Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Garry R. Cutting is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Garry R. Cutting.


The Journal of Pediatrics | 2008

Guidelines for Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis in Newborns through Older Adults: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Report

Philip M. Farrell; Beryl J. Rosenstein; Terry B. White; Frank J. Accurso; Carlo Castellani; Garry R. Cutting; Peter R. Durie; Vicky A. LeGrys; John Massie; Richard B. Parad; Michael J. Rock; Preston W. Campbell

Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) is increasingly being implemented and is soon likely to be in use throughout the United States, because early detection permits access to specialized medical care and improves outcomes. The diagnosis of CF is not always straightforward, however. The sweat chloride test remains the gold standard for CF diagnosis but does not always give a clear answer. Genotype analysis also does not always provide clarity; more than 1500 mutations have been identified in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, not all of which result in CF. Harmful mutations in the gene can present as a spectrum of pathology ranging from sinusitis in adulthood to severe lung, pancreatic, or liver disease in infancy. Thus, CF identified postnatally must remain a clinical diagnosis. To provide guidance for the diagnosis of both infants with positive NBS results and older patients presenting with an indistinct clinical picture, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation convened a meeting of experts in the field of CF diagnosis. Their recommendations, presented herein, involve a combination of clinical presentation, laboratory testing, and genetics to confirm a diagnosis of CF.


Nature Genetics | 1993

Genetic basis of variable exon 9 skipping in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mRNA

Chin-Shyan Chu; Bruce C. Trapnell; Sheila Curristin; Garry R. Cutting; Ronald G. Crystal

Variable in–frame skipping of exon 9 in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mRNA transcripts (exon 9−) occurs in the respiratory epithelium. To explore the genetic basis of this event, we evaluated respiratory epithelial cells and blood leukocytes from 124 individuals (38 with cystic fibrosis (CF), 86 without CF). We found an inverse relationship between the length of the polythymidine tract at the exon 9 splice branch/acceptor site and the proportion of exon 9− CFTR mRNA transcripts. These results strongly indicate a genetic basis in vivo modulating post–transcriptional processing of CFTR mRNA transcripts.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 1991

Cloning of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) rho 1 cDNA: a GABA receptor subunit highly expressed in the retina.

Garry R. Cutting; Lili Lu; Bruce F. O'Hara; Laura Kasch; C Montrose-Rafizadeh; D M Donovan; S Shimada; William B. Guggino; George R. Uhl

Type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA) receptors are a family of ligand-gated chloride channels that are the major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors in the nervous system. Molecular cloning has revealed diversity in the subunits that compose this heterooligomeric receptor, but each previously elucidated subunit displays amino acid similarity in conserved structural elements. We have used these highly conserved regions to identify additional members of this family by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). One PCR product was used to isolate a full-length cDNA from a human retina cDNA library. The mature protein predicted from this cDNA sequence in 458 amino acids long and displays between 30 and 38% amino acid similarity to the previously identified GABAA subunits. This gene is expressed primarily in the retina but transcripts are also detected in the brain, lung, and thymus. Injection of Xenopus oocytes with RNA transcribed in vitro produces a GABA-responsive chloride conductance and expression of the cDNA in COS cells yields GABA-displaceable muscimol binding. These features are consistent with our identification of a GABA subunit, GABA rho 1, with prominent retinal expression that increases the diversity and tissue specificity of this ligand-gated ion-channel receptor family.


Genetics in Medicine | 2001

Laboratory standards and guidelines for population- based cystic fibrosis carrier screening

Wayne W. Grody; Garry R. Cutting; Katherine W. Klinger; Carolyn Sue Richards; Michael S. Watson; Robert J. Desnick

