Georges Kunstler
Macquarie University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Georges Kunstler.
Ecology Letters | 2012
Georges Kunstler; Sébastien Lavergne; Benoı̂t Courbaud; Wilfried Thuiller; Ghislain Vieilledent; Niklaus E. Zimmermann; Jens Kattge; David A. Coomes
The relative importance of competition vs. environmental filtering in the assembly of communities is commonly inferred from their functional and phylogenetic structure, on the grounds that similar species compete most strongly for resources and are therefore less likely to coexist locally. This approach ignores the possibility that competitive effects can be determined by relative positions of species on a hierarchy of competitive ability. Using growth data, we estimated 275 interaction coefficients between tree species in the French mountains. We show that interaction strengths are mainly driven by trait hierarchy and not by functional or phylogenetic similarity. On the basis of this result, we thus propose that functional and phylogenetic convergence in local tree community might be due to competition-sorting species with different competitive abilities and not only environmental filtering as commonly assumed. We then show a functional and phylogenetic convergence of forest structure with increasing plot age, which supports this view.
Nature | 2016
Georges Kunstler; Daniel S. Falster; David A. Coomes; Francis K. C. Hui; Robert M. Kooyman; Daniel C. Laughlin; Lourens Poorter; Mark C. Vanderwel; Ghislain Vieilledent; S. Joseph Wright; Masahiro Aiba; Christopher Baraloto; John P. Caspersen; J. Hans C. Cornelissen; Sylvie Gourlet-Fleury; Marc Hanewinkel; Bruno Hérault; Jens Kattge; Hiroko Kurokawa; Yusuke Onoda; Josep Peñuelas; Hendrik Poorter; María Uriarte; Sarah J. Richardson; Paloma Ruiz-Benito; I-Fang Sun; Göran Ståhl; Nathan G. Swenson; Jill Thompson; Bertil Westerlund
Phenotypic traits and their associated trade-offs have been shown to have globally consistent effects on individual plant physiological functions, but how these effects scale up to influence competition, a key driver of community assembly in terrestrial vegetation, has remained unclear. Here we use growth data from more than 3 million trees in over 140,000 plots across the world to show how three key functional traits—wood density, specific leaf area and maximum height—consistently influence competitive interactions. Fast maximum growth of a species was correlated negatively with its wood density in all biomes, and positively with its specific leaf area in most biomes. Low wood density was also correlated with a low ability to tolerate competition and a low competitive effect on neighbours, while high specific leaf area was correlated with a low competitive effect. Thus, traits generate trade-offs between performance with competition versus performance without competition, a fundamental ingredient in the classical hypothesis that the coexistence of plant species is enabled via differentiation in their successional strategies. Competition within species was stronger than between species, but an increase in trait dissimilarity between species had little influence in weakening competition. No benefit of dissimilarity was detected for specific leaf area or wood density, and only a weak benefit for maximum height. Our trait-based approach to modelling competition makes generalization possible across the forest ecosystems of the world and their highly diverse species composition.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Montserrat Vilà; Amparo Carrillo-Gavilán; Jordi Vayreda; Harald Bugmann; Jonas Fridman; Wojciech Grodzki; Josephine Haase; Georges Kunstler; Mart-Jan Schelhaas; Antoni Trasobares
Background Despite empirical support for an increase in ecosystem productivity with species diversity in synthetic systems, there is ample evidence that this relationship is dependent on environmental characteristics, especially in structurally more complex natural systems. Empirical support for this relationship in forests is urgently needed, as these ecosystems play an important role in carbon sequestration. Methodology/Principal Findings We tested whether tree wood production is positively related to tree species richness while controlling for climatic factors, by analyzing 55265 forest inventory plots in 11 forest types across five European countries. On average, wood production was 24% higher in mixed than in monospecific forests. Taken alone, wood production was enhanced with increasing tree species richness in almost all forest types. In some forests, wood production was also greater with increasing numbers of tree types. Structural Equation Modeling indicated that the increase in wood production with tree species richness was largely mediated by a positive association between stand basal area and tree species richness. Mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation affected wood production and species richness directly. However, the direction and magnitude of the influence of climatic variables on wood production and species richness was not consistent, and vary dependent on forest type. Conclusions Our analysis is the first to find a local scale positive relationship between tree species richness and tree wood production occurring across a continent. Our results strongly support incorporating the role of biodiversity in management and policy plans for forest carbon sequestration.
Journal of Ecology | 2014
Vincent Jung; Cécile H. Albert; Cyrille Violle; Georges Kunstler; Grégory Loucougaray; Thomas Spiegelberger
Climate change is expected to increase the magnitude and the frequency of extreme climatic events such as droughts. Better understanding how plant communities will respond to these droughts is a major challenge. We expect the response to be a shift in functional trait values resulting from both species turnover and intraspecific trait variability, but little research has addressed the relative contribution of both components. We analysed the short-term functional response of subalpine grassland communities to a simulated drought by focusing on four leaf traits (LDMC: leaf dry matter content, SLA: specific leaf area, LNC: leaf nitrogen concentration and LCC: leaf carbon concentration). After evaluating species turnover and intraspecific variability separately, we determined their relative contribution in the community functional response to drought, reflected by changes in community-weighted mean traits. We found significant species turnover and intraspecific variability, as well as significant changes in community-weighted mean for most of the traits. The relative contribution of intraspecific variability to the changes in community mean traits was more important (42-99%) than the relative contribution of species turnover (1-58%). Intraspecific variability either amplified (for LDMC, SLA and LCC) or dampened (for LNC) the community functional response mediated by species turnover. We demonstrated that the small contribution of species turnover to the changes in community mean LDMC and LCC was explained by a lack of covariation between species turnover and interspecific trait differences.Synthesis. These results highlight the need for a better consideration of intraspecific variability to understand and predict the effect of climate change on plant communities. While both species turnover and intraspecific variability can be expected following an extreme drought, we report new evidence that intraspecific variability can be a more important driver of the short-term functional response of plant communities.
Oecologia | 2010
Ghislain Vieilledent; Georges Kunstler; Jean-François Dhôte; James S. Clark
Tree species differences in crown size and shape are often highlighted as key characteristics determining light interception strategies and successional dynamics. The phenotypic plasticity of species in response to light and space availability suggests that intraspecific variability can have potential consequences on light interception and community dynamics. Species crown size varies depending on site characteristics and other factors at the individual level which differ from competition for light and space. These factors, such as individual genetic characteristics, past disturbances or environmental micro-site effects, combine with competition-related phenotypic plasticity to determine the individual variability in crown size. Site and individual variability are typically ignored when considering crown size and light interception by trees, and residual variability is relegated to a residual error term, which is then ignored when studying ecological processes. In the present study, we structured and quantified variability at the species, site, and individual levels for three frequently used tree allometric relations using fixed and random effects in a hierarchical Bayesian framework. We focused on two species: Abies alba (silver fir) and Picea abies (Norway spruce) in nine forest stands of the western Alps. We demonstrated that species had different allometric relations from site to site and that individual variability accounted for a large part of the variation in allometric relations. Using a spatially explicit radiation transmission model on real stands, we showed that individual variability in tree allometry had a substantial impact on light resource allocation in the forest. Individual variability in tree allometry modulates species’ light-intercepting ability. It generates heterogeneous light conditions under the canopy, with high light micro-habitats that may promote the regeneration of light-demanding species and slow down successional dynamics.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Thomas Bourdier; Thomas Cordonnier; Georges Kunstler; Christian Piedallu; Guillaume Lagarrigues
Plant structural diversity is usually considered as beneficial for ecosystem functioning. For instance, numerous studies have reported positive species diversity-productivity relationships in plant communities. However, other aspects of structural diversity such as individual size inequality have been far less investigated. In forests, tree size inequality impacts directly tree growth and asymmetric competition, but consequences on forest productivity are still indeterminate. In addition, the effect of tree size inequality on productivity is likely to vary with species shade-tolerance, a key ecological characteristic controlling asymmetric competition and light resource acquisition. Using plot data from the French National Geographic Agency, we studied the response of stand productivity to size inequality for ten forest species differing in shade tolerance. We fitted a basal area stand production model that included abiotic factors, stand density, stand development stage and a tree size inequality index. Then, using a forest dynamics model we explored whether mechanisms of light interception and light use efficiency could explain the tree size inequality effect observed for three of the ten species studied. Size inequality negatively affected basal area increment for seven out of the ten species investigated. However, this effect was not related to the shade tolerance of these species. According to the model simulations, the negative tree size inequality effect could result both from reduced total stand light interception and reduced light use efficiency. Our results demonstrate that negative relationships between size inequality and productivity may be the rule in tree populations. The lack of effect of shade tolerance indicates compensatory mechanisms between effect on light availability and response to light availability. Such a pattern deserves further investigations for mixed forests where complementarity effects between species are involved. When studying the effect of structural diversity on ecosystem productivity, tree size inequality is a major facet that should be taken into account.
Biology Letters | 2011
Emmanuel Defossez; Benoı̂t Courbaud; Benoı̂t Marcais; Wilfried Thuiller; Elena Granda; Georges Kunstler
Theoretical models predict weakening of negative biotic interactions and strengthening of positive interactions with increasing abiotic stress. However, most empirical tests have been restricted to plant–plant interactions. No empirical study has examined theoretical predictions of interactions between plants and below-ground micro-organisms, although soil biota strongly regulates plant community composition and dynamics. We examined variability in soil biota effects on tree regeneration across an abiotic gradient. Our candidate tree species was European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), whose regeneration is extremely responsive to soil biota activity. In a greenhouse experiment, we measured tree survival in sterilized and non-sterilized soils collected across an elevation gradient in the French Alps. Negative effects of soil biota on tree survival decreased with elevation, similar to shifts observed in plant–plant interactions. Hence, soil biota effects must be included in theoretical models of plant biotic interactions to accurately represent and predict the effects of abiotic gradient on plant communities.
Annals of Forest Science | 2010
Ghislain Vieilledent; Georges Kunstler; Jean-François Dhôte
QuestionTree mortality can be modeled using two complementary covariates, tree size and tree growth. Tree growth is an integrative measure of tree vitality while tree diameter is a good index of sensitivity to disturbances and can be considered as a proxy for tree age which may indicate senescence. Few mortality models integrate both covariates because classical model calibration requires large permanent plot data-sets which are rare. How then can we calibrate a multivariate mortality model including size and growth when permanent plots data are not available?LocationTo answer this question, we studied Abies alba and Picea abies mortality in the French Swiss and Italian Alps.MethodOur study proposes an alternative semi-parametric method which includes a random sample of living and dead trees with diameter and growth measurements.ResultsWe were able to calibrate a mortality model combining both size-dependent and growth-dependent mortality. We demonstrated that A. alba had a lower annual mortality rate (10%) than P. abies (18%) for low growth (< 0.2 mmyear−1). We also demonstrated that for higher diameters (DBH ≥ 70 cm), P. abies had a higher mortality rate (0.45%) than A. alba (0.32%).ConclusionOur results are consistent with the mechanisms of colonization-competition trade-off and of successional niche theory which may explain the coexistence of these two species in the Alps. The method we developed should be useful for forecasting tree mortality and can improve the efficiency of forest