Gary T. Marshall

Bicycle helmets are highly protective against traumatic brain injury within a dense urban setting.

BACKGROUND New York City (NYC) has made significant roadway infrastructure improvements, initiated a bicycle share program, and enacted Vision Zero, an action plan to reduce traffic deaths and serious injuries. The objective of this study was to examine whether bicycle helmets offer a protective advantage against traumatic brain injury (TBI) within a contemporary dense urban setting with a commitment to road safety. METHODS A prospective observational study of injured bicyclists presenting to a Level I trauma centre was performed. All bicyclists arriving within 24 h of injury were included. Data were collected between February, 2012 and August, 2014 and included demographics, imaging studies (e.g. computed tomography (CT)), injury patterns, and outcomes including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Injury Severity Score. RESULTS Of 699 patients, 273 (39.1%) were wearing helmets at the time of injury. Helmeted bicyclists were more likely to have a GCS of 15 (96.3% [95% Confidence Interval (CI), 93.3-98.2] vs. 87.6 [95% CI, 84.1-90.6]) at presentation. Helmeted bicyclists underwent fewer head CTs (40.3% [95% CI, 34.4-46.4] vs. 52.8% [95% CI, 48.0-57.6]) and were less likely to sustain intracranial injury (6.3% [95% CI, 2.6-12.5] vs. 19.7% [14.7-25.6]), including skull fracture (0.9% [95% CI, 0.0-4.9] vs. 15.3% [95% CI, 10.8-20.7]) and subdural hematoma (0.0% [95% CI, 0.0-3.2] vs. 8.1% [95% CI, 4.9-12.5]). Helmeted bicyclists were significantly less likely to sustain significant TBI, i.e. Head AIS ≥3 (2.6% [95% CI: 0.7-4.5] vs.10.6% [7.6-12.5]). Four patients underwent craniotomy while three died; all were un-helmeted. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that helmeted bicyclists were 72% less likely to sustain TBI compared with un-helmeted bicyclists (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.61). CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial road safety measures in NYC, the protective impact of simple bicycle helmets in the event of a crash remains significant. A re-assessment of helmet laws for urban bicyclists is advisable to most effectively translate Vision Zero from a political action plan to public safety reality.

Traumatic injury in the United States: In-patient epidemiology 2000–2011

BACKGROUND Trauma is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States (US). This analysis describes trends and annual changes in in-hospital trauma morbidity and mortality; evaluates changes in age and gender specific outcomes, diagnoses, causes of injury, injury severity and surgical procedures performed; and examines the role of teaching hospitals and Level 1 trauma centres in the care of severely injured patients. METHODS We conducted a retrospective descriptive and analytic epidemiologic study of an inpatient database representing 20,659,684 traumatic injury discharges from US hospitals between 2000 and 2011. The main outcomes and measures were survey-adjusted counts, proportions, means, standard errors, and 95% confidence intervals. We plotted time series of yearly data with overlying loess smoothing, created tables of proportions of common injuries and surgical procedures, and conducted survey-adjusted logistic regression analysis for the effect of year on the odds of in-hospital death with control variables for age, gender, weekday vs. weekend admission, trauma-centre status, teaching-hospital status, injury severity and Charlson index score. RESULTS The mean age of a person discharged from a US hospital with a trauma diagnosis increased from 54.08 (s.e.=0.71) in 2000 to 59.58 (s.e.=0.79) in 2011. Persons age 45-64 were the only age group to experience increasing rates of hospital discharges for trauma. The proportion of trauma discharges with a Charlson Comorbidity Index score greater than or equal to 3 nearly tripled from 0.048 (s.e.=0.0015) of all traumatic injury discharges in 2000 to 0.139 (s.e.=0.005) in 2011. The proportion of patients with traumatic injury classified as severe increased from 22% of all trauma discharges in 2000 (95% CI 21, 24) to 28% in 2011 (95% CI 26, 30). Level 1 trauma centres accounted for approximately 3.3% of hospitals. The proportion of severely injured trauma discharges from Level 1 trauma centres was 39.4% (95% CI 36.8, 42.1). Falls, followed by motor-vehicle crashes, were the most common causes of all injuries. The total cost of trauma-related inpatient care between 2001 and 2011 in the US was

A community traffic safety analysis of pedestrian and bicyclist injuries based on the catchment area of a trauma center

240.7 billion (95% CI 231.0, 250.5). Annual total US inpatient trauma-related hospital costs increased each year between 2001 and 2011, more than doubling from

Early lower extremity fracture fixation and the risk of early pulmonary embolus: filter before fixation?

12.0 billion (95% CI 10.5, 13.4) in 2001 to 29.1 billion (95% CI 25.2, 32.9) in 2011. CONCLUSIONS Trauma, which has traditionally been viewed as a predicament of the young, is increasingly a disease of the old. The strain of managing the progressively complex and costly care associated with this shift rests with a small number of trauma centres. Optimal care of injured patients requires a reappraisal of the resources required to effectively provide it given a mounting burden.

148 Preinjury Antithrombotic Therapy and the Elderly TBI Patient

BACKGROUND This study was designed to examine the characteristics of pedestrian and bicyclist collisions with motor vehicles within New York City’s high-density hub. The primary objectives were to map crash locations and to identify hot spots within these injury clusters. The secondary objective was to quantify differences in injury severity based on road type and user behaviors. METHODS Between December 2008 and June 2011, data were prospectively collected from pedestrians and bicyclists struck by motor vehicles and brought to Bellevue Hospital, a Level 1 trauma center in New York City. Behaviors by cohort (i.e., crossing patterns for pedestrians, riding patterns for bicyclists), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and collision locations were extracted from the database. Analyses of mean ISS were performed using a Student’s t test with a p < 0.05 considered significant. Geomaps were created to identify clusters or “hot spots,” where higher volumes of crashes occurred over time. Spatial analysis was performed to demonstrate whether these were random events. RESULTS A total of 1,457 patients (1,075 pedestrians and 382 bicyclists) were enrolled. Collision locations were known for 97.5%. Of the injured pedestrians, those crossing avenues (n = 277) had higher ISSs than those crossing streets (n = 522) (p = 0.01) and were more likely to die (p = 0.002). Pedestrians crossing midblock (n = 185) had higher mean ISSs than those crossing with the signal in the crosswalk (n = 320) (8.12 vs. 5.01, p < 0.001). Based on density mapping, hot spots of pedestrian collisions were detected in midtown Manhattan, while hot spots for bicyclists were detected at bridge and tunnel portals. Spatial analysis indicates that these are not random events (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Pedestrians injured on avenues sustained more serious injuries than those injured on narrower streets. A better understanding of collision locations and features may allow for tailored injury prevention strategies. Trauma centers serve an important role in public health surveillance within their local communities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic study, level III.

Operative Risk Stratification

BACKGROUND Venous thromboembolism is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after injury. Prophylactic anticoagulation is often delayed as a result of injuries or required procedures. Those patients at highest risk in this early vulnerable window postinjury are not well characterized. We sought to determine those patients at highest risk for an early pulmonary embolism (PE) after injury. METHODS A retrospective analysis using data derived from a large state wide trauma registry (1997-2007) was performed. Patients with a documented PE and time of occurrence were selected (n = 712). Patients with fat emboli and lower extremity vascular injuries were excluded. Patients with a PE within the first 72 hours of admission (EARLY, n = 122) were compared with those with DELAYED presentation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to characterize the timing of death between the two groups. Backward stepwise logistic regression was used to determine independent risk factors for EARLY PE relative to those with DELAYED PE. RESULTS EARLY and DELAYED groups were similar in age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale, emergency department systolic blood pressure, and injury mechanism. The EARLY PE group had a lower Injury Severity Score but injuries more commonly included femur fracture. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that EARLY PE patients have a significantly higher risk of early mortality relative to DELAYED PE patients (p = 0.012). Regression analysis revealed that the only independent risk factor for EARLY PE was lower extremity/pelvic orthopedic fixation (<48 hours from injury). The risk of EARLY PE was more than threefold higher (odds ratios, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.9-7.6; p < 0.001) for those who underwent early lower extremity orthopedic fixation versus those who did not. CONCLUSION Early lower extremity/pelvis orthopedic fixation is the single independent predictor of EARLY PE in this patient cohort. Venous thromboembolism/PE prevention strategies should be made a priority in this group of patients, including early preoperative institution of anticoagulation prophylaxis. These results suggest that those with contraindications to early anticoagulation may benefit from insertion of retrievable inferior vena cava filters preoperatively.

Over reliance on computed tomography imaging in patients with severe abdominal injury: is the delay worth the risk?

Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of elderly TBI patients (>=65 years) with evidence of brain hemorrhage on computed tomography (CT) scan at our institution from 2006-2010. Patient demographics, injury severity, clinical course, length of stay, and disposition were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to compare groups and identify predictors of mortality, complication, infection, neurosurgical intervention, and hemorrhage progression. Results 1552 patients were identified with 543 aspirin only (AO), 97 clopidogrel only (CO), 218 warfarin only (WO), 193 clopidogrel/aspirin (CA), and 501 patients on no antithrombotic medication (NAT). Significant differences existed in abbreviated injury score (AIS) (p=0.012), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (p=0.013), and Marshall score (p<0.001) at time of presentation. Blood products were administered to reverse coagulopathy in 77.3% of patients. After adjusting for covariates, including medication reversal, antithrombotic use was associated with increased mortality (p=0.03); WO use conferred greater odds of mortality than preinjury use of antiplatelet agents (OR 2.53, p=0.003), which did not influence mortality (p=0.622). Rates of neurosurgical interventions (p=0.677) did not differ between groups. Survivor subset analysis demonstrated that CT-identified hemorrhage progression was not associated with preinjury antithrombotic therapy, nor were rates of complication or infection development, hospital/ICU LOS, ventilator days, or discharge disposition. When stratifying for severe and moderate TBI only, use of antithrombotics did not affect outcomes. Conclusions Preinjury use of warfarin, but not antiplatelet medications, influences survival in elderly patients admitted with TBI. Hemorrhage progression, neurosurgical interventions, and morbidity are not affected. The importance of antithrombotic therapy seems to lie in its impact on initial injury severity, which, in turn, is predictive of increased morbidity and mortality. Learning Objectives By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) describe the importance of particular risk factors for poor outcomes amongst elderly TBI patients, 2) discuss, in small groups, potential options for identifying particular at-risk subsegments of this demographic and optimizing their care, and 3) identify strategies to limit wasteful healthcare expenditures in this population.

Weight-Based Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolic Event Prophylaxis in Adult Trauma Patients Results in Improved Prophylaxis

The preoperative evaluation of the geriatric clearly presents unique challenges. Historically, risk stratification has focused on a single organ system. In the geriatric patient the combined effects of frailty, comorbidity, and disability contribute cumulatively to poor outcomes. Age, cognitive dysfunction, falls, malnutrition, and anemia are all markers for poor outcome in the geriatric patient. After completion of the geriatric workup, a complete picture of the patient’s overall health in all domains will be completed. The combined and cumulative effects of these markers provide a more powerful tool for the prediction of mortality, functional recovery, and institutionalization following surgery.