Gary Aston-Jones

Discharge of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats and monkeys suggests a role in vigilance

Recordings from noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC) neurons in behaving rats and monkeys revealed that these cells decrease tonic discharge during sleep and also during certain high arousal behaviors (grooming and consumption) when attention (vigilance) was low. Sensory stimuli of many modalities phasically activated LC neurons. Response magnitudes varied with vigilance, similar to results for tonic activity. The most effective and reliable stimuli for eliciting LC responses were those that disrupted behavior and evoked orienting responses. Similar results were observed in behaving monkeys except that more intense stimuli were required for LC responses. Our more recent studies have examined LC activity in monkeys performing an oddball visual discrimination task. Monkeys were trained to release a lever after a target cue light that occurred randomly on 10% of trials; animals had to withhold responding during non-target cues. LC neurons selectively responded to the target cues during this task. During reversal training, LC neurons lost their response to the previous target cue and began responding to the new target light in parallel with behavioral reversal. Cortical event-related potentials were elicited in this task selectively by the same stimuli that evoked LC responses. Injections of lidocaine, GABA, or a synaptic decoupling solution into the nucleus paragigantocellularis in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, the major afferent to LC, eliminated responses of LC neurons to sciatic nerve stimulation or foot- or tail-pinch. This indicates that certain sensory information is relayed to LC through the excitatory amino acid (EAA) input from the ventrolateral medulla. The effect of prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation on LC neurons was examined in anesthetized rats. Single pulse PFC stimulation had no pronounced effect on LC neurons, consistent with our findings that this area does not innervate the LC nucleus. However, trains of PFC stimulation substantially activated most LC neurons. Thus, projections from the PFC may activate LC indirectly or through distal dendrites, suggesting a circuit whereby complex stimuli may influence LC neurons. The above results, in view of previous findings for postsynaptic effects of norepinephrine, are interpreted to reveal a role for the LC system in regulating attentional state or vigilance. The roles of major inputs to LC from the ventrolateral and dorsomedial medulla in sympathetic control and behavioral orienting responses, respectively, are integrated into this view of the LC system. It is proposed that the LC provides the cognitive complement to sympathetic function.

Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task

Impulse activity was recorded extracellularly from noradrenergic neurons in the nucleus locus coeruleus (LC; 47 single-cell and 126 multicell recordings) of four cynomolgus monkeys performing an oddball visual discrimination task. For juice reward, the subjects were required to release a lever rapidly in response to an infrequent (10– 20% of trials) target cue (CS+) that was randomly intermixed with nontarget (CS-) stimuli presented on a video display. All LC neurons examined were phasically and selectively activated by target cues in this task. Other task events elicited no consistent response from these neurons (juice reward, lever release, fix-spot stimuli, nontarget stimuli). In one animal, nontarget cues phasically inhibited LC neurons. Phasic LC excitatory responses to target cues in this task occurred at a relatively short latency (mean = 90.7 msec), approximately 200 msec prior to the behavioral response (lever release). In addition, LC response magnitudes varied with behavioral performance, being substantially attenuated during epochs of poor performance (high false alarm rate). There was a positive correlation (r = 0.30, p < 0.0001) between the latency of LC responses and the latency of behavioral responses to same target cues, consistent with the possibility that LC responses may have a role in selective attention by facilitating responses to the CS+ stimulus. Analyses of behavioral response latencies to pairs of stimuli indicated that LC responses may facilitate behavioral responses to subsequent sensory cues, consistent with a role of this system in sustained attention/vigilance. Moreover, responses became reduced in magnitude over time during prolonged task performance (> 90 min), in parallel with a behavioral performance decrement. These results show that LC neurons are activated selectively by attended stimuli that demand a rapid response in this task, and that such LC responses may contribute to conditioned behavioral responses.

Afferent regulation of locus coeruleus neurons: anatomy, physiology and pharmacology

