Gayatry Mohapatra

Targeted expression of MYCN causes neuroblastoma in transgenic mice

The proto‐oncogene MYCN is often amplified in human neuroblastomas. The assumption that the amplification contributes to tumorigenesis has never been tested directly. We have created transgenic mice that overexpress MYCN in neuroectodermal cells and develop neuroblastoma. Analysis of tumors by comparative genomic hybridization revealed gains and losses of at least seven chromosomal regions, all of which are syntenic with comparable abnormalities detected in human neuroblastomas. In addition, we have shown that increases in MYCN dosage or deficiencies in either of the tumor suppressor genes NF1 or RB1 can augment tumorigenesis by the transgene. Our results provide direct evidence that MYCN can contribute to the genesis of neuroblastoma, suggest that the genetic events involved in the genesis of neuroblastoma can be tumorigenic in more than one chronological sequence, and offer a model for further study of the pathogenesis and therapy of neuroblastoma.

Localization of common deletion regions on 1p and 19q in human gliomas and their association with histological subtype

Allelic alterations of chromosomes 1 and 19 are frequent events in human diffuse gliomas and have recently proven to be strong predictors of chemotherapeutic response and prolonged survival in oligodendrogliomas (Cairncross et al., 1998; Smith et al., submitted). Using 115 human diffuse gliomas, we localized regions of common allelic loss on chromosomes 1 and 19 and assessed the association of these deletion intervals with glioma histological subtypes. Further, we evaluated the capacity of multiple modalities to detect these alterations, including loss of heterozygosity (LOH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The correlation coefficients for detection of 1p and 19q alterations, respectively, between modalities were: 0.98 and 0.87 for LOH and FISH, 0.79 and 0.60 for LOH and CGH, and 0.79 and 0.53 for FISH and CGH. Minimal deletion regions were defined on 19q13.3 (D19S412-D19S596) and 1p (D1S468-D1S1612). Loss of the 1p36 region was found in 18% of astrocytomas (10/55) and in 73% (24/33) of oligodendrogliomas (P<0.0001), and loss of the 19q13.3 region was found in 38% (21/55) of astrocytomas and 73% (24/33) of oligodendrogliomas (P=0.0017). Loss of both regions was found in 11% (6/55) of astrocytomas and in 64% (21/33) of oligodendrogliomas (P<0.0001). All gliomas with LOH on either 1p or 19q demonstrated loss of the corresponding FISH probe, 1p36 or 19q13.3, suggesting not only locations of putative tumor suppressor genes, but also a simple assay for assessment of 1p and 19q alterations as diagnostic and prognostic markers.

Genetic analysis of glioblastoma multiforme provides evidence for subgroups within the grade

We analyzed 72 primary and 25 recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) samples for DNA sequence copy number abnormalities (CNAs) by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The number of aberrations per tumor ranged from 2 to 23 in primary GBM and 5 to 25 in recurrent GBM. There were 26 chromosome regions with CNAs in more than 20% of tumors. 7q22‐36 was the most common gain and 10q25‐26 was the most common loss; each occurred in more than 70% of tumors. Of 27 amplification sites, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was the most common; it was observed in 25% of primary GBMs. Statistical analysis based on pairwise correlation of CNAs indicated that there is more than one class of primary GBM. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21:195–206, 1998.

HYAL1(LUCA-1), a candidate tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 3p21.3, is inactivated in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas by aberrant splicing of pre-mRNA

The hyaluronidase first isolated from human plasma, Hyal-1, is expressed in many somatic tissues. The Hyal-1 gene, HYAL1, also known as LUCA-1, maps to chromosome 3p21.3 within a candidate tumor suppressor gene locus defined by homozygous deletions and by functional tumor suppressor activity. Hemizygosity in this region occurs in many malignancies, including squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. We have investigated whether cell lines derived from such malignancies expressed Hyal-1 activity, using normal human keratinocytes as controls. Hyal-1 enzyme activity and protein were absent or markedly reduced in six of seven carcinoma cell lines examined. Comparative genomic and fluorescence in situ hybridization identified chromosomal deletions of one allele of HYAL1 in six of seven cell lines. Initial RT–PCR analyses demonstrated marked discrepancies between levels of HYAL1 mRNA and protein. Despite repeated sequence analyses, no mutations were found. However, two species of transcripts were identified when primers were used that included the 5′ untranslated region. The predominant mRNA species did not correlate with protein translation and contained a retained intron. A second spliced form lacking this intron was found only in cell lines that produced Hyal-1 protein. Inactivation of HYAL1 in these tumor lines is a result of incomplete splicing of its pre-mRNA that appears to be epigenetic in nature.

Detection of p16 gene deletions in gliomas: A comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) versus quantitative PCR

The p16 protein plays a key role in cell cycle control by preventing CDK4 from inactivating the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). The corresponding tumor suppressor gene (p16/MTS1/CDKN2) has recently been implicated in malignant progression of astrocytomas and could potentially serve as an important marker for patient prognosis and for guiding specific therapeutic strategies. We have undertaken a study to evaluate 2 methods of detecting p16 deletion. Thirty diffuse gliomas were analyzed for p16 gene dosage. Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on cytologic preparations using paired centromeric (CEN) and locus-specific probes for CEN9/p16. CEN8/RB, and CEN12/CDK4. Quantitative PCR was performed using primers for p16, MTAP, and reference genes. Eleven cases were also studied using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Abnormalities of the p16-CDK4-RB pathway were identified in 21 (70%) cases by FISH and/or PCR. These included 15 (50%) with p16 deletion, 9 of which were detected by both techniques, 3 by FISH alone, and 3 by PCR alone (concordance rate = 81%). FISH analysis further revealed tetraploidy/aneuploidy in 14 (47%), RB deletion in 11 (37%), and CDK4 amplification in 1 (3.3%). There were 94% and 100% concordance rates between CGH and FISH or PCR, respectively. Quantitative PCR was noninformative in 4 cases. Although FISH and quantitative PCR are both reliable techniques, each has limitations. PCR is likely to miss p16 deletions when there is significant normal cell contamination or clonal heterogeneity, whereas the p16 YAC probe used for FISH analysis may miss small deletions. Replacement of the latter with a cosmid probe may improve the sensitivity of FISH in future experiments.

Analyses of brain tumor cell lines confirm a simple model of relationships among fluorescence in situ hybridization, DNA index, and comparative genomic hybridization

Several techniques are commonly used for genetic analysis of interphase nuclei. Flow cytometry assays the distribution of DNA content in populations of nuclei stained with a DNA‐specific fluorochrome. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) quantifies the number of copies of a specific DNA sequence in single nuclei. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) assesses the relative copy number of DNA sequences throughout a test genome by comparing the signal intensities of test and reference DNA samples hybridized to a template of normal metaphase chromosomes. In principle, there are specific relationships among data obtained from these measurements, and combined measurements should provide a more comprehensive view of the sample that is analyzed. We applied these three techniques to nine brain tumor cell lines and find that a model of CGH that includes unsuppressed repeat sequences describes the data well. We estimate that up to 35% of the fluorescence intensity in well‐blocked CGH preparations may not represent unique sequences. Taking these factors into account, our results are, in general, mutually consistent, and highlight issues critical for interpreting CGH preparations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20:311‐319, 1997.

Gliomas in families: Chromosomal analysis by comparative genomic hybridization

Gliomas that aggregate in otherwise unremarkable families may have a heritable genetic basis. To determine the spectrum of genetic alterations in glioma-susceptible families, we examined tumor DNA from familial cases for regions of chromosomal gain or loss using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We compared chromosomal alterations within and among glioma families to those found in sporadic gliomas. A specific chromosomal abnormality common to the tumors of multiple unrelated probands with glioma or a specific chromosomal abnormality common to multiple affected persons in a single glioma-prone family would support the hypothesis of an inherited predisposition to glioma and at the same time identify specific regions of the genome harboring putative glioma susceptibility genes. Tumor DNA from 11 patients from seven families with two or more individuals with glioma was analyzed, including three members of a remarkable family having 10 affected individuals. We found no chromosomal abnormality common to all tumors of all probands nor did we find family-specific abnormalities in two of three glioma-prone kindreds. There were frequent copy number aberrations (CNAs) on chromosomes 7, 10, 19, and the sex chromosomes; other CNAs included +3q(13.3-29), -4q, +5q, -9q34, +12, -13q(21-->33), -15, -16p, +17qter, -18, -21, and -22. Amplifications occurred at +2 7p(11.1-->12), +2 7q(21.2-->33), +2 12q(13.2-->14), and +2 12p(11-->12). Although there were several novel CNAs [-16p, and +2 12p(11-p12)], none could readily explain the inheritance of these tumors.

Heterogeneity, polyploidy, aneusomy, and 9p deletion in human glioblastoma multiforme

The short arm of chromosome 9 is frequently deleted in malignant gliomas. We used locus-specific probes for interferon-A (IFNA) and D9S3 in combination with a chromosome 9 centromeric probe to detect genetic aberrations on a cell-by-cell basis in touch preparations of 30 glioblastomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Seven (23%) of 30 tumors had deletions in > 70% of cells; the IFNA locus was deleted in all seven, but the D9S3 locus was deleted in only five of the seven. The latter data confirm that a tumor suppressor gene on 9p relevant to glioblastoma multiforme lies between D9S3 and IFNA. Eleven tumors had deletions in 20-40% of cells, more than three standard deviations above the level in control tissues. The remaining tumors had deletions in < 20% of cells. The seven tumors with the lowest percentage of deleted cells each had more than one genetically abnormal population of cells. In total, 10 cases were of this type (i.e., aneusomic for chromosome 9). Three of these 10 tumors had hybridization patterns consistent with polyploidy.

Molecular cytogenetic quantitation of gains and losses of genetic material from human gliomas

SummaryThe unregulated growth that is characteristic of human malignant gliomas is accompanied by, and may result from, losses and/or gains of genetic material. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie how particular genetic aberrations cause dysfunctional growth will help elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease. Two techniques are proving useful in evaluating the clinical relevance of specific genetic aberrations in malignant gliomas. Fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH) permits direct visualization of gains and losses of genetic material in single cells and quantitation of cellular subpopulations that have particular genetic aberrations. Comparative genomic hybridization can identify regions of genetic gain and loss in tumor DNA.

Abstract 5757: A genome-wide screen for microdeletions reveals disruption of polarity complex genes in diverse human cancers

Proceedings: AACR 101st Annual Meeting 2010‐‐ Apr 17‐21, 2010; Washington, DCnnIn a genome-wide screen of 684 cancer cell lines, we identified homozygous intragenic microdeletions involving genes encoding components of the apical-basal cell polarity complexes. Among these, PARD3 is disrupted in cell lines and primary tumors from squamous carcinomas and glioblastomas. Reconstituting PARD3 expression in both cell types restores tight junctions and retards contactdependent proliferation. Searching specifically for small intragenic microdeletions using high resolution genomic arrays may be complementary to other genomic deletion screens and resequencing efforts in identifying new tumor suppressor genes.nnCitation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5757.