Gary E. Pakes

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Lamivudine

Lamivudine (3TC), the negative enantiomer of 2′-deoxy-3′-thiacytidine, is a dideoxynucleoside analogue used in combination with other agents in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection and as monotherapy in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Lamivudine undergoes anabolic phosphorylation by intracellular kinases to form lamivudine 5′-triphosphate, the active anabolite which prevents HIV-1 and HBV replication by competitively inhibiting viral reverse transcriptase and terminating proviral DNA chain extension.The pharmacokinetics of lamivudine are similar in patients with HIV-1 or HBV infection, and healthy volunteers. The drug is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with maximum serum concentrations usually attained 0.5 to 1.5 hours after the dose. The absolute bioavailability is approximately 82 and 68% in adults and children, respectively. Lamivudine systemic exposure, as measured by the area under the serum drug concentration-time curve (AUC), is not altered when it is administered with food.Lamivudine is widely distributed into total body fluid, the mean apparent volume of distribution (Vd) being approximately 1.3 L/kg following intravenous administration. In pregnant women, lamivudine concentrations in maternal serum, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord and neonatal serum are comparable, indicating that the drug diffuses freely across the placenta. In postpartum women lamivudine is secreted into breast milk. The concentration of lamivudine in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is low to modest, being 4 to 8% of serum concentrations in adults and 9 to 17% of serum concentrations in children measured at 2 to 4 hours after the dose.In patients with normal renal function, about 5% of the parent compound is metabolised to the trans-sulphoxide metabolite, which is pharmacologically inactive. In patients with renal impairment, the amount of trans-sulphoxide metabolite recovered in the urine increases, presumably as a function of the decreased lamivudine elimination. As approximately 70% of an oral dose is eliminated renally as unchanged drug, the dose needs to be reduced in patients with renal insufficiency. Hepatic impairment does not affect the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine. Systemic clearance following single intravenous doses averages 20 to 25 L/h (approximately 0.3 L/h/kg). The dominant elimination half-life of lamivudine is approximately 5 to 7 hours, and the in vitro intracellular half-life of its active 5′-triphosphate anabolite is 10.5 to 15.5 hours and 17 to 19 hours in HIV-1 and HBV cell lines, respectively.Drug interaction studies have shown that trimethoprim increases the AUC and decreases the renal clearance of lamivudine, although lamivudine does not affect the disposition of trimethoprim. Other studies have demonstrated no significant interaction between lamivudine and zidovudine or between lamivudine and iterferon-α-2b. There is limited potential for drug-druginteractions with compounds that are metabolised and/or highly proteinbound.

The pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients infected with HIV-1

OBJECTIVE To assess the pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from patients infected with HIV-1. DESIGN Single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, cross-over study in 10 asymptomatic, antiretroviral-experienced, HIV-1-infected patients who had a CD4+ lymphocyte count of 200-500 x 10(6)/l and had received combination treatment with lamivudine 150 mg twice a day plus zidovudine 600 mg a day (divided into two or three doses) for > or = 16 weeks prior to study entry. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive lamivudine 150 mg twice a day or lamivudine 300 mg twice a day for 14 days, with at least a 48-h washout period between treatments. Serial blood samples were collected over 36 h for determination of lamivudine serum concentrations using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and intracellular phosphate PBMC concentrations using high performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine anabolite concentration-time data. RESULTS Intracellular pharmacokinetic parameters were highly variable between patients (coefficient of variations approximately 50%). The two regimens produced lamivudine-total phosphate (totP) values of a similar magnitude. Although the 300-mg regimen tended to produce higher lamivudine-monophosphate (MP) and -triphosphate (TP) values, differences from values produced by the 150-mg regimen were not statistically significant. As lamivudine diphosphate (DP) was the predominant anabolite, accounting for 50-55% of lamivudine-totP (compared with 30-35% for lamivudine-MP and 15-20% for lamivudine-TP), the conversion of lamivudine-DP to lamivudine-TP can be regarded as the rate-limiting step. The median lamivudine-TP intracellular half-life (t1/2) for the 150-mg and 300-mg regimens did not differ significantly (15.3 and 16.1 h, respectively). Serum lamivudine pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with those observed in previous studies in HIV-1-infected patients. No apparent linear relationships were observed between lamivudine intracellular anabolite and serum data. CONCLUSIONS The intracellular pharmacokinetics of lamivudine phosphorylation in PBMC from asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients are highly variable and do not differ statistically between the 150- and 300-mg twice a day regimens. The variations in intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations following these two lamivudine dosage regimens are unlikely to result in differences in clinical effect. This was confirmed by the results of a large phase III study in HIV-1-infected patients which showed no differences in HIV-1 RNA or CD4+ lymphocyte counts between the 150- and 300-mg lamivudine regimens in combination with zidovudine.