Tract-tracing and electrophysiology studies have revealed that major inputs to the nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) are found in two structures, the nucleus paragigantocellularis (PGi) and the perifascicular area of the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi (PrH), both located in the rostral medulla. Minor afferents to LC were found in the dorsal cap of the paraventricular hypothalamus and spinal lamina X. Recent studies have also revealed limited inputs from two areas nearby the LC, the caudal midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) and the ventromedial pericoerulear region. The pericoeruleus may provide a local circuit interface to LC neurons. Recent electron microscopic analyses have revealed that LC dendrites extend preferentially into the rostromedial and caudal juxtaependymal pericoerulear regions. These extracoerulear LC dendrites may receive afferents in addition to those projecting to LC proper. However, single-pulse stimulation of inputs to such dendritic regions reveals little or no effect on LC neurons. Double-labeling studies have revealed that a variety of neurotransmitters impinging on LC neurons originate in its two major afferents, PGi and PrH. The LC is innervated by PGi neurons that stain for markers of adrenalin, enkephalin or corticotropin-releasing factor. Within PrH, large proportions of LC-projecting neurons stained for GABA or met-enkephalin. Finally, in contrast to previous conclusions, the dorsal raphe does not provide the robust 5-HT innervation found in the LC. We conclude that 5-HT inputs may derive from local 5-HT neurons in the pericoerulear area. Neuropharmacology experiments revealed that the PGi provides a potent excitatory amino acid (EAA) input to the LC, acting primarily at non-NMDA receptors in the LC. Other studies indicated that this pathway mediates certain sensory responses of LC neurons. NMDA-mediated sensory responses were also revealed during local infusion of magnesium-free solutions. Finally, adrenergic inhibition of LC from PGi could also be detected in nearly every LC neuron tested when the EAA-mediated excitation is first eliminated. In contrast to PGi, the PrH potently and consistently inhibited LC neurons via a GABAergic projection acting at GABAA receptors within LC. Such PrH stimulation also potently attenuated LC sensory responses. Finally, afferents to PGi areas that also contain LC-projecting neurons were identified. Major inputs were primarily autonomic in nature, and included the caudal medullary reticular formation, the parabrachial and Kölliker-Fuse nuclei, the PAG, NTS and certain hypothalamic areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Afferent projections to the rat locus coeruleus demonstrated by retrograde and anterograde tracing with cholera-toxin B subunit and Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin

The aim of this study was to examine the afferents to the rat locus coeruleus by means of retrograde and anterograde tracing experiments using cholera-toxin B subunit and phaseolus leucoagglutinin. To obtain reliable injections of cholera-toxin B in the locus coeruleus, electrophysiological recordings were made through glass micropipettes containing the tracer and the noradrenergic neurons of the locus coeruleus were identified by their characteristic discharge properties. After iontophoretic injections of cholera-toxin B into the nuclear core of the locus coeruleus, we observed a substantial number of retrogradely labeled cells in the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus and the dorsomedial rostral medulla (ventromedial prepositus hypoglossi and dorsal paragigantocellular nuclei) as previously described. We also saw a substantial number of retrogradely labeled neurons in (1) the preoptic area dorsal to the supraoptic nucleus, (2) areas of the posterior hypothalamus, (3) the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus, (4) mesencephalic reticular formation. Fewer labeled cells were also observed in other regions including the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, dorsal raphe nucleus, median raphe nucleus, dorsal part of the periaqueductal gray, the area of the noradrenergic A5 group, the lateral parabrachial nucleus and the caudoventrolateral reticular nucleus. No or only occasional cells were found in the cortex, the central nucleus of the amygdala, the lateral part of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the vestibular nuclei, the nucleus of the solitary tract or the spinal cord, structures which were previously reported as inputs to the locus coeruleus. Control injections of cholera-toxin B were made in areas surrounding the locus coeruleus, including (1) Barringtons nucleus, (2) the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, (3) a previously undefined area immediately rostral to the locus coeruleus and medial to the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus that we named the peri-mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, and (4) the medial vestibular nucleus lateral to the caudal tip of the locus coeruleus. These injections yielded patterns of retrograde labeling that differed from one another and also from that obtained with cholera-toxin B injection sites in the locus coeruleus. These results indicate that the area surrounding the locus coeruleus is divided into individual nuclei with distinct afferents. These results were confirmed and extended with anterograde transport of cholera-toxin B or phaseolus leucoagglutinin. Injections of these tracers in the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus, preoptic area dorsal to the supraoptic nucleus, the ventrolateral part of the periaqueductal gray, the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus yielded a substantial to large number of labeled fibers in the nuclear core of the locus coeruleus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Behavioral functions of locus coeruleus derived from cellular attributes

The electrophysiological activity of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) was examined in unanesthetized rats during spontaneously occurring behavior and sensory stimulation. The pattern of spontaneous and evoked discharge during sleep, grooming, drinking, and orienting behaviors, considered in light of other cellular anatomic and physiologic attributes, implicates the LC system in the control of vigilance and initiation of adaptive behavioral responses.

Chapter 23 Role of the locus coeruleus in emotional activation

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses recent studies of the noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC) system to consider its possible roles in emotion. It describes the recent studies of the effects of manipulating LC neurons on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and attentional behavior. Emotional responses are typically measured by EEG or autonomic arousal. Emotionally arousing stimuli produce activation of the cortical EEG, and parallel activation of autonomic measures such as blood pressure, heart rate, or galvanic skin response (as commonly used in lie detector tests). Recent results link the LC both to the EEG and autonomic responses that accompany emotionally arousing events LC neuronal projections, effects of NE on LC target cells, and discharge characteristics of LC neurons in unanesthetized, unconditioned animals are reviewed. More recent studies on the effects of stress on LC neurons, and on activity of LC neurons in behaving monkeys during a conditioned attentional task are also examined. The chapter reviews new findings on afferents to the LC that indicate the status of this key noradrenergic system in brain circuitry. Although the LC is not typically considered in the context of emotion, the analysis suggests that the LC system could play an important role in the process of emotional activation.

Locus coeruleus activity in monkey: Phasic and tonic changes are associated with altered vigilance

Impulse activity of individual neurons in the nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) was recorded from chair-restrained, unanesthetized cynomolgus monkeys. LC activity was closely related to the behavioral state of the animal. In alert waking, LC neurons displayed continuous, moderately irregular activity. In contrast, prolonged pauses in activity accompanied drowsiness. These pauses preceded eye closure and occurred 1-3 s before the onset of slow-wave EEG. At awakening, LC activation preceded by up to 3 s desynchronized EEG and eye opening. LC activity during alertness varied tonically. During behavioral agitation LC activity was higher than during goal-directed task behavior (described below). In addition to these changes in tonic activity, LC neurons were also phasically responsive to certain sensory stimuli. These cells responded selectively to unexpected, meaningful sounds. LC neurons were also recorded during a visual oddball discrimination task in which the monkey was required to selectively release a lever in response to an infrequent visual cue (target cue; CS+) to receive juice reward. LC neurons were selectively activated by CS+ cues in this task; no other task events evoked LC activity. The mean latency of CS+ response was 108 ms (90 ms for multicell recordings), more than 150 ms prior to the behavioral response (lever release). These responses became smaller in later epochs during the session, along with deteriorating task performance. It is proposed that these short-lasting stimulus-evoked LC responses may help optimize behavioral responses and increase vigilance to subsequent sensory stimuli. Together, LC may contribute both to maintaining tonic levels of vigilance and to phasically modulating the current vigilance level in a stimulus-dependent mode.

Corticotropin-releasing factor innervation of the locus coeruleus region: Distribution of fibers and sources of input

Electrophysiologic studies support the hypothesis that corticotropin-releasing factor, the neurohormone that initiates adrenocorticotropin release during stress, also serves as a neurotransmitter in the pontine noradrenergic nucleus, the locus coeruleus. To elucidate the circuitry underlying proposed corticotropin-releasing factor neurotransmission in the locus coeruleus, the present study utilized immunohistochemical techniques to characterize corticotropin-releasing factor innervation of rat locus coeruleus and pericoerulear regions. Corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive fibers were identified in the locus coeruleus of colchicine- and non-colchicine-treated rats. However, corticotropin-releasing factor innervation of pericoerulear regions rostral and lateral to the locus coeruleus was more dense than that of the locus coeruleus proper. Double-labeling studies utilizing antisera directed against corticotropin-releasing factor and tyrosine hydroxylase indicated that corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive fibers overlap with tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactive processes of locus coeruleus neurons, particularly in rostral medial and lateral regions. A group of corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive neurons was localized just lateral to the locus coeruleus and numerous corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive neurons were visualized just ventral to the rostral pole of the locus coeruleus in a region corresponding to Barringtons nucleus. None of these corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive neurons were tyrosine hydroxylase-positive. To determine the source of corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactive fibers in the locus coeruleus, injections of the retrograde tracer [wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to inactivated (apo) horseradish peroxidase coupled to gold particles] were made into the locus coeruleus and sections were processed for corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Activation of locus coeruleus neurons by nucleus paragigantocellularis or noxious sensory stimulation is mediated by intracoerulear excitatory amino acid neurotransmission.

The nucleus paragigantocellularis (PGi), located in the rostral ventrolateral medulla, is one of two major afferents to the nucleus locus coeruleus (LC). Electrical stimulation of PGi exerts a robust, predominantly excitatory influence on LC neurons that is blocked by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the broad spectrum excitatory amino acid (EAA) antagonists kynurenic acid (KYN) or gamma-D-glutamylglycine (DGG), but not by the selective N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoate (AP7). I.c.v. injection of KYN or DGG also blocked activation of LC neurons evoked by noxious somatosensory stimuli. These results indicate that activation of LC neurons by PGi and noxious stimuli may be mediated by an EAA acting at a non-NMDA receptor in LC. In the present study, microiontophoretic techniques were used to determine the sensitivity of LC neurons in vivo to the selective EAA receptor agonists kainate (KA), NMDA and quisqualate (QUIS). Microinfusion and microiontophoresis were also used to determine whether direct application of KYN, the preferential non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3 dione (CNQX) or the selective NMDA receptor antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (AP5) onto LC neurons blocked excitation elicited by stimulation of PGi or the sciatic nerve. The results demonstrated that individual LC neurons were robustly activated by direct application of KA, NMDA and QUIS. Iontophoretically applied KYN reduced or completely antagonized responses evoked by all 3 agonists. In contrast, iontophoretically applied AP5 strongly attenuated NMDA-evoked excitation, while KA-and QUIS-evoked responses were not affected by this agent. Furthermore, direct application of KYN or the specific non-NMDA receptor antagonist, CNQX, onto LC neurons substantially attenuated or completely blocked synaptic activation produced by PGi or sciatic nerve stimulation in nearly every LC neuron tested. Microinfusion of the selective NMDA receptor antagonist AP5 had no effect on sciatic nerve-evoked responses. These results confirm our hypothesis that activation of LC neurons from PGi is mediated by an EAA operating primarily at a non-NMDA receptor subtype on LC neurons. Furthermore, these findings provide additional support for the hypothesis that this pathway mediates at least some sensory-evoked responses of LC neurons.

Evidence for widespread afferents to barrington's nucleus, a brainstem region rich in corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons

Supraspinal afferents to the pontine micturition center, Barringtons nucleus, were investigated in the rat by visualization of the retrograde tracer, cholera-toxin subunit B, in neurons following iontophoretic injection into Barringtons nucleus. Tissue sections from five rats with injections primarily localized in Barringtons nucleus revealed numerous retrogradely labeled neurons throughout all rostrocaudal levels of the periaqueductal gray (particularly its ventrolateral division), in the lateral hypothalamic area (particularly medial to the fornix), and in the medial preoptic nucleus. Retrogradely labeled neurons were also consistently found in the nucleus of the solitary tract, in the vicinity of the lateral reticular nucleus, nucleus paragigantocellularis, parabrachial nucleus, Kölliker-Fuse nucleus, cuneiform nucleus, raphe nucleus and zona incerta. In the hypothalamus, in addition to the perifornical region, retrogradely labeled neurons were found in all cases in the tuberomammillary nucleus, premammillary nucleus, dorsal hypothalamic area, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, and the paraventricular nucleus. At more rostral levels, in addition to the medial preoptic area, retrogradely labeled neurons were seen in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and in a region just lateral to the supraoptic nucleus near the medial amygdaloid nucleus. Retrogradely labeled neurons were also observed in the motor, insular, and infralimbic cortices. Injections of anterograde tracers (cholera-toxin subunit B or Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin) into the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus, the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, lateral hypothalamic area, or medial preoptic area, resulted in fiber labeling within Barringtons nucleus, confirming the retrograde tracing studies. As previously reported, numerous neurons in Barringtons nucleus were immunoreactive for corticotropin-releasing hormone. Double-labeling studies revealed afferent fibers from the periaqueductal gray and lateral hypothalamic area overlapping the corticotropin-releasing hormone-immunoreactive neurons of Barringtons nucleus, and in some cases anterogradely labeled fibers with varcosities appeared to target these neurons. The present results suggest that Barringtons nucleus in the rat receives neuronal inputs from brainstem nuclei as well as from forebrain limbic structures including hypothalamic nuclei, the medial preoptic nucleus, and cortical areas involved in fluid balance or blood pressure regulation. In light of the role of Barringtons nucleus in micturition, the integration of these various inputs may be important for co-ordinating urinary function with fluid and cardiovascular homeostasis. Additionally, as neurons in Barringtons nucleus are immunoreactive for the stress-related neurohormone, corticotropin-releasing hormone, these diverse inputs may regulate stress-related functions of this nucleus.