Gaurav Mathur
Gallaudet University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gaurav Mathur.
Pediatrics | 2015
Nancy Mellon; John K. Niparko; Christian Rathmann; Gaurav Mathur; Tom Humphries; Donna Jo Napoli; Theresa Handley; Sasha Scambler; John D. Lantos
Every year, 10 000 infants are born in the United States with sensorineural deafness. Deaf children of hearing (and nonsigning) parents are unique among all children in the world in that they cannot easily or naturally learn the language that their parents speak. These parents face tough choices. Should they seek a cochlear implant for their child? If so, should they also learn to sign? As pediatricians, we need to help parents understand the risks and benefits of different approaches to parent–child communication when the child is deaf.
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics | 2013
Tom Humphries; Raja S. Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott Smith
We argue for the existence of a state constitutional legal right to language. Our purpose here is to develop a legal framework for protecting the civil rights of the deaf child, with the ultimate goal of calling for legislation that requires all levels of government to fund programs for deaf children and their families to learn a fully accessible language: a sign language.
Social Service Review | 2016
Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott Smith
Deaf children who are not provided with a sign language early in their development are at risk of linguistic deprivation; they may never be fluent in any language, and they may have deficits in cognitive activities that rely on a firm foundation in a first language. These children are socially and emotionally isolated. Deafness makes a child vulnerable to abuse, and linguistic deprivation compounds the abuse because the child is less able to report it. Parents rely on professionals as guides in making responsible choices in raising and educating their deaf children. But lack of expertise on language acquisition and overreliance on access to speech often result in professionals not recommending that the child be taught a sign language or, worse, that the child be denied sign language. We recommend action that those in the social welfare services can implement immediately to help protect the health of deaf children.
Journal of Medical Ethics | 2017
Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott Smith
There is no evidence that learning a natural human language is cognitively harmful to children. To the contrary, multilingualism has been argued to be beneficial to all. Nevertheless, many professionals advise the parents of deaf children that their children should not learn a sign language during their early years, despite strong evidence across many research disciplines that sign languages are natural human languages. Their recommendations are based on a combination of misperceptions about (1) the difficulty of learning a sign language, (2) the effects of bilingualism, and particularly bimodalism, (3) the bona fide status of languages that lack a written form, (4) the effects of a sign language on acquiring literacy, (5) the ability of technologies to address the needs of deaf children and (6) the effects that use of a sign language will have on family cohesion. We expose these misperceptions as based in prejudice and urge institutions involved in educating professionals concerned with the healthcare, raising and educating of deaf children to include appropriate information about first language acquisition and the importance of a sign language for deaf children. We further urge such professionals to advise the parents of deaf children properly, which means to strongly advise the introduction of a sign language as soon as hearing loss is detected.
Archive | 2012
Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott Smith
Cochlear implants (CIs) in small children who do not yet have a firm footing in first language acquisition are an on-going experiment with human subjects, in the sense that the risks involved have not been properly identified, much less assessed, due to the failure to focus on the biology of language and its role in first language acquisition. Too often, the developmental cognitive milestones of the deaf child and the right to language are not considered, and we risk contributing to cases of linguistic deprivation with all the ensuing consequences. We propose an immediate remedy: to teach deaf children a sign language, along with training in speech and speech-reading. For many families, such as those that live far from a Deaf community, as in a rural situation, this presents practical problems, which we address.
Journal of Clinical Ethics | 2010
Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Christopher J. Moreland; Donna Jo Napoli; Wendy Osterling; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann
Archive | 2011
Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli
Language | 2014
Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann
Archive | 2010
Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli
Journal of Medical Speech-language Pathology | 2014
Tom Humphries; Poorna Kushalnagar; Gaurav Mathur; Donna Jo Napoli; Carol Padden; Christian Rathmann; Scott Smith
Collaboration
Dive into the Gaurav Mathur's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs