Gennaro D’Amico

Emergency sclerotherapy versus vasoactive drugs for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: A cochrane meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS Emergency sclerotherapy is used as a first-line therapy for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis, although pharmacologic treatment stops bleeding in most patients. We performed a meta-analysis comparing emergency sclerotherapy with pharmacologic treatment. METHODS MEDLINE (1968-2002), EMBASE (1986-2002), and the Cochrane Library (2002;4) were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials comparing sclerotherapy with vasopressin (+/- nitroglycerin), terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide for variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Outcome measures were failure to control bleeding, rebleeding, blood transfusions, adverse events, and mortality. RESULTS Fifteen trials were identified. Sclerotherapy was not superior to terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide for any outcome and to vasopressin for rebleeding, blood transfusions, death, and adverse events; it was superior to vasopressin for the control of bleeding in a single trial flawed by a potential detection bias. Sclerotherapy was associated with significantly more adverse events than somatostatin. In a predefined sensitivity analysis, combining all of the trials irrespective of the control treatment, risk differences (sclerotherapy minus control) and confidence intervals (CIs) were as follows: failure to control bleeding, -0.03 (-0.06 to 0.01); mortality, -0.035 (-0.07 to 0.008); adverse events, 0.08 (0.02 to 0.14). Mortality risk difference was -0.01 (-0.07 to 0.04) in good-quality trials and -0.08 (-0.14 to -0.02) in poor-quality trials. CONCLUSIONS Available evidence does not support emergency sclerotherapy as the first-line treatment of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis when compared with vasoactive drugs, which control bleeding in 83% of patients. Therefore, endoscopic therapy might be added only in pharmacologic treatment failures.

Renal failure and cirrhosis: a systematic review of mortality and prognosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS To evaluate renal failure (RF) in cirrhosis to determine and quantify its prognostic significance. METHODS Studies were identified by MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, ISI Web of Science (1977-2010); search terms included renal failure, mortality, and cirrhosis. Included studies (n=74) reported >10 patients and mortality data (8088 patients). Mortality at 1, 3, and 12 months was evaluated with respect to Child-Pugh score, serum creatinine, ascites, ICU status or sepsis, prospective study design, and publication year. Pooled odds ratio (POR) for death was compared for RF vs. non-RF (5668 patients). RESULTS Overall median mortality for RF patients was 67%: 58% at 1 month and 63% (IQR 54-79) at 12 months. POR for death RF vs. non-RF patients was 7.6 (95%CI 5.4-10.8). Overall mortality before 2005 (1264 patients) was 74% and after 2005 (2833 patients) was 63% with a marked reduction only at 30 days (71% vs. 52%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides a measure of the increased risk of death in cirrhosis with renal failure. RF increases mortality 7-fold, with 50% of patients dying within one month. Preventative strategies for RF are needed.

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic balloon dilation of symptomatic intestinal Crohn's disease strictures.

AIM To evaluate prospectively the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic hydrostatic balloon dilation in a consecutive cohort of symptomatic intestinal Crohns disease strictures. METHODS Between September 2003 and December 2008 we performed endoscopic balloon dilations in 37 Crohns disease patients with 39 intestinal symptomatic strictures (4 naïve and 35 postoperative). Dilations were performed using a Rigiflex through-the-scope balloon. Clinical success rate was claimed if a patient remained asymptomatic and did not require surgery or further endoscopic dilation, following technical success. Actuarial curves of clinical, endoscopic (redilation) and surgical recurrence were obtained by Kaplan-Meier method. Demographic and disease variables were related to the main outcomes. RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 26.3 months (range, 2-61 months), the long-term global benefit rate was 89% (33/37). The 1-2-3 years cumulative symptom-free rates were respectively: 76%, 55% and 46%. Four patients were operated upon. Technical success predicts a lower rate of surgery. There were no complications related to the endoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic balloon dilation of symptomatic Crohns disease strictures may achieve clinical benefit in many patients and is a valid alternative to surgery in the management of the disease. Dilation may be repeated in recurrent intestinal obstructions and appears safe without morbidity.

Long-term sequential deferiprone–deferoxamine versus deferiprone alone for thalassaemia major patients: a randomized clinical trial

A multicentre randomized open‐label trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of long‐term sequential deferiprone–deferoxamine (DFO–DFP) versus DFP alone to treat thalassaemia major (TM). DFP at 75 mg/kg, divided into three oral daily doses, for 4 d/week and DFO by subcutaneous infusion (8–12 h) at 50 mg/kg per day for the remaining 3 d/week was compared with DFP alone at 75 mg/kg, administered 7 d/week during a 5‐year follow‐up. The main outcome measures were differences between multiple observations of serum ferritin concentrations. Secondary outcomes were survival analysis, adverse events, and costs. Consecutive thalassaemia patients (275) were assessed for eligibility; 213 of these were randomized and underwent intention‐to‐treat analysis. The decrease of serum ferritin levels during the treatment period was statistically significant higher in sequential DFP–DFO patients compared with DFP‐alone patients (P = 0·005). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for the two chelation treatments did not show any statistically significant differences (long‐rank test, P = 0·3145). Adverse events and costs were comparable between the groups. The trial results show that sequential DFP–DFO treatment compared with DFP alone significantly decreased serum ferritin concentration during treatment for 5 years without significant differences regarding survival, adverse events, or costs. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT00733811.

Music for colonoscopy: A single-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Several methods have been reported to minimize patient discomfort during colonoscopy, none are currently recommended by clinical practice guidelines. We performed a single-blind randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of music for colonoscopy. METHODS 109 patients were randomized to music-delivering or mute headphones before and during colonoscopy. Physicians were blinded to the trial. Sedation was given on demand. Primary outcome was pain measured on linear analogue scale from 0 to 10. Secondary endpoints were the difficulty of the procedure, need of sedation, overall patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure. RESULTS Mean pain score was 5.9±2.2 in the control group vs. 3.8±1.9 in the music group (p<0.00001); correspondingly overall satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure were significantly improved by music and the difficulty perceived by physicians was significantly reduced. Total administered midazolam was 36mg in the control group vs. 13 in the music group (p<0.007), pethidine was 860mg vs. 465mg (p=0.07) and patients requiring sedation were 22 vs. 9, respectively (p=0.003). A multivariable analysis to adjust treatment effect for potential confounding factors confirmed the significant beneficial effect of music. CONCLUSIONS Music significantly reduces discomfort and should be routinely offered to patients undergoing colonoscopy.

TIPS is a cost effective alternative to surgical shunt as a rescue therapy for prevention of recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices

Portosystemic shunt surgery has played a major role in the evolution of management of portal hypertension. Prophylactic shunts were abandoned in the early 1970s after 4 RCTs showed increased encephalopathy and mortality in operated patients, although bleeding was virtually abolished. The increase in mortality and portal systemic encephalopathy was attributed to the progressive liver function deterioration, induced by the blood diversion from the portal to the systemic circulation [1]. Selective variceal decompression by the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) was ideated in the late 1960s to maintain a sufficient portal hepatopetal flow, and therefore preserving liver function, while reducing the risk of variceal bleeding. However, since RCTs and meta-analyses showed no advantage of DSRS over total shunt and sclerotherapy [2], it was confined to the role of rescue therapy for failure of endoscopic therapy for the prevention of rebleeding in patients with relatively well preserved liver function. More recently the trans-jugular intra-hepatic portal systemic shunt (TIPS) has been added to the therapeutic options for portal hypertension and it is currently widely used as a rescue therapy after failure of combined medical and endoscopic therapy for the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding. In fact, since two meta-analyses showed that TIPS is effective in reducing the risk of variceal rebleeding, but also increases the risk of portal hepatic encephalopathy and does not improve survival, it is not recommended as a first-line treatment for the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding [3]. Besides the lack of clinical advantage, bare stent TIPS has also the disadvantage of requiring a strict surveillance program with ultrasonography and repeated reinterventions for preserving its patency, with a marked increase of the overall cost over that of the initial procedure. However, the rates of stent dysfunction and reinterventions have been significantly reduced by the use of covered stents. Current AASLD guidelines for the prevention of variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis recommend that TIPS

Effect of recombinant Factor VIIa on outcome of acute variceal bleeding: An individual patient based meta-analysis of two controlled trials

BACKGROUND & AIMS Two randomized controlled studies have evaluated the effect of recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) on variceal bleeding in cirrhosis without showing significant benefit. The aim of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis of the two trials on individual patient data with special focus on high risk patients. METHODS The primary outcome measure was the effect of rFVIIa on a composite five day endpoint: failure to control bleeding, 5-day rebleeding or death. Analysis was based on intention to treat. High risk was defined as active bleeding on endoscopy while under vasoactive drug infusion and Child-Pugh score >8. RESULTS 497 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis; 308 (62%) had active variceal bleeding at endoscopy (oozing or spurting) and 283 of these had a Child-Pugh score >8. Analysis on the composite endpoint in all patients with bleeding from oesophageal varices did not show any beneficial treatment effect. However, failure rate for the primary composite end-point was significantly lower in treated patients with active bleeding at endoscopy (17%) compared to placebo (26%, p=0.049). This difference was highly significant in patients with Child-Pugh score >8 and active bleeding at endoscopy (rFVIIa 16%, placebo 27%; p=0.023). No significant treatment effect was found at 42 days. Five thromboembolic events occurred in rFVIIa treated patients compared to none in placebo treated patients. CONCLUSIONS The current meta-analysis shows a beneficial effect of rFVIIa on the primary composite endpoint of control of acute bleeding, prevention of rebleeding day 1-5 and 5-day mortality in patients with advanced cirrhosis and active bleeding from oesophageal varices at endoscopy. A major drawback of the treatment is a potential increased risk of arterial thrombo-embolic events. This treatment might be considered in patients with lack of control of bleeding after standard treatment.

