Gary Rudnick

The Third Transmembrane Domain of the Serotonin Transporter Contains Residues Associated with Substrate and Cocaine Binding

Twenty residues in the third transmembrane domain of the serotonin transporter (SERT) were mutated, one at a time, to cysteine. Almost all of these mutants were fully active for serotonin (5-HT) transport and insensitive to inactivation by the positively charged cysteine reagent [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosul-fonate (MTSET). Two active mutants, I172C and I179C, were sensitive to rapid inactivation by MTSET but were relatively insensitive to the negatively charged reagent (2-sulfonatoethyl)methanethiosulfonate (MTSES). Inactivation of I172C was blocked by 5-HT and cocaine, but I179C was not similarly protected. Replacement of Tyr-175 with cysteine resulted in a mutant with low transport activity, and, at the neighboring Tyr-176, cysteine replacement completely blocked transport. The Y175C and Y176C mutants were expressed on the cell surface at levels 84% and 69%, respectively, that of wild type (C109A) SERT. Mutants Y175C and Y176C had lower cocaine affinity than C109A, as measured by displacement of the high affinity cocaine analog 2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-[125I]iodophenyl)tropane (β-CIT). For Y176C, 5-HT affinity also was decreased. MTSET inactivated β-CIT binding to I172C and Y176C, but only slightly inhibited binding to I179C and C109A. The MTSET sensitivity of cysteine replacements at positions 172, 176, and 179 was not observed when these positions were replaced with alanine, serine, or methionine. The results suggest that Ile-172, Tyr-176 and Ile-179 are on one face of an α-helical transmembrane element, and that Ile-172 and Tyr-176 are in proximity to the binding site for 5-HT and cocaine.

Determination of External Loop Topology in the Serotonin Transporter by Site-directed Chemical Labeling

The transmembrane topology of the serotonin transporter (SERT) has been examined by measuring the reactivity of selected lysine and cysteine residues with extracellular reagents. An impermeant biotinylating reagent, sulfosuccinimidyl 2-(biotinamido)ethyl-1,3-dithiopropionate (NHS-SS-biotin), was shown to label SERT transiently expressed in cultured cells. Replacement of four lysine residues that were predicted to lie in external hydrophilic loops (eK-less) largely prevented the biotinylation reaction. Likewise, the cysteine-specific biotinylation reagentN-biotinylaminoethylmethanethiosulfonate (MTSEA-biotin) labeled wild type SERT but not a mutant in which Cys-109, predicted to lie in the first external loop, was replaced with alanine. These two mutant transporters reacted with the biotinylating reagents in digitonin-permeabilized cells, demonstrating that the abundant lysine and cysteine residues predicted to lie in intracellular hydrophilic domains were reactive but not accessible in intact cells. Mutants containing a single external lysine at positions 111, 194, 243, 319, 399, 490, and 571 reacted more readily with NHS-SS-biotin than did the eK-less mutant. Similarly, mutants with a single cysteine at positions 109, 310, 406, 489, and 564 reacted more readily with MTSEA-biotin than did the C109A mutant. All of these mutants were active and therefore likely to be folded correctly. These results support the original transmembrane topology and argue against an alternative topology proposed recently for the related glycine and γ-aminobutyric acid transporters.

Cell-specific Sorting of Biogenic Amine Transporters Expressed in Epithelial Cells

We have utilized polarized epithelial cells stably expressing neurotransmitter transporters to analyze the sorting behavior of these membrane proteins. The transporters for serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), and norepinephrine (NE) are expected to be present in situ in the most distal extremities of axonal membranes, where they terminate the action of their biogenic amine substrates. Both Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) and LLC-PK1 cells were stably transfected with cDNAs encoding either the rat 5-HT transporter (SERT), the human NE transporter (NET), or the rat or human DA transporter (DAT). These cells were grown on permeable filter supports, and the transporters were localized by three independent techniques. Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy indicated that each of the transporters expressed in LLC-PK1 cells was sorted to the basolateral membrane, co-localizing with the Na+/K+-ATPase. In MDCK cells, however, DAT was located primarily on the apical surface, while SERT and NET were found on the basolateral membranes. Cell surface biotinylation using an impermeant biotinylating reagent confirmed the immunocytochemistry results. Thus, SERT and NET in MDCK cells were labeled more efficiently from the basolateral medium than the apical medium, and DAT in MDCK cells was labeled more efficiently from the apical side than the basolateral side. Transport measurements in transfected MDCK cells agreed with the immunocytochemistry and biotinylation results. These results suggest the existence of cell-specific mechanisms that discriminate between neurotransmitter transporters for surface expression and render unlikely any simple hypothesis that sorting mechanisms in neurons and epithelia are identical.

The Role of External Loop Regions in Serotonin Transport LOOP SCANNING MUTAGENESIS OF THE SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER EXTERNAL DOMAIN

Chimeric transporters were constructed in which the predicted external loops of the serotonin transporter (SERT) were replaced one at a time with a corresponding sequence from the norepinephrine transporter (NET). All of the chimeric transporters were expressed at levels equal to or greater than those of wild type SERT, but the transport and binding activity of the mutants varied greatly. In particular, mutants in which the NET sequence replaced external loops 4 or 6 of SERT had transport activity 5% or less than that of wild type, and the loop 5 replacement was essentially inactive. In some of these mutants, binding of a high affinity cocaine analog was less affected than transport, suggesting that the mutation had less effect on the initial binding steps in transport than on subsequent conformational changes. The more severely affected mutants also displayed an altered response to Na+. In contrast to the dramatic reduction in transport and binding, the specificity of ligand binding was essentially unchanged. Chimeric transporters did not gain affinity for dopamine, a NET substrate, or desipramine, an inhibitor, at the expense of affinity for serotonin or paroxetine, a selective SERT inhibitor. The results suggest that external loops are not the primary determinants of substrate and inhibitor binding sites. However, they are not merely passive structures connecting transmembrane segments but rather active elements responsible for maintaining the stability and conformational flexibility of the transporter.

Bioenergetics of Neurotransmitter Transport

Neurotransmitter transporters are essential components in the recycling of neurotransmitters released during neuronal activity. These transporters are the targets for important drugs affecting mood and behavior. They fall into at least four gene families, two encoding proteins in the plasma membrane and two in the synaptic vesicle membrane, although the known vesicular transporters have not all been cloned. Each of these transporters works by coupling the downhill movement of small ions such as Na+, Cl−, K+, and H+ to the uphill transport of neurotransmitter. Plasma membrane transporters move the transmitter into the cytoplasm by cotransport with Na+. Many transporters also couple Cl− cotransport to transmitter influx and these all belong to the NaCl-coupled family, although within the family the coupling stoichiometry can vary. Transporters for glutamate couple influx of this excitatory amino acid to Na+ and H+ influx and K+ efflux. Transporters in synaptic vesicles couple H+ efflux to neurotransmitter transport from the cytoplasm to the vesicle lumen.