Georgie Innico

Cardiac, Inflammatory and Metabolic Parameters: Hemodialysis versus Peritoneal Dialysis

Introduction: Mortality in dialysis patients is higher than in the general population, and cardiovascular disease represents the leading cause of death. Hypertension and volume overload are important risk factors for the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Other factors are mainly represented by hyperparathyroidism, vascular calcification, arterial stiffness and inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare blood pressure (BP) and metabolic parameters with cardiovascular changes [cardiothoracic ratio (CTR), aortic arch calcification (AAC) and LV mass index (LVMI)] between PD and HD patients. Materials and Methods: 45 patients (23 HD and 22 PD patients) were enrolled. BP measurements, echocardiography and chest X-ray were performed in each patient to determine the LVMI and to evaluate the CTR and AAC. Inflammatory indexes, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and arterial blood gas analysis were also evaluated. Results: LVMI was higher in PD than HD patients (139 ± 19 vs. 104 ± 22; p = 0.04). In PD patients, a significant correlation between iPTH, C-reactive protein and the presence of LVH was observed (r = 0.70, p = 0.04; r = 0.70, p = 0.03, respectively). The CTR was increased in PD patients as compared to HD patients, while no significant differences in cardiac calcifications were determined. Conclusions: Our data indicate that HD patients present more effective BP control than PD patients. Adequate fluid and metabolic control are necessary to assess the adequacy of BP, which is strongly correlated with the increase in LVMI and with the increased CTR in dialysis patients. PD is a home therapy and allows a better quality of life, but PD patients may present a further increased cardiovascular risk if not adequately monitored.

Vitamin D deficiency, insulin resistance, and ventricular hypertrophy in the early stages of chronic kidney disease

Abstract Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with markedly increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. This increase is not fully explained by traditional CV risk factors but may in part be mediated by nontraditional risk factors, such as inadequate vitamin D (vit D) levels and insulin resistance (IR). Although IR is shown in nondiabetic CKD, its association with vit D deficiency and vascular disease in this population is unknown and what this study aims to investigate. Materials and methods: The study comprised 67 patients with CKD (eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min) and 15 healthy controls matched for age and sex. The phlogosis indexes, vit D levels, IR, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were measured. Results: In our study, the mean value of LVMI and cIMT was significantly higher in patients with eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min compared with controls (p = 0.037 and p < 0.001). The IR and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were increased in CKD patients, whereas the serum levels of vit D were significantly reduced (p = 0.044, p = 0.012, p = 0.038). A positive correlation was found between LVMI and IR (r = 0.704, p = 0.041) and a negative correlation was found between IR and vit D levels (r = −0.238, p = 0.031). Conclusions: In our study, IR and vit D deficiency were found to be independent predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy and atherosclerotic disease. Vitamin D deficiency and IR are thus associated with increased CV risk. More novel approaches to improving IR and vit D supplementation in the CKD population might lead to potential strategies for preventing excess CV mortality.

Early markers of cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease

Abstract Background: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) present a markedly increased cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality since the early stages and have a high prevalence of accelerated atherosclerosis, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors and serum cardiac biomarkers would contribute to explain this increased morbidity. Aim: The aim is to investigate the relation among serum cardiac biomarkers (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors (serum uric acid, homocysteine), inflammatory indexes (C-reactive protein (CRP) serum ferritin, fibrinogen) and noninvasive predictors of atherosclerosis (carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), brachial artery flow mediated dilation (baFMD), and left ventricular mass index (LVMI)) in CKD patients. Materials and methods: In 50 patients with CKD in stage 2/3 kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (KDOQI) and 18 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, the following parameters were measured: cardiac markers (cTnT and NT-proBNP), renal function, inflammatory markers (CRP, serum ferritin and fibrinogen), serum uric acid and homocysteine. We have also evaluated LVMIs, cIMT and baFMD. Results: In our study, we showed an increase of NT-proBNP and the serum cTnT, of serum uric acid and homocysteine with a positive correlation with the increase of cIMT and LVMI and reduced baFMD compared with the controls. Conclusions: Serum cardiac biomarkers and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors increase already in the stage 2/3 KDOQI contributing to explain the high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of these patients. The NT-proBNP seems to have a rise earlier compared with serum cTnT; however, both seemed to be a useful clinical biomarker for evaluating noninvasive predictors of atherosclerosis in CKD patients.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor Therapy And Cardiovascular And Renal Damage In Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND Sunitinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), is approved for first and second line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Knowledge on the effects of sunitinib on cardiovascular (CV) risk and renal damage is limited. AIM To evaluate possible renal and CV damage in patients with RCC treated with sunitinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib were enrolled. This population was evaluated before starting treatment (T0) and after 3 months (T1). Laboratory and instrumental parameters, including interventricular septum (IVS) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were recorded before and after treatment. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (13 female, 19 male, mean age 62.7±9.9 years) were enrolled. We observed overtime, a significant reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (p=0.01), hemoglobin (Hb) (p=0.04) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH-VitD) (p=0.002), in association with a significant increase in serum phosphorus (p<0.001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p<0.001), IVS (p=0.03) and proteinuria (p<0.001), while we showed no significant differences in glycosuria, phosphaturia, serum uric acid, intact parathormone, and LVMI. CONCLUSION We observed the development of renal damage and worsening of CV indices in patients treated with sunitinib. We suggest to consider a careful assessment of renal function and CV risk factors, before initiation and during administration of this drug.

Glomerulonephritis, Pathogenetic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Options: An Overview

Introduction: Most forms of human glomerulonephritis (GN) result from immunologic mechanisms that are mediated by the actions of multiple elements of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, thereby resulting in different clinical manifestations. The treatment of immune-mediated kidney disease is based on steroids and immunosuppressive drugs that interfere with the immune processes. These groups of drugs have led to significant benefits, but severe side effects are still frequent. Monoclonal antibodies directed against molecules of inflammation or several cellular components have emerged in clinical practice. Plasmapheresis and new methods to reduce the risks associated with the procedure with standard therapies may be combined. Moreover new therapeutic options have been proposed, as the use of natural anti-inflammatory cytokines or intracellular signaling reducing inflammation. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review on the pathogenetic mechanisms of glomerulonephritis and their therapies. Results: We analized all RCTs and quasi-RCTs evaluating the current knowledge about pathogenetic mechanisms of glomerulonephritis and related therapy were considered. Conclusion: The pathogenetic mechanisms of glomerulonephritis are complex and strongly influenced by immunogenetic factors. Several clinical trials to identify the best therapeutic options for glomerulonephritis have been conducted, but currently, although significant advancements over the last 10 years have been obtained, important questions are still unanswered. Moreover, we need to consider many and important side effects that have the main therapies for glomerulonephritis. Therefore the development of a web enabled data base to assist nephrologists for the treatment of patients with glomerulonephritis is strongly suggested.