Gerd Fröhlig

Influence of right ventricular stimulation site on left ventricular function in atrial synchronous ventricular pacing

OBJECTIVES The study investigates the correlation between left ventricular function and QRS duration obtained by alternate right ventricular pacing sites. BACKGROUND 1. Right ventricular apical pacing is associated with alterations of left ventricular contraction sequence. 2. A stimulation producing narrow QRS complexes is supposed to provide for better left ventricular contraction patterns. METHODS Fourteen patients with third degree AV block received one ventricular pacing lead in apical position. The alternate lead was attached to that site on the septum that produced the smallest QRS complex as measured from the earliest to the last deflection in any of the orthogonal Frank leads (xyz). During atrial synchronous ventricular pacing, the AV delay was optimized individually and for each stimulation site using mitral valve doppler or impedance cardiography. By radionuclide ventriculography, the phase distribution histogram of left ventricular contraction was evaluated as area under the curve (AuC); systolic function was determined as ejection fraction (EF) and as absolute ejected counts (EC) in random order. The difference (delta) in QRS duration between apical and septal stimulation (deltaxyz) was correlated with the difference in phase distribution (deltaAuC) and ejection parameters (deltaEF, deltaEC). RESULTS QRS duration was shorter with septal than with apical pacing in 9 out of 14 patients (64%); it was longer in 4 (29%), and no difference was seen in 1 patient. There was a significant positive correlation between the change in QRS duration (deltaxvz) and phase distribution (deltaAuC: r = 0.66393, p = 0.010) and a significant negative correlation to systolic function (deltaEF: r = 0.70931, p = 0.004; deltaEC: r = 0.74368, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS In atrial synchronous right ventricular pacing, if the AV delay is adapted individually, decreased QRS duration obtained by alternate pacing sites is significantly correlated with homogenization of left ventricular contraction and with increased systolic function in acute tests.

A New Dual‐Chamber Pacing Mode to Minimize Ventricular Pacing

Despite the low long‐term incidence of high‐degree atrioventricular (AV) block and the known negative effects of ventricular pacing, programming of the AAI mode in patients with sinus node dysfunction (SND) remains exceptional. A new pacing mode was, therefore, designed to combine the advantages of AAI with the safety of DDD pacing. AAIsafeR behaves like the AAI mode in absence of AV block. First‐ and second‐degree AV blocks are tolerated up to a predetermined, programmable limit, and conversion to DDD takes place in case of high‐degree AV block. From DDD, the device may switch back to AAI, provided AV conduction has returned. The safety of AAIsafeR was examined in 43 recipients (70 ± 12‐year old, 24 men) of dual chamber pacemakers implanted for SND or paroxysmal AV block. All patients underwent 24‐hour ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings before hospital discharge and at 1 month of follow‐up with the AAIsafeR mode activated. No AAIsafeR‐related adverse event was observed. At 1 month, the device was functioning in AAIsafeR in 28 patients (65%), and the mean rate of ventricular pacing was 0.2%± 0.4%. Appropriate switches to DDD occurred in 15 patients (35%) for frequent, unexpected AV block. AAIsafeR mode was safe and preserved ventricular function during paroxysmal AV block, while maintaining a very low rate of ventricular pacing. The performance of this new pacing mode in the prevention of atrial fibrillation will be examined in a large, controlled study.

Atrial Sensing Performance of AV Universal Pacemakers During Exercise

To investigate the atrial sensing function of dual chamber pacemakers during exercise, we studied 57 patients aged 12 to 81 years (m = 65). They were paced for sinoatrial disorders (n = 15), second or third degree AV block (n = 37), or binodal disease (n = 11). The examination was performed 3‐24 months (m = 11) after pacemaker implantation. Individual sensing thresholds were determined at rest in the supine position, and proper detection of atrial signals at the programmed sensitivity level was verified during a period of 5‐9 minutes [m = 5.8]. Without a change in the program of the unit, symptom‐limited bicycle ergometry was performed at a maximum load of 25‐200 Watts [m = 95] and 6‐channeI chest wall electrocardiograms were continuously recorded throughout the test, including recovery. During exercise, 25/57 patients (44%) exhibited poor atrial sensing of the pulse generator; after termination of exercise in 16 of the 25 patients, proper atrial sensing resumed within 1 to 7 minutes of recovery. In the remaining nine cases, ergometry was continued after lowering the sensitivity threshold to half the initial setting or, depending on the pacemaker model, by a value of 0.4 mV. This resulted in normal function of the pulse generator in all patients but one, who needed a sensitivity adjustment of another 0.4 mV. In a subgroup of 25 patients, telemetric atrial electrogram recordings were monitored during ergometry, 19 of which could be evaluated quantitatively. Besides random atrial signal variations, presumably due to ectopic beats or runs, a systematic decrease of the peak‐to‐peak amplitude by 0.1 to 1.6 mV (3–30%) was observed in 16/19 patients during exercise. Mean signal reduction amounted to 11.8% and was statistically significant at the 0,1% level. It is concluded from these findings that, besides testing of atrial sensing at rest, the follow‐up of dual chamber pacemakers should include an exercise test.