In 1997, the National Institutes of Health convened a Consensus Development Conference on Cystic Fibrosis (CF).1 The Consensus Conference recommended that genetic screening for CF mutations should be offered to identify carriers among adults with a positive family history of CF, partners of individuals with CF, couples currently planning a pregnancy, and couples seeking prenatal care. A second NIH-sponsored conference that focused on the implementation of the Consensus Conference recommendations was held in 1998.2 Shortly thereafter, the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), in conjunction with the National Human Genome Research Institute, formed a Steering Committee to coordinate the implementation of population-based CF carrier screening and to develop “Clinical and Laboratory Provider Guidelines” for (1) provider education; (2) laboratory testing, interpretation, and genetic counseling; and (3) patient education and informed consent. The ACMG charged the Accreditation of Genetic Services Committee, chaired by Dr. Robert Desnick, to establish a Subcommittee on Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening (henceforth the “Committee”) to develop recommendations and guidelines for optimal laboratory testing, interpretation, and counseling. The Subcommittee, cochaired by Drs. Wayne Grody and Garry Cutting, met twice yearly since October 1998. The issues considered by the Committee included (1) the target population to be screened (universal vs. limited to certain high-risk ethnic groups); (2) the screening model to be used (couple-based vs. sequential); (3) criteria for and selection of the standard mutation testing panel; (4) potential value and use of an extended testing panel with additional mutations; (5) whether to test for mutations and variants associated with mild or nonclassical phenotypes (such as congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens); (6) test interpretation, reporting, and genetic counseling; and (7) laboratory quality assurance. The recommendations detailed here have been incorporated into a joint ACMG/ACOG/NIH Steering Committee document entitled “Preconceptual and Prenatal Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis” which will be widely distributed. This document also will include guidelines for providers, patient education, and informed consent. Patient education materials will include two pamphlets, entitled “Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Testing. . . The Decision is Yours” and “Cystic Fibrosis Testing: What Happens if Both My Partner and I are Carriers?” It is important to note that these guidelines were prepared for population CF carrier screening and that different testing and counseling strategies would be employed for the identification of the mutation(s) in patients diagnosed with CF or in relatives of CF patients. Such diagnostic and prenatal mutation analyses should be referred to a genetics center for appropriate testing and counseling.


Journal of Cystic Fibrosis | 2008

Consensus on the use and interpretation of cystic fibrosis mutation analysis in clinical practice

Carlo Castellani; Harry Cuppens; Milan Macek; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Eitan Kerem; Peter R. Durie; Elizabeth Tullis; Baroukh M. Assael; Cristina Bombieri; A. Brown; Teresa Casals; Mireille Claustres; Garry R. Cutting; Els Dequeker; John A. Dodge; I. Doull; Philip M. Farrell; Claude Férec; Emmanuelle Girodon; Marie Johannesson; Batsheva Kerem; Anne Munck; Pier Franco Pignatti; Dragica Radojkovic; Paolo Rizzotti; Martin Schwarz; Manfred Stuhrmann; Maria Tzetis; Julian Zielenski; J.S. Elborn

It is often challenging for the clinician interested in cystic fibrosis (CF) to interpret molecular genetic results, and to integrate them in the diagnostic process. The limitations of genotyping technology, the choice of mutations to be tested, and the clinical context in which the test is administered can all influence how genetic information is interpreted. This paper describes the conclusions of a consensus conference to address the use and interpretation of CF mutation analysis in clinical settings. Although the diagnosis of CF is usually straightforward, care needs to be exercised in the use and interpretation of genetic tests: genotype information is not the final arbiter of a clinical diagnosis of CF or CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein related disorders. The diagnosis of these conditions is primarily based on the clinical presentation, and is supported by evaluation of CFTR function (sweat testing, nasal potential difference) and genetic analysis. None of these features are sufficient on their own to make a diagnosis of CF or CFTR-related disorders. Broad genotype/phenotype associations are useful in epidemiological studies, but CFTR genotype does not accurately predict individual outcome. The use of CFTR genotype for prediction of prognosis in people with CF at the time of their diagnosis is not recommended. The importance of communication between clinicians and medical genetic laboratories is emphasized. The results of testing and their implications should be reported in a manner understandable to the clinicians caring for CF patients.


Genetics in Medicine | 2004

Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel

Michael S. Watson; Garry R. Cutting; Robert J. Desnick; Deborah A. Driscoll; Katherine W. Klinger; Michael T. Mennuti; Glenn E. Palomaki; Bradley W. Popovich; Victoria M. Pratt; Elizabeth M. Rohlfs; Charles M. Strom; C. Sue Richards; David R. Witt; Wayne W. Grody

Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel


Nature Genetics | 2013

Defining the disease liability of variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene

Patrick R. Sosnay; Karen R Siklosi; Fredrick Van Goor; Kyle Kaniecki; H. Yu; Neeraj Sharma; Anabela S. Ramalho; Margarida D. Amaral; Ruslan Dorfman; Julian Zielenski; David L. Masica; Rachel Karchin; Linda Millen; Philip J. Thomas; George P. Patrinos; Mary Corey; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Johanna M. Rommens; Carlo Castellani; Christopher M. Penland; Garry R. Cutting

Allelic heterogeneity in disease-causing genes presents a substantial challenge to the translation of genomic variation into clinical practice. Few of the almost 2,000 variants in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene CFTR have empirical evidence that they cause cystic fibrosis. To address this gap, we collected both genotype and phenotype data for 39,696 individuals with cystic fibrosis in registries and clinics in North America and Europe. In these individuals, 159 CFTR variants had an allele frequency of ł0.01%. These variants were evaluated for both clinical severity and functional consequence, with 127 (80%) meeting both clinical and functional criteria consistent with disease. Assessment of disease penetrance in 2,188 fathers of individuals with cystic fibrosis enabled assignment of 12 of the remaining 32 variants as neutral, whereas the other 20 variants remained of indeterminate effect. This study illustrates that sourcing data directly from well-phenotyped subjects can address the gap in our ability to interpret clinically relevant genomic variation.


