Gary D. Grossfeld

Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults : The American Urological Association Best Practice Policy-Part II : Patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation, and follow-up

P I of this report (preceding article) addressed the definition, detection, prevalence, and etiology of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. This section of the best practice policy (Part II) is intended to serve as guidance to urologists and primary care physicians with respect to the evaluation of adult patients who may have asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Recommendations for a nephrology evaluation and for patient follow-up are provided.

Prognostic markers in bladder cancer: a contemporary review of the literature.

PURPOSE We provide a contemporary review of bladder tumor markers and summarize their role as prognostic indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature on prognostic markers for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder was performed. RESULTS Intense research efforts are being made to identify and characterize better various bladder cancers and their true biological potential. The need to predict which superficial tumors will recur or progress and which invasive tumors will metastasize has led to the identification of a variety of potential prognostic markers. Blood group antigens, tumor associated antigens, proliferating antigens, oncogenes, peptide growth factors and their receptors, cell adhesion molecules, tumor angiogenesis and angiogenesis inhibitors, and cell cycle regulatory proteins have recently been identified. The potential clinical applications of these tumor markers are under active investigation. Recent attention has focused on which tumor markers may predict the responsiveness of a particular bladder cancer to systemic chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS At present conventional histopathological evaluation of bladder cancer (tumor grade and stage) cannot predict accurately the behavior of most bladder tumors. With a better understanding of the cell cycle, and cell to cell and cell to extracellular matrix interactions as well as improved diagnostic techniques (immunohistochemistry), progress is being made to identify and characterize other potential prognostic markers for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. The ultimate goal is to develop reliable prognostic markers that will accurately predict not only the course but also the response of a tumor to therapy. This information may then be used to dictate more aggressive treatment for tumors that are likely to progress and less aggressive treatment for those that are unlikely to progress. In the future these biological markers may also be used in gene therapy for the treatment of bladder cancer.

IMPACT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS ON PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AND THE USE OF SECONDARY CANCER TREATMENT: DATA FROM THE CAPSURE DATABASE

PURPOSE We determined the impact of positive surgical margins on prostate specific antigen (PSA) recurrence and secondary treatment in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive local treatment for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the pathology reports of 1,383 patients in the CaPSURE database, a longitudinal disease registry of men with prostate cancer, who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive local treatment. Pathological stage, Gleason score, and the number and location of any positive surgical margins were determined in each patient. PSA recurrence was defined as PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater on 2 consecutive occasions after radical prostatectomy. Secondary cancer treatment consisted of radiation or androgen deprivation after radical prostatectomy. Adjuvant and nonadjuvant secondary treatment was given within and more than 6 months after radical prostatectomy, respectively. Kaplan-Meier event rates of PSA recurrence and secondary treatment were calculated for patients with positive and negative surgical margins. We performed multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to adjust for clinical differences in groups. RESULTS Patients with positive surgical margins were significantly more likely to undergo secondary adjuvant or nonadjuvant cancer treatment and have PSA recurrence than those with negative margins. After adjusting for patient age, ethnicity, PSA at diagnosis, pathological stage and Gleason score, surgical margin status was an important independent predictor of PSA recurrence and secondary treatment (p = 0.06 and 0.0011, respectively). The number of positive margins and positive margin location had little impact on the outcomes measured. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that surgical margin status is an independent predictor of PSA recurrence and secondary cancer treatment in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy as definitive local therapy for prostate cancer.

Prospective Trial of the Herbal Supplement PC-SPES in Patients With Progressive Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE PC-SPES is an herbal supplement for which there are anecdotal reports of anti-prostate cancer activity. This phase II study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PC-SPES in prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-three patients with androgen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPCa) and 37 patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPCa) were treated with PC-SPES at a dose of nine capsules daily. Clinical outcome was assessed with serial serum prostate-specific androgen (PSA) level measurement and imaging studies. RESULTS One hundred percent of ADPCa patients experienced a PSA decline of >/= 80%, with a median duration of 57+ weeks. No patient has developed PSA progression. Thirty-one patients (97%) had declines of testosterone to the anorchid range. Two ADPCa patients had positive bone scans; both improved. One patient with a bladder mass measurable on computed tomography scan experienced disappearance of this mass. Nineteen (54%) of 35 AIPCa patients had a PSA decline of >/= 50%, including eight (50%) of 16 patients who had received prior ketoconazole therapy. Median time to PSA progression was 16 weeks (range, 2 to 69+ weeks). Of 25 patients with positive bone scans, two had improvement, seven had stable disease, 11 had progressive disease, and five did not have a repeat bone scan because of PSA progression. Severe toxicities included thromboembolic events (n = 3) and allergic reactions (n = 3). Other frequent toxicities included gynecomastia/gynecodynia, leg cramps, and grade 1 or 2 diarrhea. CONCLUSION PC-SPES seems to have activity in the treatment of both ADPCa and AIPCa and has acceptable toxicity. Further study is required to determine whether its effects exceed those expected with estrogen therapy.

