George R. Gallagher
Berry College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George R. Gallagher.
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2006
Gino J. D'Angelo; Joseph G. D'angelo; George R. Gallagher; David A. Osborn; Karl V. Miller; Robert J. Warren
Abstract We evaluated the behavioral responses of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to 4 colors of wildlife warning reflectors (red, white, blue-green, and amber) that are purported to reduce the incidence of deer–vehicle collisions. We observed white-tailed deer behaviors relative to roads before and after installation of wildlife warning reflectors using a forward-looking infrared camera during 90 observation nights. We concluded that wildlife warning reflectors were ineffective in changing deer behavior such that deer–vehicle collisions might be prevented.
Journal of Wildlife Management | 2007
Gino J. D'Angelo; Albert R. De Chicchis; David A. Osborn; George R. Gallagher; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller
Abstract Basic knowledge of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) hearing can improve understanding of deer behavior and may assist in the development of effective deterrent strategies. Using auditory brainstem response testing, we determined that white-tailed deer hear within the range of frequencies we tested, between 0.25–30 kilohertz (kHz), with best sensitivity between 4–8 kHz. The upper limit of human hearing lies at about 20 kHz, whereas we demonstrated that white-tailed deer detected frequencies to at least 30 kHz. This difference suggests that research on the use of ultrasonic (frequencies >20 kHz) auditory deterrents is justified as a possible means of reducing deer–human conflicts.
Journal of Wildlife Management | 2009
Sharon A. Valitzski; Gino J. D'Angelo; George R. Gallagher; David A. Osborn; Karl V. Miller; Robert J. Warren
Abstract We evaluated efficacy of sound as a deterrent for reducing deer (Odocoileus spp.)–vehicle collisions by observing behavioral responses of free-ranging white-tailed deer (O. virginianus) to pure-tone sounds within their documented range of hearing. Behavior of free-ranging deer within 10 m of roadways was not altered in response to a moving automobile fitted with a sound-producing device and speakers that produced 5 sound treatments documented to be within the hearing range of white-tailed deer. Many commercially available, vehicle-mounted auditory deterrents (i.e., deer whistles) are purported to emit continuous pure-tone sounds similar to those we tested. However, our data suggest that deer whistles are likely not effective in altering deer behavior in a manner that would prevent deer–vehicle collisions.
Crop Protection | 2003
George R. Gallagher; Robert Prince
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2011
William D. Gulsby; Daniel W. Stull; George R. Gallagher; David A. Osborn; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller; Lawrence V. Tannenbaum
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2014
Bradley S. Cohen; David A. Osborn; George R. Gallagher; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller
Human–Wildlife Interactions | 2011
Daniel W. Stull; William D. Gulsby; James A. Martin; Gino J. D'Angelo; George R. Gallagher; David A. Osborn; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller
Archive | 2005
Gino J. D'Angelo; Sharon A. Valitzski; Karl V. Miller; Daniel B. Warnell; George R. Gallagher; Albert R. DeChicchis; David M. Jared
Wildlife Society Bulletin | 2012
Bradley S. Cohen; David A. Osborn; George R. Gallagher; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller
Archive | 2011
William D. Gulsby; Daniel W. Stull; George R. Gallagher; David A. Osborn; Robert J. Warren; Karl V. Miller; Lawrence V. Tannenbaum