Geremia B. Bolli

Alternative routes of insulin delivery

Attempts at replicating physiological insulin secretion, as a means of restoring the normal metabolic milieu and thereby minimizing the risk of diabetic complications, has become an essential feature of insulin treatment. However, despite advances in the production, purification, formulation and methods of delivery of insulin which have occurred in recent years, this has met with limited success. The current advocacy of intensive insulin therapy regimens involving multiple daily subcutaneous injection places a heavy burden of compliance on patients and has prompted interest in developing alternative, less invasive routes of delivery. To date, attempts to exploit the nasal, oral, gastrointestinal and transdermal routes have been mainly unsuccessful. The respiratory tree, with a large surface area, offers the greatest potential for the delivery of polypeptide drugs and there is renewed interest in administrating insulin by the intrapulmonary route. Current pulmonary drug delivery systems include a variety of pressurized metered dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, nebulizers and aqueous mist inhalers. Recent clinical studies suggest a possible role for inhaled insulin in fulfilling meal‐related insulin requirements in persons with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Most experience with inhaled insulin has been obtained using either dry powder formulation in the Nektar Pulmonary Inhaler/Exubera device (Nektar Therapeutics Inc., San Carlos, CA, Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ, Pfizer, NY) or a liquid aerosol formulation in the AERx® Insulin Diabetes Management System (Aradigm Corp., Hayward, CA, NovoNordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark). If long‐term safety and efficacy is confirmed, inhalation may become the first non‐subcutaneous route of insulin administration for widespread clinical use. Despite overwhelming interest and investment in administering insulin via the oral route, success is not expected in the short term. Attempts at utilizing the buccal mucosa and skin are also continuing. Pancreatic transplantation will remain limited to those patients receiving a kidney transplant and immunotherapy. Islet cell transplantation is at an early though encouraging stage following the availability of new less toxic immunosuppressive agents. True insulin independence will require further advances in the combined fields of cell biology and genetics to ensure freedom from both the need for lifelong administration of insulin and the complications of diabetes.

Insulins today and beyond

The advent of insulin almost 80 years ago revolutionised treatment of diabetes and must be one of the most outstanding achievements of twentieth century medicine. Since then, there has been an ever-increasing awareness and acceptance of the need to achieve and sustain near-normoglycaemia to delay onset and retard progression of diabetic angiopathy. Physiological insulin replacement is therefore central to management of patients with diabetes who are unable to make [corrected] insulin. Insulin formulations, treatment strategies, and methods and routes of delivery have changed much, with more and more options for monitoring the effect on blood glucose concentrations. Patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes need insulin much more aggressively than previously. Parallel developments in glucose-sensing technologies are welcomed as an integral part of safe and optimum implementation of insulin replacement therapy.

Hypoglycemia, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Events

Diabetes is at epidemic proportions in the U.S. Patients with diabetes are at increased risk for micro- and macrovascular complications. The benefit of glycemic control in decreasing the risk for microvascular disease is well established. However, the role of glycemic control in decreasing macrovascular complications has been controversial. Several large clinical trials looking at this issue have either shown no benefit or even potential harm. The possibility of hypoglycemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular events is a topic of much debate. In this review article, we discuss the evidence for and against this hypothesis and the possible mechanisms that might be involved. Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The link between glycemic control and microvascular complications has been firmly established (1,2). However, the association between glycemic control and macrovascular disease is mainly obtained from epidemiological studies, and intensive glucose control has often failed to reduce macrovascular events. Intensive glucose control invariably increases the risk of hypoglycemia and sometimes the severity of hypoglycemia (2) Several epidemiological studies and smaller prospective studies have linked hypoglycemia to increased cardiovascular risk (3⇓–5). Recent large randomized trials looking at intensive glycemic control have either shown no benefit (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation [ADVANCE] and Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial [VADT]) or increased all cause mortality (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes [ACCORD]) (6). While the reason for the increased mortality is unclear and hypoglycemia has not been implicated as a cause of death, these studies have increased the debate about the degree of glycemic control required to decrease diabetes complications and the role of hypoglycemia in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The modern definition of hypoglycemia is plasma glucose <70 mg/dl (7⇓–9). At plasma glucose …

Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial

Aims  The goal of the study was to determine whether continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) differs from a multiple daily injection (MDI) regimen based on neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) as basal insulin with respect to glycaemic control and quality of life in people with Type 1 diabetes.