Journal of Clinical Investigation | 1999

A PDZ-interacting domain in CFTR is an apical membrane polarization signal

Bryan D. Moyer; Jerod S. Denton; Katherine H. Karlson; Donna Reynolds; Shusheng Wang; John E. Mickle; Michal Milewski; Garry R. Cutting; William B. Guggino; Min Li; Bruce A. Stanton

Polarization of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), a cAMP-activated chloride channel, to the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells is critical for vectorial transport of chloride in a variety of epithelia, including the airway, pancreas, intestine, and kidney. However, the motifs that localize CFTR to the apical membrane are unknown. We report that the last 3 amino acids in the COOH-terminus of CFTR (T-R-L) comprise a PDZ-interacting domain that is required for the polarization of CFTR to the apical plasma membrane in human airway and kidney epithelial cells. In addition, the CFTR mutant, S1455X, which lacks the 26 COOH-terminal amino acids, including the PDZ-interacting domain, is mispolarized to the lateral membrane. We also demonstrate that CFTR binds to ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 (EBP50), an apical membrane PDZ domain-containing protein. We propose that COOH-terminal deletions of CFTR, which represent about 10% of CFTR mutations, result in defective vectorial chloride transport, partly by altering the polarized distribution of CFTR in epithelial cells. Moreover, our data demonstrate that PDZ-interacting domains and PDZ domain-containing proteins play a key role in the apical polarization of ion channels in epithelial cells.


Medical Clinics of North America | 2000

GENOTYPE-PHENOTYPE RELATIONSHIPS IN CYSTIC FIBROSIS

John E. Mickle; Garry R. Cutting

The genotype-phenotype relationship in CF is complex despite its being a monogenic disorder. Factors that contribute to variability among individuals with the same genotype are an area of intense study. Nevertheless, certain conclusions can be derived from these studies. First, mutations in both CFTR alleles cause the CF phenotype. Homozygosity for delta F508 or compound heterozygosity for delta F508 and another severe mutation (e.g., G551D, W1282X) cause classic CF: obstructive pulmonary disease, exocrine pancreatic deficiency, male infertility, and elevated sweat chloride concentrations. Clinical variability is observed among patients with the classic form of CF, especially with regards to the severity of lung disease. Although understanding of the role of other genes and environment in the development of lung disease is incomplete, evidence that other factors are important raises the possibility that therapeutic intervention may be possible at several levels. Second, genotype correlates more closely with certain features of the CF phenotype than others. Mutations that allow partial function of CFTR are often associated with pancreatic sufficiency, occasionally identified with normal sweat gland function, and sporadically correlated with mild lung disease. Partially functioning mutants rarely prevent maldevelopment of the male reproductive tract; an exception is 3849 + 10 Kb C-->T. These observations suggest that certain tissues require different levels of CFTR function to avoid the pathologic manifestations typical of CF. The genetic cause of several disorders that clinically overlap CF can be attributed, in part, to mutations in CFTR. Finally, molecular analysis of disease-associated mutations identified through genotype-phenotype studies provides a mechanistic framework for genotype-based therapeutic approaches and pharmaceutical interventions.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2015

Cystic fibrosis genetics: from molecular understanding to clinical application

Garry R. Cutting

The availability of the human genome sequence and tools for interrogating individual genomes provide an unprecedented opportunity to apply genetics to medicine. Mendelian conditions, which are caused by dysfunction of a single gene, offer powerful examples that illustrate how genetics can provide insights into disease. Cystic fibrosis, one of the more common lethal autosomal recessive Mendelian disorders, is presented here as an example. Recent progress in elucidating disease mechanism and causes of phenotypic variation, as well as in the development of treatments, demonstrates that genetics continues to play an important part in cystic fibrosis research 25 years after the discovery of the disease-causing gene.

Collaboration


Dive into the Garry R. Cutting's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William B. Guggino

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Milan Macek

Charles University in Prague

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mitchell L. Drumm

Case Western Reserve University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michal Milewski

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ada Hamosh

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge