Gary A. Kochenberger
Pennsylvania State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gary A. Kochenberger.
Environment and Planning A | 1977
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger; S-N Wong
This paper shows the equivalence of entropy-maximization models to geometric programs. As a result we derive a dual geometric program which consists of the minimization of an unconstrained convex function. We develop the necessary duality equivalencies between the two dual programs and show the computational attractiveness of our approach. We also develop some characterizations of the optimal solution of the entropy model which have important implications with regard to postoptimal or sensitivity analysis.
Mathematical Programming | 1974
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger; Bruce A. McCarl
An algorithm for solving ordinary geometric programs is presented. The algorithm is based on the reduced system associated with geometric programs and is highly flexible in that it allows the use of several nonlinear optimization techniques.
Mathematical Programming | 1977
John J. Dinkel; William H. Elliott; Gary A. Kochenberger
This paper presents the results of computational studies of the properties of cutting plane algorithms as applied to posynomial geometric programs. The four cutting planes studied represent the gradient method of Kelley and an extension to develop tangential cuts; the geometric inequality of Duffin and an extension to generate several cuts at each iteration. As a result of over 200 problem solutions, we will draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of acceleration procedures, feasible and infeasible starting point, and the effect of the initial bounds on the variables. As a result of these experiments, certain cutting plane methods are seen to be attractive means of solving large scale geometric programs.
Operations Research | 1977
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger
This note develops efficient sensitivity procedures for posynomial geometric programs. These procedures provide ranging information for the primal coefficients, means for dealing with problems with loose primal constraints, and an incremental procedure for improving the estimated solutions. These sensitivity procedures are independent of the method of solution of the geometric program.
Environment and Planning A | 1973
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger; Y Seppälä
The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the applicability of geometric programming to regional land-use planning models. The regional models are of the type where the criterion is maximum accessibility, and the model is constrained by population limits on each district. After a brief discussion of geometric programming, the relationship of total accessibility models to geometric programs is developed and a method of obtaining numerical solutions is presented. Several models are analyzed using the geometric programming approach, including a game theoretic model which is used to generate decentralized plans.
Operations Research | 1978
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger
This paper presents an implementation of surrogate constraint duality in mathematical programming. Motivated by the use of linear programming duality for surrogate constraints in integer linear programs, this implementation is based on geometric programming duality. As a result of this formulation we are able to present an algorithm for surrogate constraint duality and discuss several important properties of the algorithm.
Computers & Operations Research | 1976
John J. Dinkel; George B. Kleindorfer; Gary A. Kochenberger; S. N. Wong
Abstract The constrained version of the classical travelling salesman problem (TSP) is seen to be a generic model for a wide variety of problems. Our concern here is limited to those problems which impinge directly on the environmental issues. Some potential applications are in the areas of resource management, energy conservation and transportation. The version of the problem we are faced with can be stated as: Given 1 or more persons (or vehicles) that must visit a set of n sites (plants, bus stops, pickup point, and so on) how can one develop a route which is of minimum mileage and meets certain restrictions (8 hour work day, bus seating capacity, vehicle capacity, length of trip and so on). This paper addresses the following issues in light of this problem: 1. 1. Data problems: in particular, efficient means of gathering and maintaining data. 2. 2. Numerical results: the study of efficient algorithms so that the model can be used efficiently on large problems and also on a day-to-day basis. 3. 3. Areas of potential application: for example, locational problems (office location), regionalization studies (development of efficient regional boundaries, efficient inspection and delivery routes, long range and short term resource management). 4. 4. Decision making applications in terms of analysis of operations, planning and analysis of resources via sensitivity analysis.
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications | 1976
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger; Bruce A. McCarl
A computational comparison of several methods for dealing with polynomial geometric programs is presented. Specifically, we compare the complementary programs of Avriel and Williams (Ref. 1) with the reversed programs and the harmonic programs of Duffin and Peterson (Refs. 2, 3). These methods are used to generate a sequence of posynomial geometric programs which are solved using a dual algorithm.
Engineering Optimization | 1976
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger
Abstract This paper presents a development of sensitivity analysis (post optimal) for non-linear optimization problems. The basis for this development is the optimization technique known as geometric programming. Efficient procedures are developed which relate changes in the coefficients to the new design variables. The procedure is used to analyze the design of a condenser.
Mathematical Programming | 1979
John J. Dinkel; Gary A. Kochenberger
The purpose of this paper is to present some points of clarification of a recently presented algorithm for geometric programs [7]. While presenting the clarification, we are able to identify the behavior of condensation type algorithms for generalized geometric programs.