dynamics models.RésuméQuestionIl est possible de modéliser la mortalité des arbres en utilisant deux covariables complémentaires : la taille et la croissance de l’arbre. La croissance est une mesure synthétique de la vitalité alors que le diamètre est un bon indicateur de la sensibilité aux perturbations et est très fortement corrélé à l’âge de l’arbre, qui détermine la sénescence. Peu de modèles de mortalité intègrent les deux covariables, car cela nécessite, pour les approches classiques, une calibration à partir de données de placettes permanentes qui sont rares. Comment obtenir un modèle de mortalité multivarié, incluant la taille et la croissance, lorsque des données de placettes permanentes ne sont pas disponibles?Localisation géographiquePour répondre à cette question, nous avons étudié la mortalité du sapin pectiné (Abies alba) et de l’epicéa commmun (Picea abies) dans les Alpes suisses françaises et italiennes.MéthodeNotre étude propose une méthode semi-parametrique alternative s’appuyant sur un échantillon d’arbres morts et vivants avec des mesures de diamètre et de croissance.RésultatsNous avons obtenu un modèle combinant la mortalité dépendant à la fois de la taille et de la croissance. Nous avons démontré qu’A. alba avait un taux de mortalité inférieur (10 %) à celui de P. abies (18 %) pour une faible croissance (< 0.2 mman−1). De plus, pour de larges diamètres (DBH >- 70 cm), P. abies a un taux de mortalité supérieur (0.45 %) à A. alba (0.32 %).ConclusionNos résultats sont en accord avec les mécanismes de niche de succession et de compromis entre colonisation et compétition qui sont invoqués pour expliquer la coexistence des deux espéces dans les Alpes. Notre méthode devrait contribuer à améliorer la prédiction du taux de mortalité et la précision des modèles de dynamique forestière.
Theoretical Ecology | 2012
Ghislain Vieilledent; Georges Kunstler
Intra-specific variability often produces an overlap between species distributions of individual performances which can influence competition relations and community dynamics. We analysed a two-species competition–colonisation model of vegetation with intra-specific variability in juvenile growth. On each patch colonised by both species, the winner was the juvenile with higher individual growth. Intra-specific variability disproportionately favoured the more fecund species because the tail of its distribution represented more individuals. In some cases, this process could even lead to a reversal of competition hierarchy and exclusion of the species with higher mean juvenile performance. In the space of species 2 mean growth and fecundity traits, the combinations of traits allowing coexistence with species 1 appeared close to an ideal trade-off curve. Along this curve, species 2 and species 1 coexisted at similar abundance. The balance of relative abundances diminished with the distance of species 2 from this curve. For a given level of relative species performances, coexistence stability increased continuously as species differentiation increased. In contrast to classical models that exhibit abrupt changes of equilibrium community properties when species traits vary, our model displayed continuous changes of these properties in relation to the balance of life traits within and among species. Intra-specific variability allows flexible patterns of community dynamics and could explain discrepancies between observations and classical theories.
Ecological Monographs | 2015
David M. Forsyth; Deborah J. Wilson; Tomás A. Easdale; Georges Kunstler; Charles D. Canham; Wendy A. Ruscoe; Elaine F. Wright; Lora Murphy; Andrew M. Gormley; Aurora Gaxiola; David A. Coomes
Understanding the long-term impacts of invasive mammalian browsers and granivores in mixed forests is difficult due to the many processes potentially affecting the demography of long-lived trees. We constructed individual-based spatially explicit simulation models of two mixed conifer–angiosperm forests, growing on soils of contrasting phosphorus (P) availability, to investigate how browsing by invasive red deer (Cervus elaphus scoticus) and granivory by invasive rodents (primarily house mouse Mus musculus) might alter forest dynamics. Models were parameterized with field data. Seedling growth and survival rates were estimated inside and outside deer exclosures. Seed predation rates were estimated at high and low rodent densities in mast and non-mast seeding years. For the alluvial terrace forest, which grew on P-rich soil, our model contained 15 tree species dominated by angiosperms; our model of the P-poor marine terrace forest contained seven species dominated by conifers. The two forest models were us...