Gary M. Levin

Role of Propofol in Refractory Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of the proposed mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and therapeutic considerations associated with the use of propofol in the management of patients with refractory status epilepticus. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE database (January 1966–April 1998) was searched for literature pertaining to status epilepticus and propofol. Additional literature was obtained from the references of selected articles identified in the search. Information from all articles published in English was considered for inclusion in the article. DATA SYNTHESIS: Propofol is a unique, nonbarbiturate, anesthetic agent possessing anticonvulsant properties, although the exact anticonvulsant mechanism is unknown. Several case reports and two small, open, uncontrolled studies have described the efficacy of propofol in refractory status epilepticus. Most of these clinical reports discuss the utility of propofol after traditional treatment regimens have failed or are not tolerated. Initiation of propofol usually resulted in termination of seizure activity and/or electroencephalographic burst suppression within seconds that was sustained during the drugs use. Additionally, propofol was well tolerated. Advantages of propofol compared with traditional barbiturate anesthetic agents include better cardiovascular tolerability and a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile, allowing for rapid assessment of efficacy and neurologic assessment upon drug withdrawal. Propofol has been associated with a variety of neuroexcitatory adverse events such as opisthotonos, muscle rigidity, and choreoathetoid movements. Additionally, although the data are inconclusive, propofol has also been reported to cause seizures. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol has shown promising results in the management of refractory status epilepticus when traditional therapies have failed or were not tolerated; however, controlled clinical trials are needed to better assess the comparative efficacy, neurologic adverse effects, and clinical outcome to better define its role in refractory status epilepticus.

Assessment of Human Serotonin 1A Receptor Polymorphisms and SSRI Responsiveness

AbstractBackground: Depression is thought to involve, in part, dysregulation of serotonergic neurotransmission. In depressed individuals, the number of serotonin receptors, including the 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin)-1A (5-HT1A) autoreceptors, are increased. Clinical improvement with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is not usually observed until several weeks after treatment initiation. This delay may be due to the time it takes for the autoreceptors to downregulate. Roughly one-third of patients with depression do not respond to an initial trial of antidepressant medication treatment, possibly as a result of structural variations in the 5-HT1A receptor. Aims: This study was designed to determine the allelic frequency of seven 5-HT1A receptor polymorphisms in a depressed versus a nondepressed population, and in SSRI responders versus nonresponders. All the polymorphisms studied are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the HTR1A gene, which encodes 5-HT1A. Seven prevalent SNPs were included in the analysis. Results: The study showed no relationship between any of the HTR1A polymorphisms and SSRI responders versus nonresponders. Conclusion: While the study has several limitations, the results are consistent with a growing body of literature that suggests that the pharmacogenetics of depression (an inherently complex disorder) may turn out to be multifactorial, and may include the HTR1A gene in concert with other serotonin-related genes.

Quetiapine, an Atypical Antipsychotic

The discovery of antipsychotic agents in the 1950s revolutionized the treatment of schizophrenia. A large body of evidence supports the dopamine D2 receptor antagonists efficacy in the treatment of psychotic symptoms. However, the advent of newer agents seems to point to a more complex interaction of neurotransmission in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In fact, a defining characteristic of atypical agents is a higher ratio of serotonin (5HT2) receptor blockade to D2 receptor blockade. Clozapine was the first atypical agent to be introduced; it was followed by risperidone, olanzapine, and now quetiapine, which is a dibenzothiazepine derivative structurally related to clozapine and olanzapine.

Factors Affecting Prescribing of the Newer Antidepressants

OBJECTIVE: To survey various prescriber types and specialties to determine whether differences exist in prescribing patterns for the newer antidepressants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A survey about prescribing of the newer antidepressants was mailed to 1500 New York state licensed prescribers who were randomly selected from membership rosters. Nurse practitioners; physician assistants and physicians in family medicine, primary care, general practice, and internal medicine; and psychiatrists were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescriber responses regarding factors involved with choosing among the newer antidepressants. RESULTS: A total of 508 surveys (36%) were returned, of which 398 (29%) were acceptable for analysis. In choosing among the newer antidepressants, most prescribers ranked patient diagnosis and past success as a high priority, and free drug samples and drug-representative detailing as a low priority. The majority of each prescriber type preferred fluoxetine for major depression and depression associated with fatigue; paroxetine for concomitant anxiety and depression, as well as for panic disorder; and sertraline for geriatric patients and patients with suicidal ideation. Differences existed between the prescriber groups when asked whether prescribing habits for the newer antidepressants were based on familiarity with a particular agent (p = 0.0009) and on labeled indications (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate prescribing preferences for the newer antidepressants among different prescriber groups. Additional studies are needed to determine predictors of patient response to newer antidepressants and clinical guidelines for their use.

Citalopram in the treatment of depression and other potential uses in psychiatry.

During the past decade, treatment options for depression have increased with the introduction of new agents. Older agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, increase noradrenergic and serotonergic neurotransmission. Attempts to separate antidepressant effects from adverse effects led to the development of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Citalopram is the newest SSRI to be marketed in the United States. Of all SSRIs on the market, it is the most selective for serotonin reuptake pump. Its efficacy in treating depression was evident in both placebo‐controlled and comparator trials. In addition, citalopram was studied in the treatment of other psychiatric disorders. The agent has less inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes than other SSRIs, possibly giving it a lower potential for drug interactions.

Long‐term Use of Atypical Antipsychotics in Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder is a chronic disease that may require lifetime treatment. The maintenance therapy of bipolar disorder can be challenging for the treating clinician. Currently, according to the American Psychiatric Association (APA) guidelines, lithium, valproic acid, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and the antipsychotics are recommended for the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. The antipsychotics are recommended to be continued only if the clinician decides that they are necessary for the control of persistent psychosis or for prophylaxis against recurrence. Although the APA guidelines provide sufficient evidence for the use of these mood stabilizers, newer drugs such as the atypical antipsychotics are being investigated for use in the maintenance phase of treatment of bipolar disorder.

Methamphetamine and fluoxetine treatment of a child with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

ABSTRACT An 11-year-old child with obsessive-compulsive disorder, major depression, and attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder was successfully treated with a combination of fluoxetine (mean 30 mg daily) and methamphetamine (sustained release 10 mg daily). Methamphetamine was selected because of the desirability of avoiding stimulants whose commercial formulations contain food dyes (this child appeared sensitive to tartrazine in dextroamphetamine and other agents), whose effects on hepatic metabolism were minimal (unlike methylphenidate) and whose mechanism of action is reliably rapid (unlike pemoline). Although methamphetamine carries the stigma of an abusable drug and has been implicated in neurotoxicity in animals when used at extremely high doses, methamphetamine may have certain advantages over other psychostimulants in some clinical situations. The combined use of fluoxetine and methamphetamine did not appear to be associated with significant adverse effects.

Mania with Bupropion: A Dose-Related Phenomenon?

OBJECTIVE: To report a case in which bipolar depression was resistant to usual therapies, requiring dosages of bupropion >450 mg/d and to review the literature on mania associated with bupropion and propose a potential theory of a dose-related threshold associated with bupropion and mania. CASE SUMMARY: A 44-year-old white man with a 25-year history of bipolar affective disorder presented with depression resistant to usual therapies. Bupropion therapy was initiated and the dosage was titrated to 600 mg/d. After exceeding the maximum recommended daily dose (450 mg/d), he experienced a manic episode attrib uted to high-dose bupropion. DISCUSSION: Due to increased risk of seizures, current prescribing guidelines state that the total daily dose of bupropion is not to exceed 450 mg/d. Since bupropion is the agent least likely to cause a manic switch in bipolar disorder, this agent seemed a logical choice to treat the patients depression. Due to a lack of response, the bupropion dosage was titrated to a maximum of 600 mg/d. Since the patient did not switch into mania until the dosage exceeded 450 mg/d, we speculate that this adverse reaction is a dose-related phenomenon. Scientific literature supports this theory. CONCLUSIONS: A switch into mania is a potential risk associated with antidepressant drug use in bipolar affective disorder. Bupropion is believed to be associated with a decreased risk compared with other antidepressant therapies. However, our case report as well as others support the theory that this decreased risk may be due to dosages not exceeding the recommended daily dose (450 mg/d). Doses of bupropion >450 mg/d should be used with caution in depressed patients with bipolar affective disorder.

A Review of Cyclic Antidepressant-Induced Blood Dyscrasias

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature for cases of blood dyscrasias associated with cyclic antidepressants. Several types of blood dyscrasias are discussed. DATA SOURCES: All references were selected through the use of MEDLINE. Indexing terms were blood, abnormalities, dyscrasias, antidepressants, agranulocytosis, and eosinophilia. The only constraints were English language and human subjects. STUDY SELECTION: All cases were included except for letters to the editor of various journals when pertinent data such as doses and additional medications were omitted. DATA SYNTHESIS: The review provides a table listing the different blood dyscrasias and the drug the patient was receiving. The table also includes time of onset, time to recovery, and several symptoms for each patient. CONCLUSIONS: Common symptoms of various blood dyscrasias are discussed. The chemical structures of the antidepressants are related to phenothiazines, which are also implicated in causing blood dyscrasias. Recommendations for treatment of both the dyscrasia and depression are discussed.

Sertindole, a New Atypical Antipsychotic for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

The introduction of antipsychotics for the management of schizophrenia greatly improved the quality of life of many patients suffering from this debilitating disease. Although typical antipsychotic drugs represent a significant advancement in psychopharmacology, they carry a heavy side effect burden, have little efficacy in the management of negative symptoms, and are ineffective in about one‐third of patients with schizophrenia. Atypical antipsychotic agents characterized the next major advancement in pharmacotherapy They differ from typical antipsychotics in their mechanism of action, side effect profiles, and clinical efficacy. Sertindole is a new atypical antipsychotic.