Gary D. Burkholder

The ultrastructure of G- and C-banded chromosomes

Abstract A method of visualizing chromosome bands by electron microscopy has been used to investigate the fine structural organization of G- and C-banded chromosomes. The following information has been obtained: 1. 1. G-bands, produced by trypsinization, were electron dense regions of highly packed chromatin fibres separated by regions in which the chromatin fibres were much less densely packed (interbands). 2. 2. Several degrees of chromatin dispersion were apparent in trypsinized chromosomes. Such dispersion was not a prerequisite for the initial visualization of G-bands, however the progressive pattern of dispersion indicated that the bands were relatively more resistant to dispersion than the interbands. 3. 3. After fixation and trypsinization, individual chromatin fibres measured 250 A in diameter and appeared morphologically similar to control chromatin fibres seen by whole mount electron microscopy. 4. 4. In trypsinized chromosome complements, the chromosomes often appeared to be interconnected to one another by chromatin fibres. The evidence indicates that these interchromosomal fibres are artefacts produced by the overlapping of dispersed chromatin fibres. 5. 5. When the same metaphase chromosome was observed by both light and electron microscopy, some of the light microscopic G-bands were represented by two or more ultrastructural bands. The number of bands seen in metaphase chromosomes by electron microscopy appears to approach the increased number of bands generally seen in prometaphase chromosomes by light microscopy. 6. 6. C-banding methods (NaOH treatment or overtrypsinization) resulted in the extraction of variable amounts of chromatin from the non C-band regions of the chromosomes, however the constitutive heterochromatin remained highly condensed and resistant to extraction. This result supports the hypothesis that the mechanism of C-banding involves the selective loss of non C-band chromatin.

Immunofluorescent staining of mammalian nuclei and chromosomes with a monoclonal antibody to triplex DNA.

Triplex DNA is an unusual conformation of DNA formed when two pyrimidine nucleotide strands share a common purine strand. A monoclonal antibody, demonstrated by numerous criteria to be specific for triplex DNA, was used to investigate the presence and distribution of this unique DNA configuration in nuclei and chromosomes of mouse LM cells and human lymphocytes. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that constitutive heterochromatin in acetic-methanol fixed mouse nuclei was usually, but not always immunofluorescent, suggesting possible cell cycle related variations in the amount of triplex DNA or its accessibility in this condensed chromatin. In fixed mouse and human chromosomes, there was a positive correlation between immunofluorescent staining patterns, Hoechst 33258 banding, and G- and/or C-banding patterns. Unfixed, isolated mouse chromosomes also reacted positively with the antibody, particularly when they were gently decondensed by exposure to low ionic conditions at neutral pH. This result indicates that fixation is not mandatory for antibody staining, suggesting that some mammalian chromosomal DNA may be naturally organized in a triplex configuration. However, there is a possibility that fixation may facilitate the formation of additional triplex DNA complexes in potential sequences or expose previously inaccessible triplex DNA. The precise correspondence between the immunofluorescent patterns produced by anti-triplex DNA antibodies and G- and C-bands known to represent regions of chromatin condensation, suggests a potential role of triplex DNA in chromosome structure and regional chromatin condensation.

Morphological and biochemical effects of endonucleases on isolated mammalian chromosomes in vitro

Endonuclease digestion of isolated and unfixed mammalian metaphase chromosomes in vitro was examined as a means to study the higher-order regional organization of chromosomes related to banding patterns and the mechanisms of endonuclease-induced banding. Isolated mouse LM cell chromosomes, digested with the restriction enzymes AluI, HaeIII, EcoRI, BstNI, AvaII, or Sau96I, demonstrated reproducible G- and/or C-banding at the cytological level depending on the enzyme and digestion conditions. At the molecular level, specific DNA alterations were induced that correlated with the banding patterns produced. The results indicate that: (1) chromatin extraction is intimately involved in the mechanism of endonuclease induced chromosome banding. (2) The extracted DNA fragments are variable in size, ranging from 200 bp to more than 4 kb in length. (3) For HaeIII, there appears to be variation in the rate of restriction site cleavage in G- and R-bands; HaeIII sites appear to be more rapidly cleaved in R-bands than in G-bands. (4) AluI and HaeIII ultimately produce banding patterns that reflect regional differences in the distribution of restriction sites along the chromosome. (5) BstNI restriction sites in the satellite DNA of constitutive heterochromatin are not cleaved intrachromosomally, probably reflecting an inaccessibility of the BstNI sites to enzyme due to the condensed nature of this chromatin or specific DNA-protein interactions. This implies that some enzymes may induce banding related to regional differences in the accessibility of restriction sites along the chromosome. (6) Several specific nonhistone protein differences were noted in the extracted and residual chromatin following an AluI digestion. Of these, some nonhistones were primarily detected in the extracted chromatin while others were apparently resistant to extraction and located principally in the residual chromatin. (7) The chromatin in constitutive heterochromatin is transiently resistant to cleavage by micrococcal nuclease.

Triplex DNA in plasmids and chromosomes

Circular plasmids containing pyrimidine purine tracts can form both inter-and intramolecular triplexes. Addition of poly(dTC) to plasmid pTC45, which contains a (TC)45.(GA)45 insert, results in intermolecular triplex formation. Agarose-gel electrophoresis gives rise to many well-resolved bands, which correspond to 1, 2, 3, 4... plasmid molecules attached to the added pyrimidine strand. In the electron microscope these complexes appear as a rosette of petals. The mobility of these triplex-containing complexes can be retarded by the addition of a triplex-specific monoclonal antibody, Jel318. Intramolecular triplex formation can be demonstrated at pH 5 in pTC45 and also in pT463-I, a plasmid containing a segment of a crab satellite DNA with both (G)n.(C)n and (TCC)n.(GGA)n inserts. However, although the intermolecular triplex remains stable for some time at pH 8, intramolecular triplex formation only occurs at low pH. Triplexes can also be detected by an immunoblotting procedure with Jel318. This unfamiliar structure is readily demonstrated in eukaryotic extracts, but not in cell extracts from Escherichia coli. Triplexes may thus be an inherent feature of eukaryotic chromosome structure.

DNA-protein interactions and chromosome banding☆

Abstract Pancreatic DNase I was used as a probe to study DNA-protein interactions in condensed and extended chromatin fractions isolated from Chinese hamster liver, and in human lymphocyte and mouse L cell metaphase chromosomes in situ. By studying the rate of digestion of chromatin DNA by DNase, we have previously shown that DNA in extended chromatin is more sensitive to DNase digestion than that in condensed chromatin. In the current investigation, we have examined whether this differential sensitivity of the chromatin fractions to DNase is due to differences in protein binding to DNA or differences in the degree of chromatin condensation. By “decondensing” the condensed chromatin and comparing its rate of digestion to that of untreated condensed and extended chromatin, it was found that differences in the degree of binding of proteins to DNA rather than the degree of condensation of the chromatin primarily determines the sensitivity of each fraction to DNase. Extraction of the various classes of chromosomal proteins, followed by DNase digestion of the residual chromatin revealed that both the histone and non-histone proteins protect the DNA in the chromatin fractions from DNase attack; however, the more tightly associated non-histones appear to be specifically responsible for the differential sensitivity of the chromatin fractions to DNase digestion. These non-histones may be more tightly associated with the DNA in condensed than in extended chromatin, thereby protecting the DNA in condensed chromatin against DNase attack to a greater extent than that in extended chromatin. When metaphase chromosomes were briefly digested with DNase in situ and subsequently stained with Feulgen reagent, incontrovertible C-banding and some G-banding was obtained. This DNaseinduced banding demonstrates that the DNA in C-band and possibly G-band regions is less accessible to DNase than that in the interband regions, and our biochemical data suggest that this differential accessibility is caused by differential DNA-protein binding such that the non-histones are more tightly coupled to the DNA in the G- and C-band regions than they are in the interbands. Differences in the binding of non-histones to DNA in different segments of the metaphase chromosome may be involved in the mechanism of G- and C-banding.

Immunofluorescent localization of triplex DNA in polytene chromosomes of Chironomus and Drosophila

Purine · pyrimidine (pur·pyr) DNA tracts are prevalent in eukaryotic genomes. They can adopt a triplex conformation in vitro under conditions that may exist in vivo, suggesting that triplex (H-) DNA may exist naturally in chromosomes. To explore this possibility and gain insight concerning potential functions, the distribution of triplex DNA was studied in fixed polytene chromosomes of Chironomus tentans and Drosophila melanogaster by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using an anti-triplex DNA monoclonal antibody (Jel 318). Chromosomes stained with this antibody exhibited immunopositive regions corresponding to condensed chromatin bands; interbands were less immunofluorescent. These results imply that there is more triplex DNA in bands than in interbands. In Chironomus, nucleolar organizer regions and Balbiani rings were immunonegative, indicating that triplex DNA is not present in decondensed, transcriptionally active chromatin. A few specific bands in both Chironomus and Drosophila were intensely immunofluorescent. In Drosophila, one such region was 81F on chromosome 3R. Competition during staining with exogenously added sequences corresponding to a constituent 1.672 g/cm3 satellite DNA in region 81F failed to abolish the immunofluorescence, suggesting that the satellite DNA does not fortuitously react with Jel 318 and implying that unidentified pur·pyr sequences forming triplex DNA are also present at this location. Region 81F exhibits ectopic pairing with nonrelated chromosome regions that have also proven to be intensely immunopositive; this suggests that the formation of triplex DNA between common, shared pur·pyr sequences in these otherwise nonhomologous bands might account for the ectopic pairing phenomenon. Together with our previous results, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that triplex DNA may play a role in chromosome organization by participating in regional chromatin condensation.