Atrial signal variations and pacemaker malsensing during exercise: a study in the time and frequency domain.

To give some explanation for atrial malsensing in dual chamber pacing that occurs only during exercise, atrial electrograms from 33 patients were telemetrically recorded and analyzed in both the time and frequency domains. During exercise, an overall decrease from 6.4 +/- 1.9 to 5.6 +/- 1.9 mV (-11%) in the atrial signal amplitude was noted. Despite considerable variability among patients, marked changes occurred in 15 patients whose signals diminished by 11 to 49%. Slew rates showed a similar decrease from 1.35 +/- 0.45 to 1.18 +/- 0.45 V/s (-10.8%), with individual changes of as much as -51%. Signal attenuation in the time domain correlated well with frequency data, exhibiting a highly significant reduction of signal energy between 25 and 105 Hz. However, spectral distribution changed from rest to exercise, with a relative increase of signal energy in the range between 5 and 25 Hz and a decrease at higher frequencies. Individual changes differed widely when low (15 to 65 Hz) and high (65 to 115 Hz) frequencies were compared, but in a group of 11 patients signal attenuation in the high frequency band was more pronounced (-45%) than in the low frequency band (-23%). The clinical impact of the change in frequency distribution during ergometry was visualized by computer simulation of two different (low and high bandpass) filters. Although in individual patients, both characteristics may be favorable with respect to atrial sensing, it was observed in 11 patients that high pass filtering attenuates signal amplitudes by 10 to 24% in excess of the variation without filtering.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Bipolar ventricular far-field signals in the atrium.

In an attempt to evaluate the prevalence and predisposing factors of bipolar ventricular far‐field oversensing, 57 patients were studied who had a Medtronic dual chamber pacemaker implanted (models 7940: n = 6; 7960i: n = 41; 401: n = 3; 8968i: n = 7) and bipolar atrial leads with a dipole spacing from 8.6 to 60 mm attached to various parts of the atrial wall (lateral/anterior: n = 30; appendage: n = 10; atrial septum: n = 10; floating: n = 7). Median bipolar sensing threshold for P waves was 4.0 mV (2.8–4.0 mV, lower and upper quartile) with standard leads and 0.35 (0.25–1.4) mV with single pass (VDD) devices. At the highest sensitivity available, 43 of 50 DDD pacemakers but only two of seven VDD systems detected intrinsic R waves in the atrium (P < 0.01). Ventricular far‐field oversensing occurred at 0.5 mV in 28 (56%) and at 1.0 mV in 16 of 50 DDD units (32%), respectively, and there was one observation in a septal implant at a sensitivity of even 2.8 mV. With ventricular pacing, VDD systems were as susceptible to far‐field signals as DDD pacemakers. Outside the postventricular blanking period (100 ms), evoked R waves were detected by 27 of 57 systems (47%) at maximum atrial sensitivity, by 10 (18%) at 0.5 mV, and by 2 (4%) at a setting of 1.0 up to 1.4 mV, respectively. There was no definite superiority of any lead position, there was a trend in favor of the atrial free wall for better intrinsic R wave rejection, but just the opposite was the case for paced ventricular beats. Bipolar signal discrimination tended to be higher with short tip‐to‐ring spacing (17.8 mm) but the difference to larger dipole lengths (30–60 mm) was not significant in terms of the R to P wave ratio and the overall far‐field susceptibility. In summary, bipolar ventricular far‐field oversensing in the atrium is common with short postventricular blanking times and high atrial sensitivity settings that may be warranted for tachyarrhythmia detection and mode switching. A potentially more discriminant effect of shorter dipole lengths (≤ 10 mm) remains to be tested.

Responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy with narrow or intermediate QRS complexes identified by simple echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony: The DESIRE study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is recommended for patients with NYHA class III–IV refractory heart failure (HF), ejection fraction <35% and a QRS >120ms. We attempted to identify responders to CRT from echocardiographic (echo) indices of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with QRS < 150 ms.

The Influence of Right Atrial Septal Pacing on the Interatrial Contraction Sequence

Right atrial septal pacing yields shorter interatrial conduction delays than conventional right atrial pacing at the free wall or the right atrial appendage. However, the hemodynamic effects of right atrial septal pacing are less well known. This study measured the delay between right and left atrial contractions during right atrial septal pacing (n = 21), conventional right atrial pacing (n = 32) and atrial multisite pacing (n = 6) by pulse Doppler echocardiography of transtricuspidal and transmitral blood flow. The effects of right atrial septal pacing (n = 14) versus conventional right atrial pacing (n = 22) on the optimal AV delay during dual chamber pacing was examined in patients with high degree atrioventricular (AV) block. Compared to sinus rhythm, conventional right atrial pacing increased P wave duration from 119 ± 21 ms to 137 ± 24 ms (P < 0.001), whereas both right atrial septal pacing (119 ± 10 ms before, 106 ± 13 ms during pacing, P = 0.002) and atrial multisite pacing (123 ± 20 ms before, 112 ± 11 ms during pacing, P = 0.5) shortened P wave duration. Atrial pacing caused a significant (P < 0.002) prolongation of atrial conduction delays from 24 ± 21 ms to 41 ± 26 ms during conventional right atrial pacing, and reversed the right‐to‐left into a left‐to‐right contraction sequence in 20 of 21 patients during right atrial septal pacing (atrial conduction delay during sinus rhythm: 34 ± 23 ms vs 37 ± 26 ms during atrial pacing, P < 0.0001). Atrial multisite pacing caused a nonsignificant shortening of the usual right‐to‐left contraction delay from 22 ± 34 ms to 11 ± 18 ms. The optimal left heart AV delay during AV sequential pacing was significantly (P = 0.002) shorter during right atrial septal pacing (108 ± 38 ms) than during conventional right atrial pacing (152 ± 33 ms). During conventional right atrial pacing the optimal right heart AV delay was significantly (P = 0.029) shorter than the optimal left heart AV delay. The opposite relation was observed for right atrial septal pacing (P = 0.033). Conclusions: Interatrial septal pacing does not synchronize right and left atrial contractions. It reverses the atrial mechanical timing from a right‐to‐left to a left‐to‐right contraction sequence, and requires the setting of shorter AV delays during dual chamber pacing if based on the optimization of left heart timing. Interatrial septal pacing is a technique which allows pacing of the left atrium from a right atrial site, rather than a single site approach to biatrial pacing.

Cineradiography for determination of normal and abnormal function in mechanical heart valves

To determine the diagnostic value of cineradiography of mechanical heart valves, 112 cinefluoroscopic studies were performed in 76 patients with 95 valve prostheses (caged ball or disk valves, tilting disk and bileaflet valves). A patient group (n = 45) presenting with clinical or echocardiographic findings suggestive of valve-related complications was compared with a control group (n = 31) without such symptoms. Disk-opening angles (mean +/- SD) for Medtronic Hall aortic valves were found to be significantly smaller (62.8 +/- 11.1 degrees) in patients than in control subjects (73.9 +/- 1.6 degrees; p < 0.05). Tissue ingrowth or thrombus formation, or both, demonstrated in 3 patients on subsequent reoperation, are considered as the main cause of incomplete or asymmetric disk opening. Opening and closing times did not differ significantly between patients and control subjects. Besides abnormal valve motion, structural defects such as strut fracture or leaflet escape could be rapidly detected by cineradiography if x-ray projections according to the particular valve design were used. Together with quantitative Doppler echocardiographic and clinical data, this method can help to give specific answers if the question is to either confirm or exclude imminent or acute valve malfunction. Thus, modern cineradiography is a highly valuable noninvasive diagnostic tool for both rapid management of emergency cases and routine follow-up of patients with mechanical heart valves.

Longevity of Dual Chamber Pacemakers: Device and Patient Related Determinants

KINDERMANN, M., et al.: Longevity of Dual Chamber Pacemakers: Device and Patient Related Determinants. In 382 patients with three different dual chamber pulse generators, the median time interval to battery depletion was 98.3 months. Cox regression analysis revealed the following variables as significant predictors of battery longevity: programmed pacing rate, energy of the stimulation output, mode of stimulation (i.e., proportion of paced cycles in one or two chambers), battery capacity, and internal sensing current of the pacemaker. Although 27% of all patients died before the service life of the pacemaker was over and despite a rate of premature reoperations of 8.6%, the majority of pacemaker patients (55%) fully used the expected battery life span of the pulse generator. Patients who died before the pacemaker had reached its end of service were significantly older at implantation than patients who survived until pacemaker replacement. The vast majority (92%) of patients received another dual chamber pulse generator when replacement was required. These data underline the need for long‐lasting dual chamber devices.

Selective site pacing: The right ventricular approach

Animal data and recent findings in humans have questioned the appropriateness of pacing the heart from the right ventricular apex. Numerous, mostly small sized, studies have evaluated alternative sites within the right ventricle. There is now sufficient evidence that right ventricular apical pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with or without heart failure is detrimental. Pacing from the right side of the heart as an attempt at nonpharmacological therapy for heart failure, turns out to be obsolete. In antibradycardia pacing with the need for continuous ventricular support, the interest in preserving left ventricular function drives the ongoing search for the most favorable pacing site within the right ventricle. Results, so far, are conflicting which may be attributed to the inhomogeneity of patient groups, the small cohorts studied, the differing protocols used, and the lack of accepted definitions of right ventricular lead positions. Larger studies are needed to evaluate intraoperative criteria for optimal lead placement and the potential benefit of nonapical right ventricular pacing. (PACE 2004; 27[Pt. II]:855–861)