Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Gary M. Lovett is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Gary M. Lovett.


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2005

Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems

Aaron M. Ellison; Michael S. Bank; Barton D. Clinton; Elizabeth A. Colburn; Katherine J. Elliott; Chelcy R. Ford; David R. Foster; Brian D. Kloeppel; Jennifer D. Knoepp; Gary M. Lovett; Jacqueline E. Mohan; David A. Orwig; Nicholas L. Rodenhouse; William V. Sobczak; Kristina A. Stinson; Jeffrey K. Stone; Christopher M. Swan; Jill Thompson; Betsy Von Holle; Jackson R. Webster

In many forested ecosystems, the architecture and functional ecology of certain tree species define forest structure and their species-specific traits control ecosystem dynamics. Such foundation tree species are declining throughout the world due to introductions and outbreaks of pests and pathogens, selective removal of individual taxa, and over-harvesting. Through a series of case studies, we show that the loss of foundation tree species changes the local environment on which a variety of other species depend; how this disrupts fundamental ecosystem processes, including rates of decomposition, nutrient fluxes, carbon sequestration, and energy flow; and dramatically alters the dynamics of associated aquatic ecosystems. Forests in which dynamics are controlled by one or a few foundation species appear to be dominated by a small number of strong interactions and may be highly susceptible to alternating between stable states following even small perturbations. The ongoing decline of many foundation species provides a set of important, albeit unfortunate, opportunities to develop the research tools, models, and metrics needed to identify foundation species, anticipate the cascade of immediate, short- and long-term changes in ecosystem structure and function that will follow from their loss, and provide options for remedial conservation and management.


Ecosystems | 2006

Reconciling carbon-cycle concepts, terminology, and methods

F. S. Chapin; George M. Woodwell; James T. Randerson; Edward B. Rastetter; Gary M. Lovett; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Deborah A. Clark; Mark E. Harmon; David S. Schimel; Riccardo Valentini; Christian Wirth; John D. Aber; Jonathan J. Cole; Michael L. Goulden; Jennifer W. Harden; Martin Heimann; Robert W. Howarth; Pamela A. Matson; A. D. McGuire; Jerry M. Melillo; Harold A. Mooney; Jason C. Neff; R. A. Houghton; Michael L. Pace; Michael G. Ryan; Steven W. Running; Osvaldo E. Sala; William H. Schlesinger; Ernst-Detlef Schulze

Recent projections of climatic change have focused a great deal of scientific and public attention on patterns of carbon (C) cycling as well as its controls, particularly the factors that determine whether an ecosystem is a net source or sink of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Net ecosystem production (NEP), a central concept in C-cycling research, has been used by scientists to represent two different concepts. We propose that NEP be restricted to just one of its two original definitions—the imbalance between gross primary production (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER). We further propose that a new term—net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB)—be applied to the net rate of C accumulation in (or loss from [negative sign]) ecosystems. Net ecosystem carbon balance differs from NEP when C fluxes other than C fixation and respiration occur, or when inorganic C enters or leaves in dissolved form. These fluxes include the leaching loss or lateral transfer of C from the ecosystem; the emission of volatile organic C, methane, and carbon monoxide; and the release of soot and CO2 from fire. Carbon fluxes in addition to NEP are particularly important determinants of NECB over long time scales. However, even over short time scales, they are important in ecosystems such as streams, estuaries, wetlands, and cities. Recent technological advances have led to a diversity of approaches to the measurement of C fluxes at different temporal and spatial scales. These approaches frequently capture different components of NEP or NECB and can therefore be compared across scales only by carefully specifying the fluxes included in the measurements. By explicitly identifying the fluxes that comprise NECB and other components of the C cycle, such as net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and net biome production (NBP), we can provide a less ambiguous framework for understanding and communicating recent changes in the global C cycle.


