Gary Lesoing

On-farm experiment designs and implications for locating research sites

Research plots that are large enough to accommodate regular farm machinery are thought to contain too much field variation to allow reliable interpretation of experimental results. This study was conducted to determine whether experimental error was controlled on a wide variety of agricultural field trials that used plots larger than normally used by researchers. The investigation included trials conducted on an experiment station and trials conducted on actual commercial farms. The planning and management of the experiments ranged from those completely conducted by university researchers to those completely done by farmers. The level of experimental error in all the trials was well within the limits normally accepted by researchers in agronomy. Plots ranging in length from 125 to 1200 feet and as wide as one or two passes of standard farm machinery gave experimental results that were statistically sound. Statistical requirements for randomization and replication were all met. The ability to use large plots and farmer participation enhances the testing of new technology on farms. This leads to new opportunities to test crop production factors in a systems setting under actual farm conditions. The statistical reliability of the on-farm designs analyzed in this study should increase cooperation among researchers, extension workers, and farmers in research activities.

Fractal analysis of spatial and temporal variability

Abstract Characterizing spatial and temporal variability is important in variable rate (VRAT) or long-term studies. This study was conducted to compare spatial variability of soil nitrate in a VRAT nitrogen (N) application study and temporal variability of soybean (Glycine max L.) yield in a long-term organic vs. inorganic study. In the VRAT study, conventional uniform N application was compared with variable rate and variable rate minus 15% N. In the long-term experiment, soybean yields under organic (manure application), fertilizer, and fertilizer plus herbicide systems were studied from 1975 to 1991. Semivariograms were estimated for soil nitrate in the VRAT and for soybean yield in the long-term study. The slope of the regression line of log semivariogram vs. log lag (h, distance or year) was used to estimate the fractal dimension (D), which is an indication of variability pattern. The intercepts (log k) of the log–log lines, which indicate extent of variability, were also compared between treatments. There was no significant effect of the N treatments on the D-values in the VRAT study. The extent of spatial variability for residual soil nitrate became significantly less after imposing N application regimes. The variable rate N application had lower log k-values than uniform application indicating reduced soil nitrate variability with VRAT N application. In the long-term study, all three management systems had similar D and log k-values for soybean yield indicating similar temporal yield variability for the three systems. The three management systems used did not change temporal effects on soybean yield. Rainfall during July and August accounted for 65% of variability in soybean grain yield. Fractal and covariance analyses can be effectively used to compare treatments or management systems for spatial or temporal variability.