Gerald Gamrath
Zuse Institute Berlin
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gerald Gamrath.
Mathematical Programming Computation | 2011
Thorsten Koch; Tobias Achterberg; Erling Andersen; Oliver Bastert; Timo Berthold; Robert E. Bixby; Emilie Jeanne Anne Danna; Gerald Gamrath; Ambros M. Gleixner; Stefan Heinz; Andrea Lodi; Hans D. Mittelmann; Ted K. Ralphs; Domenico Salvagnin; Daniel E. Steffy; Kati Wolter
This paper reports on the fifth version of the Mixed Integer Programming Library. The miplib 2010 is the first miplib release that has been assembled by a large group from academia and from industry, all of whom work in integer programming. There was mutual consent that the concept of the library had to be expanded in order to fulfill the needs of the community. The new version comprises 361 instances sorted into several groups. This includes the main benchmark test set of 87 instances, which are all solvable by today’s codes, and also the challenge test set with 164 instances, many of which are currently unsolved. For the first time, we include scripts to run automated tests in a predefined way. Further, there is a solution checker to test the accuracy of provided solutions using exact arithmetic.
symposium on experimental and efficient algorithms | 2010
Gerald Gamrath; Marco E. Lübbecke
We report on experiments with turning the branch-price-and-cut frameworkSCIP into a generic branch-price-and-cut solver. That is, given a mixed integer program (MIP), our code performs a Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition according to the user’s specification, and solves the resulting re-formulation via branch-and-price. We take care of the column generation subproblems which are solved as MIPs themselves, branch and cut on the original variables (when this is appropriate), aggregate identical subproblems, etc. The charm of building on a well-maintained framework lies in avoiding to re-implement state-of-the-art MIP solving features like pseudo-cost branching, preprocessing, domain propagation, primal heuristics, cutting plane separation etc.
Mathematical Programming Computation | 2017
Gerald Gamrath; Thorsten Koch; Stephen J. Maher; Daniel Rehfeldt; Yuji Shinano
The Steiner tree problem in graphs is a classical problem that commonly arises in practical applications as one of many variants. While often a strong relationship between different Steiner tree problem variants can be observed, solution approaches employed so far have been prevalently problem-specific. In contrast, this paper introduces a general-purpose solver that can be used to solve both the classical Steiner tree problem and many of its variants without modification. This versatility is achieved by transforming various problem variants into a general form and solving them by using a state-of-the-art MIP-framework. The result is a high-performance solver that can be employed in massively parallel environments and is capable of solving previously unsolved instances.
Archive | 2016
Gerald Gamrath; Timo Berthold; Stefan Heinz; Michael Winkler
Primal heuristics play an important role in the solving of mixed integer programs (MIPs). They help to reach optimality faster and provide good feasible solutions early in the solving process. In this paper, we present two new primal heuristics which take into account global structures available within MIP solvers to construct feasible solutions at the beginning of the solving process. These heuristics follow a large neighborhood search (LNS) approach and use global structures to define a neighborhood that is with high probability significantly easier to process while (hopefully) still containing good feasible solutions. The definition of the neighborhood is done by iteratively fixing variables and propagating these fixings. Thereby, fixings are determined based on the predicted impact they have on the subsequent domain propagation. The neighborhood is solved as a sub-MIP and solutions are transferred back to the original problem. Our computational experiments on standard MIP test sets show that the proposed heuristics find solutions for about every third instance and therewith help to improve the average solving time.
EURO Journal on Computational Optimization | 2014
Gerald Gamrath
One of the essential components of a branch-and-bound based mixed-integer linear programming (MIP) solver is the branching rule. Strong branching is a method used by many state-of-the-art branching rules to select the variable to branch on. It precomputes the dual bounds of potential child nodes by solving auxiliary linear programs and thereby helps to take good branching decisions that lead to a small search tree. In this paper, we describe how these dual bound predictions can be improved by including domain propagation into strong branching. Domain propagation is a technique that MIP solvers usually apply at every node of the branch-and-bound tree to tighten the local domains of variables. Computational experiments on standard MIP instances indicate that our improved strong branching method significantly improves the quality of the predictions and causes almost no additional effort. For a full strong branching rule, we are able to obtain substantial reductions of the branch-and-bound tree size as well as the solving time. Moreover, the state-of-the-art hybrid branching rule can be improved this way as well.
integration of ai and or techniques in constraint programming | 2013
Gerald Gamrath
Strong branching is an important component of most variable selection rules in branch-and-bound based mixed-integer linear programming solvers. It predicts the dual bounds of potential child nodes by solving auxiliary LPs and thereby helps to keep the branch-and-bound tree small. In this paper, we describe how these dual bound predictions can be improved by including domain propagation into strong branching. Computational experiments on standard MIP instances indicate that this is beneficial in three aspects: It helps to reduce the average number of LP iterations per strong branching call, the number of branch-and-bound nodes, and the overall solving time.
integration of ai and or techniques in constraint programming | 2015
Gerald Gamrath; Anna Melchiori; Timo Berthold; Ambros M. Gleixner; Domenico Salvagnin
In mixed-integer programming, the branching rule is a key component to a fast convergence of the branch-and-bound algorithm. The most common strategy is to branch on simple disjunctions that split the domain of a single integer variable into two disjoint intervals. Multi-aggregation is a presolving step that replaces variables by an affine linear sum of other variables, thereby reducing the problem size. While this simplification typically improves the performance of MIP solvers, it also restricts the degree of freedom in variable-based branching rules.
A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research | 2017
Gerald Gamrath; Christoph Schubert
Branching rules are an integral component of the branch-and-bound algorithm typically used to solve mixed-integer programs and subject to intense research. Different approaches for branching are typically compared based on the solving time as well as the size of the branch-and-bound tree needed to prove optimality. The latter, however, has some flaws when it comes to sophisticated branching rules that do not only try to take a good branching decision, but have additional side-effects. We propose a new measure for the quality of a branching rule that distinguishes tree size reductions obtained by better branching decisions from those obtained by such side-effects. It is evaluated for common branching rules providing new insights in the importance of strong branching.
Archive | 2017
Ambros M. Gleixner; Michael Bastubbe; Leon Eifler; Tristan Gally; Gerald Gamrath; Robert Lion Gottwald; Gregor Hendel; Christopher Hojny; Thorsten Koch; Marco E. Lübbecke; Stephen J. Maher; Matthias Miltenberger; Benjamin Müller; Marc E. Pfetsch; Christian Puchert; Daniel Rehfeldt; Franziska Schlösser; Christoph Schubert; Felipe Serrano; Yuji Shinano; Jan Merlin Viernickel; Matthias Walter; Fabian Wegscheider; Jonas T. Witt; Jakob Witzig
Archive | 2011
Thorsten Koch; Tobias Achterberg; Erling Andersen; Oliver Bastert; Timo Berthold; Robert E. Bixby; Emilie Jeanne Anne Danna; Gerald Gamrath; Ambros M. Gleixner; Stefan Heinz; Andrea Lodi; Hans D. Mittelmann; Ted K. Ralphs; Domenico Salvagnin; Daniel E. Steffy; Kati Wolter