Genevieve Pham-Kanter
Drexel University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Genevieve Pham-Kanter.
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2013
Eric G. Campbell; Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Christine Vogeli; Lisa I. Iezzoni
and Kushel. Statistical analysis: Vijayaraghavan. Obtained funding: Bangsberg, Miaskowski, and Kushel. Administrative, technical, and material support: Penko, Bangsberg, Miaskowski, and Kushel. Study supervision: Bangsberg and Kushel. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. Funding/Support: This study was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Drug Abuse R01DA022550, and a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health R01MH54907. The Tenderloin Center for Clinical Research was supported by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF),Clinical andTranslational Institute grant, NIH/NCRR UCSF-CTSI UL1 RR024131. Dr Vijayaraghavan is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Cancer Prevention and Control Division, Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego. Role of the Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. Previous Presentation: Results from this study were presented in an oral presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine; May 12, 2012; Orlando, Florida. Additional Contributions: We thank the research assistants for conducting the patient interviews; the participants for their contribution to this study; and Eric Vittinghoff, PhD, and David Guzman, MSPH, for their contributions toward the statistical analysis and interpretation of data, and for their comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript. Online-Only Material: The eTable is available at http: //www.jamainternalmed.com.
Substance Abuse | 2016
Sarah E. Wakeman; Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Karen Donelan
ABSTRACT Background: Previous research demonstrates that most primary care physicians feel unprepared to diagnose and treat substance use disorder (SUD). Confidence in SUD management has been associated with improved clinical practices. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 290 inpatient and outpatient general internists in an academic medical center evaluating attitudes, preparedness, and clinical practice related to SUD. Results: 149 general internists responded, a response rate of 51%. Forty-six percent frequently cared for patients with SUD. Sixteen percent frequently referred patients to treatment and 6% frequently prescribed a medication to treat SUD. Twenty percent felt very prepared to screen for SUD, 9% to provide a brief intervention, 7% to discuss behavioral treatments, and 9% to discuss medication treatments. Thirty-one percent felt that SUD is different from other chronic diseases because they believe using substances is a choice. Fourteen percent felt treatment with opioid agonists was replacing one addiction with another. Twelve percent of hospitalists and 6% of PCPs believe that someone who uses drugs is committing a crime and deserves punishment. Preparedness was significantly associated with evidence-based clinical practice and favorable attitudes. Frequently caring for patients with SUD was significantly associated with preparedness, clinical practice, and favorable attitudes. Conclusions: SUD is a treatable and prevalent disease, yet a majority of general internists do not feel very prepared to screen, diagnose, provide a brief intervention, refer to treatment, or discuss treatment options with patients. Very few frequently prescribe medications to treat SUD. Some physicians view substance use as a crime and a choice. Physician preparedness and exposure to SUD is associated with improved clinical practice and favorable attitudes towards SUD. Physicians need education and support to provide better care for patients with SUD.
Academic Medicine | 2016
Darren E. Zinner; Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Eric G. Campbell
Purpose Since 2000, federal funders and many journals have established policies requiring more open sharing of data and materials post-publication, primarily through online supplements and third-party repositories. This study examined changes in sharing and withholding practices among academic life scientists, particularly geneticists, between 2000 and 2013. Method In 2000 and 2013, the authors surveyed separate samples of 3,000 academic life scientists at the 100 U.S. universities receiving the most National Institutes of Health funding. Respondents were asked to estimate the number of requests for information, data, and materials they made to and received from other academic researchers in the past three years. They were also asked about potential consequences of sharing and withholding. Results Response rates were 63.9% (1,849/2,893) in 2000 and 40.8% (1,165/2,853) in 2013. Proportions of faculty in 2000 and 2013 who received, denied, made, or were denied at least one request were not statistically different. However, the total volume of requests received from or made to other scientists dropped substantially (19.4 received in 2000 versus 10.8 in 2013, P < .001; 8.4 made in 2000 versus 6.6 in 2013, P < .001). Faculty in 2013 also made an average of 8.4 requests to third-party repositories. Researchers in 2013 were less likely to report sharing resulted in new research or collaborations. Conclusions The results show a dramatic shift in sharing mechanisms, away from a peer-to-peer sharing model toward one based on central repositories. This may increase efficiency, but collaborations may suffer if personal communication among scientists is deemphasized.
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health | 2012
Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Noreen Goldman
Background Although sons are thought to impose greater physiological costs on mothers than daughters, sons may be advantageous for parental survival in some social contexts. The authors examined the relationship between the sex composition of offspring and parental survival in contemporary China and Taiwan. Because of the importance of sons for the provision of support to elderly parents in these populations, the authors hypothesised that sons would have a beneficial effect on parental survival relative to daughters. Methods The authors used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and the Taiwan Longitudinal Study of Aging (TLSA). The CLHLS sample consisted of 4132 individuals aged 65 years and over in 2002. The TLSA sample comprised two cohorts: 3409 persons aged 60 years and over in 1989 and 2193 persons aged 50–66 years in 1996. These cohorts were followed up for 3, 18 and 11 years, respectively. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the relationship between the sex composition of offspring and parental mortality. Results Based on seven measures of sex composition, no protective effect of sons was found in either China or Taiwan. For example, in the 1989 Taiwan sample, the hazard ratio (HR) for maternal mortality associated with having an eldest son was 0.979 (95% CI 0.863 to 1.111). In Taiwan, daughters may have been more beneficial than sons in reducing mortality in recent years. Conclusion The authors offer several explanations for these findings, including possible benefits associated with emotional and interpersonal forms of support provided by daughters and negative impacts of conflicts arising between parents and resident daughters-in-law.
