Geoff Podger
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Geoff Podger.
Archive | 2013
Mac Kirby; Francis H. S. Chiew; Mohammed Mainuddin; Bill Young; Geoff Podger; Andy Close
The Murray-Darling Basin experiences frequent droughts and, at the time of this writing, parts of it are in the grip of the worst drought in the 110 years of comparatively high-quality records. In this chapter, we consider the term drought to be several years with less than median rainfall. The combined impacts of drought and over-allocation of water for irrigation use have led to severe stress on floodplains and wetlands. Climate change projections suggest that the Murray-Darling Basin will be on average drier in the future. The recent drought period has experienced lower autumn and winter rain and higher temperatures than past droughts, resulting in the lowest runoff totals on record in recent years. While these features may be associated with climate change, they may equally be a result of large, long-term climate variability. The recent drought and declining river health have exposed the inadequacy of current water management to cope with the variability of water availability in the Murray-Darling Basin. Future water management strategies should involve consideration of a range of scenarios, including those incorporating climate change.
Marine and Freshwater Research | 2014
Mat Gilfedder; Geoff Podger; David Rassam; Dan Pagendam; Cathy J. Robinson
The application of river-system models to inform water-resource planning and management is a growing global phenomenon. This requires models to be applied so that they are useful to water decision makers charged with setting targets that provide adequate water flows to sustain landholders and communities. This article examines why and how the innovative application of river-system models can facilitate interactions between water science and water management in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin (the Basin). A trajectory river-modelling method was applied to run multiple short historical climate sequences through a river-system model to provide historical probabilities. These can allow better assessment of the risks and impacts associated with stream flow and water availability. This method allows known historical variability to be presented, and produces relevant results for a 10–15-year water-sharing plan lifetime. The benefits were demonstrated in the Basin’s Lachlan Catchment where modelled river-flow results demonstrated the increased variability between shorter 15-year sequences than for a single 114-year run. This approach highlighted the benefits of expressing modelling results as historical probabilities to inform short-term and strategic water-planning efforts.
International Journal of River Basin Management | 2017
Ang Yang; Dushmanta Dutta; Jai Vaze; Shaun Kim; Geoff Podger
ABSTRACT The Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) is home to two million people and accounts for about 60% of the water use in Australia. The MDB river system is a highly complex and mostly regulated system covering four states (Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia) and one territory. Different jurisdictions used different models for water resources and planning. A number of difficulties were faced in combining those models (of different characteristics and spatio-temporal resolutions) for basin-wide water resources planning. In order to overcome those difficulties and enhance the consistency and transparency in modelling outcomes across multiple jurisdictions, this paper proposes a homogeneous agent-based integrated modelling framework. Each agent is used to represent a region in the MDB. Its behaviour is modelled by a newly built Source river model. The interactions between agents are modelled based on the hydrological connectivity in the real-world river systems. A three-level parallel computing mechanism is developed to significantly increase its efficiency and reduce computational time. Due to its homogeneousness, it largely reduces the system complexity and makes modelling results consistent, explainable and comparable. By nature, the agent-based system is flexible and portable. All these unique features of the platform suit the modelling needs of various states to federal government water resource management agencies.
Decision Making in Water Resources Policy and Management#R##N#An Australian Perspective | 2017
Carmel Pollino; P.J. Wallbrink; A.K. Parashar; Geoff Podger; R. McLoughlin
Abstract This chapter reports on a project that was established under the decade-long Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) on water resource management (2009–19) between the governments of India and Australia. This MoU supports the application of Australian water resources expertise to assist India in building capacity and managing water at a Basin scale. The project was largely technically based, focusing on the Brahmani-Baitarni River Basin located in the eastern part of India, and used Australian expertise in modeling developed largely in the Murray-Darling Basin. The project had two objectives. The first was building capacity in central and state government engineers in India to use river system models in a basin-planning context, and the second was using the modeling to deliver scenario options for management of water in the basin. This paper focuses on the former objective. The program of capacity-building activities was agreed upon at the outset of the project, which was aimed at three types of participants: trainers (those who could train others, with a focus on river modeling), users (those who could develop the skills to use the river models), and influencers (those who could understand the model outputs and use them in a policy sense). The capacity-building program was implemented over a 3-year period, with a mix of engagement activities. Basin planning forms a key component of Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM). Both basin planning and IWRM are still emerging concepts, and there have been few applications in India. As with any program of work that is new and that has a substantial breadth, a number of challenges were experienced. These included limited availability of and access to data, advanced river system models requiring a depth of capacity and expertise for use, and a need to ensure that the policy drivers for basin planning in India from the various levels of government were represented within the project context. More broadly, the institutional arrangements for planning and managing in basin scale water resources in India are still evolving, and application and implementation of basin planning is still in its infancy. Nonetheless, the project has succeeded in building capacity in the use of river system models and in the development of river models that have the potential to support a basin-planning approach. The next challenge is to apply these skills within a basin-planning policy context.
Water Resources Management | 2016
Cuan Petheram; Justin Hughes; L. McKellar; Shaun Kim; L. Holz; Perry Poulton; M. Kehoe; S. Podger; Geoff Podger; David McJannet; John Hornbuckle
To meet the anticipated increase in global demand for food and fibre products, large areas of land around the world are being cleared and infrastructure constructed to enable irrigation, referred to herein as ‘greenfield irrigation’. One of the challenges in assessing the profitability of a greenfield irrigation development is understanding the impact of variability in climate and water availability and the trade-offs with scheme size, cost and the sensitivity of crop yield to water stress. For example, is it more profitable to irrigate a small area of land most years or a large area once every few years? And, is it more profitable to partially or fully water the crop? This paper presents a new method for efficiently linking a river system model and an agricultural production model to explore the financial trade-offs of different management choices, thereby enabling the optimal scheme area and most appropriate level of farmer risk to be identified. The method is demonstrated for a hypothetical but plausible greenfield irrigation development based around a large dam in the Flinders catchment, northern Australia. It was found that a dam and irrigation development paid for and operated by the same entity is not, under the conditions examined in this analysis, economically sustainable. The method could also be used to explore the impact of different management strategies on the agricultural production and profitability of existing irrigation schemes within a whole of river system context.
Water Resources Research | 2013
Albert Van Dijk; Hylke E. Beck; Russell S. Crosbie; Richard de Jeu; Yi Y. Liu; Geoff Podger; Bertrand Timbal; Neil R. Viney
Journal of Hydrology | 2014
Quanxi Shao; Julien Lerat; Geoff Podger; Dushmanta Dutta
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2014
Luk Peeters; Geoff Podger; T. Smith; Trevor Pickett; R. H. Bark; S. M. Cuddy
Journal of Hydrology | 2012
Quanxi Shao; Julien Lerat; Heron Brink; Kerrie M. Tomkins; Ang Yang; Luk Peeters; Ming Li; Lu Zhang; Geoff Podger; Luigi J. Renzullo
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2014
Jorge L. Peña-Arancibia; Tim R. McVicar; Zahra Paydar; Lingtao Li; Juan Pablo Guerschman; Randall J. Donohue; Dushmanta Dutta; Geoff Podger; Albert I. J. M. van Dijk; Francis H. S. Chiew
Collaboration
Dive into the Geoff Podger's collaboration.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
View shared research outputs