Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where George Woodman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by George Woodman.


Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2015

The REDUCE pivotal trial: a prospective, randomized controlled pivotal trial of a dual intragastric balloon for the treatment of obesity

Jaime Ponce; George Woodman; James Swain; Erik B. Wilson; Wayne J. English; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Eric Bour; Steven A. Edmundowicz; Brad Snyder; Flavia Soto; Shelby Sullivan; Richard Holcomb; John W. Lehmann

BACKGROUND Saline-filled intragastric balloon devices are reversible endoscopic devices designed to occupy stomach volume and reduce food intake. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a dual balloon system plus diet and exercise in the treatment of obesity compared to diet and exercise alone. SETTING Academic and community practice, United States. METHODS Participants (n = 326) with body mass index (BMI) 30-40 kg/m(2) were randomized to endoscopic DBS treatment plus diet and exercise (DUO, n = 187) or sham endoscopy plus diet and exercise alone (DIET, n = 139). Co-primary endpoints were a between-group comparison of percent excess weight loss (%EWL) and DUO subject responder rate, both at 24 weeks. Thereafter DUO patients had the DBS retrieved followed by 24 additional weeks of counseling; DIET patients were offered DBS treatment. RESULTS Mean BMI was 35.4. Both primary endpoints were met. DUO weight loss was over twice that of DIET. DUO patients had significantly greater %EWL at 24 weeks (25.1% intent-to-treat (ITT), 27.9% completed cases (CC, n = 167) compared with DIET patients (11.3% ITT, P = .004, 12.3% CC, n = 126). DUO patients significantly exceeded a 35% response rate (49.1% ITT, P<.001, 54.5% CC) for weight loss dichotomized at 25%EWL. Accommodative symptoms abated rapidly with support and medication. Balloon deflation occurred in 6% without migrations. Early retrieval for nonulcer intolerance occurred in 9%. Gastric ulcers were observed; a minor device change led to significantly reduced ulcer size and frequency (10%). CONCLUSION The DBS was significantly more effective than diet and exercise in causing weight loss with a low adverse event profile.


Obesity | 2017

Randomized sham-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastric plication for primary obesity: The ESSENTIAL trial

Shelby Sullivan; James M. Swain; George Woodman; Marc Antonetti; Nestor de la Cruz-Muñoz; Sreeni S. Jonnalagadda; Michael B. Ujiki; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Jaime Ponce; Marvin Ryou; Jason Reynoso; Rajiv Chhabra; G. Brent Sorenson; Wendell K. Clarkston; Steven A. Edmundowicz; J. Christopher Eagon; Daniel B. Leslie; Thomas Lavin; Christopher C. Thompson

Evaluate safety and efficacy of the pose™ procedure for obesity treatment.


Obesity | 2016

Delayed gastric emptying as a proposed mechanism of action during intragastric balloon therapy: Results of a prospective study.

Victoria Gomez; George Woodman; Barham K. Abu Dayyeh

The effects of intragastric balloon (IGB) therapy on gastric emptying (GE) and weight loss remain to be fully understood. The effects of IGB on GE were investigated in this study.


International Journal of Obesity | 2017

Intragastric balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial

Anita P. Courcoulas; B K Abu Dayyeh; L Eaton; J Robinson; George Woodman; M Fusco; Vafa Shayani; Helmuth Billy; Daniel J. Pambianco; Christopher J. Gostout

Background/objectives:This trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Orbera Intragastric Balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention.Subjects/methods:In this multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial, 255 adults with a body mass index of 30–40 kg m−2 were treated and outcomes were assessed up to 12 months. Participants were randomized to endoscopic placement of an intragastric balloon plus lifestyle or lifestyle intervention alone. Balloons were removed at 6 months and lifestyle intervention continued for both groups through 12 months. At 9 months, coprimary end points were two measures of weight loss.Results:At 6 months, weight loss was −3.3% of total body weight (−3.2 kg) in the lifestyle arm vs −10.2% (−9.9 kg) in the balloon plus lifestyle arm (P<0.001); at 9 months (3 months postballoon removal), weight loss was −3.4% (−3.2 kg) vs −9.1% (−8.8 kg, P⩽0.001); and at 12 months, −3.1% (−2.9 kg) vs −7.6% (−7.4 kg, P⩽0.001). For the primary end points, at 9 months, mean percent loss of weight in excess of ideal body weight (s.d.) at 9 months was 26.5% (20.7) (P=0.32) and 9.7% (15.1) in the balloon and control groups, respectively. Also, 45.6% (36.7, 54.8) of the subjects randomized to the balloon achieved at least 15% loss of weight in excess of ideal body weight greater than the control group (P<0.001). The majority of balloon subjects experienced adverse events; 86.9% nausea, 75.6% vomiting, 57.5% abdominal pain and 18.8% had their device removed before 6 months because of an adverse event or subject request. Five subjects (3.1%) in the balloon group had a gastric abnormality at the time of device removal, and no ulcers were found.Conclusions and relevance:Intragastric balloon achieved greater short-term weight loss at 3 and 6 months postballoon removal than lifestyle intervention alone. Adverse gastrointestinal events were common.


Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2018

Randomized sham-controlled trial of the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss

Shelby Sullivan; James Swain; George Woodman; Steven A. Edmundowicz; Tarek Hassanein; Vafa Shayani; John C. Fang; Mark D. Noar; George Eid; Wayne J. English; Nabil Tariq; Michael C. Larsen; Sreenivasa S. Jonnalagadda; Dennis S. Riff; Jaime Ponce; Dayna S. Early; Eric Volkmann; Anna R. Ibele; Matthew D. Spann; Kumar Krishnan; Juan Carlos Bucobo; Aurora D. Pryor

BACKGROUND Obesity is a significant health problem and additional therapies are needed to improve obesity treatment. OBJECTIVE Determine the efficacy and safety of a 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system for weight loss. SETTING Fifteen academic and private practice centers in the United States. METHODS This was a double-blind, randomized sham-controlled trial of the swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system plus lifestyle therapy compared with lifestyle therapy alone for weight loss at 6 months in participants aged 22 to 60 years with body mass index 30 to 40 kg/m2, across 15 sites in the United States. The following endpoints were included: difference in percent total weight loss in treatment group versus control group was >2.1%, and a responder rate of >35% in the treatment group. RESULTS Three hundred eighty-seven patients swallowed at least 1 capsule. Of participants, 93.3% completed all 24 weeks of blinded study testing. Nonserious adverse events occurred in 91.1% of patients, but only .4% were severe. One bleeding ulcer and 1 balloon deflation occurred. In analysis of patients who completed treatment, the treatment and control groups achieved 7.1 ± 5.0% and 3.6 ± 5.1% total weight loss, respectively, and a mean difference of 3.5% (P = .0085). Total weight loss in treatment and control groups were 7.1 ± 5.3 and 3.6 ± 5.1 kg (P < .0001), and body mass index change in the treatment and control groups were 2.5 ± 1.8 and 1.3 ± 1.8 kg/m2 (P < .0001), respectively. The responder rate in the treatment group was 66.7% (P < .0001). Weight loss maintenance in the treatment group was 88.5% at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with lifestyle therapy and the 6-month swallowable gas-filled intragastric balloon system was safe and resulted in twice as much weight loss compared with a sham control, with high weight loss maintenance at 48 weeks.


Gastroenterology | 2016

812d The Obalon Swallowable 6-Month Balloon System is More Effective Than Moderate Intensity Lifestyle Therapy Alone: Results From a 6- Month Randomized Sham Controlled Trial

Shelby Sullivan; James M. Swain; George Woodman; Steven A. Edmundowicz; Tarek Hassanein; Vafa Shayani; John C. Fang; George M. Eid; Wayne J. English; Nabil Tariq; Michael C. Larsen; Aurora D. Pryor; Sreenivasa S. Jonnalagadda; Dennis S. Riff; Jaime Ponce; Mark D. Noar


Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2015

444 A Randomized, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of an Intragastric Balloon As an Adjunct to a Behavioral Modification Program, in Comparison With a Behavioral Modification Program Alone in the Weight Management of Obese Subjects

Barham K. Abu Dayyeh; Laura L. Eaton; George Woodman; Mark Fusco; Vafa Shayani; Helmuth Billy; Anita Courcoulas; Daniel J. Pambianco; Christopher J. Gostout


Gastroenterology | 2016

100 12 Month Randomized Sham Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Targeted Use of Endoscopic Suture Anchors for Primary Obesity: The ESSENTIAL Study

Shelby Sullivan; James M. Swain; George Woodman; Marc Antonetti; Sreeni Jonnalagadda; Michael B. Ujiki; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Jaime Ponce; Marvin Ryou; Jason F. Reynoso; Rajiv Chhabra; G. Brent Sorenson; Wendell K. Clarkston; Steven A. Edmundowicz; J. Christopher Eagon; Dan Mullady; Daniel B. Leslie; Christopher C. Thompson; Thomas Lavin


Gastroenterology | 2016

380 Baseline Gastric Emptying and its Change in Response to Diverse Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies Predict Weight Change After Intervention

Barham K. Abu Dayyeh; George Woodman; Andres Acosta; Guilherme Sauniti Lopes; Christopher J. Gostout; Eduardo G. de Moura; Victoria Gomez; Bruno da Costa Martins; Mark Topazian; Michael Camilleri


Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases | 2016

Year 2 Outcomes in a Randomized Sham Controlled Trial Reporting Weight Loss and Safety of Targeted Use of Endoscopic Suture Anchors for Primary Obesity: The Essential Study

Thomas Lavin; Shelby Sullivan; James Swain; George Woodman; Marc Antonetti; Nestor de la Cruz-Muñoz; Sreeni S. Jonnalagadda; Michael B. Ujiki; Sayeed Ikramuddin; Jaime Ponce; Marvin Ryou; Jason F. Reynoso; Rajiv Chhabra; G. Brent Sorensen; Wendell Clarkston; Steven Edmundowicz; J. Christopher Eagon; Dan Mullady; Daniel B. Leslie; Christopher C. Thompson

Collaboration


Dive into the George Woodman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jaime Ponce

Memorial Hospital of South Bend

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shelby Sullivan

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steven A. Edmundowicz

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne J. English

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge