Georg Kunz

Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib have complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic antitumour activity in models of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. We argue that the two anti-HER2 agents given together would be better than single-agent therapy. METHODS In this parallel groups, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study undertaken between Jan 5, 2008, and May 27, 2010, women from 23 countries with HER2-positive primary breast cancer with tumours greater than 2 cm in diameter were randomly assigned to oral lapatinib (1500 mg), intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose 4 mg/kg [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED], subsequent doses 2 mg/kg), or lapatinib (1000 mg) plus trastuzumab. Treatment allocation was by stratified, permuted blocks randomisation, with four stratification factors. Anti-HER2 therapy alone was given for the first 6 weeks; weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was then added to the regimen for a further 12 weeks, before definitive surgery was undertaken. After surgery, patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same targeted therapy as in the neoadjuvant phase to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00553358. FINDINGS 154 patients received lapatinib, 149 trastuzumab, and 152 the combination. pCR rate was significantly higher in the group given lapatinib and trastuzumab (78 of 152 patients [51·3%; 95% CI 43·1-59·5]) than in the group given trastuzumab alone (44 of 149 patients [29·5%; 22·4-37·5]; difference 21·1%, 9·1-34·2, p=0·0001). We recorded no significant difference in pCR between the lapatinib (38 of 154 patients [24·7%, 18·1-32·3]) and the trastuzumab (difference -4·8%, -17·6 to 8·2, p=0·34) groups. No major cardiac dysfunctions occurred. Frequency of grade 3 diarrhoea was higher with lapatinib (36 patients [23·4%]) and lapatinib plus trastuzumab (32 [21·1%]) than with trastuzumab (three [2·0%]). Similarly, grade 3 liver-enzyme alterations were more frequent with lapatinib (27 [17·5%]) and lapatinib plus trastuzumab (15 [9·9%]) than with trastuzumab (11 [7·4%]). INTERPRETATION Dual inhibition of HER2 might be a valid approach to treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. FUNDING GlaxoSmithKline.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor A, has shown clinical efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy, measured according to the rate of pathological complete response (absence of invasive and intraductal disease in the breast and the axillary lymph nodes), and the safety of adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early-stage breast cancer. METHODS We randomly assigned 1948 patients with a median tumor size of 40 mm on palpation to receive neoadjuvant epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, with or without concomitant bevacizumab. Patients with untreated HER2-negative breast cancer were eligible if they had large tumors, hormone-receptor-negative disease, or hormone-receptor-positive disease with palpable nodes or positive findings on sentinel-node biopsy, and no increased cardiovascular or bleeding risk. RESULTS Overall, the rates of pathological complete response were 14.9% with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel and 18.4% with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel plus bevacizumab (odds ratio with addition of bevacizumab, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.65; P=0.04); the corresponding rates of pathological complete response were 27.9% and 39.3% among 663 patients with triple-negative tumors (P=0.003) and 7.8% and 7.7% among 1262 patients with hormone-receptor-positive tumors (P=1.00). Breast-conserving surgery was possible in 66.6% of the patients in both groups. The addition of bevacizumab, as compared with neoadjuvant therapy alone, was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxic effects (febrile neutropenia, mucositis, the hand-foot syndrome, infection, and hypertension) but with a similar incidence of surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS The addition of bevacizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the rate of pathological complete response among patients with HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. Efficacy was restricted primarily to patients with triple-negative tumors, in whom the pathological complete response is considered to be a reliable predictor of long-term outcome. (Funded by Sanofi-Aventis and Roche, Germany; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00567554.).

