George R. Wheaton
American Institutes for Research
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George R. Wheaton.
Journal of Applied Psychology | 1976
George R. Wheaton; Ellen Eisner; Angelo Mirabella; Edwin A. Fleishman
Abstract : The report describes the first study in a program of research dealing with the relationships between the characteristics of human tasks and the abilities required for task performance. The goal of the program is to generate principles which can be used to identify ability requirements from knowledge of the characteristics of a task and of variations in the conditions of task performance. Such knowledge has important implications for both selection and training of personnel. The study investigated the relationship between variations in an auditory signal identification task and consequent changes in the abilities related to identification performance. (Modified author abstract)
Transfer of Learning#R##N#Contemporary Research and Applications | 1987
Andrew M. Rose; Robert Evans; George R. Wheaton
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the prescribed and actual evaluations of training system effectiveness. It presents alternatives to transfer of training as criteria for training system effectiveness. The chapter also presents an emerging model for training system evaluations, the device effectiveness forecast technique. The armed forces of the United States rely on training devices and simulators as indispensable components of training. The design of training devices in theory is based on detailed and precise information about the training requirements to be met, physical and functional characteristics needed to satisfy requirements, intended use of the device, and its effectiveness and cost. However, unavoidable logistic demands during training device acquisition make empirical tests of effectiveness difficult to conduct. As a necessary consequence, appraisals of a particular design, or competing design alternatives, are primarily analytic. Formal analytic procedures, however, are inadequate or nonexistent. The bases on which device design decisions are made have not been articulated, nor is it clear what kinds of data or levels of data specificity are needed to support such decisions. There is a need, therefore, for analytic procedures, applicable during both early and later stages of device acquisition that permit prediction of the potential effectiveness of device designs.
Archive | 1971
Alfred J. Farina; George R. Wheaton; Edwin A. Fleishman
Journal of Applied Psychology | 1974
George C. Theologus; George R. Wheaton; Edwin A. Fleishman
Archive | 1976
George R. Wheaton; Andrew M. Rose; Paul W Fingerman; Arthur L. Korotkin; Dennis H. Holding
Archive | 1974
Andrew M. Rose; Paul W. Fingerman; George R. Wheaton; Ellen Eisner; Gloria Kramer
Archive | 1972
George R. Wheaton; Angelo Mirabella
Archive | 1976
George R. Wheaton; Paul W Fingerman; Andrew M. Rose; Russell L Leonard; Frank J. Harris
Archive | 1975
George R. Wheaton; Andrew M. Rose; Paul W. Fingerman
Archive | 1973
George R. Wheaton; Ellen J. Shaffer; Angelo Mirabella; Edwin A. Fleishman