Gerie J. Glas
University of Amsterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Gerie J. Glas.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2013
Gerie J. Glas; K.F. van der Sluijs; Marc J. Schultz; Jorrit-Jan H. Hofstra; T. van der Poll; Marcel Levi
Summary. Enhanced intrapulmonary fibrin deposition as a result of abnormal broncho‐alveolar fibrin turnover is a hallmark of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pneumonia and ventilator‐induced lung injury (VILI), and is important to the pathogenesis of these conditions. The mechanisms that contribute to alveolar coagulopathy are localized tissue factor‐mediated thrombin generation, impaired activity of natural coagulation inhibitors and depression of bronchoalveolar urokinase plasminogen activator‐mediated fibrinolysis, caused by the increase of plasminogen activator inhibitors. There is an intense and bidirectional interaction between coagulation and inflammatory pathways in the bronchoalveolar compartment. Systemic or local administration of anticoagulant agents (including activated protein C, antithrombin and heparin) and profibrinolytic agents (such as plasminogen activators) attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy. Several preclinical studies show additional anti‐inflammatory effects of these therapies in ARDS and pneumonia.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine | 2017
Brendon P. Scicluna; Lonneke A. van Vught; Aeilko H. Zwinderman; Maryse A. Wiewel; Emma E. Davenport; Katie L Burnham; Peter Nürnberg; Marcus J. Schultz; Janneke Horn; Olaf L. Cremer; Marc J. M. Bonten; Charles J. Hinds; Hector R. Wong; Julian C. Knight; Tom van der Poll; Friso M. de Beer; Lieuwe D. Bos; Jos F. Frencken; Maria E. Koster-Brouwer; Kirsten van de Groep; Diana M. Verboom; Gerie J. Glas; Roosmarijn T. M. van Hooijdonk; Arie J. Hoogendijk; Mischa A. Huson; Peter M. C. Klein Klouwenberg; David S. Y. Ong; Laura R. A. Schouten; Marleen Straat; Esther Witteveen
BACKGROUND Host responses during sepsis are highly heterogeneous, which hampers the identification of patients at high risk of mortality and their selection for targeted therapies. In this study, we aimed to identify biologically relevant molecular endotypes in patients with sepsis. METHODS This was a prospective observational cohort study that included consecutive patients admitted for sepsis to two intensive care units (ICUs) in the Netherlands between Jan 1, 2011, and July 20, 2012 (discovery and first validation cohorts) and patients admitted with sepsis due to community-acquired pneumonia to 29 ICUs in the UK (second validation cohort). We generated genome-wide blood gene expression profiles from admission samples and analysed them by unsupervised consensus clustering and machine learning. The primary objective of this study was to establish endotypes for patients with sepsis, and assess the association of these endotypes with clinical traits and survival outcomes. We also established candidate biomarkers for the endotypes to allow identification of patient endotypes in clinical practice. FINDINGS The discovery cohort had 306 patients, the first validation cohort had 216, and the second validation cohort had 265 patients. Four molecular endotypes for sepsis, designated Mars1-4, were identified in the discovery cohort, and were associated with 28-day mortality (log-rank p=0·022). In the discovery cohort, the worst outcome was found for patients classified as having a Mars1 endotype, and at 28 days, 35 (39%) of 90 people with a Mars1 endotype had died (hazard ratio [HR] vs all other endotypes 1·86 [95% CI 1·21-2·86]; p=0·0045), compared with 23 (22%) of 105 people with a Mars2 endotype (HR 0·64 [0·40-1·04]; p=0·061), 16 (23%) of 71 people with a Mars3 endotype (HR 0·71 [0·41-1·22]; p=0·19), and 13 (33%) of 40 patients with a Mars4 endotype (HR 1·13 [0·63-2·04]; p=0·69). Analysis of the net reclassification improvement using a combined clinical and endotype model significantly improved risk prediction to 0·33 (0·09-0·58; p=0·008). A 140-gene expression signature reliably stratified patients with sepsis to the four endotypes in both the first and second validation cohorts. Only Mars1 was consistently significantly associated with 28-day mortality across the cohorts. To facilitate possible clinical use, a biomarker was derived for each endotype; BPGM and TAP2 reliably identified patients with a Mars1 endotype. INTERPRETATION This study provides a method for the molecular classification of patients with sepsis to four different endotypes upon ICU admission. Detection of sepsis endotypes might assist in providing personalised patient management and in selection for trials. FUNDING Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, Netherlands.