Journal of Leukocyte Biology | 2015
Jalayne J. Arias; Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Eric G. Campbell
The 1996 Bermuda Principles launched a new era in data sharing, reflecting a growing belief that the rapid public dissemination of research data was crucial to scientific progress in genetics. A historical review of data sharing policies in the field of genetics and genomics reflects changing scientific norms and evolving views of genomic data, particularly related to human subjects’ protections and privacy concerns. The 2013 NIH Draft Genomic Data Sharing (GDS) Policy incorporates the most significant protections and guidelines to date. The GDS Policy, however, will face difficult challenges ahead as geneticists seek to balance the very real concerns of research participants and the scientific norms that propel research forward. This article provides a novel evaluation of genetic and GDS policies’ treatment of human subjects’ protections. The article examines not only the policies, but also some of the most pertinent scientific, legal, and regulatory developments that occurred alongside data sharing policies. This historical perspective highlights the challenges that future data sharing policies, including the recently disseminated NIH GDS Draft Policy, will encounter.
Journal of Urban Health-bulletin of The New York Academy of Medicine | 2017
David M. Kern; Amy H. Auchincloss; Lucy F. Robinson; Mark Stehr; Genevieve Pham-Kanter
This paper evaluates variation in food prices within and between neighborhoods to improve our understanding of access to healthy foods in urbanized areas and potential economic incentives and barriers to consuming a higher-quality diet. Prices of a selection of healthier foods (dairy, fruit juice, and frozen vegetables) and unhealthy foods (soda, sweets, and salty snacks) were obtained from 1953 supermarkets across the USA during 2009–2012 and were linked to census block group socio-demographics. Analyses evaluated associations between neighborhood SES and proportion Black/Hispanic and the prices of healthier and unhealthy foods, and the relative price of healthier foods compared with unhealthy foods (healthy-to-unhealthy price ratio). Linear hierarchical regression models were used to explore geospatial variation and adjust for confounders. Overall, the price of healthier foods was nearly twice as high as the price of unhealthy foods (
Journal of Leukocyte Biology | 2015
Jalayne J. Arias; Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Rosa Gonzalez; Eric G. Campbell
0.590 vs
Archive | 2011
Genevieve Pham-Kanter
0.298 per serving; healthy-to-unhealthy price ratio of 1.99). This trend was consistent across all neighborhood characteristics. After adjusting for covariates, no association was found between food prices (healthy, unhealthy, or the healthy-to-unhealthy ratio) and neighborhood SES. Similarly, there was no association between the proportion Black/Hispanic and healthier food price, a very small positive association with unhealthy price, and a modest negative association with the healthy-to-unhealthy ratio. No major differences were seen in food prices across levels of neighborhood SES and proportion Black/Hispanic; however, the price of healthier food was twice as expensive as unhealthy food per serving on average.
Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2017
Genevieve Pham-Kanter; Michelle M. Mello; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Eric G. Campbell; Daniel Carpenter
Recent policies and proposed regulations, including the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for the Common Rule and the 2014 NIH Genetic Data Sharing Policy, seek to improve research subject protections. Protections for subjects whose genetic data is shared are critical to reduce risks such as loss of confidentiality, stigma, and discrimination. In the article ‘It depends whose data are being shared: considerations for genomic data sharing policies’, Robinson et al. provide a response to our article, ‘The Growth and Gaps of Genetic Data Sharing Policies’. Robinson et al. highlight the importance of individual and group preferences. In this article, we extend the conversation on models for improving protections which will mitigate consequences for individuals and groups that are vulnerable to stigma and discrimination.
Milbank Quarterly | 2014
Genevieve Pham-Kanter
In this study, I look at whether individuals treat overweight workers differently from slender workers when deliberating about bonuses and promotions. Using a nationally representative sample of over 1700 subjects, I experimentally vary the performance ratings and the apparent weight of candidate employees and ask respondents to distribute bonuses among employees and to make promotion recommendations. I find that there is discrimination against overweight workers when bonuses are being allocated and when promotion assessments are being made. Conditional on having the same average performance ratings, overweight workers are allocated about 5% less in bonuses than slender workers. Heavier workers are also 2 percentage points less likely to be recommended for promotions. In contrast to previous research, I find that men and women are equally penalized for being overweight. If bonuses are a measure of employee taste-based discrimination, these results suggest that some of the weight penalty seen in observational studies is the result of employee taste-based discrimination.