Prospective Validation of Immunological Infiltrate for Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer - A Substudy of the Neoadjuvant GeparQuinto Trial

Introduction We have recently described an increased lymphocytic infiltration rate in breast carcinoma tissue is a significant response predictor for anthracycline/taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The aim of this study was to prospectively validate the tumor-associated lymphocyte infiltrate as predictive marker for response to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT. Patients and Methods The immunological infiltrate was prospectively evaluated in a total of 313 core biopsies from HER2 negative patients of the multicenter PREDICT study, a substudy of the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto study. Intratumoral lymphocytes (iTuLy), stromal lymphocytes (strLy) as well as lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) were evaluated by histopathological assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were analyzed and compared between the defined subgroups using the exact test of Fisher. Results Patients with lymphocyte-predominant breast cancer (LPBC) had a significantly increased pCR rate of 36.6%, compared to non-LPBC patients (14.3%, p<0.001). LPBC and stromal lymphocytes were significantly independent predictors for pCR in multivariate analysis (LPBC: OR 2.7, p = 0.003, strLy: OR 1.2, p = 0.01). The amount of intratumoral lymphocytes was significantly predictive for pCR in univariate (OR 1.2, p = 0.01) but not in multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR 1.2, p = 0.11). Conclusion Confirming previous investigations of our group, we have prospectively validated in an independent cohort that an increased immunological infiltrate in breast tumor tissue is predictive for response to anthracycline/taxane-based NACT. Patients with LPBC and increased stromal lymphocyte infiltration have significantly increased pCR rates. The lymphocytic infiltrate is a promising additional parameter for histopathological evaluation of breast cancer core biopsies.

Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and anthracycline–taxane-based chemotherapy in 678 triple-negative primary breast cancers; results from the geparquinto study (GBG 44)

BACKGROUND We evaluated the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant epirubicin, (E) cyclophosphamide (C) and docetaxel containing chemotherapy with and without the addition of bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with untreated cT1c-4d TNBC represented a stratified subset of the 1948 participants of the HER2-negative part of the GeparQuinto trial. Patients were randomized to receive four cycles EC (90/600 mg/m(2); q3w) followed by four cycles docetaxel (100 mg/m(2); q3w) each with or without bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; q3w) added to chemotherapy. RESULTS TNBC patients were randomized to chemotherapy without (n = 340) or with bevacizumab (n = 323). pCR (ypT0 ypN0, primary end point) rates were 27.9% without and 39.3% with bevacizumab (P = 0.003). According to other pCR definitions, the addition of bevacizumab increased the pCR rate from 30.9% to 41.8% (ypT0 ypN0/+; P = 0.004), 36.2% to 46.4% (ypT0/is ypN0/+; P = 0.009) and 32.9% to 43.3% (ypT0/is ypN0; P = 0.007). Bevacizumab treatment [OR 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-2.42; P = 0.002], lower tumor stage (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.24-4.54; P = 0.009) and grade 3 tumors (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.48; P = 0.009) were confirmed as independent predictors of higher pCR in multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in TNBC significantly increases pCR rates.

Genetic variants in VEGF pathway genes in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab: Results from the randomized phase III GeparQuinto study.

Studies assessing the effect of bevacizumab (BEV) on breast cancer (BC) outcome have shown different effects on progression‐free and overall survival, suggesting that a subgroup of patients may benefit from this treatment. Unfortunately, no biomarkers exist to identify these patients. Here, we investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF pathway genes correlate with pathological complete response (pCR) in the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial. HER2‐negative patients were randomized into treatment arms receiving either BEV combined with standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In a pre‐planned biomarker study, DNA was collected from 729 and 724 patients, respectively from both treatment arms, and genotyped for 125 SNPs. Logistic regression assessed interaction between individual SNPs and both treatment arms to predict pCR. Five SNPs may be associated with a better response to BEV, but none of them remained significant after correction for multiple testing. The two SNPs most strongly associated, rs833058 and rs699947, were located upstream of the VEGF‐A promoter. Odds ratios for the homozygous common, heterozygous and homozygous rare rs833058 genotypes were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.49–3.75), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.88–1.64) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34–1.12). Notably, some SNPs in VEGF‐A exhibited a more pronounced effect in the triple‐negative subgroup. Several SNPs in VEGF‐A may be associated with improved pCR when receiving BEV in the neoadjuvant setting. Although none of the observed effects survived correction for multiple testing, our observations are consistent with previous studies on BEV efficacy in BC. Further research is warranted to clarify the predictive value of these markers.

