Gary C. Butts

Impact of Financial Incentives on Documented Immunization Rates in the Inner City: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE This study determined the effect of 2 financial incentives---bonus and enhanced fee-for-service---on documented immunization rates during a second period of observation. METHODS Incentives were given to 57 randomly selected inner-city physicians 4 times at 4-month intervals based on the performance of 50 randomly selected children. Coverage from linked records from all sources was determined for a subsample of children within physician offices. RESULTS Up-to-date coverage rates documented in the charts increased significantly for children in the bonus group (49.7% to 55.6%; P <.05) and the enhanced fee-for-service group (50.8% to 58.2%; P <.01) compared with the control group. The number of immunizations given by these physicians did not change significantly, although the number of immunizations given by others and documented by physicians in the bonus group did increase (P <.05). Up-to-date coverage for all groups increased from 20 to 40 percentage points when immunizations from physician charts were combined with other sources. CONCLUSIONS Both financial incentives produced a significant increase in coverage levels. Increases were primarily due to better documentation not to better immunizing practices. The financial incentives appeared to provide motivation to physicians but were not sufficient to overcome entrenched behavior patterns. However, true immunization coverage was substantially higher than that documented in the charts.

Creating alliances to improve cancer prevention and detection among urban medically underserved minority groups : The east harlem partnership for cancer awareness

The East Harlem Partnership for Cancer Awareness (EHPCA) was formed in 1999 to reduce disparities in cancer screening and prevention among medically underserved minorities residing in a large urban community (East Harlem, New York City) by increasing awareness of cancer risk, prevention, and treatment, and promoting greater participation in breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening and early detection. The Partnership augments a 20‐year collaboration between an academic medical center, a public hospital, and 2 community health centers. Needs assessments were conducted to inform program development. Cancer education, outreach, and screening programs were developed based on the PRECEED‐PROCEED model for health education and health promotion programming. Needs assessments revealed that although the majority of the population (86%) was insured and had a source of primary care, cancer screening guidelines for breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancers were not being followed. Outreach strategies, targeted curricula, educational sessions, and screening programs have been developed and implemented to improve knowledge levels and increase screening participation. The EHPCA is a model of a successful partnership among the public and private sectors to reduce disparities in cancer screening and prevention in a diverse, medically underserved, urban minority community. Future efforts to reduce cancer screening disparities in this population will include patient navigation and improved access to standard‐of‐care screening such as colonoscopy. Cancer 2006.

Diversity in Academic Medicine No. 1 Case for Minority Faculty Development Today

For the past 20 years, the percentage of the American population consisting of nonwhite minorities has been steadily increasing. By 2050, these nonwhite minorities, taken together, are expected to become the majority. Meanwhile, despite almost 50 years of efforts to increase the representation of minorities in the healthcare professions, such representation remains grossly deficient. Among the underrepresented minorities are African and Hispanic Americans; Native Americans, Alaskans, and Pacific Islanders (including Hawaiians); and certain Asians (including Hmong, Vietnamese, and Cambodians). The underrepresentation of underrepresented minorities in the healthcare professions has a profoundly negative effect on public health, including serious racial and ethnic health disparities. These can be reduced only by increased recruitment and development of both underrepresented minority medical students and underrepresented minority medical school administrators and faculty. Underrepresented minority faculty development is deterred by barriers resulting from years of systematic segregation, discrimination, tradition, culture, and elitism in academic medicine. If these barriers can be overcome, the rewards will be great: improvements in public health, an expansion of the contemporary medical research agenda, and improvements in the teaching of both underrepresented minority and non-underrepresented minority students.

Physician credentials and practices associated with childhood immunization rates: private practice pediatricians serving poor children in New York City.

Private practice physicians in New York City’s poorest neighborhoods are typically foreign trained, have generally substandard clinical practices, and have been accused of rushing Medicaid patients through to turn a profit. However, they also represent a sizable share of physician capacity in medically underserved neighborhoods. This article documents the level of credentials, systems, and immunization-related procedures among these physicians. Furthermore, it assesses the relationship between such characteristics and childhood immunization rates. The analysis utilizes a cross-sectional comparison of immunization rates in 60 private practices that submitted 2,500 or more Medicaid claims for children. Immunization data were gathered from medical records for 2,948 randomly selected children under 3 years of age. Half of sampled physicians were board certified (55%), and half were accepted by the Medicaid P referred P hysicians and Children (P P AC) program (51.7%). Of physicians, 43% saw patients only on a walk-in basis, while only 17% scheduled the next appointment while the patient was still in the office. There were 75% of the physicians who reported usually immunizing at acute care visits. Immunization rates were higher among PPAC physicians compared to others (41% vs. 29% up to date for diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis [DTP]/Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib], polio, and measles-mumps-rubella [MMR], P=.01), and board-certified physicians showed a trend tovard better immunization rates (39% vs. 30%, P=.07). Physicians who reported usually immunizing at acute care visits also had higher rates than those who did not (38% vs. 27%, P=.05). Scheduling a date and time for the next immunization showed a trend toward association with immunization coverage (37% vs. 28%, P=.10). Private practice physicians who provide high volumes of care reimbursed by Medicaid have improved their credentials and affiliations over time, thereby expanding reimbursement options. Credentials and affiliations were at least as effective in distinguishing relatively high- and low-performing physicians, as were immunization-related practices, suggesting that they are useful markers for higher quality care. The relative success of the P P AC programshould informefforts to inprove the capacity and quality of primary care for vulnerable children. Appointment and reminder systems that effectively manage the flow of children back into the office for immunizations and the vigilant use of acute care visits for immunizations go hand in hand. Opportunity exists for payers and plans to encourage and support these actions.

Comparison of Preventive Care in Medicaid Managed Care and Medicaid Fee for Service in Institutions and Private Practices

OBJECTIVE To compare preventive screening for children in Medicaid managed care (MMC) with children in Medicaid fee for service (M-FFS) in private and institutional settings. METHODS The sample included randomly selected institutions and private practice physicians in New York City. Within setting, children in MMC and M-FFS were sampled randomly and charts reviewed for immunizations and lead and anemia screening. RESULTS In both institutions and private practices, children enrolled in MMC appeared more likely to be up-to-date than their M-FFS counterparts for immunizations (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.05), lead screening (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.01), and anemia screening (institution, P <.01; private practice, P <.01). However, children in MMC had more visits (P <.01) and were followed up for a longer time (P <.01). After controlling for these variables, effects of MMC diminished and only remained significant for screening among private physicians. When considering 10 different attributes of managed care plans, no clear pattern of association with better preventive care services was observed. CONCLUSION The positive effect of managed care on preventive care services was largely explained by more visits and longer follow-up time; however, there were differences between institutions and private practices, with enrollment in MMC associated with some positive effect on screenings in private practices.

Role of Institutional Climate in Fostering Diversity in Biomedical Research Workforce: A Case Study

This article reviews the barriers to diversity in biomedical research and describes the evolution of efforts to address climate issues to enhance the ability to attract, retain, and develop underrepresented minorities, whose underrepresentation is found both in science and medicine, in the graduate-school biomedical research doctoral programs (PhD and MD/PhD) at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. We also describe the potential beneficial impact of having a climate that supports diversity and inclusion in the biomedical research workforce. The Mount Sinai School of Medicine diversity-climate efforts are discussed as part of a comprehensive plan to increase diversity in all institutional programs: PhD, MD/PhD, and MD, and at the residency, postdoctoral fellow, and faculty levels. Lessons learned from 4 decades of targeted programs and activities at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine may be of value to other institutions interested in improving diversity in the biomedical science and academic medicine workforce.

Medicaid managed care in New York: problems and promise for childhood immunizations.

New York State is aggressively pursuing mandatory Medicaid managed care. Under managed care, physicians and plans have a defined population for which they are responsible, quality assurance monitoring emphasizes immunization rates along with other preventive services, and population-based incentives are possible. The literature does not offer compelling evidence, however, that immunization coverage is any better in managed care than under fee-for-service. If reimbursement is low and physician capacity insufficient, immunization rates may be considerably worse. In New York, care needs to be taken so that expansion does not outstrip the capacity of managed care plans to absorb additional enrollees.

Diversity in academic medicine no. 4 Northeast Consortium: innovation in minority faculty development

In fiscal year 2006, the US Government abruptly and drastically reduced its funding for programs to increase the racial and ethnic diversity of academic medicine, including programs to increase the development of minority medical faculty. Anticipating this reduction, 4 such programs-the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry in New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine-decided to pool their resources, forming the Northeast Consortium of Minority Faculty Development. An innovation in minority faculty development, the Northeast Consortium of Minority Faculty Development has succeeded in exposing faculty trainees to research and teaching that they might not have considered otherwise, expanding the number and diversity of their mentors and role models, providing them potential access to larger and different populations and databases for purposes of research, and expanding their peer contacts. After introducing the Northeast Consortium of Minority Faculty Development, this article describes the origins and goals of each member program.

Quality oversight for Medicaid managed care plans: impact on providers.

The purpose of this study was to describe managed care organization (MCO)-provider interactions around quality monitoring in Medicaid managed care. Heads of ambulatory pediatrics in institutions and private providers in offices in New York City (NYC) responded to questions regarding several forms of MCO-provider communications around quality. It appears that the current quality monitoring review process undertaken by managed care plans in provider sites in NYC is duplicative and overlapping. Feedback from the quality reviews is not being received by the providers who are giving care and incentives/disincentives are not felt. These constitute severe limitations to the current system of quality oversight.

Factors affecting immunization status of college students in New York City (NYC).

SUMMARY Objectives: Although immunization is an important public health issue, there have been few studies conducted and minimal information gathered concerning the immunization status of NYC college students. In response to this void, the NYC Department of Healths Bureau of Immunization designed and implemented a study to determine the accessibility of immunization information and service. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-one college students were asked to complete an immunization survey designed by the researchers in the immunization clinics of New York City. Results: Significant correlations were found between the accessibility of immunization information and immigration status, years of residence in the U.S.A., primary language, as well as school credit completed. Results also indicated that the accessibility of immunization service correlates significantly with ethnicity, immigration status, primary language, years of residence in the U.S.A., accessibility of immunization information, insurance status, employment status, and personal and family income. Conclusions: The information gathered from this study is useful for public health administration, policy analysis, and program planning.