UNDER STAGING AND UNDER GRADING IN A CONTEMPORARY SERIES OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR DATABASE

PURPOSE We determined the prevalence of under staging and under grading in contemporary patients undergoing radical prostatectomy in academic and community based urology practices, and defined important predictors of under staging in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We compared clinical T stage and biopsy Gleason score with pathological T stage and prostatectomy Gleason score in 1,313 patients enrolled in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor database, a longitudinal registry of patients with prostate cancer, who underwent radical prostatectomy, including 53% since 1995. Under grading was determined for the primary and secondary Gleason patterns and defined as a biopsy Gleason pattern of 1 to 3 that became pathological Gleason pattern 4 or 5. Under staging was defined as a clinically organ confined tumor that was extraprostatic stages pT3 to 4 or N+ at radical prostatectomy. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to determine important risk factors for under staging and significant risk factors were used to identify the likelihood of under staging in clinically relevant patient subgroups. The importance of the percent of positive biopsies in regard to the likelihood of under staging was determined by assigning patients to previously described risk groups based on serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis and biopsy Gleason score. RESULTS Under grading of primary and secondary Gleason patterns occurred in 13% and 29% of patients, respectively, while under staging occurred in 24%. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score and the percent of positive biopsies were significant predictors of under staging. The percent of positive biopsies appeared to be most important for predicting the likelihood of extraprostatic disease extension in intermediate or high risk disease based on serum PSA at diagnosis and biopsy Gleason grade. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of under grading and under staging in contemporary patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may be lower than previously reported. PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score and the percent of positive biopsies are important predictors of under staging. The percent of positive biopsies should be incorporated into risk assessment models of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

PREDICTING RISK OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH THE CENTER FOR PROSTATE DISEASE RESEARCH AND CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR DATABASES

PURPOSE Biostatistical models to predict stage or outcome in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason sum on biopsy or prostatectomy specimen, clinical or pathological stage and other variables, including ethnicity, have been developed. However, to date models have relied on small subsets from academic centers or military populations that may not be representative. Our study validates and updates a model published previously with the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE, UCSF, Urology Outcomes Research Group and TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.), a large multicenter, community based prostate cancer database and Center for Prostate Disease Research (CPDR), a large military database. MATERIALS AND METHODS We validated a biostatistical model that includes pretreatment PSA, highest Gleason sum on prostatectomy specimen, prostatectomy organ confinement status and ethnicity, including white and black patients. We then revised it with the Cox regression analysis of the combined 503 PSA era surgical cases from the CPDR prospective cancer database and 1,012 from the CaPSURE prostate cancer outcomes database. RESULTS The original equation with 3 risk groups stratified CaPSURE cases into distinct categories with 7-year disease-free survival rates of 72%, 42.1% and 27.6% for low, intermediate and high risk men, respectively. Parameter estimates obtained from a Cox regression analysis provided a revised model equation that calculated the relative risk of recurrence as: exponent (exp)[(0.54 x Race) + (0.05 x sigmoidal transformation of PSA [PSA(ST)]) + (0.23 x Postop Gleason) + (0.69 x Pathologic stage). The relative risk of recurrence, as calculated by the aforementioned equation, was used to stratify the cases into 4 risk groups. Very low-4.7 or less, low-4.7 to 7.1, high-7.1 to 16.7 and very high-greater than 16.7, and patients at risk had 7-year disease-free survival rates of 85.4%, 66.0%, 50.6% and 21.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS With a broad cohort of community based, academic and military cases, we developed an equation that stratifies men into 4 discrete risk groups of recurrence after radical prostatectomy and confirmed use of a prior 3 risk group model. Although the variables of ethnicity, pretreatment PSA, highest Gleason sum on prostatectomy specimen and organ confinement status on surgical pathology upon which the model is based are easily obtained, more refined modeling with additional variables are needed to improve prediction of intermediate risk in individuals.

Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy : Treatment outcomes and failure patterns

OBJECTIVES To define the optimal role for radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to characterize specific patterns of PSA failure in this setting. METHODS The records of 105 patients who underwent RT after RP (69 received therapeutic RT because of an elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, 36 received immediate adjuvant RT) were reviewed. The median follow-up was 35 months after RT and 57 months after RP. Radiation success was defined as achievement and maintenance of a PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL. Preoperative, pathologic, and postoperative characteristics were examined for their ability to predict success after RT. Patterns of PSA recurrence after RT were also examined by determining the PSA nadir, PSA velocity, and timing of androgen-deprivation therapy. RESULTS Of 105 patients, 47 experienced biochemical failure. Actuarial 3 and 5-year progression-free survival estimates for all patients were 55% and 43%, respectively. Significant favorable predictors of response to RT by multivariate analysis were preoperative PSA less than 20 ng/mL and the use of adjuvant RT. However, patients who received therapeutic RT with a pre-RT PSA less than 1.0 ng/mL demonstrated progression-free outcome equivalent to those who received adjuvant RT. Two distinct patterns of PSA failure were observed on the basis of PSA nadir after RT. Patients whose PSA failed to reach a nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL after RT had progression with a high PSA velocity (1.5 ng/mL/yr). Patients whose PSA reached a nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL but who subsequently had treatment failure progressed later with a lower PSA velocity (0.36 ng/ml/yr). CONCLUSIONS RT is effective in select patients after RP. Given the low PSA velocity consistent with persistent local disease in nearly 50% of patients in whom RT failed, more effective local therapy is needed after RP in high-risk patients.

PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION IN MEN WITH PRIOR HIGH GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA OR ATYPICAL PROSTATE BIOPSY

PURPOSE We used clinical variables to predict prostate cancer detection on re-biopsy among patients diagnosed with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) or atypia on initial prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 45 men with atypia and 43 with high grade PIN were eligible for our study. Clinical variables were tested with univariate and multivariate logistic regression to predict who would have cancer on re-biopsy. We also calculated the odds of detecting cancer with various repeat sampling strategies and determined whether the location of initial atypia or high grade PIN is correlated to that of cancer on re-biopsy. RESULTS Of the patients in the atypia and high grade PIN groups 51% had cancer on re-biopsy. Cancer was diagnosed significantly earlier in the high grade PIN than in the atypia cohort (average 7.5 versus 22.9 months, respectively, p = 0.005). Multivariate logistic modeling showed that digital rectal examination and patient age were independent predictors of cancer in atypia, whereas no variables were significantly predictive for high grade PIN. Of cancers in the atypia and high grade PIN 65% and 74%, respectively, would have been detected if re-biopsy was focused only at the initial site of disease. CONCLUSIONS Men with atypia or high grade PIN merit close followup because 50% will have cancer on re-biopsy as will those who are older with an abnormal digital rectal examination. Although re-biopsy should focus primarily on the original site of atypia or high grade PIN, cancer detection significantly increases with the sampling of adjacent sites.

Contemporary patterns of androgen deprivation therapy use for newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Although once reserved for the management of metastatic prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is being used increasingly to treat lower stages of disease. We sought to assess patterns of ADT use in a contemporary cohort of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer who had > or =12 months of follow-up evaluation were identified in a national disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. The patterns of ADT use, both primary and secondary, were characterized and stratified by risk according to prostate-specific antigen levels, clinical stage, and Gleason score. In a cohort of 1485 men, 46% underwent ADT at some point during their treatment: 41% as primary therapy (either sole therapy or neoadjuvant therapy), and 5% as secondary therapy. In all, 50% of men receiving initial ADT had low- or intermediate-risk disease characteristics. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy, neoadjuvant ADT was administered in 20% and 48% of patients, respectively. Secondary hormonal manipulation was observed in 5% and 7% of patients treated initially with surgery or radiation, respectively. ADT is commonly used to treat men with prostate cancer. Much of the use of ADT is in men with low- and intermediate-risk disease characteristics. The appropriateness of such therapy requires further study, including its effect, not only on disease endpoints, but also on resource utilization and health-related quality of life.

Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE Previous studies have shown that patients with clinical stage T2c-T3 prostate cancer, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. or a biopsy Gleason score of 8 to 10 are at high risk for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. We determined the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in this high risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 547 patients with high risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco or as part of the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor data base, a longitudinal disease registry of patients with prostate cancer. High risk disease was defined as 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage T2c-T3 disease in 411 patients, serum PSA at diagnosis greater than 20 ng./ml. in 124 and/or biopsy Gleason score 8 to 10 in 114. Disease recurrence was defined as PSA 0.2 ng./ml. or greater on 2 consecutive occasions after radical prostatectomy or second cancer treatment more than 6 months after surgery. The Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to determine significant independent predictors of disease recurrence. The likelihood of disease recurrence for clinically relevant patient groups was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS Median followup after surgery was 3.1 years. Disease recurred in 177 patients (32%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum PSA at diagnosis, biopsy Gleason score, ethnicity and the percent of positive prostate biopsies were significant independent predictors of disease recurrence, while patient age and clinical tumor stage were not. Patients with a Gleason score 8 to 10 tumor and a serum PSA of 10 ng./ml. or less had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than those with PSA greater than 10 ng./ml. (47% versus 19%, p <0.05). Patients with a serum PSA at diagnosis of greater than 20 ng./ml. and a Gleason score of less than 8 had a significantly higher likelihood of remaining disease-free 5 years after surgery than similar patients with a Gleason score of 8 or greater (45% versus 0%, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS PSA, Gleason score, ethnicity and the percent of positive prostate biopsies appear to be the most important pretreatment predictors of disease recurrence in men with high risk prostate cancer. Patients with high grade disease may continue to be appropriate candidates for local therapy if PSA is less than 10 ng./ml. at diagnosis or there are fewer than 66% positive prostate biopsies.