Diagnostic performance of Baveno IV criteria in cirrhotic patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding : analysis of the F7 liver-1288 study population

BACKGROUND & AIMS The definition of failure to control bleeding agreed upon at the Baveno IV consensus meeting, included the Adjusted Blood Requirement Index [ABRI: number of blood units/(final-initial hematocrit+0.01)]. ABRI ≥0.75 denotes failure. However, timing for hematocrit measurements was not defined. The aims of this study were: (1) to assess the Baveno IV criteria performance to classify treatment success or failure to control bleeding at 5 days, (2) to determine the appropriate timing for hematocrit. METHODS Two hundred and forty-two cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding were independently classified by three clinical experts according to the Baveno IV criteria, by analysis of the database of a randomized trial. ABRI was calculated by using the closest hematocrit to the 5 day time point from the first trial product administration (ABRI-1) or after the latest transfusion within the 5-day period (ABRI-2). The gold standard for success/failure for 5-day control of bleeding was the clinical judgment of the three independent observers based on all the clinical and follow-up data. RESULTS Inter-observer agreement for the final outcome assessment was 0.82 and a final consensus was obtained in 236/242 patients. Inter-observer agreement on patient classification with Baveno IV criteria was 0.70 with ABRI-1 and 0.84 with ABRI-2. c-statistics for correct patients classification were 0.86 for ABRI-1, 0.84 for ABRI-2, and 0.88 for Baveno IV criteria without ABRI. ABRI-1 caused misclassification of 27 patients and ABRI-2 of 39. CONCLUSIONS Baveno IV criteria are accurate to assess outcome of patients with variceal bleeding. There is a substantial observer variability linked to timing of hematocrits for ABRI calculation. With the current definition ABRI does not add to the performance of the other criteria.

Consensus conference on TIPS management: Techniques, indications, contraindications

The trans jugular intrahepatic Porto systemic shunt (TIPS) is no longer viewed as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results in survival. Moreover, the availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered endoprostheses has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, since the last updated International guidelines have been published (year 2009) new evidence have come, which have open the field to new indications and solved areas of uncertainty. On this basis, the Italian Association of the Study of the Liver (AISF), the Italian College of Interventional Radiology-Italian Society of Medical Radiology (ICIR-SIRM), and the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) promoted a Consensus Conference on TIPS. Under the auspices of the three scientific societies, the consensus process started with the review of the literature by a scientific board of experts and ended with a formal consensus meeting in Bergamo on June 4th and 5th, 2015. The final statements presented here were graded according to quality of evidence and strength of recommendations and were approved by an independent jury. By highlighting strengths and weaknesses of current indications to TIPS, the recommendations of AISF-ICIR-SIRM-SIAARTI may represent the starting point for further studies.

SEQUENTIAL ALTERNATING DEFERIPRONE AND DEFEROXAMINE TREATMENT COMPARED TO DEFERIPRONE MONOTHERAPY: MAIN FINDINGS AND CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP OF A LARGE MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL IN -THALASSEMIA MAJOR PATIENTS

In β-thalassemia major (β-TM) patients, iron chelation therapy is mandatory to reduce iron overload secondary to transfusions. Recommended first line treatment is deferoxamine (DFO) from the age of 2 and second line treatment after the age of 6 is deferiprone (L1). A multicenter randomized open-label trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of long-term alternating sequential L1-DFO vs. L1 alone iron chelation therapy in β-TM patients. Deferiprone 75 mg/kg 4 days/week and DFO 50 mg/kg/day for 3 days/week was compared with L1 alone 75 mg/kg 7 days/week during a 5-year follow-up. A total of 213 thalassemia patients were randomized and underwent intention-to-treat analysis. Statistically, a decrease of serum ferritin level was significantly higher in alternating sequential L1-DFO patients compared with L1 alone patients (p = 0.005). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the two chelation treatments did not show statistically significant differences (log-rank test, p = 0.3145). Adverse events and costs were comparable between the groups. Alternating sequential L1-DFO treatment decreased serum ferritin concentration during a 5-year treatment by comparison to L1 alone, without significant differences of survival, adverse events or costs. These findings were confirmed in a further 21-month follow-up. These data suggest that alternating sequential L1-DFO treatment may be useful for some β-TM patients who may not be able to receive other forms of chelation treatment.