George Ebra

Thirty-Year Follow-Up Defines Survival Benefit for Second Internal Mammary Artery in Propensity-Matched Groups

BACKGROUND The value of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft is well established. However, the incremental value of a second IMA graft is controversial. Despite reports of improved survival with bilateral IMA (BIMA) grafting, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons reports its use in 4% of coronary artery bypass graft operations. We report the influence of BIMA vs SIMA grafting on hospital and late mortality in comparable groups. METHODS Retrospective review was conducted of 4584 consecutive isolated coronary artery bypass graft operations (2369 SIMA and 2215 BIMA) performed from 1972 to 1994. The influence of the second IMA was assessed by multivariate analyses of risk factors associated with hospital and late mortality and by propensity score analysis that compares patients with similar baseline characteristics for receiving a second IMA graft. All patients were monitored clinically to assess outcomes. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 4.5% for SIMA vs 2.6% for BIMA patients (p = 0.001). When stratified by propensity score to undergo BIMA grafting, no difference in hospital mortality was found. Multivariate analyses showed SIMA grafting was significantly associated with late but not hospital mortality. Survival curves after 52,572 patient-years of follow-up (mean, 11.5 years; range, 6 weeks to 32 years) demonstrated improved long-term survival for BIMA vs SIMA patients in all quintiles except those with the greatest propensity for SIMA, wherein late survival was comparable between groups. In matched groups, survival favored BIMA patients (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS BIMA grafting offers a long-term survival advantage over SIMA grafting in propensity-matched groups.

Determinants of operative mortality in octogenarians undergoing coronary bypass

BACKGROUND The elderly segment of the population is increasing rapidly, and surgeons are being asked to consider patients more than 80 years old as candidates for coronary bypass. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors that may adversely affect mortality as well as analyze functional outcomes and survival in octogenarians undergoing coronary bypass. METHODS From July 1989 through February 1994, 300 consecutive patients 80 years of age and older underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. There were 176 men (58.7%) and 124 women (41.3%) with a mean age of 80.9 years (range, 80 to 99 years). Preoperatively, 274 patients (91.3%) had disabling angina, 76 (25.3%) had left main coronary stenosis greater than 50%, and 293 patients (98.3%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. RESULTS The overall hospital mortality was 11.0% (33/300) with an elective mortality of 9.6% (23/240), urgent mortality of 11% (5/45), and emergent mortality of 33.3% (5/15). Significant independent predictors of operative mortality were preoperative renal dysfunction, postoperative pulmonary insufficiency, postoperative renal dysfunction, use of intraaortic balloon pumping, and sternal wound infection. The actuarial survival for patients discharged from the hospital was 74.6% +/- 5.6% (standard error of the mean) at 54 months. CONCLUSIONS A favorable outcome may be expected when coronary artery bypass grafting is performed in patients 80 years of age or older with severe angina.

Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting Enhances Survival in Diabetic Patients: A 30-Year Follow-Up of Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts

Background— The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an unprecedented rate, affecting nearly 8% of the population. Previous studies have demonstrated a potential benefit for surgical over interventional revascularization in this group of patients. Similarly, studies have shown the superiority of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting in select populations. However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA grafting in diabetics. Therefore, we studied the long-term results of BIMA versus SIMA grafting in a large population of diabetic patients in whom BIMA grafting was broadly applied. Methods and Results— Between February 1972 and May 1994, 1107 consecutive diabetic patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with either SIMA (n=646) or BIMA (n=461) grafting. Optimal matching with the propensity score was used to create matched SIMA (n=414) and BIMA (n=414) cohorts. Cross-sectional follow-up (6 weeks to 30.1 years; mean, 8.9 years) determined long-term survival. There was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between matched SIMA and BIMA groups (operative mortality, 10 of 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P =0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P =0.179); total complications, 71 of 414 [17.1%] versus 71 of 414 [17.1%]; P =1.000). Late survival was significantly enhanced with the use of BIMA grafting (median survival: SIMA, 9.8 years versus BIMA, 13.1 years; P =0.001). Use of BIMA was found to be associated with late survival on Cox regression ( P =0.003). Conclusion— Compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA grafting in propensity score–matched patients provides diabetics with enhanced survival without any increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality. # Clinical Perspective {#article-title-42}Background— The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increasing at an unprecedented rate, affecting nearly 8% of the population. Previous studies have demonstrated a potential benefit for surgical over interventional revascularization in this group of patients. Similarly, studies have shown the superiority of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafting over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafting in select populations. However, concerns about sternal wound infection have discouraged the use of BIMA grafting in diabetics. Therefore, we studied the long-term results of BIMA versus SIMA grafting in a large population of diabetic patients in whom BIMA grafting was broadly applied. Methods and Results— Between February 1972 and May 1994, 1107 consecutive diabetic patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with either SIMA (n=646) or BIMA (n=461) grafting. Optimal matching with the propensity score was used to create matched SIMA (n=414) and BIMA (n=414) cohorts. Cross-sectional follow-up (6 weeks to 30.1 years; mean, 8.9 years) determined long-term survival. There was no difference in operative mortality, sternal wound infection, or total complications between matched SIMA and BIMA groups (operative mortality, 10 of 414 [2.4%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.279; sternal wound infection, 7 of 414 [1.7%] versus 13 of 414 [3.1%]; P=0.179); total complications, 71 of 414 [17.1%] versus 71 of 414 [17.1%]; P=1.000). Late survival was significantly enhanced with the use of BIMA grafting (median survival: SIMA, 9.8 years versus BIMA, 13.1 years; P=0.001). Use of BIMA was found to be associated with late survival on Cox regression (P=0.003). Conclusion— Compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA grafting in propensity score–matched patients provides diabetics with enhanced survival without any increase in perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting improves long-term survival in patients with reduced ejection fraction: A propensity-matched study with 30-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting has been shown to improve long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. However, there has been reluctance to use this technique in higher-risk patients. Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) have been shown to present a higher operative risk and reduced long-term survival. We studied the perioperative and long-term results of BITA versus single internal thoracic artery grafting (SITA) in a large population of patients with reduced EF in whom BITA grafting was broadly applied. METHODS Between February 1972 and May 1994, 4537 consecutive patients in whom EF was recorded underwent SITA (2340) or BITA (2197) grafting. Prospectively collected clinical data recorded EF categorically as less than 0.30 (group I; n = 233), 0.30 to 0.50 (group II; n = 1256), or greater than 0.50 (group III; n = 3048). Multivariable analyses were performed to determine correlates of operative and late mortality. Optimal matching using propensity scoring was used to create matched SITA and BITA cohorts: group I, SITA and BITA, n = 87 each; group II, SITA and BITA, n = 448 each; group III, SITA and BITA, n = 1137 each. Equality of survival distribution was tested by the log-rank algorithm. RESULTS There was no difference in operative mortality between matched SITA and BITA groups (group I: SITA vs BITA, 10.3% vs 6.9%, P = .418; group II: 4.7% vs 4.5%, P = .873; group III: 3.2% vs 2.0%, P = .086). SITA versus BITA was not a predictor of operative mortality on logistic regression analysis. There was no difference in freedom from any postoperative complication, including sternal wound infection, between matched SITA and BITA groups. Late survival was significantly enhanced with the use of BITA grafting in groups II and III (10- and 20-year survival, SITA vs BITA, in group II: 57.7% ± 0.3% and 19% ± 2.5% vs 62.0% ± 2.3% and 33.1% ± 3.4%, respectively, P = .016; and in group III: 67.1% ± 1.4% and 35.8% ± 1.7% vs 74.6% ± 1.3% and 38.1% ± 2.1%, respectively, P = .012). Likewise, choice of SITA versus BITA was a significant predictor of late mortality on Cox regression in both groups II (P < .007) and III (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Broadly applied BITA compared with SITA grafting in propensity-matched patients provides enhanced long-term survival with no increase in operative mortality or morbidity for patients with normal and reduced EF. The expanded use of BITA grafting should be seriously considered.

Minimally invasive surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: the thoracoscopic box lesion approach.

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. It is often found in association with structural heart disease; however, lone atrial fibrillation is not uncommon. Potentially, these patients are ideal candidates for a minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation.MethodsFrom August 2003 through February 2006, 100 drug-resistant symptomatic patients with lone atrial fibrillation underwent thoracoscopic off-pump closed-chest epicardial ablation using the FLEX 10 AFx Microwave Ablation System (Guidant, Indianapolis, IN, USA). There were 66 men (66.0%) and 34 women (34.0%), with a mean age of 60.9 ± 9.8 (range 37–81) years. Mean duration of atrial fibrillation was 72.4 ± 79.5 (range 6–480) months. Sixty-four patients (64.0% had paroxysmal, 11 (11.0%) had persistent and 25 (25.0%) had permanent atrial fibrillation.ResultsThere were no hospital deaths. Postoperative in-hospital complications were minimal. Mean postoperative length of stay was 3.4 ± 1.7 days. Cumulative follow-up was 2,106.3 (mean 23.1) patient months, with a maximum follow-up of 39.8 months. There were three late deaths (3.0%). In nine patients (9.0%), the thoracoscopic box lesion pulmonary vein isolation operation and subsequent electrophysiological intervention failed, and a Cox-Maze operation was performed. Follow-up was 100% complete, with 42.0% (37 of 88) patients in normal sinus rhythm. Two patients (2.3%) experienced a transient ischemic attack and two (2.3%) a cerebral vascular accident. Twenty-seven patients (30.7%) required electrophysiological intervention post procedure. Ten patients (11.4%) were on amiodarone and 48 (54.5%) were on coumadin at follow-up.ConclusionTotally thoracoscopic surgical ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation is technically feasible and presents minimal risk to the patient. Clinical results with the application of microwave energy have been less than satisfactory, with no demonstrated electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. Moreover, long-term relief from atrial fibrillation has not been achieved.

Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Disease in the Elderly: A Longitudinal Analysis

From November, 1972, through December, 1986, 219 consecutive patients 70 years of age and older with aortic stenosis (AS) underwent aortic valve replacement. One hundred seven of them had isolated pure AS, and 112 had AS and coronary artery disease (AS + CAD). The mean age of the AS group was 75.4 years (range, 70 to 88 years) and of the AS + CAD group, 74.8 years (range, 70 to 86 years). The mean aortic valve gradient in the AS group was 87.7 +/- 30.6 mm Hg and in the AS + CAD group, 68.0 +/- 51.3 mm Hg (p less than 0.001). Hospital mortality for the AS group was 12.1% (13 patients) and for the AS + CAD group, 8.9% (10 patients). The long-term survival at seven years was 77.2 +/- 5.5% (+/- the standard error of the mean) for the AS group and 57.0 +/- 6.9% for the AS + CAD group (p less than 0.006). Postoperative assessment reveals substantial functional improvement. These early and long-term favorable results provide a much needed reference point when valvuloplasty is being considered. Aortic valve replacement is the treatment of choice in elderly patients with symptomatic AS.

Location of the second internal mammary artery graft does not influence outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting.

BACKGROUND Although the use of two internal mammary arteries (IMA) in coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been associated with improved patient survival and clinical status, the optimal use of the second IMA graft remains controversial. We, therefore, explored clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients undergoing bilateral IMA grafting. METHODS Between February 1972 and May 1994, 2,215 consecutive patients underwent bilateral IMA grafting. The second IMA was used to revascularize the left coronary system (LCS) in 1,479 and the right coronary system (RCS) in 736 patients. Propensity score optimal matching algorithm was used to create the matched LCS group (n=730) and RCS group (n=730). Cross-sectional follow-up (6 weeks to 32.1 years; mean 12.8; 96.7% complete) was performed. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine correlates of operative mortality and late mortality. Patient clinical status and Short Form-36 scores of late survivors were compared. RESULTS There was no difference in either operative mortality or late survival between LCS and RCS patients, in either unmatched or matched groups. Operative mortality unmatched was LCS 38 of 1,479 (2.6%) versus RCS 20 of 736 (2.7%; p=0.837). For matched groups, it was LCS 13 of 730 (1.8%) versus RCS 20 of 736 (2.7%; p=0.284). Median survival in unmatched patients was LCS 15.8 years versus RCS 16.1 years (p=0.803); for matched patients, it was LCS 16.1 years versus RCS 16.1 years (p=0.671). Site of second IMA was not associated with either operative mortality or late survival on multivariable analysis. At follow-up, both groups demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes, with 98.4% of LCS patients and 96.8% of RCS patients in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II, and no significant difference in either the physical (p=0.142) or mental (p=0.542) health summary scores on the Short Form-36. CONCLUSIONS Use of two IMA grafts demonstrates excellent long-term results with no demonstrable difference in outcome between RCS and LCS patients.

Arterial grafting results in reduced operative mortality and enhanced long-term quality of life in octogenarians

BACKGROUND Despite well-established benefits of arterial (ART) grafting, surgeons have been reluctant to use this conduit in octogenarians. This study explores the influence of arterial revascularization on operative and long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of 987 consecutive patients 80 years of age or older who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1989 and November 2000. Patients with saphenous vein graft only (SVG; n = 574) were compared with those receiving arterial and saphenous vein grafts (ART+SVG; n = 413). Mean follow-up for SVG patients was 3.8 years (range, 4 months to 12.6 years) and 98.6% complete, and mean follow-up was 3.1 years for ART+SVG patients (range, 2 months to 11.2 years) and 97.3% complete. RESULTS Patients with SVG had a significantly higher (p = 0.009) operative mortality (11.1% versus 6.3%) and significantly longer postoperative length of stay (12.9 versus 10.7 days; p = 0.002) than ART+SVG recipients. More ART+SVG than SVG patients were free of all postoperative complications (290 of 413; 70.2% versus 372 of 574; 64.8%; p = 0.086). Multivariable analysis identified SVG as an independent predictor of operative mortality (p = 0.014) and late mortality (p = 0.040). When patients were matched by equivalent propensity scores to receive SVG only, operative mortality was higher for SVG patients in four of the five quintiles. At 10 years, 97.0% +/- 1.2% of SVG and 92.9% +/- 3.7% of ART+SVG current survivors were free of all late major adverse cardiac events (p = 0.565), and 95.5% of SVG patients and 97.5% of ART+SVG patients were in Canadian class 1 or 2 (p = 0.162). On the SF-36 quality-of-life assessment, ART+SVG patients scored significantly higher than both SVG patients and age-adjusted normal subjects. Physical health summary component scores were 36.8 +/- 11.0 for SVG and 41.0 +/- 10.3 for ART+SVG (p = 0.001). Mental health summary scores were comparable for the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Arterial grafting confers an operative survival benefit, and an enhanced long-term quality of life in elderly patients.

Eighteen-year follow-up demonstrates prolonged survival and enhanced quality of life for octogenarians after coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE Octogenarians comprise the fastest growing population segment. Numerous reports have documented improved accomplishment of coronary artery bypass grafting in this high-risk cohort. But what is the quality of life after surgery, and how sustainable are the clinical benefits? METHODS Sequential cross-sectional analyses were performed on 1062 consecutive patients 80 years old and older who underwent isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution from 1989 to 2001. After mean follow-up of 3.4 years (1 month-12.6 years), the Short Form 36 quality of life survey was administered to all survivors. Late follow-up for survival was performed after a mean 5.6 years (1 month-17.9 years). Multivariate analyses assessed risk factors associated with operative mortality, Short Form 36 self-assessment, and late survival. RESULTS Mean age at operation was 83.1±2.8 years (range, 80-99 years). Overall in-hospital mortality was 9.7%, decreasing progressively to 2.2% during the course of the study. At midterm follow-up, 97.1% of patients were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society class I or II; Short Form 36 scores were comparable to age-adjusted norms in both physical and mental health summary scores. Actuarial survivals were 42.2%±1.5% at 7 years and 9.9%±1.4% at 14 years. Median survival was 5.9 years; 5.2 years for male patients and 6.7 for female patients (P=004). CONCLUSIONS The risk of coronary artery bypass grafting for octogenarians now rivals that of a younger population. Midterm quality of life and long-term survival approach those of the general population.

Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting in women: A 21-year experience

BACKGROUND Coronary artery bypass grafting traditionally has carried a higher mortality rate in women than in men. It remains the leading cause of death in women despite major advances in diagnosis and treatment over the past 2 decades. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted to identify risk factors that adversely influence hospital mortality, morbidity, and long-term clinical results in women undergoing bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. From January 1972 through October 1994, 327 consecutive women received bilateral internal mammary artery grafts and supplemental vein grafts. Patient age ranged from 32 to 84 years (mean, 65.7 years). There were 262 patients (80.1%) with three-vessel disease; 71 (21.7%) had substantial (> 50%) stenosis of the left main coronary artery, 65 (19.9%) had a moderately reduced (0.30 to 0.50) ejection fraction, and 11 (3.4%) had a severely reduced (< 0.30) ejection fraction. Preoperatively, 316 patients (96.6%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. RESULTS There were 1,016 coronary artery grafts (mean, 3.1 per patient). The overall hospital mortality rate was 3.4% (11 of 327). Postoperative complications included myocardial infarction in 18 patients (5.5%), stroke in 5 (1.5%), pulmonary insufficiency in 11 (3.4%), reoperation for bleeding in 7 (2.1%), and sternal infection in 8 (2.4%). Independent predictors of operative death were postoperative cardiac arrest (p < 0.001), use of intraaortic balloon pump (p < 0.001), and reoperation for bleeding (p < 0.050). Follow-up was completed on 316 hospital survivors (100%) and ranged from 6 months to 21 years (mean, 5.1 years). Actuarial survival (mean +/- standard error of the mean) was 90.5% +/- 1.9% at 5 years and 65.6% +/- 6.1% at 10 years. At follow-up, 252 patients (94.0%) were asymptomatic in New York Heart Association class I, and 12 (4.5%) were in class II. CONCLUSIONS This longitudinal study demonstrates that bilateral internal mammary artery grafting, though technically demanding, can be achieved in women with low hospital mortality and morbidity rates. Patients experienced reduced late cardiac events, excellent functional improvement, and enhanced long-term survival.