Science | 1986

Atmospheric Deposition and Canopy Interactions of Major Ions in a Forest

Steven E. Lindberg; Gary M. Lovett; Daniel D. Richter; Dale W. Johnson

Airborne particles and vapors contributed significantly to the nutrient requirements and the pollutant load of a mixed hardwood forest in the eastern United States. Dry deposition was an important mechanism of atmospheric input to the foliar canopy, occurring primarily by vapor uptake for sulfur, nitrogen, and free acidity and by particle deposition for calcium and potassium. The canopy retained 50 to 70 percent of the deposited free acidity and nitrogen, but released calcium and potassium. Atmospheric deposition supplied 40 and 100 percent of the nitrogen and sulfur requirements, respectively, for the annual woody increment. This contribution was underestimated significantly by standard bulk deposition collectors.


Ecology | 2002

BELOWGROUND ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGAL COMMUNITY CHANGE OVER A NITROGEN DEPOSITION GRADIENT IN ALASKA

Erik A. Lilleskov; Timothy J. Fahey; Thomas R. Horton; Gary M. Lovett

Nitrogen availability may be a major factor structuring ectomycorrhizal fungal communities. Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition has been implicated in the decline of ectomycorrhizal fungal (EMF) sporocarp diversity. We previously characterized the pattern of decreased sporocarp species richness over an anthropogenic N deposition gradient in Alaska (USA). To determine whether this change in sporocarp community structure was paralleled below ground, we used molecular and morphological techniques to characterize the ectomycorrhizal community of white spruce (Picea glauca) over this gradient. We then related patterns of richness and relative abundance of taxa to various N-affected environmental parameters. Species richness of EMF declined dramatically with increasing N inputs. Over 30 taxa were identified at the low-N sites, compared with nine at the high-N sites. Low-N site dominants (Piloderma spp., Amphinema byssoides, Cortinarius spp., and various dark-mantled Tomentella spp.) disappeared completely at th...


Biogeochemistry | 1998

The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook

Gene E. Likens; Charles T. Driscoll; Donald C. Buso; Thomas G. Siccama; Chris E. Johnson; Gary M. Lovett; Timothy J. Fahey; William A. Reiners; Douglas F. Ryan; C.W. Martin; Scott W. Bailey

AbstractA synthesis of the biogeochemistry of Ca was done during 1963–1992in reference and human-manipulated forest ecosystems of the Hubbard BrookExperimental Forest (HBEF), NH. Results showed that there has been a markeddecline in concentration and input of Ca in bulk precipitation, an overalldecline in concentration and output of Ca in stream water, and markeddepletion of Ca in soils of the HBEF since 1963. The decline in streamwaterCa was related strongly to a decline in SO


BioScience | 2006

Forest Ecosystem Responses to Exotic Pests and Pathogens in Eastern North America

Gary M. Lovett; Charles D. Canham; Mary A. Arthur; Kathleen C. Weathers; Ross D. Fitzhugh


Ecological Applications | 1994

Atmospheric Deposition of Nutrients and Pollutants in North America: An Ecological Perspective

Gary M. Lovett

_4^{2 - }


Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment | 2007

Who needs environmental monitoring

Gary M. Lovett; Douglas A. Burns; Charles T. Driscoll; Jennifer C. Jenkins; Myron J. Mitchell; Lindsey E. Rustad; James B. Shanley; Gene E. Likens; Richard Haeuber


Ecological Applications | 1993

A Spatial Model of Atmospheric Deposition for the Northeastern U.S.

Scott V. Ollinger; John D. Aber; Gary M. Lovett; Sarah Millham; Richard G. Lathrop; Jennifer M. Ellis

+NO


Ecosystems | 2002

Control of Nitrogen Loss from Forested Watersheds by Soil Carbon:Nitrogen Ratio and Tree Species Composition

Gary M. Lovett; Kathleen C. Weathers; Mary A. Arthur

Collaboration


Dive into the Gary M. Lovett's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gene E. Likens

University of Connecticut

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter M. Groffman

City University of New York

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Myron J. Mitchell

State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas A. Burns

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge