Gary Peters

Rivaroxaban for secondary stroke prevention in patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source: Design of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial

Background Embolic strokes of undetermined source comprise up to 20% of ischemic strokes. The stroke recurrence rate is substantial with aspirin, widely used for secondary prevention. The New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus ASA to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source international trial will compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, versus aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with recent embolic strokes of undetermined source. Main hypothesis In patients with recent embolic strokes of undetermined source, rivaroxaban 15 mg once daily will reduce the risk of recurrent stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism (primary efficacy outcome) compared with aspirin 100 mg once daily. Design Double-blind, randomized trial in patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source, defined as nonlacunar cryptogenic ischemic stroke, enrolled between seven days and six months from the qualifying stroke. The planned sample size of 7000 participants will be recruited from approximately 480 sites in 31 countries between 2014 and 2017 and followed for a mean of about two years until at least 450 primary efficacy outcome events have occurred. The primary safety outcome is major bleeding. Two substudies assess (1) the relative effect of treatments on MRI-determined covert brain infarcts and (2) the biological underpinnings of embolic strokes of undetermined source using genomic and biomarker approaches. Summary The New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus ASA to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source trial is evaluating the benefits and risks of rivaroxaban for secondary stroke prevention in embolic strokes of undetermined source patients. Main results are anticipated in 2018.

Rivaroxaban for Stroke Prevention after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source

Background Embolic strokes of undetermined source represent 20% of ischemic strokes and are associated with a high rate of recurrence. Anticoagulant treatment with rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, may result in a lower risk of recurrent stroke than aspirin. Methods We compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (at a daily dose of 15 mg) with aspirin (at a daily dose of 100 mg) for the prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with recent ischemic stroke that was presumed to be from cerebral embolism but without arterial stenosis, lacune, or an identified cardioembolic source. The primary efficacy outcome was the first recurrence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism in a time‐to‐event analysis; the primary safety outcome was the rate of major bleeding. Results A total of 7213 participants were enrolled at 459 sites; 3609 patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban and 3604 to receive aspirin. Patients had been followed for a median of 11 months when the trial was terminated early because of a lack of benefit with regard to stroke risk and because of bleeding associated with rivaroxaban. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 172 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 5.1%) and in 160 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.8%) (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.33; P=0.52). Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 158 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 4.7%) and in 156 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 4.7%). Major bleeding occurred in 62 patients in the rivaroxaban group (annualized rate, 1.8%) and in 23 in the aspirin group (annualized rate, 0.7%) (hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.39; P<0.001). Conclusions Rivaroxaban was not superior to aspirin with regard to the prevention of recurrent stroke after an initial embolic stroke of undetermined source and was associated with a higher risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bayer and Janssen Research and Development; NAVIGATE ESUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02313909.)

Hormonal Effects on Tirilazad Clearance in Women: Assessment of the Role of CYP3A

This study assessed whether the previously reported difference in tirilazad clearance between pre‐ and postmenopausal women is reversed by hormone replacement and whether this observation can be explained by differences in CYP3A4 activity. Ten healthy women from each group were enrolled: premenopausal (ages 18–35), postmenopausal (ages 50–70), postmenopausal receiving estrogen, and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen and progestin. Volunteers received 0.0145 mg/kg midazolam and 3.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate intravenously on separate days. Plasma tirilazad and midazolam were measured by HPLC/dual mass spectrophotometry (MS/MS) assays. Tirilazad clearance was significantly higher in premenopausal women (0.51 ± 0.09 L/hr/kg) than in postmenopausal groups (0.34 ± 0.07, 0.32 ± 0.06, and 0.36 ± 0.08 L/hr/kg, respectively) (p = 0.0001). Midazolam clearance (0.64 ± 0.12 L/hr/kg) was significantly higher in premenopausal women compared to postmenopausal groups (0.47 ± 0.11, 0.49 ± 0.11, and 0.53 ± 0.19 L/hr/kg, respectively) (p = 0.037). Tirilazad clearance was weakly correlated with midazolam clearance (r2 = 0.129, p = 0.02). Tirilazad clearance is faster in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women, but the effect of menopause on clearance is not reversed by hormone replacement. Tirilazad clearance in these women is weakly related to midazolam clearance, a marker of CYP3A activity.

Rivaroxaban: a novel oral anticoagulant for the prevention and treatment of several thrombosis‐mediated conditions

The development of rivaroxaban (XARELTO®) is an important new medical advance in the field of oral anticoagulation. Thrombosis‐mediated conditions constitute a major burden for patients, healthcare systems, and society. For more than 60 years, the prevention and treatment of these conditions have been dominated by oral vitamin K antagonists (such as warfarin) and the injectable heparins. Thrombosis can lead to several conditions, including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, and/or death. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis with an effective, convenient‐to‐use oral anticoagulant with a favorable safety profile is critical, especially in an aging society in which the risk of thrombosis, and the potential for bleeding complications, is increasing. Rivaroxaban acts to prevent and treat thrombosis by potently inhibiting coagulation Factor Xa in the blood. Factor Xa converts prothrombin to thrombin, which initiates the formation of blood clots by converting fibrinogen to clot‐forming fibrin and leads to platelet activation. After a large and novel clinical development program in over 75,000 patients to date, rivaroxaban has received approval for multiple indications in the United States, European Union, and other countries worldwide to prevent and treat several thrombosis‐mediated conditions. This review will highlight some of the unique aspects of the rivaroxaban development program.

Induction of tirilazad clearance by phenytoin.

Tirilazad is a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor being studied for the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage; phenytoin is used for seizure prophylaxis in the same disorder. The induction of tirilazad clearance by phenytoin was assessed in 12 volunteers (6 male, 6 female). Subjects received phenytoin orally every 8 h for 7 days (200 mg for nine doses and 100 mg for 13 doses) in one phase of a crossover study. In both study phases, 1.5 mg kg−1 tirilazad mesylate was administered by IV infusion every 6 h for 29 doses. Tirilazad mesylate and U‐89678 (an active metabolite) in plasma were quantified by HPLC. After the final dose, tirilazad clearance was increased by 91.8% in subjects receiving phenytoin+tirilazad versus tirilazad alone. AUC0–6 for U‐89678 after the last tirilazad dose was reduced by 93.1% by concomitant phenytoin. These effects were statistically significant. The time course of induction was consistent with that of phenytoins effect on the ratio of urinary 6β ‐hydroxycortisol to cortisol, a measure of hepatic CYP3A activity. The results show that phenytoin induces metabolism of tirilazad and U‐89678 in healthy subjects and that, under these conditions, tirilazad clearance approaches liver blood flow.

Pharmacokinetics of Tirilazad and U-89678 in Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving a Loading Regimen and Maintenance Regimen of 10 mg/kg/day of Tirilazad

The pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate and its active reduced metabolite, U‐89678, were evaluated in ischemic stroke patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg tirilazad every 3 hours for the first 12 hours of dosing followed by 2.5 mg/kg every 6 hours for a total of 22 doses (5 days). Trough and serial samples drawn during the 6 hours after administration of the last dose were analyzed for plasma levels of tirilazad and U‐89678 by means of high‐performance liquid chromatography. Complete concentration—time profiles were available for 20 patients, including 12 men (mean age, 68.0 years) and 8 women (mean age, 75.0 years). Trough concentrations of tirilazad and U‐89678 were consistent with the loading regimen used. The mean area under the concentration—time curve from time 0 to 6 hours (AUC0–6) of tirilazad was 8181 ± 2398 ng · hr/mL in men and 8135 ± 3671 ng · hr/mL in women. The mean AUC0–6 of U‐89678 was 2761 ± 1834 ng · hr/mL in men and 1477 ± 903 ng · hr/mL in women. These results show that gender has a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of U‐89678 but little effect on the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad in elderly ischemic stroke patients. These observations are consistent with previous findings in healthy young and elderly subjects.

Characterization of Patients with Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source in the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND The New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial vs. ASA to Prevent Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE-ESUS) trial is a randomized phase-III trial comparing rivaroxaban versus aspirin in patients with recent ESUS. AIMS We aimed to describe the baseline characteristics of this large ESUS cohort to explore relationships among key subgroups. METHODS We enrolled 7213 patients at 459 sites in 31 countries. Prespecified subgroups for primary safety and efficacy analyses included age, sex, race, global region, stroke or transient ischemic attack prior to qualifying event, time to randomization, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. RESULTS Mean age was 66.9 ± 9.8 years; 24% were under 60 years. Older patients had more hypertension, coronary disease, and cancer. Strokes in older subjects were more frequently cortical and accompanied by radiographic evidence of prior infarction. Women comprised 38% of participants and were older than men. Patients from East Asia were oldest whereas those from Latin America were youngest. Patients in the Americas more frequently were on aspirin prior to the qualifying stroke. Acute cortical infarction was more common in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe, whereas prior radiographic infarctions were most common in East Asia. Approximately forty-five percent of subjects were enrolled within 30 days of the qualifying stroke, with earliest enrollments in Asia and Eastern Europe. CONCLUSIONS NAVIGATE-ESUS is the largest randomized trial comparing antithrombotic strategies for secondary stroke prevention in patients with ESUS. The study population encompasses a broad array of patients across multiple continents and these subgroups provide ample opportunities for future research.

Thrombin Exosite 1 Inhibition with JNJ-64179375 Inhibits Thrombus Formation in a Human Translational Model of Thrombosis

Abstract Aims JNJ-64179375 (hereafter JNJ-9375) is a first-in-class, highly specific, large molecule, exosite 1 thrombin inhibitor. In preclinical studies, JNJ-9375 demonstrated robust antithrombotic protection with a wider therapeutic index when compared to apixaban. The purpose of the present study was to examine for the first time the antiplatelet, anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects of JNJ-9375 in a translational model of ex vivo human thrombosis. Methods and results Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in a double-blind randomized crossover study of JNJ-9375 (2.5, 25, and 250 μg/mL), bivalirudin (6 μg/mL; positive control), and matched placebo. Coagulation, platelet activation, and thrombus formation were determined using coagulation assays, flow cytometry, and an ex vivo perfusion chamber, respectively. JNJ-9375 caused concentration-dependent prolongation of all measures of blood coagulation (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and thrombin time; P < 0.001 for all) and agonist selective inhibition of thrombin (0.1 U/mL) stimulated platelet p-selectin expression (P < 0.001) and platelet-monocyte aggregates (P = 0.002). Compared to placebo, JNJ-9375 (250 μg/mL) reduced mean total thrombus area by 41.1% (95% confidence intervals 22.3 to 55.3%; P < 0.001) at low shear and 32.3% (4.9 to 51.8%; P = 0.025) at high shear. Under both shear conditions, there was a dose-dependent decrease in fibrin-rich thrombus (P < 0.001 for both) but not platelet-rich thrombus (P = ns for both). Conclusion Exosite 1 inhibition with JNJ-9375 caused prolongation of blood coagulation, selective inhibition of thrombin-mediated platelet activation, and reductions in ex vivo thrombosis driven by a decrease in fibrin-rich thrombus formation. JNJ-9375 represents a novel class of anticoagulant with potential therapeutic applications.

A Cross‐Study Analysis Evaluating the Effects of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Rivaroxaban in Clinical Studies

US prescribing guidelines recommend that 15‐ and 20‐mg doses of rivaroxaban be administered with food for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and for reduction in the risk of recurrence of DVT and PE. In addition, the US prescribing guidelines recommend these doses be administered with an evening meal to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this model‐based cross‐study comparison was to examine the impact of food, with regard to both meal timing and content, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of rivaroxaban, using data collected during its clinical development. Results of this analysis showed that a PK model built from pooled data in the AF population (for whom rivaroxaban was administered with an evening meal) and in the DVT population (for whom rivaroxaban was administered with a morning meal) can describe both data sets well. Furthermore, the PK model built from data in the AF population alone can adequately predict the PK profile of the DVT population and vice versa. This cross‐study analysis also confirmed the findings from previous clinical pharmacology studies, which showed that meal content does not have a clinically relevant impact on the PK of rivaroxaban at 20 mg. Therefore, although the administration of rivaroxaban with food is necessary for maintaining high bioavailability, neither meal timing nor meal content appears to affect the PK of rivaroxaban.