Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Geert Van Hootegem is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Geert Van Hootegem.


International Journal of Management Reviews | 2008

Teamworking and Organizational Performance: A Review of Survey-Based Research

Anne Delarue; Geert Van Hootegem; Stephen Procter; Mark Burridge

This paper presents a review of recent survey-based research looking at the contribution of teamwork to organizational performance. In particular, it focuses on empirical studies in which both teamwork and performance are directly measured in a quantitative way. The paper begins by identifying four interrelated dimensions of teamwork effectiveness: attitudinal, behavioural, operational and financial. The first two represent transmission mechanisms by which organizational performance can be improved. The latter two provide direct measures of organizational outcomes. The review shows that teamworking has a positive impact on all four dimensions of performance. It also reveals that, when teamwork is combined with structural change, performance can be further enhanced. The paper concludes by highlighting some important research gaps that future studies could address.


Ergonomics | 2015

Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety – developing the conceptual framework

Pascale Carayon; Peter A. Hancock; Nancy G. Leveson; Ian Noy; Laerte Idal Sznelwar; Geert Van Hootegem

Traditional efforts to deal with the enormous problem of workplace safety have proved insufficient, as they have tended to neglect the broader sociotechnical environment that surrounds workers. Here, we advocate a sociotechnical systems approach that describes the complex multi-level system factors that contribute to workplace safety. From the literature on sociotechnical systems, complex systems and safety, we develop a sociotechnical model of workplace safety with concentric layers of the work system, socio-organisational context and the external environment. The future challenges that are identified through the model are highlighted. Practitioner Summary: Understanding the environmental, organisational and work system factors that contribute to workplace safety will help to develop more effective and integrated solutions to deal with persistent workplace safety problems. Solutions to improve workplace safety need to recognise the broad sociotechnical system and the respective interactions between the system elements and levels.


Creativity and Innovation Management | 2014

On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement

Stan De Spiegelaere; Guy Van Gyes; Hans De Witte; Wendy Niesen; Geert Van Hootegem

European policy is focusing on innovation as a way out of the economic crisis. At the same time, job insecurity is rising as Europe is still in crisis. In this paper, we examine whether job insecurity affects the innovative work behaviour of employees by focusing on the relation between job insecurity, job autonomy, work engagement and innovative work behaviour (IWB). Using employee level survey data, we use structural equation modelling to disentangle the relations between these variables. The partially mediated model shows the best fit with the data. This model shows that job insecurity and autonomy are both directly and indirectly, through work engagement, related with IWB. For autonomy these relations are positive, while they are negative (and smaller) for job insecurity. Moreover, a negative covariance is observed between job insecurity and autonomy.


Personnel Review | 2002

Team responsibility structure and team performance

Hans Doorewaard; Geert Van Hootegem; R. Huys

Анализируется влияние типа ответственности, принятого в коллективе, на результаты его работы. Основу исследования составил анализ результатов деятельности 36 фирм в Нидерландах, проведенный в 1997 г. В практической деятельности обследуемых фирм преобладали два типа групповой ответственности. Первый относится к командам, построенным по иерархическому принципу, когда основные решения принимает лидер. Второй - к командам, в которых ответственность разделена, когда решения принимаются каждым членом команды самостоятельно. Авторы убедительно показывают, что команды с разделенной ответственностью оказались более жизнеспособными по сравнению с командами, построенными по иерархическому принципу. Подчеркивается, что члены команды, являющиеся профессионалами в своих областях, вносят существенный вклад в результат работы предприятия. Интересно, что уже само проведение исследования помогло улучшить понимание связи между управлением человеческими ресурсами и эффективностью работы организации.


International Journal of Geographical Information Science | 2012

Reconsidering the definition of a spatial data infrastructure

Paul H. J. Hendriks; Ezra Dessers; Geert Van Hootegem

The great interest in spatial data infrastructures (SDIs) has led to a wealth of SDI definitions in SDI debates. The article aims to contribute to both theory-oriented and practice-oriented SDI research by providing a critical re-examination of the SDI literature. Ashbys formal theory of regulation, which sees infrastructures as regulatory devices, is used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of several SDI definitions. This exercise shows how debates of the SDI objectives and the roles of users get caught in mantraps and also opens the door for a way out of this confusion by distinguishing between functional and adoption objectives. It also highlights the emphasis on technological components in the SDI definitions, which sidestep the importance of structural and human resource components in SDI.


International Journal of Operations & Production Management | 2004

The sustainability of teamwork under changing circumstances: The case of Volvo‐Ghent

Geert Van Hootegem; Rik Huys; Anne Delarue

Volvos car assembly plant in Ghent, Belgium, is currently experiencing turbulent times. The plant is implementing the biggest expansion in its history, with plans to almost double its production capacity in 2004. Moreover, Ford is increasingly consolidating its position as the new owner of Volvo. Both developments are challenging the distinctive model of teamwork that Volvo‐Ghent has established over the last decade. This paper assesses the challenges presented by these two developments and the possible outcomes in terms of teamwork at Volvo‐Ghent. This assessment relies on a combination of theories of team structure and team processes.


Work, Employment & Society | 2010

Worker agency and trade union renewal: the case of Poland

Adam Mrozowicki; Valeria Pulignano; Geert Van Hootegem

Contrary to predictions of continued weakness of the union movement in post-socialist countries of Central and Eastern Europe, in recent years Polish trade unions have undertaken various revitalisation attempts, including campaigns to organise unions in the private sector. Although the existing literature accounts for this internal union transformation by referring to macrosocial and institutional factors, this article suggests that the emerging potential of union renewal is linked with the new forms of union activism and worker agency. This asser tion is based on an exploratory empirical study using 45 biographical narrative interviews with company-level union representatives in Poland.The analysis reveals the existence of ‘transitional’ and ‘reinvented’ patterns of union activism. The article concludes that new unionism in Poland does not resemble an economic unionism or broad social movement unionism as suggested by other authors. On the contrary, it follows a path that combines the reinvented union ethos with market-oriented strategies.


Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation | 2012

Job Design and Innovative Work Behavior: One Size Does Not Fit All Types of Employees

Stan De Spiegelaere; Guy Van Gyes; Geert Van Hootegem

As innovative employees become imperative for an organizations’ success, research identified job design as a crucial variable in promoting innovative work behavior (IWB) (Hammond et al., 2011). Using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model of Bakker & Demerouti (2007), this article contributes to the literature as it uses recent insights on the distinction between job challenges and job hindrances (Van den Broeck et al., 2010) and distinguishes between blue- and white-collar employees. Using survey data of 893 employees of various organizations the findings generally confirm the JD-R model, although important differences were found between blue-collar and white-collar employees regarding the relation of organizing and routine tasks with IWB. Job content insecurity further was found to be very detrimental for blue-collar IWB. These findings have important HR and political implications as they show that there is no ‘one size fits all’ HR solution for innovation.


Human Relations | 1999

Toward Less Division of Labor? New Production Concepts in the Automotive, Chemical, Clothing, and Machine Tool Industries

Rik Huys; Luc Sels; Geert Van Hootegem; Jan Bundervoet; E Henderickx

In this contribution, we focus on the results of the Belgian Trend Study. The intention of this study was to examine the prevalence of new production concepts within the widest possible range of companies in the automotive, the machine tool, the chemical, and the clothing industries. The Trend Study aimed to answer the following questions: is the Taylorist division of labor a thing of the past? What are the alternatives? Are shifts in the division of labor accompanied by another type of personnel policy, and do traditional industrial relations have to make way for this new approach? The methodological concept used had to guarantee that the findings at the level of each industry could be generalized. Though the picture emerging from the empirical data collected in the four industrial sectors is inevitably diverse, the data make it possible merely to suggest a neorather than a post-Thylorist or -Fordist concept.


Economic & Industrial Democracy | 2014

Labour Flexibility and Innovation, Complementary or Concurrent Strategies? A Review of the Literature

Stan De Spiegelaere; Guy Van Gyes; Geert Van Hootegem

The European strategy for growth has a two-fold aim: to become an innovative union and to enhance labour flexibility. Yet, few have addressed the question of whether these two strategies are compatible or concurrent. Through a review of the literature, this article addresses this question by focusing on different types of labour flexibility (functional, contractual and financial), and two types of innovation outcomes: employee-driven innovation (EDI) and organizational innovativeness. Using insights from different research traditions, sound evidence is found for a positive relation between different forms of functional flexibility and both EDI and organizational innovation. This is nevertheless not so for contractual and financial flexibility. Indications are found that these types of labour flexibility are potentially negative for both EDI and organizational innovation. Yet, trends in the European labour market and EU backed policies do not focus on enhancing functional flexibility, but rather aim to increase contractual and financial flexibility.The European strategy for growth has a twofold aim: to become an innovative union and to enhance labour flexibility. Yet, few have addressed the question of whether these two strategies are compatible or concurrent. Through a review of the literature, this article addresses this question by focusing on different types of labour flexibility (functional, contractual and financial), and two types of innovation outcomes: employee-driven innovation (EDI) and organizational innovativeness. Using insights from different research traditions, sound evidence is found for a positive relation between different forms of functional flexibility and both EDI and organizational innovation. This is nevertheless not so for contractual and financial flexibility. Indications are found that these types of labour flexibility are potentially negative for both EDI and organizational innovation. Yet, trends in the European labour market and EU backed policies do not focus on enhancing functional flexibility, but rather aim to increase contractual and financial flexibility.

Collaboration


Dive into the Geert Van Hootegem's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ezra Dessers

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rik Huys

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luc Sels

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sam Pless

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Delarue

Catholic University of Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lander Vermeerbergen

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tom Vander Steene

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Luc Sels

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jos Benders

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge