Giacomo De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; Benjamin Dumont; E. Fereres; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Leslie A. Hunt; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D. Jones; Kurt Christian Kersebaum
Nature Plants3, 17102 (2017); published online 17 July 2017; corrected online 27 September 2017.
Archive | 2011
Garry J. O’Leary; Sue Walker; N. L. Joshi; Jeff W. White
There is great diversity in rainfed farming systems with climate and soil type dictating, to a large degree, their primary structure. Profitable crop production requires efficient collection of water and then its effective extraction by the crop with minimal losses to evaporation, runoff, drainage and weed competition. The supply of water for rainfed crop production is primarily controlled by the seasonal pattern (summer or winter dominance), by intensity of precipitation and its interaction with the absorptive capacity of the soil. The relationship between water use and crop yield is close and positive and forms the basis of crop water production functions. In relation to the structure, operation and management of rainfed farming systems, we focus on optimisation of four primary components: (1) the delivery of water; (2) the capture of rainfall; (3) the portion of water available for crop production; and (4) the efficiency of conversion of water to a usable product, and how these can be used. Optimising the availability of water and its use is complex but subject to straightforward analyses. Management is aimed at maximising water supply and its efficiency of use. The ways that water availability is managed are diverse but strongly interconnected, and reflect differing biophysical and economic conditions. Our examples, from both developed and developing countries show that there is a common strategy despite the diversity.
Nature Climate Change | 2015
Senthold Asseng; Frank Ewert; Pierre Martre; Reimund P. Rötter; David B. Lobell; Davide Cammarano; Bruce A. Kimball; Michael J. Ottman; Gerard W. Wall; Jeffrey W. White; Matthew P. Reynolds; Phillip D. Alderman; P. V. V. Prasad; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Jakarat Anothai; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Andrew J. Challinor; G. De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; E. Fereres; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Leslie A. Hunt; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D. Jones; Kurt-Christian Kersebaum; A-K. Koehler
Field Crops Research | 2015
K.M. Barlow; B.P. Christy; Garry J. O’Leary; P.A. Riffkin; James Nuttall
Field Crops Research | 2005
Victor O. Sadras; Garry J. O’Leary; David Roget
Field Crops Research | 2000
Garry J. O’Leary
Nature Climate Change | 2016
Bing Liu; Senthold Asseng; Christoph Müller; Frank Ewert; Joshua Elliott; David B. Lobell; Pierre Martre; Alex C. Ruane; Daniel Wallach; James W. Jones; Cynthia Rosenzweig; Pramod K. Aggarwal; Phillip D. Alderman; Jakarat Anothai; Bruno Basso; Christian Biernath; Davide Cammarano; Andrew J. Challinor; Delphine Deryng; Giacomo De Sanctis; Jordi Doltra; E. Fereres; Christian Folberth; Margarita Garcia-Vila; Sebastian Gayler; Gerrit Hoogenboom; Leslie A. Hunt; Roberto C. Izaurralde; Mohamed Jabloun; Curtis D. Jones