Genevieve Boulet

Commonly Measured Clinical Variables Are Not Associated With Burden of Complications in Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes: Results From the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes

Twenty-five percent of individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) are resistant to complications, and this is not entirely explained by superior glycemic control (1–4). Although associations between clinical variables and individual complications have been comprehensively examined (1–4), analysis of total complication burden may detect previously unrecognized associations. The Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes actively recruited 325 individuals who had T1D for 50 or more years (5). Subjects completed a questionnaire, and recent laboratory tests and eye reports were provided by primary care physicians and eye specialists, respectively. Nephropathy was defined by an albumin-to-creatinine ratio of >2 mg/mmol for participants on an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or >3.4 mg/mmol for participants not on an ACE inhibitor or ARB. Symptomatic neuropathy was defined by a score ≥3 on the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) questionnaire component. Retinopathy was defined by documentation of nonproliferative or proliferative retinopathy in the eye specialist report. Coronary artery disease was defined by self-reported …

Reproducibility of In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy Using an Automated Analysis Program for Detection of Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy.

Objective In vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy (IVCCM) is a validated, non-invasive test for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) detection, but its utility is limited by the image analysis time and expertise required. We aimed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of a novel automated analysis program compared to manual analysis. Methods In a cross-sectional diagnostic study, 20 non-diabetes controls (mean age 41.4±17.3y, HbA1c 5.5±0.4%) and 26 participants with type 1 diabetes (42.8±16.9y, 8.0±1.9%) underwent two separate IVCCM examinations by one observer and a third by an independent observer. Along with nerve density and branch density, corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL) was obtained by manual analysis (CNFLMANUAL), a protocol in which images were manually selected for automated analysis (CNFLSEMI-AUTOMATED), and one in which selection and analysis were performed electronically (CNFLFULLY-AUTOMATED). Reproducibility of each protocol was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and, as a secondary objective, the method of Bland and Altman was used to explore agreement between protocols. Results Mean CNFLManual was 16.7±4.0, 13.9±4.2 mm/mm2 for non-diabetes controls and diabetes participants, while CNFLSemi-Automated was 10.2±3.3, 8.6±3.0 mm/mm2 and CNFLFully-Automated was 12.5±2.8, 10.9 ± 2.9 mm/mm2. Inter-observer ICC and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were 0.73(0.56, 0.84), 0.75(0.59, 0.85), and 0.78(0.63, 0.87), respectively (p = NS for all comparisons). Intra-observer ICC and 95%CI were 0.72(0.55, 0.83), 0.74(0.57, 0.85), and 0.84(0.73, 0.91), respectively (p<0.05 for CNFLFully-Automated compared to others). The other IVCCM parameters had substantially lower ICC compared to those for CNFL. CNFLSemi-Automated and CNFLFully-Automated underestimated CNFLManual by mean and 95%CI of 35.1(-4.5, 67.5)% and 21.0(-21.6, 46.1)%, respectively. Conclusions Despite an apparent measurement (underestimation) bias in comparison to the manual strategy of image analysis, fully-automated analysis preserves CNFL reproducibility. Future work must determine the diagnostic thresholds specific to the fully-automated measure of CNFL.

Diabetes Care Disparities in Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes in Canada and the U.S.: A Cross-sectional Comparison

OBJECTIVE To assess national differences in diabetes care and quality of life (QOL) between individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (≥50 years) in Canada and the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional data from identical surveys administered in the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes and the Joslin Medalist Study, collected in 2013–2016 and 2005–2011, respectively, were compared. Laboratory values and ophthalmic examination were completed by clinical care physicians for Canadians and the Joslin Clinic for Americans. Univariate comparisons and multivariable regression for HbA1c, QOL, insulin pump use, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed. Nephropathy, CAD, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were self-reported; neuropathy was defined by a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire component) score ≥3, and proliferative retinopathy was documented from ophthalmic examination. QOL was self-reported on an ordinal scale. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-one Canadians and 668 Americans had similar ages (mean 65.78 years [SD 8.67] vs. 66.38 years [7.66], P = 0.27) and durations of diabetes (median 53.00 years [interquartile range 51.00, 58.00] vs. 53.00 years [51.00, 57.00], P = 0.51). Canadians had higher HbA1c (mean 7.53% [SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.22% [0.98] [55 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001), lower QOL (36.9% vs. 48.7% with “excellent” QOL, P = 0.0002), and less CAD (29.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.0003) and insulin pump use (43.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.0002). Other complication rates were similar. Residual differences for Canadians compared with Americans remained after adjustment for age, sex, CAD, PAD, education, and relevant a priori selected variables: 0.28% higher HbA1c (P = 0.0004); and odds ratios of 0.68 (95% CI 0.51, 0.90), 0.46 (0.31, 0.68), and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) for higher QOL, CAD, and insulin pump use, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although Canadians and Americans have similar rates of complications other than CAD, further research is required to understand why Canadians have higher HbA1c levels, lower QOL, and less insulin pump use.

Neuropathy and presence of emotional distress and depression in longstanding diabetes: Results from the Canadian study of longevity in type 1 diabetes

AIM To determine the association of neuropathy and other complications with emotional distress and depression among patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes (T1DM). METHODS Canadians with ≥50years of T1DM completed a questionnaire including assessment of distress and depression by the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), respectively. Complications were determined using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire Component), fundoscopy reports, renal function tests, and self-reported peripheral-(PVD) and cardiovascular (CVD) disease. Associations were analyzed by Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 323 participants, 137 (42.4%) had neuropathy, 113 (36.5%) nephropathy, 207 (69.5%) retinopathy, 95 (29.4%) CVD, and 31 (9.8%) PVD. The neuropathy subgroup had higher prevalence of distress (13 (9.5%) vs. 6 (3.3%), p=0.029) and depression (34 (24.9%) vs. 12 (6.5%), p<0.001). Adjusting for diabetes complications, neuropathy was associated with higher PAID (adjusted RR 1.44 (95% CI 1.14-1.82), p=0.003) and GDS scores (adjusted RR1.57 (1.18-2.11), p=0.002). Independent of potential confounders, neuropathy remained associated with higher PAID (adjusted RR 1.39 (1.10-1.76), p=0.006) and GDS scores (adjusted RR 1.37 (1.03-1.83), p=0.032). Associations with neuropathy were not fully explained by neuropathic pain. CONCLUSION Compared to other complications, neuropathy had the greatest association with distress and depression in longstanding T1DM, independent of pain. Strategies beyond pain management are needed to improve quality of life in diabetic neuropathy.

Adiposity Impacts Intrarenal Hemodynamic Function in Adults With Long-standing Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Diabetic Nephropathy: Results From the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes

OBJECTIVE Central adiposity is considered to be an important cardiorenal risk factor in the general population and in type 1 diabetes. We sought to determine the relationship between central adiposity and intrarenal hemodynamic function in adults with long-standing type 1 diabetes with and without diabetic nephropathy (DN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 1 diabetes (n = 66, duration ≥50 years) and age-/sex-matched control subjects (n = 73) were studied. The cohort was stratified into 44 DN Resistors (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and <30 mg/day urine albumin) and 22 patients with DN (eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or ≥30 mg/day urine albumin). Intrarenal hemodynamic function (glomerular filtration rate for inulin [GFRINULIN], effective renal plasma flow for p-aminohippuric acid [ERPFPAH]) was measured. Afferent arteriolar resistance, efferent arteriolar resistance, renal blood flow, renal vascular resistance [RVR], filtration fraction, and glomerular pressure were derived from the Gomez equations. Fat and lean mass were quantified by DXA. RESULTS Whereas measures of adiposity did not associate with GFRINULIN or ERPFPAH in healthy control subjects, trunk fat mass inversely correlated with GFRINULIN (r = −0.46, P < 0.0001) and ERPFPAH (r = −0.31, P = 0.01) and positively correlated with RVR (r = 0.53, P = 0.0003) in type 1 diabetes. In analyses stratified by DN status, greater central adiposity related to lower GFRINULIN values in DN and DN Resistors, but the relationships between central adiposity and ERPFPAH and RVR were attenuated and/or reversed in patients with DN compared with DN Resistors. CONCLUSIONS The adiposity-intrarenal hemodynamic function relationship may be modified by the presence of type 1 diabetes and DN, requiring further study of the mechanisms by which adiposity influences renal hemodynamic function.

Lower corneal nerve fibre length identifies diabetic neuropathy in older adults with diabetes: results from the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes

Abbreviations CNBD Corneal nerve branch density CNFD Corneal nerve fibre density CNFL Corneal nerve fibre length IVCCM In vivo corneal confocal microscopy ROC Receiver operating characteristic ROC-AUC Area under the ROC curve To the Editor: There exists an urgent need to better characterise and identify the presence of early-stage diabetic neuropathy when therapy is most likely to be effective. The lack of an objective endpoint for early neuropathy has seriously hindered the evaluation of disease-modifying therapies in clinical research and the prediction of neuropathy progression in clinical care [1, 2]. There is considerable evidence that injury to small, thinly myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibres precedes injury to large myelinated fibres in individuals with diabetic neuropathy [3]. Morphological examination of the small nerve fibres of the cornea by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) has emerged as an objective and non-invasive imaging technique for identifying diabetic neuropathy. Specifically, lower corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL) has been confirmed as a valid biomarker for neuropathy identification in younger adults with type 1 diabetes [4, 5] and may represent a surrogate endpoint for trials of disease-modifying therapies for neuropathy. However, CNFL’s diagnostic performance may be impaired with advanced age and diabetes duration owing to ageand extensive disease-related changes in corneal nerve morphology [6]. We aimed to determine whether CNFL retains its diagnostic validity in a unique cohort of older adults who have lived with type 1 diabetes for over 50 years. As part of the second phase of the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes [7], 67/75 (89%) participants with type 1 diabetes and 69/75 (92%) participants forming a non-diabetic control group from age/sex-matched subgroups underwent electrophysiology-based procedures to define neuropathy (reference standard) and evaluation of corneal morphology by IVCCM (index test) in a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline evaluation. All participants provided written informed consent and the study and its procedures were approved by the institutional ethics board at the University * Bruce A. Perkins bruce.perkins@sinaihealthsystem.ca

red Hot Tyre Black Ipanema Wheels Kids 1OgfBq |proanimationfilm.com

OBJECTIVE To assess national differences in diabetes care and quality of life (QOL) between individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (≥50 years) in Canada and the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional data from identical surveys administered in the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes and the Joslin Medalist Study, collected in 2013–2016 and 2005–2011, respectively, were compared. Laboratory values and ophthalmic examination were completed by clinical care physicians for Canadians and the Joslin Clinic for Americans. Univariate comparisons and multivariable regression for HbA1c, QOL, insulin pump use, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed. Nephropathy, CAD, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were self-reported; neuropathy was defined by a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire component) score ≥3, and proliferative retinopathy was documented from ophthalmic examination. QOL was self-reported on an ordinal scale. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-one Canadians and 668 Americans had similar ages (mean 65.78 years [SD 8.67] vs. 66.38 years [7.66], P = 0.27) and durations of diabetes (median 53.00 years [interquartile range 51.00, 58.00] vs. 53.00 years [51.00, 57.00], P = 0.51). Canadians had higher HbA1c (mean 7.53% [SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.22% [0.98] [55 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001), lower QOL (36.9% vs. 48.7% with “excellent” QOL, P = 0.0002), and less CAD (29.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.0003) and insulin pump use (43.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.0002). Other complication rates were similar. Residual differences for Canadians compared with Americans remained after adjustment for age, sex, CAD, PAD, education, and relevant a priori selected variables: 0.28% higher HbA1c (P = 0.0004); and odds ratios of 0.68 (95% CI 0.51, 0.90), 0.46 (0.31, 0.68), and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) for higher QOL, CAD, and insulin pump use, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although Canadians and Americans have similar rates of complications other than CAD, further research is required to understand why Canadians have higher HbA1c levels, lower QOL, and less insulin pump use.

gris Run 400 Go Noir Proxo Skechers XO0wqq |proanimationfilm.com

OBJECTIVE To assess national differences in diabetes care and quality of life (QOL) between individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (≥50 years) in Canada and the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional data from identical surveys administered in the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes and the Joslin Medalist Study, collected in 2013–2016 and 2005–2011, respectively, were compared. Laboratory values and ophthalmic examination were completed by clinical care physicians for Canadians and the Joslin Clinic for Americans. Univariate comparisons and multivariable regression for HbA1c, QOL, insulin pump use, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed. Nephropathy, CAD, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were self-reported; neuropathy was defined by a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire component) score ≥3, and proliferative retinopathy was documented from ophthalmic examination. QOL was self-reported on an ordinal scale. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-one Canadians and 668 Americans had similar ages (mean 65.78 years [SD 8.67] vs. 66.38 years [7.66], P = 0.27) and durations of diabetes (median 53.00 years [interquartile range 51.00, 58.00] vs. 53.00 years [51.00, 57.00], P = 0.51). Canadians had higher HbA1c (mean 7.53% [SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.22% [0.98] [55 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001), lower QOL (36.9% vs. 48.7% with “excellent” QOL, P = 0.0002), and less CAD (29.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.0003) and insulin pump use (43.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.0002). Other complication rates were similar. Residual differences for Canadians compared with Americans remained after adjustment for age, sex, CAD, PAD, education, and relevant a priori selected variables: 0.28% higher HbA1c (P = 0.0004); and odds ratios of 0.68 (95% CI 0.51, 0.90), 0.46 (0.31, 0.68), and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) for higher QOL, CAD, and insulin pump use, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although Canadians and Americans have similar rates of complications other than CAD, further research is required to understand why Canadians have higher HbA1c levels, lower QOL, and less insulin pump use.

Validity of a point-of-care nerve conduction device for polyneuropathy identification in older adults with diabetes: Results from the Canadian Study of Longevity in Type 1 Diabetes

Objective Point-of-care nerve conduction devices (POCD) have been studied in younger patients and may facilitate screening for polyneuropathy in non-specialized clinical settings. However, performance may be impaired with advanced age owing to age-related changes in nerve conduction. We aimed to evaluate the validity of a POCD as a proxy for standard nerve conduction studies (NCS) in older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods Sural nerve amplitude potential (AMP) and sural nerve conduction velocity (CV) was measured in 68 participants with ≥ 50 years T1D duration and 71 controls (from age/sex-matched subgroups) using POCD and NCS protocols. Agreement was determined by the Bland-Altman method, and validity was determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Results T1D were 53% female, aged 66±8yr and had diabetes duration 54yr[52,58]. Controls were 56%(p = 0.69) female and aged 65±8yr(p = 0.36). Mean AMPPOCD and CVPOCD for the 139 participants was 7.4±5.8μV and 45.7±11.2m/s and mean AMPNCS and CVNCS was 7.2±6.1μV and 43.3±8.3m/s. Mean difference of AMPPOCD−AMPNCS was 0.3±3.8μV and was 2.3±8.5m/s for CVPOCD−CVNCS. A AMPPOCD of ≤6μV had 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity for identifying abnormal AMPNCS, while a CVPOCD of ≤44m/s had 81% sensitivity and 82% specificity to identify abnormal CVNCS. Abnormality in AMPPOCD or CVPOCD was associated with 87% sensitivity, while abnormality in both measures was associated with 97% specificity for polyneuropathy identification. Conclusions The POCD has strong agreement and diagnostic accuracy for identification of polyneuropathy in a high-risk subgroup and thus may represent a sufficiently accurate and rapid test for routinely detecting those with electrophysiological dysfunction.

NA Marine Marine Marine Arkady Arkady Arkady NA Arkady Marine NA NA qq4wrCB |proanimationfilm.com

OBJECTIVE To assess national differences in diabetes care and quality of life (QOL) between individuals with long-standing type 1 diabetes (≥50 years) in Canada and the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Cross-sectional data from identical surveys administered in the Canadian Study of Longevity in Diabetes and the Joslin Medalist Study, collected in 2013–2016 and 2005–2011, respectively, were compared. Laboratory values and ophthalmic examination were completed by clinical care physicians for Canadians and the Joslin Clinic for Americans. Univariate comparisons and multivariable regression for HbA1c, QOL, insulin pump use, and coronary artery disease (CAD) were performed. Nephropathy, CAD, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were self-reported; neuropathy was defined by a Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (Questionnaire component) score ≥3, and proliferative retinopathy was documented from ophthalmic examination. QOL was self-reported on an ordinal scale. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-one Canadians and 668 Americans had similar ages (mean 65.78 years [SD 8.67] vs. 66.38 years [7.66], P = 0.27) and durations of diabetes (median 53.00 years [interquartile range 51.00, 58.00] vs. 53.00 years [51.00, 57.00], P = 0.51). Canadians had higher HbA1c (mean 7.53% [SD 1.03] [59 mmol/mol] vs. 7.22% [0.98] [55 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001), lower QOL (36.9% vs. 48.7% with “excellent” QOL, P = 0.0002), and less CAD (29.7% vs. 41.2%, P = 0.0003) and insulin pump use (43.3% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.0002). Other complication rates were similar. Residual differences for Canadians compared with Americans remained after adjustment for age, sex, CAD, PAD, education, and relevant a priori selected variables: 0.28% higher HbA1c (P = 0.0004); and odds ratios of 0.68 (95% CI 0.51, 0.90), 0.46 (0.31, 0.68), and 0.71 (0.52, 0.96) for higher QOL, CAD, and insulin pump use, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although Canadians and Americans have similar rates of complications other than CAD, further research is required to understand why Canadians have higher HbA1c levels, lower QOL, and less insulin pump use.