Genetic variants in VEGF pathway genes in neoadjuvant breast cancer patients receiving bevacizumab

Studies assessing the effect of bevacizumab (BEV) on breast cancer (BC) outcome have shown different effects on progression‐free and overall survival, suggesting that a subgroup of patients may benefit from this treatment. Unfortunately, no biomarkers exist to identify these patients. Here, we investigate whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF pathway genes correlate with pathological complete response (pCR) in the neoadjuvant GeparQuinto trial. HER2‐negative patients were randomized into treatment arms receiving either BEV combined with standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. In a pre‐planned biomarker study, DNA was collected from 729 and 724 patients, respectively from both treatment arms, and genotyped for 125 SNPs. Logistic regression assessed interaction between individual SNPs and both treatment arms to predict pCR. Five SNPs may be associated with a better response to BEV, but none of them remained significant after correction for multiple testing. The two SNPs most strongly associated, rs833058 and rs699947, were located upstream of the VEGF‐A promoter. Odds ratios for the homozygous common, heterozygous and homozygous rare rs833058 genotypes were 2.36 (95% CI, 1.49–3.75), 1.20 (95% CI, 0.88–1.64) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.34–1.12). Notably, some SNPs in VEGF‐A exhibited a more pronounced effect in the triple‐negative subgroup. Several SNPs in VEGF‐A may be associated with improved pCR when receiving BEV in the neoadjuvant setting. Although none of the observed effects survived correction for multiple testing, our observations are consistent with previous studies on BEV efficacy in BC. Further research is warranted to clarify the predictive value of these markers.

Survival Analysis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Trastuzumab or Lapatinib in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer in the GeparQuinto (G5) Study (GBG 44)

Purpose The GeparQuinto phase III trial demonstrated a lower pathologic complete response (pCR; pT0 ypN0) rate when lapatinib was added to standard anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy compared with trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive breast cancer. Here, we report the long-term outcomes. Methods Patients with HER2-positive tumors (n = 615) received neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin (E) plus cyclophosphamide (C), followed by docetaxel (T) in combination with either lapatinib (L) or trastuzumab (H; ECH-TH arm: n = 307; ECL-TL arm: n = 308). All patients received adjuvant trastuzumab for a total of 12 months and 18 months in the ECH-TH and ECL-TL arms, respectively. Median follow-up was 55 months. Results Three-year disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the two treatment arms. Long-term outcomes correlated with pCR (DFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .042; DDFS: HR, 0.55; P = .021; and OS: HR, 0.31; P = .004). A benefit only for OS was observed in patients who were treated with trastuzumab and achieved pCR versus no pCR (HR, 0.15; P = .010), whereas no difference was found in patients with pCR versus without pCR in the lapatinib arm. DFS and DDFS remained unchanged in both treatment arms according to hormone receptor status, whereas OS was significantly better in hormone receptor-positive patients who were treated with neoadjuvant lapatinib (HR, 0.32; P = .019), followed by adjuvant trastuzumab. No difference was observed in hormone receptor-negative patients; however, the small number of events limits this interpretation. Within the hormone receptor-negative cohort, pCR was significantly associated with DFS, DDFS, and OS ( P = .002, .005, and .002, respectively). Conclusion pCR correlated with long-term outcome. In patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors, prolonged anti-HER2 treatment-neoadjuvant lapatinib for 6 months, followed by adjuvant trastuzumab for 12 months-significantly improved survival compared with anti-HER2 treatment with trastuzumab alone.

Abstract S4-6: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis of the GEPARQUINTO Study (GBG 44)

Background: The anti-VEGF-receptor antibody bevacizumab (Bev) showed increased response rates and prolonged progression-free survival in combination with anthracyclines (A) and taxanes (T) in metastatic breast cancer (BC). One primary aim of the GeparQuinto phase III study was to improve pathological complete response (pCR) by adding Bev to AT-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We previously reported interim safety data showing more leukopenia, infections, mucositis, and hypertension, but less edema for the combination with Bev (von Minckwitz G et al, Ann Oncol 2010 in press). Patients and Methods: Patients (P) with untreated HER2-negative BC were eligible if they had cT3/4a-d; or estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor-negative; or ER/PgR-positive tumors with clinically N+ (for cT2) or pN SLN + (for cT1) disease, and no increased cardiac or bleeding risks. P were randomized to receive 4 cycles epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) (90/600 mg/m 2 ) q3w followed by 4 cycles docetaxel (D) (100mg/m2) with or without concomitant Bev 15mg/kg q3w added to chemotherapy cycles. P not clinically responding to EC ± Bev were considered as treatment failures and entered another part of the protocol. pCR was defined as no invasive or non-invasive tumor residuals in breast and nodes. We assumed a pCR rate of 14% (based on GeparDuo) and expected a pCR of 18.9% for EC-D+Bev (odds ratio 1.43). A two-sided Pearson9s Chi2 with α=0.05 and β=0.20 calculated a sample size of 1934 P. Results: Between 05/07 and 06/10 1889 P were randomized to EC-D (N=944) and EC-D+Bev (N=945). Median tumor size was 40/40 [-Bev/+Bev] mm (clinically) and 29/29 mm (sonographically); 6.3%/5.8% had T4a-c, 6.6%/6.7% T4d, 2.0%/2.1% bilateral, 14.3%/13.8% multifocal, and 8.8%/10.0% multicentric disease, 89.3%/88.9% had non-lobular, 42.5%/43.3% grade 3, 57.1%/58.4% node-positive, and 34.5%/33.6% ER and PgR-negative (triple-negative) disease. So far, 24% and 17% of patients did not respond to the first 4 cycles of EC-Bev and EC+Bev, respectively, and discontinued randomized treatment. The last randomized P will have surgery early Dec910. Results on histological response and surgical outcome will be reported. Conclusion: The GeparQuinto trial will provide for the first time randomized phase III efficacy data on Bev in combination to chemotherapy for patients with early breast cancer. pCR after Bev treatment can be considered as a surrogate marker for long term outcome but this has to be examined during further follow up of the patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S4-6.

Abstract P3-11-01: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus: Survival analysis of The HER2-negative cohort of the GEPARQUINTO study (GBG 44)

BACKGROUND: The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates from 14.9% to 18.4% (P=0.04) overall; specifically in patients with TNBC (27.9% to 39.3% (P=0.003) (von Minckwitz et al, NEJM 2012). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel patients who had no early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Huober et al, Eur J Cancer 2013). Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with 4xEC a 4x docetaxel with or without bevacizumab, 15 mg/Kg q3w before surgery. 408 patients not clinically responding to EC ± Bev were randomized to 12x weekly paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5mg/day. Patients with HR-positive tumors received endocrine treatment after surgery. 379 events are required to show a HR of 0.75 (α=0.05, s=0.8) between the bevacizumab arms. 397 relapses and 234 deaths were observed after a median follow up of 3.8 years overall, of those 115 relapses and 75 deaths occurred in the non-responding cohort. RESULTS: Overall, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.780 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC showed no improvement in DFS (HR 0.991; P = 0.948) and OS (HR 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3, cT4a-c, cT4d; pCR or not, CR, PR, NC after first 4 cycles chemotherapy) showed a benefit from bevacizumab. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P=0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P=0.658) was observed for patients who had no early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term results finally do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for patients who had no early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Citation Format: Bernd Gerber, Sibylle Loibl, Michael Untch, Holger Eidtmann, Mahdi Rezai, Peter A Fasching, Hans Tesch, Holm Eggemann, Iris Schrader, Kornelia Kittel, Claus Hanusch, Jens Huober, Christine Solbach, Christian Jackisch, Georg Kunz, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Maik Hauschild, Tanja Fehm, Valentina Nekljudova, Gunter von Minckwitz. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus: Survival analysis of The HER2-negative cohort of the GEPARQUINTO study (GBG 44) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-01.