Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by George W. Anstadt.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2003
Ronald Loeppke; Pamela A. Hymel; Jennifer H. Lofland; Laura T. Pizzi; Doris L. Konicki; George W. Anstadt; Catherine M. Baase; Joseph Fortuna; Ted Scharf
An establishment of health-related productivity measurements and critical evaluation of health-related productivity tools is needed. An expert panel was created. A literature search was conducted to identify health-related productivity measurement tools. Each instrument was reviewed for: 1) supporting scientific evidence (eg, reliability and validity); 2) applicability to various types of occupations, diseases, and level of severity of disease; 3) ability to translate data into a monetary unit; and 4) practicality. A modified Delphi technique was used to build consensus. The expert panel recommended absenteeism, presenteeism, and employee turnover/replacement costs as key elements of workplace health-related productivity measurement. The panel also recommended that productivity instruments should: 1) have supporting scientific evidence, 2) be applicable to the particular work setting, 3) be supportive of effective business decision-making, and 4) be practical. Six productivity measurement tools were reviewed. The panel recommended necessary elements of workplace health-related productivity measurement, key characteristics for evaluating instruments, and tools for measuring work loss. Continued research, validation, and on-going evaluation of health-related productivity instruments are needed.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1997
William Brady; Jean Bass; Royce Moser; George W. Anstadt; Ronald Loeppke
This is the first in a series of studies designed to assist directors of occupational health and safety services in defining, measuring, predicting, and integrating total health and safety costs into useful management information. This study was structured to review recent literature on health and safety costs and to categorize costs as either direct or indirect. This delineation should aid in defining total health and safety costs, delineating priority areas for interventions to reduce costs, and evaluating the effectiveness of health and safety programs. The significance of such efforts is underscored by the reported direct health care costs for the nations work force of over
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1997
Robert J. McCunney; George W. Anstadt; Wayne N. Burton; David Gregg
418 billion, and indirect costs, using the lower range of estimates for such costs, of over
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1991
George W. Anstadt
837 billion. Reducing the total costs of over
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1990
George W. Anstadt
1.256 trillion would have major impacts on corporate productivity and competitiveness, as well as on availability of health care programs for employees. Recommendations for follow-up activities to define costs and evaluate intervention programs are provided.
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1989
George W. Anstadt
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2009
George W. Anstadt
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1994
George W. Anstadt
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1993
Elizabeth E. Gresch; George W. Anstadt
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 1991
George W. Anstadt