Ghada Ahmad
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ghada Ahmad.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2011
Timm Dickfeld; Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Alejandro Jimenez; Aharon Turgeman; Richard Kuk; Matthew Peters; Anastasios Saliaris; Magdi Saba; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Jean Jeudy
Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of 0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of 2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of <2.0 W/kg before VT ablation. Device interrogation demonstrated unchanged ICD parameters immediately before, after, or at 68±21 days follow-up (P>0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of <1.5-mV mapping points. Display of scar border zone allowed identification of excellent pace mapping sites, with only limited voltage mapping in 64% of patients. Viable endocardium of >2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | 2014
Olurotimi Mesubi; Ghada Ahmad; Jean Jeudy; Alejandro Jimenez; Richard Kuk; Anastasios Saliaris; Vincent See; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Timm Dickfeld
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is the gold standard for myocardial scar evaluation. Although ideal for substrate assessment in ventricular tachycardia (VT), most patients have an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) at presentation for ablation. This study evaluates the ICD artifact burden during standard late gadolinium enhancement CMRI (LGE‐CMRI) evaluation of myocardial scar in VT patients with ICDs.
The Journal of Nuclear Medicine | 2012
Jing Tian; Mark F. Smith; Ghada Ahmad; Vasken Dilsizian; Alejandro Jimenez; Timm Dickfeld
The integration of myocardial scar models in 3-dimensional (3D) mapping systems may provide a novel way of helping to guide ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablations. This study assessed the value of 201Tl SPECT perfusion imaging to define ventricular myocardial scar areas and to characterize electrophysiology voltage-derived myocardial substrate categories of scar, border zone (BZ), and normal myocardium regions. Scar and BZ regions have been implicated in the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias. Methods: Ten patients scheduled for VT ablation underwent 201Tl SPECT before the ablation procedure. 3D left ventricular (LV) scar models were created from the SPECT images. These scar models were registered with the LV voltage maps and analyzed with a 17-segment cardiac model. Scar location and scar burden were compared between the SPECT scar models and voltage maps. In addition, 201Tl SPECT uptake was quantified using a 68-segment cardiac model and compared among voltage-defined scar, BZ, and normal segments. Results: 3D models of LV myocardium and scar were successfully created from 201Tl SPECT images and integrated in a clinical mapping system. The surface registration error with the electrophysiology voltage map was 4.4 ± 1.0 mm. The 3D scar location from SPECT matched in 72% of the segments with the voltage map findings. All successful ablation sites were located within the SPECT-defined scar or within 1 cm of its border, with 73% of the successful ablation sites within 1 cm of the scar border. Voltage measurements in SPECT-defined scar and normal areas were 1.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 2.8 mV, respectively (P < 0.001). The fractional SPECT scar burden area (18.8% ± 5.2%) agreed better with the abnormal (scar plus BZ) voltage area (20.8% ± 15.7%) than with the scar voltage area (5.8% ± 5.8%). Mean normalized 201Tl uptake was 55% ± 21% in the voltage-defined scar, 63% ± 20% in BZ, and 79% ± 17% in normal myocardial segments (P < 0.05 for scar or BZ vs. normal). Conclusion: 3D SPECT surface models of LV scar were accurately integrated into a clinical mapping system and predicted endocardial voltage-defined scar. These preliminary data support the possible use of widely available 201Tl SPECT to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2012
Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Olurotimi Mesubi; Jean Jeudy; Timm Dickfeld
Voltage mapping is the primary tool for identifying sites for substrate-guided ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation, but there are limitations in its application. Delayed-enhanced cardiac MRI (DE-CMRI) can facilitate VT ablations by providing complementary detail about myocardial scar location and geometry. We present the case of a patient with recurrent VT with left bundle branch block (LBBB)-right-side inferior axis morphology and a challenging voltage map.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2011
Timm Dickfeld; Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Alejandro Jimenez; Aharon Turgeman; Richard Kuk; Matthew Peters; Anastasios Saliaris; Magdi Saba; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Jean Jeudy
Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of 0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of 2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of <2.0 W/kg before VT ablation. Device interrogation demonstrated unchanged ICD parameters immediately before, after, or at 68±21 days follow-up (P>0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of <1.5-mV mapping points. Display of scar border zone allowed identification of excellent pace mapping sites, with only limited voltage mapping in 64% of patients. Viable endocardium of >2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2011
Timm Dickfeld; Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Alejandro Jimenez; Aharon Turgeman; Richard Kuk; Matthew Peters; Anastasios Saliaris; Magdi Saba; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Jean Jeudy
Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of 0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of 2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of <2.0 W/kg before VT ablation. Device interrogation demonstrated unchanged ICD parameters immediately before, after, or at 68±21 days follow-up (P>0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of <1.5-mV mapping points. Display of scar border zone allowed identification of excellent pace mapping sites, with only limited voltage mapping in 64% of patients. Viable endocardium of >2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2011
Timm Dickfeld; Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Alejandro Jimenez; Aharon Turgeman; Richard Kuk; Matthew Peters; Anastasios Saliaris; Magdi Saba; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Jean Jeudy
Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of 0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of 2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.Background— Substrate-guided ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) relies on voltage mapping to define the scar and border zone. An integrated 3D scar reconstruction from late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI could facilitate VT ablations. Methods and Results— Twenty-two patients with ICD underwent contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI with a specific absorption rate of <2.0 W/kg before VT ablation. Device interrogation demonstrated unchanged ICD parameters immediately before, after, or at 68±21 days follow-up (P>0.05). ICD imaging artifacts were most prominent in the anterior wall and allowed full and partial assessment of LGE in 9±4 and 12±3 of 17 segments, respectively. In 14 patients with LGE, a 3D scar model was reconstructed and successfully registered with the clinical mapping system (accuracy, 3.9±1.8 mm). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, bipolar and unipolar voltages of 1.49 and 4.46 mV correlated best with endocardial MRI scar. Scar visualization allowed the elimination of falsely low voltage recordings (suboptimal catheter contact) in 4.1±1.9% of <1.5-mV mapping points. Display of scar border zone allowed identification of excellent pace mapping sites, with only limited voltage mapping in 64% of patients. Viable endocardium of >2 mm resulted in >1.5-mV voltage recordings despite up to 63% transmural midmyocardial scar successfully ablated with MRI guidance. All successful ablation sites demonstrated LGE (transmurality, 68±26%) and were located within 10 mm of transition zones to 0% to 25% scar in 71%. Conclusions— Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI can be safely performed in selected patients with ICDs and allows the integration of detailed 3D scar maps into clinical mapping systems, providing supplementary anatomic guidance to facilitate substrate-guided VT ablations.
Circulation-arrhythmia and Electrophysiology | 2011
Timm Dickfeld; Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Alejandro Jimenez; Aharon Turgeman; Richard Kuk; Matthew Peters; Anastasios Saliaris; Magdi Saba; Stephen R. Shorofsky; Jean Jeudy
Archive | 2012
Jing Tian; Ghada Ahmad; Olurotimi Mesubi; Jean Jeudy; Timm Dickfeld
Circulation | 2012
Thomas Klein; Olurotimi Mesubi; Ghada Ahmad; Mark F. Smith; Wengen Chen; Kelechi Ego-Osuala; Anastasio Saliaris; Vincent See; Steve Shorofsky; Vasken Dilsizian; Timm Dickfeld