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis | 2016
Gerie J. Glas; Marcel Levi; Marc J. Schultz
Severe burn injury is associated with systemic coagulopathy. The changes in coagulation described in patients with severe burns resemble those found patients with sepsis or major trauma. Coagulopathy in patients with severe burns is characterized by procoagulant changes, and impaired fibrinolytic and natural anticoagulation systems. Both the timing of onset and the severity of hemostatic derangements are related to the severity of the burn. The exact pathophysiology and time course of coagulopathy are uncertain, but, at least in part, result from hemodilution and hypothermia. As the occurrence of coagulopathy in patients with severe burns is associated with increased comorbidity and mortality, coagulopathy could be seen as a potential therapeutic target. Clear guidelines for the treatment of coagulopathy in patients with severe burns are lacking, but supportive measures and targeted treatments have been proposed. Supportive measures are aimed at avoiding preventable triggers such as tissue hypoperfusion caused by shock, or hemodilution and hypothermia following the usually aggressive fluid resuscitation in these patients. Suggested targeted treatments that could benefit patients with severe burns include systemic treatment with anticoagulants, but sufficient randomized controlled trial evidence is lacking.
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics | 2016
Friso M. de Beer; Wim K. Lagrand; Gerie J. Glas; Charlotte J.P. Beurskens; Gerard van Mierlo; Diana Wouters; Sacha Zeerleder; Joris J. T. H. Roelofs; Nicole P. Juffermans; Janneke Horn; Marcus J. Schultz
Complement activation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of pneumonia. We hypothesized that inhibition of the complement system in the lungs by repeated treatment with nebulized plasma-derived human C1-esterase inhibitor reduces pulmonary complement activation and subsequently attenuates lung injury and lung inflammation. This was investigated in a rat model of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia. Rats were intra–tracheally challenged with S. pneumoniae to induce pneumonia. Nebulized C1-esterase inhibitor or saline (control animals) was repeatedly administered to rats, 30 min before induction of pneumonia and every 6 h thereafter. Rats were sacrificed 20 or 40 h after inoculation with bacteria. Brochoalveolar lavage fluid and lung tissue were obtained for measuring levels of complement activation (C4b/c), lung injury and inflammation. Induction of pneumonia was associated with pulmonary complement activation (C4b/c at 20 h 1.24 % [0.56–2.59] and at 40 h 2.08 % [0.98–5.12], compared to 0.50 % [0.07–0.59] and 0.03 % [0.03–0.03] in the healthy control animals). The functional fraction of C1-INH was detectable in BALF, but no effect was found on pulmonary complement activation (C4b/c at 20 h 0.73 % [0.16–1.93] and at 40 h 2.38 % [0.54–4.19]). Twenty hours after inoculation, nebulized C1-esterase inhibitor treatment reduced total histology score, but this effect was no longer seen at 40 h. Nebulized C1-esterase inhibitor did not affect other markers of lung injury or lung inflammation. In this negative experimental animal study, severe S. pneumoniae pneumonia in rats is associated with pulmonary complement activation. Repeated treatment with nebulized C1-esterase inhibitor, although successfully delivered to the lungs, does not affect pulmonary complement activation, lung inflammation or lung injury.
Trials | 2014
Gerie J. Glas; Johannes Muller; Jan M. Binnekade; Berry I. Cleffken; Kirsten Colpaert; Barry Dixon; Nicole P. Juffermans; Paul Knape; Marcel Levi; Bert G Loef; D.P. Mackie; Manu Lng Malbrain; Marcus J. Schultz; Koenraad F. van der Sluijs
Annals of Intensive Care | 2016
Gerie J. Glas; Ary Serpa Neto; Janneke Horn; Amalia Cochran; Barry Dixon; Elamin M. Elamin; Iris Faraklas; Sharmila Dissanaike; Andrew C. Miller; Marcus J. Schultz
Intensive Care Medicine | 2017
Lieuwe D. Bos; Cheryl Stips; Laura R. A. Schouten; Lonneke A. van Vught; Maryse A. Wiewel; Luuk Wieske; Roosmarijn T. M. van Hooijdonk; Marleen Straat; Friso M. de Beer; Gerie J. Glas; Caroline E. Visser; Evert de Jonge; Nicole P. Juffermans; Janneke Horn; Marcus J. Schultz
Critical Care Medicine | 2018
Maria E. Koster-Brouwer; Diana M. Verboom; Brendon P. Scicluna; Kirsten van de Groep; Jos F. Frencken; Davy Janssen; Rob Schuurman; Marcus J. Schultz; Tom van der Poll; Marc J. M. Bonten; Olaf L. Cremer; Friso M. de Beer; Lieuwe D. Bos; Gerie J. Glas; Arie J. Hoogendijk; Roosmarijn T. M. van Hooijdonk; Janneke Horn; Mischa A. Huson; Peter M. C. Klein Klouwenberg; David S. Y. Ong; Laura R. A. Schouten; Marleen Straat; Lonneke A. van Vught; Luuk Wieske; Maryse A. Wiewel; Esther Witteveen
Critical Care | 2015
Gerie J. Glas; Ary Serpa Neto; Janneke Horn; Marc J. Schultz
Critical Care | 2014
Fm de Beer; Gerie J. Glas; Charlotte J.P. Beurskens; Janneke Horn; Marc J. Schultz; Wim K. Lagrand