Acute, short-term hyperglycemia enhances shear stress-induced platelet activation in patients with type II diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to assess whether acute, short-term hyperglycemia affects platelet reactivity in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). BACKGROUND Hyperglycemic spikes are thought to precipitate ischemic events in T2DM. Previous studies have shown in vivo platelet activation in diabetes; however, no studies have assessed whether acute in vivo hyperglycemia induces further activation of platelets. METHODS In a cross-over, randomized, double-blind study, 12 patients with T2DM underwent 4 h of either acute hyperglycemia (13.9 mmol/l, 250 mg/dl) or euglycemia (5.5 mmol/l, 100 mg/dl). Shear stress-induced platelet activation, P-selectin and lysosomal integral membrane protein (LIMP) expression on platelets in the bleeding-time blood, urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) (TxB(2)) excretion, von Willebrand factor:antigen (vWF:Ag), and von Willebrand factor:activity (vWF:activity) were measured before and after hyperglycemia or euglycemia. RESULTS Shear stress-induced platelet activation, P-selectin and LIMP expression on platelets in the bleeding-time blood, and urinary 11-dehydro-TxB(2) excretion increased significantly after hyperglycemic clamping, whereas no changes were observed after euglycemic clamping. Plasma vWF:Ag and vWF:activity increased strikingly in parallel fashion after hyperglycemic clamping, whereas no changes were observed after euglycemic clamping. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate that acute, short-term hyperglycemia induces an increased activation of platelets exposed to high shear stress conditions in vitro (filtration method) or in vivo (bleeding time). In vivo platelet activation is reflected by an increased urinary excretion of 11-dehydro-TxB(2). The increased levels of vWF in the circulation correlate with the increase in platelet activation markers and may indicate some degree of causation. Acute, short-term hyperglycemia in T2DM may precipitate vascular occlusions by facilitating platelet activation.

Acute Antihyperglycemic Mechanisms of Metformin in NIDDM: Evidence for Suppression of Lipid Oxidation and Hepatic Glucose Production

To establish the antihyperglycemic mechanisms of metformin in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) independently of the long-term, aspecific effects of removal of glucotoxicity, 21 NIDDM subjects (14 obese, 7 nonobese) were studied on two separate occasions, with an isoglycemic (plasma glucose ∼9 mM) hyperinsulinemic (two-step insulin infusion, 2 h each, at the rate of 4 and 40 mU · m−2 · min−1) clamp combined with [3−3H]glucose infusion and indirect calorimetry, after administration of either metformin (500 mg per os, at –5 and –1 h before the clamp) or placebo. Compared with placebo, hepatic glucose production (HGP) decreased ∼30% more after metformin (from 469 ± 50 to 330 ± 54 μmol/min), but glucose uptake did not increase. Metformin suppressed free fatty acids (FFAs) by ∼17% (from 0.42 ± 0.04 to 0.35 ± 0.04 mM) and lipid oxidation by ∼25% (from 4.5 ± 0.4 to 3.4 ± 0.4 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) and increased glucose oxidation by ∼ 16% (from 16.2 ± 1.4 to 19.3 ± 1.3 μmol.kg−1 · min−1) compared with placebo (P < 0.05), but did not affect nonoxidative glucose metabolism, protein oxidation, or total energy expenditure. Suppression of FFA and lipid oxidation after metformin correlated with suppression of HGP (r = 0.70 and r = 0.51, P < 0.001). The effects of metformin in obese and nonobese subjects were no different. We conclude that the specific, antihyperglycemic effects of metformin in the clinical condition of hyperglycemia in NIDDM are primarily due to suppression of HGP, not stimulation of glucose uptake, and are mediated, at least in part, by suppression of FFA and lipid oxidation.

Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin vs. pioglitazone when added to metformin : a 24-week, randomized, double-blind study

Aim:  The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin vs. pioglitazone as add‐on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.

Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Dynamics of the Long-Acting Insulin Analogs Glargine and Detemir at Steady State in Type 1 Diabetes A double-blind, randomized, crossover study

OBJECTIVE—To compare pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin analogs glargine and detemir, 24 subjects with type 1 diabetes (aged 38 ± 10 years, BMI 22.4 ± 1.6 kg/m2, and A1C 7.2 ± 0.7%) were studied after a 2-week treatment with either glargine or detemir once daily (randomized, double-blind, crossover study). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Plasma glucose was clamped at 100 mg/dl for 24 h after subcutaneous injection of 0.35 unit/kg. The primary end point was end of action (time at which plasma glucose was >150 mg/dl). RESULTS—With glargine, plasma glucose remained at 103 ± 3.6 mg/dl up to 24 h, and all subjects completed the study. Plasma glucose increased progressively after 16 h with detemir, and only eight subjects (33%) completed the study with plasma glucose <180 mg/dl. Glucose infusion rate (GIR) was similar with detemir and glargine for 12 h, after which it decreased more rapidly with detemir (P < 0.001). Estimated total insulin activity (GIR area under the curve [AUC]0–end of GIR) was 1,412 ± 662 and 915 ± 225 mg/kg (glargine vs. detemir, P < 0.05), with median time of end of action at 24 and 17.5 h (glargine vs. detemir, P < 0.001). The antilipolytic action of detemir was lower than that of glargine (AUC free fatty acids0–24 h 11 ± 1.7 vs. 8 ± 2.8 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS—Detemir has effects similar to those of glargine during the initial 12 h after administration, but effects are lower during 12–24 h.

The Dawn Phenomenon — A Common Occurrence in Both Non-Insulin-Dependent and Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

The dawn phenomenon is a condition recently described in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) that is characterized by abrupt increases in fasting levels of plasma glucose or insulin requirements or both between 5 and 9 a.m., in the absence of antecedent hypoglycemia. To determine its potential clinical relevance, we assessed its frequency and reproducibility in 20 patients with IDDM and in 13 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) during overnight closed-loop (feedback-controlled) intravenous insulin infusion. After 6 a.m., plasma glucose levels increased similarly in NIDDM (89 +/- 2 mg per deciliter, midnight to 6 a.m., vs. 98 +/- 2 mg per deciliter, 6 to 9 a.m.; P less than 0.01). Insulin requirements increased at least 50 per cent for 1 1/2 hours in 77 per cent of patients with NIDDM and in 75 per cent of patients with IDDM. In five patients with IDDM who were studied on four occasions, the phenomenon occurred during 17 of the 20 observation periods, with insulin requirements after 6 a.m. increasing 225 +/- 34 per cent; coefficients of variation in individual patients ranged from 4 to 25 per cent. Thus, the dawn phenomenon occurs commonly in both NIDDM and IDDM, but its potential variability must be taken into consideration when one is attempting to adjust insulin doses.

Long-term recovery from unawareness, deficient counterregulation and lack of cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycaemia, following institution of rational, intensive insulin therapy in IDDM.

SummaryHypoglycaemia unawareness, is a major risk factor for severe hypoglycaemia and a contraindication to the therapeutic goal of near-normoglycaemia in IDDM. We tested two hypotheses, first, that hypoglycaemia unawareness is reversible as long as hypoglycaemia is meticulously prevented by careful intensive insulin therapy in patients with short and long IDDM duration, and that such a result can be maintained long-term. Second, that intensive insulin therapy which strictly prevents hypoglycaemia, can maintain long-term near-normoglycaemia. We studied 21 IDDM patients with hypoglycaemia unawareness and frequent mild/severe hypoglycaemia episodes while on “conventional” insulin therapy, and 20 nondiabetic control subjects. Neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and deterioration in cognitive function were assessed in a stepped hypoglycaemia clamp before, and again after 2 weeks, 3 months and 1 year of either intensive insulin therapy which meticulously prevented hypoglycaemia (based on physiologic insulin replacement and continuous education, experimental group, EXP, n=16), or maintenance of the original “conventional” therapy (control group, CON, n=5). At entry to the study, all 21 IDDM-patients had subnormal neuroendocrine and symptom responses, and less deterioration of cognitive function during hypoglycaemia. After intensive insulin therapy in EXP, the frequency of hypoglycaemia decreased from 0.5±0.05 to 0.045±0.02 episodes/patient-day; HbA1C increased from 5.83±0.18 to 6.94±0.13% (range in non-diabetic subjects 3.8–5.5%) over a 1-year period; all counterregulatory hormone and symptom responses to hypoglycaemia improved between 2 weeks and 3 months, with the exception of glucagon which improved at 1 year; and cognitive function deteriorated further as early as 2 weeks (p<0.05). The improvement in responses was maintained at 1 year. The improvement in plasma adrenaline and symptom responses inversely correlated with IDDM duration. In contrast, in CON, neither frequency of hypoglycaemia, nor neuroendocrine responses to hypoglycaemia improved. Thus, meticulous prevention of hypoglycaemia by intensive insulin therapy reverses hypoglycaemia unawareness even in patients with long-term IDDM, and is compatible with long-term near-normoglycaemia. Because carefully conducted intensive insulin therapy reduces, not increases the frequency of moderate/severe hypoglycaemia, intensive insulin therapy should be extended to the majority of IDDM patients in whom it is desirable to prevent/delay the onset/progression of microvascular complications.