Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where George F. Flanagan is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by George F. Flanagan.


Archive | 2013

Fluoride Salt-Cooled High-Temperature Reactor Technology Development and Demonstration Roadmap

David Eugene Holcomb; George F. Flanagan; Gary T Mays; William David Pointer; Kevin R Robb; Graydon L. Yoder

Fluoride salt-cooled High-temperature Reactors (FHRs) are an emerging reactor class with potentially advantageous performance characteristics, and fully passive safety. This roadmap describes the principal remaining FHR technology challenges and the development path needed to address the challenges. This roadmap also provides an integrated overview of the current status of the broad set of technologies necessary to design, evaluate, license, construct, operate, and maintain FHRs. First-generation FHRs will not require any technology breakthroughs, but do require significant concept development, system integration, and technology maturation. FHRs are currently entering early phase engineering development. As such, this roadmap is not as technically detailed or specific as would be the case for a more mature reactor class. The higher cost of fuel and coolant, the lack of an approved licensing framework, the lack of qualified, salt-compatible structural materials, and the potential for tritium release into the environment are the most obvious issues that remain to be resolved.


Archive | 2011

Pre-Conceptual Design of a Fluoride-Salt-Cooled Small Modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor (SmAHTR)

S.R. Greene; Jess C Gehin; David Eugene Holcomb; Juan J. Carbajo; Dan Ilas; Anselmo T Cisneros; Venugopal Koikal Varma; W.R. Corwin; Dane F Wilson; Graydon L. Yoder; A L Qualls; Fred J Peretz; George F. Flanagan; Dwight A Clayton; Eric Craig Bradley; Gary L Bell; John D. Hunn; Peter J Pappano; Mustafa Sacit Cetiner

This document presents the results of a study conducted at Oak Ridge National Laboratory during 2010 to explore the feasibility of small modular fluoride salt-cooled high temperature reactors (FHRs). A preliminary reactor system concept, SmATHR (for Small modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor) is described, along with an integrated high-temperature thermal energy storage or salt vault system. The SmAHTR is a 125 MWt, integral primary, liquid salt cooled, coated particle-graphite fueled, low-pressure system operating at 700 C. The system employs passive decay heat removal and two-out-of-three , 50% capacity, subsystem redundancy for critical functions. The reactor vessel is sufficiently small to be transportable on standard commercial tractor-trailer transport vehicles. Initial transient analyses indicated the transition from normal reactor operations to passive decay heat removal is accomplished in a manner that preserves robust safety margins at all times during the transient. Numerous trade studies and trade-space considerations are discussed, along with the resultant initial system concept. The current concept is not optimized. Work remains to more completely define the overall system with particular emphasis on refining the final fuel/core configuration, salt vault configuration, and integrated system dynamics and safety behavior.


Archive | 2009

An Analysis of Testing Requirements for Fluoride Salt Cooled High Temperature Reactor Components

David Eugene Holcomb; Sacit M. Cetiner; George F. Flanagan; Fred J Peretz; Graydon L. Yoder

This report provides guidance on the component testing necessary during the next phase of fluoride salt-cooled high temperature reactor (FHR) development. In particular, the report identifies and describes the reactor component performance and reliability requirements, provides an overview of what information is necessary to provide assurance that components will adequately achieve the requirements, and then provides guidance on how the required performance information can efficiently be obtained. The report includes a system description of a representative test scale FHR reactor. The reactor parameters presented in this report should only be considered as placeholder values until an FHR test scale reactor design is completed. The report focus is bounded at the interface between and the reactor primary coolant salt and the fuel and the gas supply and return to the Brayton cycle power conversion system. The analysis is limited to component level testing and does not address system level testing issues. Further, the report is oriented as a bottom-up testing requirements analysis as opposed to a having a top-down facility description focus.