The effect of chromosome banding techniques on the proteins of isolated chromosomes

Experiments were undertaken to determine the effect of various chromosome banding treatments on the histone and nonhistone proteins of isolated, fixed, air-dried metaphase chromosomes. Chromosome preparations were exposed to G-banding (SSC, urea, NaCl-urea, or trypsin), R-banding (Earles balanced salt solution), and C-banding (NaOH or Ba(OH)2) treatments, and the extracted and residual proteins were examined by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The results indicate that each of the banding treatments induce characteristic alterations in the chromosomal proteins. The residual proteins left in chromosomes after the diverse G-banding treatments were generally similar to one another, indicating that treatments inducing the same type of banding have similar effects on the chromosomal proteins. This was also true for the two different C-banding treatments. On the other hand, the residual protein patterns seen after the G-banding treatments were strikingly different from those seen after R-banding, which in turn differed from those seen after C-banding. The treatments inducing different types of banding therefore produce markedly different effects on the chromosomal proteins. These protein alterations may have an important influence on the induction of chromosome bands.

Differential accessibility of DNA in extended and condensed chromatin to pancreatic DNase I

Abstract Pancreatic DNase I has been used to study the interaction between DNA and chromosomal proteins in extended and condensed chromatin fractions isolated from mouse and Chinese hamster livers. It was found that DNase digests extended chromatin at a faster rate than condensed chromatin, and the evidence suggests that the chromosomal proteins are more tightly complexed to the DNA in condensed than in extended chromatin. This difference in DNA-protein interaction in extended and condensed chromatin may be related to the functional difference which characterizes these fractions, and might be one of the factors underlying the production of bands on metaphase chromosomes.

Proteins in chromosome banding

Nuclei were isolated from Chinese hamster cells, treated with hypotonic KCl, fixed in acetic methanol, and either air-dried in glass tubes (in situ) or left in suspension (in vitro). These preparations were then exposed to a variety of G-banding treatments, including the 2 × SSC, urea, NaCl-urea, and trypsin methods. The proteins extracted into the treatment solution and those remaining in the nuclei were analyzed by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The three former treatments extracted specific subsets of the total nuclear nonhistone proteins into the treatment solution. Some of the extracted nonhistones were common to all treatments while others were unique to a particular treatment. Variable amounts and types of the histones were also extracted by these treatments, but significant quantities of all of these proteins still remained in the nuclei afterwards. The trypsin treatment appeared to degrade some of the nonhistones, while other non-histones, as well as the histones, were relatively resistant to trypsin digestion. Although there were a few differences in the residual proteins found in the nuclei after the various G-band treatments, the overall electrophoretic patterns of these proteins were generally similar. The results indicate that the G-banding techniques induce specific and reproducible changes in the proteins of isolated nuclei. If these banding treatments induce similar changes in the proteins of mitotic chromosomes, such alterations might be involved in mechanisms of chromosome banding.

The mechanisms responsible for reciprocal BrdU-Giemsa staining

Abstract Cytological and biochemical experiments were undertaken to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the reciprocal Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions subjected to high or low pH NaH2PO4 treatments. These experiments included staining of chromosome preparations with ethidium bromide (EB), acridine orange (AO), or dansyl chloride, digestion of BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromatin with pancreatic DNase I, and SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the proteins extracted from, and those remaining in isolated, fixed, air-dried nuclei subjected to either NaH2PO4 treatment. The collective evidence from this and previous work clearly indicates that, although the staining reactions following the different pH treatments are reciprocal, the mechanisms of induction of the staining effects are not. After the high pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted chromosome regions are palely and intensely stained with Giemsa, respectively. This treatment preferentially solubilizes BrdU-substituted DNA, probably as a result of the photolysis or high temperature hydrolysis of BrdU-DNA. Concomitantly, this treatment selectively denatures the BrdU-DNA. The reduction in the amount of DNA in the BrdU regions leads to a quantitative decrease in Giemsa-dye binding, resulting in pale staining relative to unsubstituted regions. The extraction of BrdU-substituted DNA does not appear to simultaneously extract much chromosomal protein. After the low pH treatment, BrdU-substituted and unsubstituted regions appear intensely and palely stained with Giemsa, respectively. BrdU substitution greatly increases the binding affinity of histone H1 to DNA, and the low pH treatment preferentially extracts the less tightly bound H1 of the unsubstituted chromatin. This extraction of H1 is presumably responsible for the preferential dispersion of unsubstituted DNA outside the boundaries of the chromosome onto the surrounding area of the slide. The unsubstituted chromosome regions subsequently stain relatively palely with Giemsa, because the DNA in these regions is more dispersed than that in the BrdU-substituted regions. The low pH treatment concomitantly denatures the unsubstituted DNA.