Gavin Taylor-Stokes
Adelphi University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gavin Taylor-Stokes.
Lung Cancer | 2013
Shrividya Iyer; Gavin Taylor-Stokes; Adam Roughley
BACKGROUND To assess patient reported symptom burden and impact on disease specific health related quality of life (HRQOL) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS Patients with advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC in France (n = 613) and Germany (n = 600) were recruited into a multicenter, patient record-based cross-sectional study. Patient reported symptoms using the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, which assesses fatigue, loss of appetite, shortness of breath, cough, pain and blood in sputum on a 0-100 visual analog scale. Disease specific and generic HRQOL were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) respectively. A multivariate regression analysis was performed with total FACT-L score as the dependent variable and symptom scores as predictors. Age, gender, stage and performance status were used as control variables. RESULTS Majority of the patients were male (67%), Caucasian (93%) with an average age of 63 years. Fatigue, loss of appetite, shortness of breath, cough and pain were reported by ≥ 90% of patients. The mean health utility index score was found to be 0.58 and the mean general health status score was 58.0. Fatigue (β = -0.122; p < 0.001), loss of appetite (β = -0.170; p < 0.001), pain (β = -0.145; p < 0.001), shortness of breath (β = -0.118; p < 0.001) were found to be significant predictors of lung cancer specific quality of life as measured by the FACT-L total score. CONCLUSION Fatigue, loss of appetite, shortness of breath and pain have a significant negative impact on patient reported disease specific HRQOL in advanced NSCLC patients.
Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy | 2011
Gavin Taylor-Stokes; James Pike; Alesia Sadosky; Arthi Chandran; Thomas Toelle
Objective To evaluate the association of patient-reported severity of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) with other outcomes in a European population of patients using the Adelphi Disease Specific Programme for pDPN (DSP III, 2008). Methods The severity of patients’ pDPN (mild, moderate, or severe) was rated independently by both patients and physicians. Relationships were evaluated between patient-reported pDPN severity and other patient-reported outcomes including pain, sleep, function, and work productivity. Physicians rated the severity of patients’ pDPN (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and sleep interference. Results Patient-reported data were available from 634 individuals (56.2% male, mean age 63 years) from France, Germany, Italy, and the UK, of whom only 22.2% reported that they were currently employed. pDPN severity was rated as mild, moderate, and severe by 22.2%, 60.9%, and 16.9% of the patients, respectively. There was a significant association between patient-rated and physician-rated pDPN severity (P < 0.0001), although there were discrepancies in agreement (kappa = 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.43; weighted kappa = 0.43, 95% CI 0.37, 0.48) among physician and patient ratings in a substantial proportion of patients across severity categories. Higher pDPN severity was associated with greater interference of daily function including sleep (P < 0.0001 for all pairwise comparisons). Among employed patients, percent of pDPN-related impairment while at work (presenteeism) and overall work impairment increased with greater pDPN severity, resulting in indirect costs that increased significantly with pDPN severity;
Journal of Medical Economics | 2011
Andrew G. Bushmakin; Joseph C. Cappelleri; Gavin Taylor-Stokes; Jennifer Sayers; Alesia Sadosky; Dawn Carroll; Toby Gosden; Paul Emery
8266,
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques | 2013
Alesia Sadosky; Gavin Taylor-Stokes; Steve Lobosco; James Pike; Edgar L. Ross
15,449, and
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology | 2018
John Ashcroft; Davneet Judge; Sujith Dhanasiri; Gavin Taylor-Stokes; Chloe Middleton
24,300 for mild, moderate, and severe pDPN, respectively (overall P < 0.001). Conclusion Severity of patient-rated pDPN was significantly associated with outcomes, including function and productivity; poorer function and lower productivity were reported at higher pDPN severity levels. Moreover, physicians rated pDPN severity different from patients in a substantial proportion of patients.
Value in Health | 2015
L Manuel; Gary Milligan; A Graham; Gavin Taylor-Stokes
Abstract Objective: To determine how patient-rated osteoarthritis (OA) severity correlates with other patient-reported and clinical outcomes in the European clinical setting. Methods: We used the Adelphi Arthritis VII (2008) Disease Specific Program (DSP). OA severity was patient-rated using the question ‘How bad would you say your arthritis is now?’ with responses of ‘mild,’ ‘moderate,’ and ‘severe.’ Patient-reported outcomes included a 0–100 mm pain visual analogue scale (VAS); questions on daily functioning; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) scale; and EuroQoL (EQ-5D). Regression models and chi-square analyses evaluated relationships between self-rated OA severity and other outcomes. Results: Patient-reported data were available from 1739 individuals (63.1% female, mean age 64.4 [standard deviation 11.9] years) from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. With increasing OA severity; mild (24.5%), moderate (56.3%), severe (19.2%), statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed with higher pain VAS scores (28.3, 49.9, 69.2, respectively), reduced function, and greater overall work impairment due to OA (24.3%, 38.5%, 68.6%, respectively). Significant associations of patient-reported OA severity with function and health status were indicated, including the EQ-5D health state index; 0.77 (mild), 0.62 (moderate), 0.30 (severe) (p < 0.0001). Physicians tended to overestimate patients who rated their OA as mild, and underrate patients who rated their OA as severe. Conclusions: In five European countries, patient-rated OA severity was associated with other patient-reported outcomes, and may be of benefit in the clinical setting when choosing treatment options aimed at improving pain, function and productivity, providing an accurate and tangible assessment of patient’s perceptions of their disease.
Value in Health | 2015
A Graham; Gary Milligan; L Manuel; Gavin Taylor-Stokes
Study Design: A cross-sectional observational study of physicians and patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) in the United States. Objective: To evaluate the association of patient-reported CLBP severity with other patient-reported outcomes. Summary of Background Data: Appropriate management of patients with CLBP can be enhanced by understanding how patients perceive the severity of their CLBP. Methods: Data were from the 2009 Adelphi Disease Specific Programme. Patients reported the severity of their CLBP condition by answering the question Please rate how your chronic lower back pain condition is today with responses of mild, moderate, and severe. Patient-reported severity was evaluated with respect to scores on standard patient self-report measures of pain, pain interference, health status, functional disability, work productivity, and questions addressing satisfaction with medications for treating CLBP. Results: Of 1860 subjects in the CLBP database, 1363 (73.3%) agreed to complete the survey. This sample was similarly distributed between males (49%) and females (51%), with mean age 54.8 years: 52% were employed at least part-time. CLBP severity was rated as mild, moderate and severe by 28.6%, 53.3%, and 18.2% of patients, respectively. With increasing CLBP severity, significant differences were observed in increased pain (P<0.0001), pain interference with function (P<0.0001), and impairment while working due to CLBP (P<0.01), mainly due to presenteeism. Increased work impairment resulted in higher costs related to lost work productivity; annual lost productivity costs were estimated at
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2014
Shrividya Iyer; Adam Roughley; Alex Rider; Gavin Taylor-Stokes
7080,
Clinical Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2014
Robert Wood; Carly J. Paoli; Ron D. Hays; Gavin Taylor-Stokes; James Piercy; Matthew Gitlin
16,616, and
Clinical Therapeutics | 2011
Gavin Taylor-Stokes; Steve Lobosco; James Pike; Alesia Sadosky; Edgar L. Ross
25,032 per patient for mild, moderate, and severe CLBP, respectively (P<0.0001 for pairwise comparisons). Patient satisfaction with pain-related medication was inversely associated with CLBP severity. Conclusions: The association between patient-reported CLBP severity and other patient-reported outcomes demonstrates that in the clinical setting, patient-reported CLBP severity provides an accurate and suitable indicator of patient-reported health status. This indicator may be useful for guiding management strategies for CLBP patients.