Gerard F. Laniak
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gerard F. Laniak.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2014
Gene Whelan; Keewook Kim; Mitch A. Pelton; Karl J. Castleton; Gerard F. Laniak; Kurt Wolfe; Rajbir Parmar; Justin E. Babendreier; Michael Galvin
Integrated environmental modeling (IEM) includes interdependent science-based components that comprise an appropriate software modeling system and are responsible for consuming and producing information as part of the system, but moving information from one component to another (i.e., interoperability) is the responsibility of the IEM software system. We describe and discuss the Framework for Risk Analysis in Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES), a component-based IEM system, from the standpoint of software design requirements which define system functionalities. Design requirements were identified in a series of workshops, attended by IEM practitioners, and reported in the development of a number of IEM software systems. The requirements cover issues associated with standards, component connectivity, linkage protocols, system architecture and functionality, and web-based access, all of which facilitate the creation of plug & play components from stand-alone models through a series of software support tools and standards.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2017
Getachew F. Belete; Alexey Voinov; Gerard F. Laniak
Integration of models requires linking models which can be developed using different tools, methodologies, and assumptions. We performed a literature review with the aim of improving our understanding of model integration process, and also presenting better strategies for building integrated modeling systems. We identified five different phases to characterize integration process: pre-integration assessment, preparation of models for integration, orchestration of models during simulation, data interoperability, and testing. Commonly, there is little reuse of existing frameworks beyond the development teams and not much sharing of science components across frameworks. We believe this must change to enable researchers and assessors to form complex workflows that leverage the current environmental science available. In this paper, we characterize the model integration process and compare integration practices of different groups. We highlight key strategies, features, standards, and practices that can be employed by developers to increase reuse and interoperability of science software components and systems.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2018
Gene Whelan; Keewook Kim; Rajbir Parmar; Gerard F. Laniak; Kurt Wolfe; Michael Galvin; Marirosa Molina; Yakov A. Pachepsky; Paul Duda; Richard G. Zepp; Lourdes Prieto; Julie L. Kinzelman; Gregory T. Kleinheinz; Mark A. Borchardt
Many watershed models simulate overland and instream microbial fate and transport, but few provide loading rates on land surfaces and point sources to the waterbody network. This paper describes the underlying equations for microbial loading rates associated with 1) land-applied manure on undeveloped areas from domestic animals; 2) direct shedding (excretion) on undeveloped lands by domestic animals and wildlife; 3) urban or engineered areas; and 4) point sources that directly discharge to streams from septic systems and shedding by domestic animals. A microbial source module, which houses these formulations, is part of a workflow containing multiple models and databases that form a loosely configured modeling infrastructure which supports watershed-scale microbial source-to-receptor modeling by focusing on animal- and human-impacted catchments. A hypothetical application - accessing, retrieving, and using real-world data - demonstrates how the infrastructure can automate many of the manual steps associated with a standard watershed assessment, culminating in calibrated flow and microbial densities at the watersheds pour point.
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2013
Gerard F. Laniak; Gabriel Olchin; Jonathan L. Goodall; Alexey Voinov; Mary C. Hill; Pierre D. Glynn; Gene Whelan; Gary N. Geller; Nigel W. T. Quinn; Michiel Blind; Scott D. Peckham; S. M. Reaney; N. Gaber; Robert H. Kennedy; Andrew Hughes
Risk Analysis | 1997
Gerard F. Laniak; James G. Droppo; Ernest R. Faillace; Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam; William B. Mills; Dennis L. Strenge; Gene Whelan; Charley Yu
Risk Analysis | 1997
William B. Mills; Jing-Jy Cheng; James G. Droppo; Ernest R. Faillace; Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam; Robert A. Johns; Gerard F. Laniak; Christine S. Lew; Dennis L. Strenge; Jonna F. Sutherland; Gene Whelan; Charley Yu
Environmental Modelling and Software | 2013
Gerard F. Laniak; Andrea Emilio Rizzoli; Alexey Voinov
Environmental Engineering Science | 1999
Gene Whelan; John P. McDonald; Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam; Gerard F. Laniak; Christine S. Lew; William B. Mills; C. Yu
Risk-Based Corrective Action and Brownfields Restorations: | 1998
Gene Whelan; Gerard F. Laniak
Archive | 2016
Rajbir Parmar; Kurt Wolfe; Gene Whelan; Gerard F. Laniak; Mike Galvin; Jonathan L. Goodall