Geoffrey A. Tate

Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure

We use unique worker-plant matched panel data to measure differences in wage changes experienced by workers displaced from closing plants. We observe larger losses among women than men, comparing workers who move from the same closing plant to the same new firm. However, we find a significantly smaller gap in hiring firms with female leadership. The results are strongest among women who are displaced from male-led plants and from less competitive industries. Our results suggest an important externality to having women in leadership positions: They cultivate more female-friendly cultures inside their firms.

The Human Factor in Acquisitions: Cross-Industry Labor Mobility and Corporate Diversification

Internal labor markets facilitate cross-industry worker reallocation and collaboration, and the resulting benefits are largest when the markets include industries that utilize similar worker skills. We construct a matrix of industry pair-wise human capital transferability using information obtained from more than 11 million job changes. We show that diversifying acquisitions occur more frequently among industry pairs with higher human capital transferability. Such acquisitions result in larger labor productivity gains and are less often undone in subsequent divestitures. Moreover, acquirers retain more high skill workers and they exploit the real option to move workers from the target firm to jobs in other industries inside the merged firm. Overall, our results identify human capital as a source of value from corporate diversification and provide an explanation for seemingly unrelated acquisitions.

Friends During Hard Times: Evidence from the Great Depression

We test whether network connections to other firms through executives and directors increase value by exploiting differences in survival rates in response to a common negative shock. We find that firms that had more connections on the eve of the 1929 financial market crash have higher 10-year survival rates during the Great Depression. Consistent with a financing channel, we find that the results are particularly strong for small firms, private firms and firms with small cash holdings relative to the sample median prior to the shock. Moreover, connections to cash-rich firms are stronger predictors of survival, overall and among financially constrained firms. Because of the greater segmentation of markets in the 1920s and 1930s than in modern data samples, we can mitigate the potential endogeneity of network connections at the time of the shock by exploiting variation in the local demand for directors’ services. We also find evidence that the information that flows through network links increases the odds that a firm will be acquired.

Investor Experience and Attention: The Effect of Financial Shocks on Individual Trading Decisions

Using unique data on employee ownership plans sponsored by U.S. public companies, we estimate the effects of the 2008 financial crisis on individual investors’ participation and trading decisions. Consistent with a decreased willingness to take risk, we observe an increase in the average propensity to exercise employee stock options following the crisis, controlling for grant timing and moneyness in addition to time-invariant firm and employee characteristics. However, the results are concentrated among employees with limited experience in option plans prior to the pre-crisis run-up in equity prices. Moreover, we find that low-experience employees also increase their participation in employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs) following the shock. Conditional on initiating participation in ESPPs, we find that they are disproportionally likely to sell the acquired shares both immediately and within the first year of ownership. Since declining to participate in an ESPP amounts to leaving money on the table, our results suggest a new wrinkle in our understanding of how investors’ personal return experiences interact with risk preferences. While negative shocks appear to diminish investors’ appetites for risk, they also mitigate investor inattention. Thus, at least along certain dimensions, they can induce investors to make decisions that are closer to the optimum. * Preliminary and incomplete. Do not circulate without the authors’ permission.Using unique data on employee ownership plans sponsored by U.S. public companies, we estimate the effects of the 2008 financial crisis on individual investors’ participation and trading decisions. Consistent with a decreased willingness to take risk, we observe an increase in the average propensity to exercise employee stock options following the crisis, controlling for grant timing and moneyness in addition to time-invariant firm and employee characteristics. However, the results are concentrated among employees with limited experience in option plans prior to the pre-crisis run-up in equity prices. Moreover, we find that low-experience employees also increase their participation in employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs) following the shock. Conditional on initiating participation in ESPPs, we find that they are disproportionally likely to sell the acquired shares both immediately and within the first year of ownership. Since declining to participate in an ESPP amounts to leaving money on the table, our results suggest a new wrinkle in our understanding of how investors’ personal return experiences interact with risk preferences. While negative shocks appear to diminish investors’ appetites for risk, they also mitigate investor inattention. Thus, at least along certain dimensions, they can induce investors to make decisions that are closer to the optimum.