Gerasimos Prodromitis
Panteion University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gerasimos Prodromitis.
Social Psychological and Personality Science | 2013
Felicia Pratto; Atilla Cidam; Andrew L. Stewart; Fouad Bou Zeineddine; María Aranda; Antonio Aiello; Xenia Chryssochoou; Aleksandra Cichocka; J. Christopher Cohrs; Kevin Durrheim; Véronique Eicher; Rob Foels; Paulina Górska; I-Ching Lee; Laurent Licata; James H. Liu; Liu Li; Ines Meyer; Davide Morselli; Orla T. Muldoon; Hamdi Muluk; Stamos Papastamou; I. Petrovic; Nebojsa Petrovic; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Francesca Prati; Monica Rubini; Rim Saab; Jacquelien van Stekelenburg; Joseph Sweetman
We tested the internal reliability and predictive validity of a new 4-item Short Social Dominance Orientation (SSDO) scale among adults in 20 countries, using 15 languages (N = 2,130). Low scores indicate preferring group inclusion and equality to dominance. As expected, cross-nationally, the lower people were on SSDO, the more they endorsed more women in leadership positions, protecting minorities, and aid to the poor. Multilevel moderation models showed that each effect was stronger in nations where a relevant kind of group power differentiation was more salient. Distributions of SSDO were positively skewed, despite use of an extended response scale; results show rejecting group hierarchy is normative. The short scale is effective. Challenges regarding translations, use of short scales, and intersections between individual and collective levels in social dominance theory are discussed.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2016
Joshua M. Tybur; Yoel Inbar; Lene Aarøe; Pat Barclay; Fiona Kate Barlowe; Mícheál de Barra; D. Vaughn Beckerh; Leah Borovoi; Incheol Choi; Jong An Choik; Nathan S. Consedine; Alan Conway; Jane Rebecca Conway; Paul Conway; Vera Cubela Adoric; Dilara Ekin Demirci; Ana María Fernández; Diogo Conque Seco Ferreirat; Keiko Ishii; Ivana Jakšic; Tingting Ji; Florian van Leeuwen; David M.G. Lewis; Norman P. Li; Jason C. McIntyre; Sumitava Mukherjee; Justin H. Park; Boguslaw Pawlowski; Michael Bang Petersen; David A. Pizarro
Significance Pathogens, and antipathogen behavioral strategies, affect myriad aspects of human behavior. Recent findings suggest that antipathogen strategies relate to political attitudes, with more ideologically conservative individuals reporting more disgust toward pathogen cues, and with higher parasite stress nations being, on average, more conservative. However, no research has yet adjudicated between two theoretical accounts proposed to explain these relationships between pathogens and politics. We find that national parasite stress and individual disgust sensitivity relate more strongly to adherence to traditional norms than they relate to support for barriers between social groups. These results suggest that the relationship between pathogens and politics reflects intragroup motivations more than intergroup motivations. People who are more avoidant of pathogens are more politically conservative, as are nations with greater parasite stress. In the current research, we test two prominent hypotheses that have been proposed as explanations for these relationships. The first, which is an intragroup account, holds that these relationships between pathogens and politics are based on motivations to adhere to local norms, which are sometimes shaped by cultural evolution to have pathogen-neutralizing properties. The second, which is an intergroup account, holds that these same relationships are based on motivations to avoid contact with outgroups, who might pose greater infectious disease threats than ingroup members. Results from a study surveying 11,501 participants across 30 nations are more consistent with the intragroup account than with the intergroup account. National parasite stress relates to traditionalism (an aspect of conservatism especially related to adherence to group norms) but not to social dominance orientation (SDO; an aspect of conservatism especially related to endorsements of intergroup barriers and negativity toward ethnic and racial outgroups). Further, individual differences in pathogen-avoidance motives (i.e., disgust sensitivity) relate more strongly to traditionalism than to SDO within the 30 nations.
Journal of Traumatic Stress | 2009
Vasiliki Papanikolau; Gerasimos Prodromitis
This study investigated whether relations between beliefs about the personal controllability of reinforcing events and levels of psychopathology were differentiated with respect to levels of trauma and loss experienced in a series of devastating wildfires. In contrast with studies of combat veterans and professional firefighters, in wildfire survivors external locus of control beliefs and psychopathology were correlated only in respondents who experienced higher levels of trauma and loss; specifically, for residents of designated disaster areas (N = 409), but not for a demographically matched sample of residents of adjacent, non-fire-damaged areas (N = 391). The conflicting findings across studies are interpreted with respect to probable differences in contingencies of reinforcement for causal attributions in professionals and in novices in disaster management.
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine | 2013
Vasiliki Papanikolaou; Mohsen Gadallah; Gloria R. Leon; Efthalia Massou; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Angelos Skembris; Jeffrey Levett
INTRODUCTION Social and political instability have become common situations in many parts of the world. Exposure to different types of traumatic circumstances may differentially affect psychological status. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the relationship between personal perceptions of control over the events happening in ones life and psychological distress in two groups who experienced physical trauma but differed as to whether the trauma was a result of political upheaval and violence. Views on the extent to which the state was interested in the individual were also assessed. METHODS The sample consisted of 120 patients who were injured in the Cairo epicenter and 120 matched controls from the greater Cairo area whose injuries were from other causes. The Brown Locus of Control Scale and the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL 90-R) were administered approximately three months after the January 2011 start of the demonstrations and subsequent overthrow of the government. RESULTS The groups did not differ on locus of control. For both groups, externality was associated with greater distress, suggesting a relationship between perceived helplessness in controlling ones life and distress. The Cairo group scored significantly higher than the control group on the SCL 90-R Global Severity Index (GSI) and Positive Symptom Total (PST). Perceptions of state interest in the population were low; overall, 78% viewed the state as having little or no interest in them. Discussion The relationship between exposure intensity and psychological distress is examined. In addition, differences in findings in populations experiencing political chaos compared with other types of disasters are considered. CONCLUSION Beliefs regarding personal control over ones life circumstances are more closely associated with psychological distress than the circumstances in which the trauma occurred.
Social Psychological and Personality Science | 2014
Felicia Pratto; Atilla Cidam; Andrew L. Stewart; F. Bou Zeineddine; María Aranda; Antonio Aiello; Xenia Chryssochoou; Aleksandra Cichocka; J. C. Cohrs; Kevin Durrheim; Véronique Eicher; Rob Foels; Paulina Górska; I-C Lee; Laurent Licata; James H. Liu; L. Li; Ines Meyer; Davide Morselli; Orla T. Muldoon; Hamdi Muluk; Stamos Papastamou; I. Petrovic; Nebojsa Petrovic; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Francesca Prati; Monica Rubini; Rim Saab; J. van Stekelenburg; Joseph Sweetman
Pratto, F., Çidam A., Stewart, A. L., Zeineddine, F. B., Aranda, M., Aiello, A., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cohrs, J. C., Durrheim, K., Eicher, V., Foels, R., Górska, P., Lee, I.-C., Licata, L., Liu, J. H., Li, L., Meyer, I., Morselli, D., Muldoon, O., Muluk, H., Papastamou, S., Petrovic, I., Petrovic, N., Prodromitis, G., Prati, F., Rubini, M., Saab, R., van Stekelenburg, J., Sweetman, J., Zheng, W., Henkel, K. E. (2013). Social dominance in context and in individuals: Contextual moderation of robust effects of social dominance orientation in 15 languages and 20 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 587-599. (Original DOI: 10.1177/1948550612473663) On page 587 of the above article published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, author Monica Rubinis institutional affiliation was listed as the University of Limerick in Limerick, Ireland; however, her institutional affiliation was with the Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna in Bologna, Italy.
Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy | 2005
Stamos Papastamou; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Tilemachos Iatridis
REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE | 2017
Silvia Mari; Chiara Volpato; Stamos Papastamou; Xenia Chryssochoou; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Vassilis Pavlopoulos
Psychology | 2011
Vicky Papanikolaou; D. Adamis; Gerasimos Prodromitis; John Kyriopoulos
International Review of Social Psychology | 2018
Stamos Papastamou; Xenia Chryssochoou; Vassilis Pavlopoulos; Gerasimos Prodromitis; Gabrielle Poeschl; Silvia Mari; Joaquim Pires Valentim; Chiara Volpato; Pascal Marchand; Pierre Ratinaud
International Review of Social Psychology | 2017
Gerasimos Prodromitis; Xenia Chryssochoou; Stamos Papastamou