Garth T. Whiteside

Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characterization of the cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, GW405833, utilizing rodent models of acute and chronic pain, anxiety, ataxia and catalepsy

To date, two cannabinoid receptors have been identified, CB1 and CB2. Activation of these receptors with non-selective cannabinoid receptor agonists reduces pain sensitivity in animals and humans. However, activation of CB1 receptors is also associated with central side effects, including ataxia and catalepsy. More recently, a role for selective CB2 agonists in pain modification has been demonstrated. GW405833, a selective CB2 agonist, was recently reported to partially reverse the inflammation and hyperalgesia in a rat model of acute inflammation. In the current report, we extend the characterization and therapeutic potential of this compound. For the first time, we show that GW405833 selectively binds both rat and human CB2 receptors with high affinity, where it acts as a partial agonist (approximately 50% reduction of forskolin-mediated cAMP production compared to the full cannabinoid agonist, CP55,940). We also report for the first time that intraperitoneal administration of GW405833 (0.3-100 mg/kg) to rats shows linear, dose-dependent increases in plasma levels and substantial penetration into the central nervous system. In addition, GW405833 (up to 30 mg/kg) elicits potent and efficacious antihyperalgesic effects in rodent models of neuropathic, incisional and chronic inflammatory pain, the first description of this compound in these models. In contrast, analgesia, sedation and catalepsy were not observed in this dose range, but were apparent at 100 mg/kg. Additionally, GW405833 was not antihyperalgesic against chronic inflammatory pain in CB2 knockout mice. These data support the tenet that selective CB2 receptor agonists have the potential to treat pain without eliciting the centrally-mediated side effects associated with non-selective cannabinoid agonists, and highlight the utility of GW405833 for the investigation of CB2 physiology.

Pharmacological characterisation of a rat model of incisional pain

Both clinical and preclinical models of postsurgical pain are being used more frequently in the early evaluation of new chemical entities. In order to assess the validity and reliability of a rat model of postincisional pain, the effects of different classes of clinically effective analgesic drugs were evaluated against multiple behavioural end points. Following surgical incision, under general anaesthesia, of the plantar surface of the rat hind paw, we determined the time course of mechanical hyperalgesia, tactile allodynia and hind limb weight bearing using the Randall–Selitto (paw pressure) assay, electronic von Frey and dual channel weight averager, respectively. Behavioural evaluations began 24 h following surgery, and were continued for 9–14 days. Mechanical hyperalgesia, tactile allodynia and a decrease in weight bearing were present on the affected limb within 1 day of surgery with maximum sensitivity 1–3 days postsurgery. Accordingly, we examined the effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), morphine and gabapentin, on established hyperalgesia and allodynia, 1 day following plantar incision. In accordance with previous reports, both systemic morphine and gabapentin administration reversed mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the incised rat hind paw. Both drugs were more potent against mechanical hyperalgesia than tactile allodynia. All of the NSAIDs tested, including cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitors, reversed mechanical hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia in the incised rat hind paw. The rank order of potency for both hyperalgesia and allodynia was indomethacin > celecoxib > etoricoxib > naproxen. We have investigated the potency and efficacy of different classes of analgesic drugs in a rat model of postincisional pain. The rank order of potency for these drugs reflects their utility in treating postoperative pain in the clinic. As these compounds showed reliable efficacy across two different behavioural end points, the Randall–Selitto (paw pressure) assay and electronic von Frey, these methods may prove useful in the study of postsurgical pain and the assessment of novel treatments.

Ensuring transparency and minimization of methodologic bias in preclinical pain research: PPRECISE considerations

Abstract There is growing concern about lack of scientific rigor and transparent reporting across many preclinical fields of biological research. Poor experimental design and lack of transparent reporting can result in conscious or unconscious experimental bias, producing results that are not replicable. The Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION) public–private partnership with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sponsored a consensus meeting of the Preclinical Pain Research Consortium for Investigating Safety and Efficacy (PPRECISE) Working Group. International participants from universities, funding agencies, government agencies, industry, and a patient advocacy organization attended. Reduction of publication bias, increasing the ability of others to faithfully repeat experimental methods, and increased transparency of data reporting were specifically discussed. Parameters deemed essential to increase confidence in the published literature were clear, specific reporting of an a priori hypothesis and definition of primary outcome measure. Power calculations and whether measurement of minimal meaningful effect size to determine these should be a core component of the preclinical research effort provoked considerable discussion, with many but not all agreeing. Greater transparency of reporting should be driven by scientists, journal editors, reviewers, and grant funders. The conduct of high-quality science that is fully reported should not preclude novelty and innovation in preclinical pain research, and indeed, any efforts that curtail such innovation would be misguided. We believe that to achieve the goal of finding effective new treatments for patients with pain, the pain field needs to deal with these challenging issues.

Effect of colchicine on neuropeptide Y expression in rat dorsal root ganglia and spinal cord

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression in the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) was examined after application of colchicine, an axonal transport blocker, on the intact sciatic nerve or prior to axotomy or chronic constriction injury (CCI). Rats that underwent topical application of colchicine on the sciatic nerve showed decreased responsiveness to heat stimulation, ipsilaterally. CCI-induced hyperalgesia was prevented by prior application of colchicine. However, colchicine did not block axotomy-induced NPY increase when applied proximally to the injury. In fact, colchicine induced the expression of NPY in the DRG and spinal cord in an identical manner to axotomy. The present data indicates that the increase in NPY observed after nerve injury could be initiated by the suppression of retrograde transport of factors, possibly neurotrophins, rather than by the production of an active factor at the site of injury.

Robustness of arterial blood gas analysis for assessment of respiratory safety pharmacology in rats.

Whole body plethysmography using unrestrained animals is a common technique for assessing the respiratory risk of new drugs in safety pharmacology studies in rats. However, wide variations in experimental technique make cross laboratory comparison of data difficult and raise concerns that non-appropriate conditions may mask the deleterious effects of test compounds - in particular with suspected respiratory depressants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the robustness of arterial blood gas analysis as an alternative to plethysmography in rats. We sought to do this by assessing the effect of different vehicles and times post-surgical catheterization on blood gas measurements, in addition to determining sensitivity to multiple opioids. Furthermore, we determined intra-lab variability from multiple datasets utilizing morphine and generated within a single lab and lastly, inter-lab variability was measured by comparing datasets generated in two separate labs. Overall, our data show that arterial blood gas analysis is a measure that is both flexible in terms of experimental conditions and highly sensitive to respiratory depressants, two key limitations when using plethysmography. As such, our data strongly advocate the adoption of arterial blood gas analysis as an investigative approach to reliably examine the respiratory depressant effects of opioids.