George L. Hicks
University of Rochester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George L. Hicks.
Annals of Surgery | 1975
George L. Hicks; M W Eastland; James A. DeWeese; Allyn G. May; Charles G. Rob
Abdominal aortic aneurysm resections were performed on 298 patients between January, 1966 and December, 1973. The results were compared with 186 resections previously reported between 1955-1965. Hospital mortality rates for elective resections were 13% in 1955-1965, 8.4% in 1966-1973, and 4.2% in the 113 patients treated during the last 3 years. Urgent resections for intact aneurysms, previously associated with a 36% mortality, resulted in a 6% mortality rate in 1966-1973. The emergency resection mortality rate for ruptured aneurysm, originally 69%, was reduced to a present day over-all mortality of 55%, and 42% for the last 3 years. Calculated actuarial survival at 5 years was 65% for urgent (intact), 60% for elective and 40% for emergency (ruptured) groups. Atherosclerosis remains the major deterrent to long-term survival with myocardial infarction and stroke causing 43% of deaths occurring within 5 years. Improved survival appeared secondary to better operative technique, postoperative patient monitoring, increased surgical experience, and more elective resections of smaller, asymptomatic aneurysms than in 1955-1965. With present day low mortality rates, elective resection should be recommended in all patients without significant medical contraindications.
American Journal of Cardiology | 1992
Kathleen B. King; Patricia C. Clark; George L. Hicks
This study compares women and men undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Factors before and after coronary surgery were examined to identify variables related to mortality and morbidity. The study population included 465 women and 465 men matched for age (mean age 64.2 years) who underwent first time isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between 1983 and 1988. There were higher incidences of systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, postmyocardial infarction angina, thyroid gland disease, arthritis (p less than 0.001 for all), acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.03), congestive heart failure (p = 0.03), and emergency surgery (p = 0.02) in women, whereas more men had peptic ulcer disease (p less than 0.001). The in-hospital death rate was not significantly different (women 4.3% vs men 3.7%). For all subjects, emergency surgery (p less than 0.001), significant left main narrowing (p less than 0.05) and renal disease (p less than 0.001) were related to death, whereas history of myocardial infarction (p less than 0.05) and diabetes (p less than 0.05) were related to death only in men. Age and body surface area were not related to death. After surgery men had a higher incidence of atrial arrhythmia (p less than 0.001), and women had a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (p less than 0.001). Although women did not have a higher mortality rate, the data suggest that women and men do not share all the same predictors of mortality after surgery.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2011
George L. Hicks; James J. Gangemi; Ronald E. Angona; Paul S. Ramphal; Richard H. Feins; James I. Fann
OBJECTIVE At Boot Camp, we evaluated a modular approach to skills mastery related to cardiopulmonary bypass and crisis scenarios. METHODS With 32 first-year cardiothoracic surgery residents divided into 4 groups, 4 consecutive hours were devoted to cardiopulmonary bypass skills by using a perfused nonbeating heart model, computer-controlled CPB simulator, and perfused beating heart simulator. Based on the cardiopulmonary bypass simulator, each resident was assessed by using a checklist rating score on cardiopulmonary bypass management and 1 crisis scenario. An overall cardiopulmonary bypass score was determined. Economy of time and thought was assessed (1 = unnecessary/disorganized to 5 = maximum economy). At the end of the session, residents completed a written examination. Residents rated the sessions on cannulation skills, cardiopulmonary bypass knowledge, and cardiopulmonary bypass emergency and crisis scenarios on a 5-point scale (5 = very helpful to 1 = not helpful). RESULTS Thirty residents completed cardiopulmonary bypass simulator exercises. For initiation and termination of cardiopulmonary bypass, most residents performed the tasks and sequence correctly. Some elements were not performed correctly. For instance, 3 residents did not verify the activated clotting time before cardiopulmonary bypass initiation. Four residents demonstrated inadequate communication with the perfusionist, including lack of assertiveness and unclear commands. In crisis scenarios management of massive air embolism (n = 8) was challenging and resulted in the most errors; poor venous drainage and high arterial line pressure scenarios were managed with fewer errors. For the protamine reaction scenario, all residents (n = 7) identified the problem, but in 3 cases heparin was not redosed before resuming cardiopulmonary bypass for right ventricular failure. The score for economy of time and thought was 3.83 ± 0.6 (range, 3-5). The score of the written examination was 90.0 ± 11.3 (range, 60-100), which did not correlate with the overall cardiopulmonary bypass score of 91.4 ± 7.1 (range, 80-100; r = 0.07). The session on acquiring aortic cannulation skills was rated 4.92, that for cardiopulmonary bypass knowledge was rated 4.96, and that for cardiopulmonary bypass crisis scenarios was rated 4.96. CONCLUSIONS This Boot Camp session introduced residents early in their training to aortic cannulation, principles and management of cardiopulmonary bypass, and crisis management. Based on a modular approach, technical skills and knowledge of cardiopulmonary bypass can be acquired and assessed by using simulations, but further work with more comprehensive educational modules and practice will accelerate the path to mastery of these critical skills.
American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2002
Neil Blumberg; Joanna M. Heal; J. Cowles; George L. Hicks; William H. Risher; Prem K. Samuel; Scott A. Kirkley
An implementation trial of leukocyte-reduced transfusions in cardiac surgery (primary coronary artery bypass graft and valve replacement) was performed from July to December 1998; comparisons were made with data from the same period in 1997. Patients from both periods were similar in important preoperative and intraoperative variables (age, sex, weight, number of units of RBCs transfused, ejection fraction). The mean total number of complications was statistically significantly decreasedfrom 0.26 complications per patient in the non-leukocyte-reduced to 0.19 in the leukocyte-reduced recipients. Overall, the mean +/- ISD costs of care per patient decreasedfrom 1997 (
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1992
George L. Hicks
27,615 +/-
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Michael F. Swartz; Gregory W. Fink; Muhammad F. Sarwar; George L. Hicks; Yao Yu; Rui Hu; Charles J. Lutz; Steven M. Taffet; José Jalife
33,973) to 1998 (
Transfusion | 2001
Neil Blumberg; Joanna M. Heal; George L. Hicks; William H. Risher
27,038 +/-
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine | 1997
Qingyan Zhu; Wei Yu; Xiaoping Yang; George L. Hicks; Raymond J. Lanzafame; Tingchung Wang
24,107). Mean costs decreased
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1991
Charles W. Boustany; Gerald W. Murphy; George L. Hicks
1,700 per patient for recipients of leukocyte-reduced blood in 1998 compared with recipients of non-leukocyte-reduced blood in 1997 Mean costs increased
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery | 1984
George L. Hicks; Robert K. Salley; James A. DeWeese
4,000 per patient in patients who did not receive transfusions in 1998 compared with 1997. Hospitalization costs decreased when leukocyte-reduced transfusions were implemented for patients undergoing cardiac surgery in our institution. Implementation of leukocyte reduction may be cost neutral or cost saving in at least some settings.
Collaboration
Dive into the George L. Hicks's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs