George Millward

Interaction between direct penetration and disturbance dynamo electric fields in the storm-time equatorial ionosphere

[1] The direct penetration of the high-latitude electric field to lower latitudes, and the disturbance dynamo, both play a significant role in restructuring the storm-time equatorial ionosphere and thermosphere. Although the fundamental mechanisms generating each component of the disturbance electric field are well understood, it is difficult to identify the contribution from each source in a particular observation. In order to investigate the relative contributions of the two processes, their interactions, and their impact on the equatorial ionosphere and thermosphere, the response to the March 31, 2001, storm has been modeled using the Rice Convection Model (RCM) and the Coupled Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Plasmasphere-Electrodynamics (CTIPe) model. The mid- and low-latitude electric fields from RCM have been imposed as a driver of CTIPe, in addition to the high latitude magnetospheric sources of ion convection and auroral precipitation. The high latitude sources force the global storm-time wind fields, which act as the driver of the disturbance dynamo electric fields. The magnitudes of the two sources of storm-time equatorial electric field are compared for the March 2001 storm period. During daytime, and at the early stage of the storm, the penetration electric field is dominant; while at night, the penetration and disturbance dynamo effects are comparable. Both sources are sufficient to cause significant restructuring of the low latitude ionosphere. Our results also demonstrate that the mid- and low-latitude conductivity and neutral wind changes initiated by the direct penetration electric field preferentially at night are sufficient to alter the subsequent development of the disturbance dynamo.

Storm-time changes in the upper atmosphere at low latitudes

Abstract A three-dimensional coupled model of the thermosphere, ionosphere, plasmasphere and electrodynamics has been used to investigate the dynamic and electrodynamic response at low latitudes during a geomagnetic storm. A storm was simulated at equinox and high solar activity, and was characterized by a 12-h enhancement of the high-latitude magnetospheric electric field and auroral precipitation. The deposition of energy at high-latitudes heats the thermosphere and drives equatorward wind surges, and changes the global circulation. The first wave arrives at the equator, 3.5 h after storm onset. The change in the global circulation drives downwelling at low latitudes, which decreases molecular species, and causes a slight positive ionospheric phase. By far the dominant driver of the low latitudes is due to the changes in electrodynamics. The dynamo effect of the altered wind circulation opposes the normal diurnal variation, with downward ion drift during the day and upward drift at night. On the dayside, the equatorial ionization anomaly becomes weaker, the ionospheric F-region peak height is lowered, and the eastward zonal winds are reduced. At night the anomaly is strengthened, the ionosphere is raised, and zonal winds accelerate. The global electrodynamic changes are consistent with earlier results, but the speed of the response was unexpected. The model results showed an equatorial response within 2 h of the storm onset, well before the first gravity waves arrived at the equator. The dynamo action of the mid-latitude wind surges drive an F-region dynamo that can cause charge buildup at the terminators, producing electric fields that immediately leak to the equator. The meridional winds act as the driver of the low-latitude storm response by changing the dynamo action of the winds. In contrast, the zonal winds respond to the redistribution of charge brought about by the electrodynamic changes, rather than acting as a driver of the change.

An investigation into the influence of tidal forcing on F region equatorial vertical ion drift using a global ionosphere‐thermosphere model with coupled electrodynamics

A recent development of the coupled thermosphere-ionosphere-plasmasphere model (CTIP) has been the inclusion of the electrodynamic coupling between the equatorial ionosphere and thermosphere. The vertical ion drifts which result are shown to be largely in agreement with empirical data, on the basis of measurements made at the Jicamarca radar and other equatorial sites [Scherliess and Fejer, 1999]. Of particular importance, the CTIP model clearly reproduces the “prereversal enhancement” in vertical ion drift, a key feature of the observational data. Inacurracies in the modeled daytime upward ion motion have been investigated with regard to changing the magnitude and phase of components of the lower thermospheric tidal forcing. The results show that daytime vertical ion motion is highly dependent upon both the magnitude and phase of the semidiurnal tidal component. In addition, the CTIP model shows the prereversal enhancement to be unaffected by changes in tidal forcing, but only for conditions of high solar activity. During periods of low solar activity the form of the prereversal enhancement is clearly dependant upon the magnitude and phase of the semidiurnal tide.

Ionospheric F 2 layer seasonal and semiannual variations

An extensive series of computations, using the Coupled Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Plasmasphere model (CTIP), has been undertaken to investigate the semiannual variation in peak noontime electron density, a common feature of the Fa-layer, particularly at low latitudes and in the southern hemisphere at mid-latitudes. Results from the model reveal such a variation, most prominently, at mid-latitudes, in the South American sector. An analysis of this phenomenon shows that it is intimately related to the large offset of the geomagnetic axis from Earths spin axis in the southern hemisphere. Because of this offset, a given geographic latitude in the South American sector corresponds to a lower magnetic latitude than in other sectors and is thus farther from the energy inputs associated with the auroral regions. As a result, the composition changes are much smaller during the winter months than at other longitudes, the mean molecular mass being essentially constant for a 4-month period centered on the winter solstice. This result is understood in terms of the global thermospheric circulation. In the absence of any composition changes, noon ionospheric density is influenced primarily by the solar zenith angle. This angle reaches a maximum at the winter Solstice, leading to diminished ion production, a minimum in N(m)F2, and therefore a semiannual variation overall. On the basis of the model results, the semiannual variation is seen as a feature of the midlatitude ionosphere at geographic longitudes opposite to the location of the geomagnetic pole. This phenomenon is seen in both northern and southern hemispheres, though the effect is much larger in the southern hemisphere as a result of the greater magnetic offset.

Modelling composition changes in F-layer storms

A coupled thermosphere-ionosphere-plasmasphere model CTIP is used to simulate storm changes in the ionosphere. The simulations cover a period of 72 hours, starting with imposed high-latitude energy inputs (particle precipitation and electric fields) that represent a moderately severe geomagnetic storm (Kp 5) lasting for 12 h. Equinox and solstice conditions are studied. We give particular attention to comparing changes in peak electron density, NmF2, to those of the [ON2] concentration ratio of the neutral air. During the first few hours of the storm, large perturbations are produced by strong meridional winds. After that initial phase, we find that the changes of NmF2 and of [ON2] ratio correspond closely, the composition changes being produced by the thermospheric “storm circulation”, as in the “composition bulge” theory of Fuller-Rowell el al. (1994). The simulations reproduce the general form of the seasonal variations in the changes of NmF2 at mid-latitudes as derived from worldwide ionosonde data. Some storm effects at sub-auroral latitudes are caused by movement and infilling of the ionospheric trough. We conclude that the composition change theory accounts for the major features of F-layer storm behaviour at midlatitudes.

An unexpected cooling effect in Saturn's upper atmosphere.

The upper atmospheres of the four Solar System giant planets exhibit high temperatures that cannot be explained by the absorption of sunlight. In the case of Saturn the temperatures predicted by models of solar heating are ∼200 K, compared to temperatures of ∼400 K observed independently in the polar regions and at 30° latitude. This unexplained ‘energy crisis’ represents a major gap in our understanding of these planets’ atmospheres. An important candidate for the source of the missing energy is the magnetosphere, which injects energy mostly in the polar regions of the planet. This polar energy input is believed to be sufficient to explain the observed temperatures, provided that it is efficiently redistributed globally by winds, a process that is not well understood. Here we show, using a numerical model, that the net effect of the winds driven by the polar energy inputs is not to heat but to cool the low-latitude thermosphere. This surprising result allows us to rule out known polar energy inputs as the solution to the energy crisis at Saturn. There is either an unknown—and large—source of polar energy, or, more probably, some other process heats low latitudes directly.

the driver of giant planet atmospheres

We present a review of recent developments in the use of molecular ion as a probe of physics and chemistry of the upper atmospheres of giant planets. This ion is shown to be a good tracer of energy inputs into Jupiter (J), Saturn (S) and Uranus (U). It also acts as a ‘thermostat’, offsetting increases in the energy inputs owing to particle precipitation via cooling to space (J and U). Computer models have established that is also the main contributor to ionospheric conductivity. The coupling of electric and magnetic fields in the auroral polar regions leads to ion winds, which, in turn, drive neutral circulation systems (J and S). These latter two effects, dependent on , also result in very large heating terms, approximately 5×1012 W for Saturn and greater than 1014 W for Jupiter, planet-wide; these terms compare with approximately 2.5×1011 W of solar extreme UV absorbed at Saturn and 1012 W at Jupiter. Thus, is shown to play a major role in explaining why the temperatures of the giant planets are much greater (by hundreds of kelvin) at the top of the atmosphere than solar inputs alone can account for.

Giant Planet Ionospheres and Thermospheres: The Importance of Ion-Neutral Coupling

Planetary upper atmospheres — coexisting thermospheres and ionospheres — form an important boundary between the planet itself and interplanetary space. The solar wind and radiation from the Sun may react with the upper atmosphere directly, as in the case of Venus. If the planet has a magnetic field, however, such interactions are mediated by the magnetosphere, as in the case of the Earth. All of the Solar System’s giant planets have magnetic fields of various strengths, and interactions with their space environments are thus mediated by their respective magnetospheres. This article concentrates on the consequences of magnetosphere-atmosphere interactions for the physical conditions of the thermosphere and ionosphere. In particular, we wish to highlight important new considerations concerning the energy balance in the upper atmosphere of Jupiter and Saturn, and the role that coupling between the ionosphere and thermosphere may play in establishing and regulating energy flows and temperatures there. This article also compares the auroral activity of Earth, Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus. The Earth’s behaviour is controlled, externally, by the solar wind. But Jupiter’s is determined by the co-rotation or otherwise of the equatorial plasmasheet, which is internal to the planet’s magnetosphere. Despite being rapid rotators, like Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus appear to have auroral emissions that are mainly under solar (wind) control. For Jupiter and Saturn, it is shown that Joule heating and “frictional” effects, due to ion-neutral coupling can produce large amounts of energy that may account for their high exospheric temperatures.

Modeling the Storm Time Electrodynamics

A model that electrodynamically couples inner magnetosphere, ionosphere, plasmasphere, thermosphere, and electrodynamics has been developed and is used to separate sources of the storm time electric fields between the magnetospheric, ionospheric, and thermospheric processes and to investigate their nonlinear interactions. The two sources of the electric-field disturbances, prompt penetration (PP) and disturbance dynamo (DD), have been identified in the coupled model results. Furthermore, the results suggest that the sources of variability in storm time electric fields are associated with the nonlinear interaction between the PP and DD, such that the response depends on the preconditioning of the coupled system. The preconditioning in this study is caused by the fact that the magnetosphere, ionosphere, and thermosphere respond to external forcing as a coupled system. The results clearly demonstrate the need for a fully coupled model of magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere, in order to determine the preconditioning effect.