Fosamprenavir or atazanavir once daily boosted with ritonavir 100 mg, plus tenofovir/emtricitabine, for the initial treatment of HIV infection: 48-week results of ALERT

BackgroundOnce-daily (QD) ritonavir 100 mg-boosted fosamprenavir 1400 mg (FPV/r100) or atazanavir 300 mg (ATV/r100), plus tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) 300 mg/200 mg, have not been compared as initial antiretroviral treatment. To address this data gap, we conducted an open-label, multicenter 48-week study (ALERT) in 106 antiretroviral-naïve, HIV-infected patients (median HIV-1 RNA 4.9 log10 copies/mL; CD4+ count 191 cells/mm3) randomly assigned to the FPV/r100 or ATV/r100 regimens.ResultsAt baseline, the FPV/r100 or ATV/r100 arms were well-matched for HIV-1 RNA (median, 4.9 log10 copies/mL [both]), CD4+ count (mean, 176 vs 205 cells/mm3). At week 48, intent-to-treat: missing/discontinuation = failure analysis showed similar responses to FPV/r100 and ATV/r100 (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL: 75% (40/53) vs 83% (44/53), p = 0.34 [Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test]); mean CD4+ count change-from-baseline: +170 vs +183 cells/mm3, p = 0.398 [Wilcoxon rank sum test]). Fasting total/LDL/HDL-cholesterol changes-from-baseline were also similar, although week 48 median fasting triglycerides were higher with FPV/r100 (150 vs 131 mg/dL). FPV/r100-treated patients experienced fewer treatment-related grade 2–4 adverse events (15% vs 57%), with differences driven by ATV-related hyperbilirubinemia. Three patients discontinued TDF/FTC because their GFR decreased to <50 mL/min.ConclusionThe all-QD regimens of FPV/r100 and ATV/r100, plus TDF/FTC, provided similar virologic, CD4+ response, and fasting total/LDL/HDL-cholesterol changes through 48 weeks. Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients experienced treatment-related grade 2–4 adverse events.

A Review of the Pharmacokinetics of Abacavir

Abacavir is a carbocyclic 2′-deoxyguanosine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is used as either a 600-mg once-daily or 300-mg twice-daily regimen exclusively in the treatment of HIV infection. Abacavir is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with peak concentrations occurring 0.63–1 hour after dosing. The absolute bioavailability of abacavir is approximately 83%. Abacavir pharmacokinetics are linear and doseproportional over the range of 300–1200 mg/day. To date, one study has assessed the steady-state pharmaco-kinetics of abacavir following a 600-mg once-daily regimen, and reported a geometric mean steady-state abacavir peak concentration of 3.85 µg/mL. Although this concentration is higher than the steady-state abacavir peak concentration reported following a 300-mg twice-daily regimen (0.88–3.19 µg/mL, depending on the study), the geometric mean steady-state abacavir exposure over 24 hours was similar following these regimens. Coadministration with food has no significant effect on abacavir exposure; therefore, abacavir may be administered with or without food.The apparent volume of distribution of abacavir after intravenous administration is approximately 0.86 ± 0.15 L/kg, suggesting that abacavir is distributed to extravascular spaces. Binding to plasma proteins is about 50% and is independent of the plasma abacavir concentration.Abacavir is extensively metabolized by the liver; less than 2% is excreted as unchanged drug in the urine. Abacavir is primarily metabolized via two pathways, uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase and alcohol dehydrogenase, resulting in the inactive glucuronide metabolite (361W94, ∼36% of the dose recovered in the urine) and the inactive carboxylate metabolite (2269W93, ∼30% of the dose recovered in the urine). The remaining 15% of abacavir equivalents found in the urine are minor metabolites, each less than 2% of the total dose. Faecal elimination accounts for about 16% of the dose. The terminal elimination half-life of abacavir is approximately 1.5 hours. The antiviral effect of abacavir is due to its intracellular anabolite, carbovir-triphosphate (CBV-TP). When assessed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry, CBV-TP has been shown to have a long elimination half-life (>20 hours), supporting once-daily dosing. The mean CBV-TP trough concentrations do not differ following abacavir 600-mg once-daily and 300-mg twice-daily regimens.Limited data are available for abacavir in subjects with renal dysfunction or hepatic impairment. Abacavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected subjects with end-stage renal disease were found to be no different from those observed in healthy adults; this finding was consistent with the kidney being a minor route of abacavir elimination. A study of abacavir pharmacokinetics in hepatically impaired adults (Child-Pugh score of 5–6) showed that the abacavir area under the plasma concentration-time curve and elimination half-life were 89% and 58% greater, respectively, suggesting that the daily dose of abacavir should be reduced in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score of 5–6). Abacavir pharmacokinetics have not been studied in patients with higher Child-Pugh scores.Abacavir is not significantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, nor does it inhibit these enzymes. Therefore, clinically significant drug interactions between abacavir and drugs metabolized by CYP enzymes are unlikely. The potential for drug interactions is no different when abacavir is used as a once-daily regimen versus a twice-daily regimen. No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between recommended doses of abacavir and lamivudine, zidovudine, alcohol (ethanol) or methadone.

Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Sumatriptan in Healthy Subjects Following Ascending Single Intranasal Doses and Multiple Intranasal Doses:

The delivery of sumatriptan doses intranasally could add greater flexibility in the treatment of migraine than is possible with the currently available subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan preparations. Two independent double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of intranasally administered sumatriptan following ascending single doses (three different dose levels) and multiple doses. In the four-way crossover, ascending-dose study, 20 healthy female subjects were randomized to receive on separate occasions single intranasal spray doses of 5, 10, or 20 mg sumatriptan (as the hemisulphate salt) or placebo into one nostril. Adverse events were mild and consisted mainly of bitter taste at the back of the throat and events typical of sumatriptan administered by other routes (headache, lightheadedness and tingling). Area under the plasma sumatriptan concentration versus time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) increased with the dose. Dose proportionality was demonstrated between 5 and 10 mg but not across the dose range 5–20 mg. Time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was variable due to multiple peaking. The elimination half-life (t1/2), approximately 2 h, was unaffected by the magnitude of dose. In the two-period, multiple-dose, crossover study, 12 healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized to receive either sumatriptan hemisulphate 20 mg or placebo, administered intranasally as a spray three times a day for 4 days, The two dosing periods were separated by 3 to 14 days. Multiple doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events occurring or withdrawals due to adverse events. All patients reported a mild to moderate drug-related disturbance of taste. Nasal examinations remained normal, and olfactory function was unaffected. The AUC over the first 8 h following dosing (AUC8) and fraction of the dose excreted in the urine (fe; 6.2% vs 3.6%) were similar on Days 1 and 4. Day 4 values were significantly higher (p0.05) for Cmax (16.9 ng/ml vs 13.1 ng/ml), renal clearance (Clr; 19.0 l/h vs 14.2 l/h), and t1/2 (2.18 h vs 1.93 h), and shorter for tmax (0.88 h vs 1.75 h). Some accumulation (22%) occurred over the 4 days of dosing. Serum concentrations of the pharmacologically inactive indole acetic acid metabolite of sumatriptan were fourfold to fivefold higher than corresponding sumatriptan concentrations. Overall, these studies show the sumatriptan intranasal spray formulation is well tolerated, allows rapid absorption of sumatriptan, and results in only a clinically insignificant degree of sumatriptan accumulation upon repeated dosing.

Correlation between self-reported adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and virologic outcome.

The Patient Medication Adherence Questionnaire Version 1.0 (PMAQ-V1.0) is a patient-reported adherence instrument to assess medication-taking behaviors and identify barriers to adherence with antiretroviral therapy. To assess the correlation between adherence and virologic outcome, the PMAQ-V1.0 was administered to 194 antiretroviral-experienced adults with HIV infection enrolled in a 16-week evaluation of protease inhibitor-containing regimens featuring a lamivudine/ zidovudine combination tablet. At baseline, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were less than 10,000 copies/mL and CD4+-cell counts were equal to or greater than 300 x 106/L; patients had been receiving a conventional regimen of lamivudine + zidovudine (separately) plus a protease inhibitor for at least 10 weeks immediately prior to the study. Forty-eight percent of patients who reported missing at least one dose of a nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) during the study had detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA, compared with 26% of patients who reported no missed doses (P = .002). Patients who missed at least one dose of an NRTI or protease inhibitor were 2.5 times more likely to have quantifiable HIV-1 RNA than those who reported no missed doses. Patients who reported fewer barriers and more motivators to adherence had better virologic outcomes (P = .001). Several dimensions of the PMAQ-V1.0 did not function as well as hypothesized. In this study, self-reported adherence derived from the PMAQ-V1.0 predicted virologic outcomes, but further refinement of the dimensions appears warranted.

Pharmacokinetics of Zidovudine and Lamivudine in Neonates following Coadministration of Oral Doses Every 12 Hours

A phase I, repeat‐dose, open‐label study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of zidovudine and lamivudine, coadministered orally every 12 hours, in 16 neonates whose mothers were infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1). The prospective mothers had been stabilized on a zidovudine/lamivudine regimen since week 36 of pregnancy to prevent mother‐to‐child transmission of HIV During 1 week postpartum, the mothers received zidovudine 300 mg plus lamivudine 150 mg every 12 hours and breastfed. Neonatal treatment was initiated 12 hours following birth with 4 mg/kg of zidovudine suspension plus 2 mg/kg of lamivudine solution every 12 hours; this regimen was continued for 1 week. Between days 1 and 7 of neonatal treatment, the neonatal oral clearance (CL/F) of zidovudine and lamivudine increased by 2‐fold (p < 0.001) and 1.6‐fold (p = 0.004), respectively, possibly reflecting maturation of intestinal hepatic and renal function occurring during the first week of life. Day 7/day 1 ratios for exposure (area under the serum concentration‐time curve [AUC]) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax) were 0.48 and 0.63, respectively, for zidovudine and 0.64 and 0.73, respectively, for lamivudine. At the time of delivery, the geometric mean cord/maternal concentration ratio was 1.24 for zidovudine and 1.12 for lamivudine, indicating free passage of each drug across the placenta. The maternal and neonatal treatment regimens were well tolerated. The results of this study confirm that in the neonate, a convenient regimen combining zidovudine 4 mg/kg and lamivudine 2 mg/kg, administered orally every 12 hours, provides zidovudine serum exposure very similar to that reported with the standard neonatal zidovudine regimen of 2 mg/kg every 6 hours, as well as lamivudine serum exposure within the range reported in adults receiving lamivudine 15 0mg twice a day and children receiving 4 mg/kg twice a day.

Substituting abacavir for hyperlipidemia-associated protease inhibitors in HAART regimens improves fasting lipid profiles, maintains virologic suppression, and simplifies treatment.

BackgroundHyperlipidemia secondary to protease inhibitors (PI) may abate by switching to anti-HIV medications without lipid effects.MethodAn open-label, randomized pilot study compared changes in fasting lipids and HIV-1 RNA in 104 HIV-infected adults with PI-associated hyperlipidemia (fasting serum total cholesterol >200 mg/dL) who were randomized either to a regimen in which their PI was replaced by abacavir 300 mg twice daily (n = 52) or a regimen in which their PI was continued (n = 52) for 28 weeks. All patients had undetectable viral loads (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) at baseline and were naïve to abacavir and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.ResultsAt baseline, the mean total cholesterol was 243 mg/dL, low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol 149 mg/dL, high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol 41 mg/dL, and triglycerides 310 mg/dL. Mean CD4+ cell counts were 551 and 531 cells/mm3 in the abacavir-switch and PI-continuation arms, respectively. At week 28, the abacavir-switch arm had significantly greater least square mean reduction from baseline in total cholesterol (-42 vs -10 mg/dL, P < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (-14 vs +5 mg/dL, P = 0.016), and triglycerides (-134 vs -36 mg/dL, P = 0.019) than the PI-continuation arm, with no differences in HDL-cholesterol (+0.2 vs +1.3 mg/dL, P = 0.583). A higher proportion of patients in the abacavir-switch arm had decreases in protocol-defined total cholesterol and triglyceride toxicity grades, whereas a smaller proportion had increases in these toxicity grades. At week 28, an intent-to treat: missing = failure analysis showed that the abacavir-switch and PI-continuation arms did not differ significantly with respect to proportion of patients maintaining HIV-1 RNA <400 or <50 copies/mL or adjusted mean change from baseline in CD4+ cell count. Two possible abacavir-related hypersensitivity reactions were reported. No significant changes in glucose, insulin, insulin resistance, C-peptide, or waist-to-hip ratios were observed in either treatment arm, nor were differences in these parameters noted between treatments.ConclusionIn hyperlipidemic, antiretroviral-experienced patients with HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL and CD4+ cell counts >500 cells/mm3, substituting abacavir for hyperlipidemia-associated PIs in combination antiretroviral regimens improves lipid profiles and maintains virologic suppression over a 28-week period, and it simplifies treatment.

Comparison of Once-Daily Fosamprenavir Boosted with Either 100 or 200 mg of Ritonavir, in Combination with Abacavir/Lamivudine: 96-Week Results from COL100758

The long-term efficacy of once-daily (qd) fosamprenavir (FPV) 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 100 mg (FPV/r100) has not been evaluated previously. A 96-week open-label, randomized, multicenter study compared the efficacy/safety of FPV/r100 with FPV 1400 mg boosted by ritonavir 200 mg qd (FPV/r200), plus abacavir/lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg qd, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL)> or =1000 copies/ml. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving VL <400 copies/ml or discontinuing for drug-related reasons. In the intent-to-treat:exposed (ITT-E) population, missing = failure (M = F), and observed approaches were used to assess between-arm differences in VL responses by Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and CD4(+) count by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. One hundred and fifteen (115) patients enrolled, with 58 on FPV/r100 (median VL 4.7 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 259 cells/mm(3)) and 57 on FPV/r200 (median VL 4.9 log(10) copies/ml; CD4(+) count 179 cells/mm(3)). Fewer FPV/r100-treated patients discontinued treatment prematurely (12 vs. 24) and experienced virologic failure (5 vs. 8, none developing major protease inhibitor resistance mutations). At week 96, more FPV/r100-treated patients had VL <400 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 78% (45/58) vs. 53% (30/57), p = 0.006; observed: 98% (45/46) vs. 94% (30/32)] and VL<50 copies/ml [ITT-E,M = F: 66% (38/58) vs. 53% (30/57); observed: 83% (38/46) vs. 94% (30/32)]. The FPV/r100 and FPV/r200 arms were similar at week 96 regarding median change from baseline in CD4(+) count (+265 vs. +260 cells/mm(3)) and total cholesterol (+33 vs. +35 mg/dl), and in total-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (4.0 vs. 4.1) and type/frequency of treatment-related grade 2-4 adverse events, although FPV/r100 was associated with a lower elevation in triglycerides (+27 vs. +48 mg/dl). In conclusion, through 96 weeks, FPV/r100 was more effective and prompted less elevation in triglycerides than FPV/r200.

Albuterol extended-release products: effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of single oral doses of Volmax and Proventil Repetabs in healthy male volunteers.

The absorption of albuterol from a single 4‐mg oral dose of Volmax® and Proventil® Repetabs® was investigated under both fasting and fed conditions in an open‐label, randomized, four‐period, crossover study in 24 healthy male volunteers. Blood was collected for determination of albuterol plasma concentrations by HPLC over 30 hours postdose. Twenty subjects were evaluable for data analysis. The mean Cmax for Volmax;® administered after a meal was 19% lower than that of the drug administered in a fasting state (3.9 ng/mL vs. 4.8 ng/mL; P <.01). An almost equivalent lowering of the mean Cmax (by 21%) was observed for Proventil® Repetabs® after administration with a meal versus fasting (4.2 ng/mL vs. 5.3 ng/mL; P <.01). There were no significant differences between the two formulations in the degree of Cmax reduction due to the presence of food. The tmax occurred significantly later during the fed treatment for Volmax® only (4.9 hours fasted vs. 6.4 hours fed; P <.01). The lag time was significantly greater during the fed treatments for Volmax®. No differences were observed in the area under the plasma concentration—time curve (AUC) for either formulation under fasting versus fed conditions, suggesting that the extent of absortion was not altered by food. Overall, food caused a more sustained release of albuterol from both Volmax® and Proventil® Repetab®.