Nuclear Technology | 2012

STUDY OF FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNIT 4 SPENT-FUEL POOL

Dean Wang; Ian C Gauld; Graydon L. Yoder; Larry J. Ott; George F. Flanagan; Matthew W Francis; Emilian L. Popov; Juan J. Carbajo; Prashant K Jain; John C. Wagner; Jess C Gehin

A study on the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station spent-fuel pool (SFP) at Unit 4 (SFP4) is presented in this paper. We discuss the design characteristics of SFP4 and its decay heat load in detail and provide a model that we developed to estimate the SFP evaporation rate based on the SFP temperature. The SFP level of SFP4 following the March 11, 2011, accident is predicted based on the fundamental conservation laws of mass and energy. Our predicted SFP level and temperatures are in good agreement with measured data and are consistent with Tokyo Electric Power Company evaluation results.


Archive | 2009

Integration of Biorefineries and Nuclear Cogeneration Power Plants - A Preliminary Analysis

S.R. Greene; George F. Flanagan; Abhijeet P. Borole

Biomass-based ethanol and nuclear power are two viable elements in the path to U.S. energy independence. Numerous studies suggest nuclear power could provide a practical carbon-free heat source alternative for the production of biomass-based ethanol. In order for this coupling to occur, it is necessary to examine the interfacial requirements of both nuclear power plants and bioethanol refineries. This report describes the proposed characteristics of a small cogeneration nuclear power plant, a biochemical process-based cellulosic bioethanol refinery, and a thermochemical process-based cellulosic biorefinery. Systemic and interfacial issues relating to the co-location of either type of bioethanol facility with a nuclear power plant are presented and discussed. Results indicate future co-location efforts will require a new optimized energy strategy focused on overcoming the interfacial challenges identified in the report.


Nuclear Technology | 2016

Safeguards Considerations for Thorium Fuel Cycles

Louise G. Worrall; Andrew Worrall; George F. Flanagan; Stephen Croft; Alan M Krichinsky; Chris A Pickett; Robert Dennis McElroy; Steven L Cleveland; Donald N Kovacic; J Michael Whitaker; and Jessica L. White-Horton

Abstract By around 2025, thorium-based fuel cycles are likely to be deployed internationally. States such as China and India are pursuing research, development, and deployment pathways toward a number of commercial-scale thorium fuel cycles, and they are already building test reactors and the associated fuel cycle infrastructure. In the future, the potential exists for these emerging programs to sell, export, and deploy thorium fuel cycle technology in other states. Without technically adequate international safeguards protocols and measures in place, any future potential clandestine misuse of these fuel cycles could go undetected, compromising the deterrent value of these protocols and measures. The development of safeguards approaches for thorium-based fuel cycles is therefore a matter of some urgency. Yet, the focus of the international safeguards community remains mainly on safeguarding conventional 235U- and 239Pu-based fuel cycles while the safeguards challenges of thorium-uranium fuel cycles remain largely uninvestigated. This raises the following question: Is the International Atomic Energy Agency and international safeguards system ready for thorium fuel cycles? Furthermore, is the safeguards technology of today sufficiently mature to meet the verification challenges posed by thorium-based fuel cycles? In defining these and other related research questions, the objectives of this paper are to identify key safeguards considerations for thorium-based fuel cycles and to call for an early dialogue between the international safeguards and the nuclear fuel cycle communities to prepare for the potential safeguards challenges associated with these fuel cycles. In this paper, it is concluded that directed research and development programs are required to meet the identified safeguards challenges and to take timely action in preparation for the international deployment of thorium fuel cycles.


Archive | 2014

Development of an Automated Decision-Making Tool for Supervisory Control System

Sacit M. Cetiner; Michael David Muhlheim; George F. Flanagan; David Fugate; Roger A. Kisner

This technical report was generated as a product of the Supervisory Control for Multi-Modular Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Plants project within the Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface technology area under the Advanced Small Modular Reactor (AdvSMR) Research and Development Program of the US Department of Energy. The report documents the definition of strategies, functional elements, and the structural architecture of a supervisory control system for multi-modular AdvSMR plants. This research activity advances the state of the art by incorporating real-time, probabilistic-based decision-making into the supervisory control system architectural layers through the introduction of a tiered-plant system approach. The report provides background information on the state of the art of automated decision-making, including the description of existing methodologies. It then presents a description of a generalized decision-making framework, upon which the supervisory control decision-making algorithm is based. The probabilistic portion of automated decision-making is demonstrated through a simple hydraulic loop example.


Archive | 2012

Sodium fast reactor safety and licensing research plan. Volume II.

Hans Ludewig; Dana Auburn Powers; John C. Hewson; Jeffrey L. LaChance; Art Wright; Jesse Phillips; R. Zeyen; B. Clement; Frank Garner; Leon Walters; Steve Wright; Larry J. Ott; Ahti Jorma Suo-Anttila; Richard Denning; Hiroyuki Ohshima; Shuji Ohno; S. Miyhara; Abdellatif M. Yacout; M. T. Farmer; D. Wade; C. Grandy; R. Schmidt; J. Cahalen; Tara Jean Olivier; Robert J. Budnitz; Yoshiharu Tobita; Frederic Serre; Ken Natesan; Juan J. Carbajo; Hae-Yong Jeong

Expert panels comprised of subject matter experts identified at the U.S. National Laboratories (SNL, ANL, INL, ORNL, LBL, and BNL), universities (University of Wisconsin and Ohio State University), international agencies (IRSN, CEA, JAEA, KAERI, and JRC-IE) and private consultation companies (Radiation Effects Consulting) were assembled to perform a gap analysis for sodium fast reactor licensing. Expert-opinion elicitation was performed to qualitatively assess the current state of sodium fast reactor technologies. Five independent gap analyses were performed resulting in the following topical reports: (1) Accident Initiators and Sequences (i.e., Initiators/Sequences Technology Gap Analysis), (2) Sodium Technology Phenomena (i.e., Advanced Burner Reactor Sodium Technology Gap Analysis), (3) Fuels and Materials (i.e., Sodium Fast Reactor Fuels and Materials: Research Needs), (4) Source Term Characterization (i.e., Advanced Sodium Fast Reactor Accident Source Terms: Research Needs), and (5) Computer Codes and Models (i.e., Sodium Fast Reactor Gaps Analysis of Computer Codes and Models for Accident Analysis and Reactor Safety). Volume II of the Sodium Research Plan consolidates the five gap analysis reports produced by each expert panel, wherein the importance of the identified phenomena and necessities of further experimental research and code development were addressed. The findings from these five reports comprised the basis for the analysis in Sodium Fast Reactor Research Plan Volume I.


Archive | 2014

Initiating Events for Multi-Reactor Plant Sites

Michael David Muhlheim; George F. Flanagan; Willis P Poore Iii

Inherent in the design of modular reactors is the increased likelihood of events that initiate at a single reactor affecting another reactor. Because of the increased level of interactions between reactors, it is apparent that the Probabilistic Risk Assessments (PRAs) for modular reactor designs need to specifically address the increased interactions and dependencies.


Archive | 2014

Preliminary Development of a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

Thomas J. Harrison; Rebecca J. Moses; George F. Flanagan

In summary, this preliminary WBS serves as an initial basis for the capital cost component of the economic analysis of SMRs. This preliminary WBS comes from the known WBS for existing, large nuclear power plants and develops the methodology for accounting for the anticipated differences between the current large plants and the projected SMR designs.

Collaboration


Dive into the George F. Flanagan's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Eugene Holcomb

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Graydon L. Yoder

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey L. LaChance

Sandia National Laboratories

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jess C Gehin

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fred J Peretz

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Juan J. Carbajo

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mustafa Sacit Cetiner

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Randy Belles

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Bari

Brookhaven National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge