Giacomo Basadonna

Early versus late acute renal allograft rejection : impact on chronic rejection

We studied the effect of acute renal allograft rejection and its timing on the development of chronic rejection and subsequent graft loss. Between January 1, 1987 and April 30, 1991, 424 patients at the University of Minnesota received a primary kidney transplant (minimum follow-up, 1 year). Patients were subdivided by donor source, presence or absence of acute rejection, and the timing of acute rejection onset (early, ≤ 60 days vs. late, > 60 days post-transplant). For living donor (LD) transplant recipients (n=219), the incidence of chronic rejection is 0.8% in those who had no acute rejection (n=130), 20% in those with acute rejection ≤60 days (n=59) (P<0.001 vs. no acute rejection), and 43% in those with acute rejection > 60 days (n=30) (P<0.001 vs. no acute rejection, P=0.04 vs. early acute rejection). For cadaver (CAD) transplant recipients (n=205), the incidence of chronic rejection is 0% in those who had no acute rejection (n=109), 36% in those with acute rejection ≤ 60 days (n=69) (P<0.001 vs. no acute rejection), and 63% in those with acute rejection > 60 days (n=27) (P<0.001 vs. no acute rejection, P=0.03 vs. early acute rejection). For both LD and CAD recipients, no grafts have been lost to chronic rejection among those who did not first have at least 1 acute rejection episode. In contrast, 23 patients with acute rejection have had graft loss to chronic rejection. For both LD and CAD recipients, those with > 1 acute rejection episode had significantly more chronic rejection than those with only 1 rejection (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic rejection based on whether the first acute rejection episode was steroid resistant or steroid responsive. We conclude that acute rejection is strongly related to the development of biopsy-proven chronic rejection and subsequent graft loss. Patients undergoing their first acute rejection episode > 60 days (vs. ≤ 60 days) have an increased incidence of chronic rejection.

Results of the double-blind, randomized, multicenter, phase III clinical trial of thymoglobulin versus Atgam in the treatment of acute graft rejection episodes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND Thymoglobulin, a rabbit anti-human thymocyte globulin, was compared with Atgam, a horse anti-human thymocyte globulin for the treatment of acute rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial with enrollment stratification based on standardized histology (Banff grading) was conducted. Subjects received 7-14 days of Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/ day) or Atgam (15 mg/kg/day). The primary end point was rejection reversal (return of serum creatinine level to or below the day 0 baseline value). RESULTS A total of 163 patients were enrolled at 25 transplant centers in the United States. No differences in demographics or transplant characteristics were noted. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated that Thymoglobulin had a higher rejection reversal rate than Atgam (88% versus 76%, P=0.027, primary end point). Day 30 graft survival rates (Thymoglobulin 94% and Atgam 90%, P=0.17), day 30 serum creatinine levels as a percentage of baseline (Thymoglobulin 72% and Atgam 80%; P=0.43), and improvement in posttreatment biopsy results (Thymoglobulin 65% and Atgam 50%; P=0.15) were not statistically different. T-cell depletion was maintained more effectively with Thymoglobulin than Atgam both at the end of therapy (P=0.001) and at day 30 (P=0.016). Recurrent rejection, at 90 days after therapy, occurred less frequently with Thymoglobulin (17%) versus Atgam (36%) (P=0.011). A similar incidence of adverse events, post-therapy infections, and 1-year patient and graft survival rates were observed with both treatments. CONCLUSIONS Thymoglobulin was found to be superior to Atgam in reversing acute rejection and preventing recurrent rejection after therapy in renal transplant recipients.

Reduced incidence of Epstein-Barr virus-associated posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder using preemptive antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has been observed with increasing frequency consequent to the availability of more effective and potent immunosuppression. Prior work suggested that a peripheral blood monitoring strategy detecting peripheral B lymphoproliferation was effective in the early diagnosis of PTLD among 7 of 179 (3.9%) consecutive transplant recipients. Each of those seven patients received at least one course of antithymocyte globulin, Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin, or OKT3 before developing PTLD. METHODS To determine whether antiviral prophylaxis might reduce the incidence of PTLD, a subsequent group of 198 consecutive recipients received either ganciclovir or acyclovir during antilymphocyte antibody administration. When the donor or recipient were cytomegalovirus-seropositive, ganciclovir was given; acyclovir was used when both were cytomegalovirus-seronegative. Baseline and protocol posttransplant cell surface profiles were obtained using immunofluorescence and flow cytometry to detect T cells, lymphocyte activation markers, and the CD19 B cell antigen. RESULTS Demographic factors, including the incidence of recipients more than 50 years of age, non-Caucasians, previous transplantation, and diabetes mellitus, were similar in both groups. Additionally, the number of patients receiving antilymphocyte preparations was similar. However, only one patient (0.5%) from the latter group who received preemptive antiviral therapy developed PTLD. Although elevations in CD19+ B cells preceded clinical PTLD among each of the seven earlier patients, evidence of peripheral B cell proliferation was not demonstrated for the sole patient from the latter group, which suggests a possible effect of antiviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic antiviral therapy may reduce the sensitivity of peripheral monitoring for B lymphoproliferation, but the dramatic reduction in PTLD incidence strongly supports its use among transplant recipients at risk.

Donor kidney exchanges.

Kidney transplantation from live donors achieves an excellent outcome regardless of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch. This development has expanded the opportunity of kidney transplantation from unrelated live donors. Nevertheless, the hazard of hyperacute rejection has usually precluded the transplantation of a kidney from a live donor to a potential recipient who is incompatible by ABO blood type or HLA antibody crossmatch reactivity. Region 1 of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) has devised an alternative system of kidney transplantation that would enable either a simultaneous exchange between live donors (a paired exchange), or a live donor/deceased donor exchange to incompatible recipients who are waiting on the list (a live donor/list exchange). This Regional system of exchange has derived the benefit of live donation, avoided the risk of ABO or crossmatch incompatibility, and yielded an additional donor source for patients awaiting a deceased donor kidney. Despite the initial disadvantage to the list of patients awaiting an O blood type kidney, as every paired exchange transplant removes a patient from the waiting list, it also avoids the incompatible recipient from eventually having to go on the list. Thus, this approach also increases access to deceased donor kidneys for the remaining candidates on the list.

Repeat Organ Transplantation in the United States, 1996-2005

The prospect of graft loss is a problem faced by all transplant recipients, and retransplantation is often an option when loss occurs. To assess current trends in retransplantation, we analyzed data for retransplant candidates and recipients over the last 10 years, as well as current outcomes. During 2005, retransplant candidates represented 13.5%, 7.9%, 4.1% and 5.5% of all newly registered kidney, liver, heart and lung candidates, respectively. At the end of 2005, candidates for retransplantation accounted for 15.3% of kidney transplant candidates, and lower proportions of liver (5.1%), heart (5.3%) and lung (3.3%) candidates. Retransplants represented 12.4% of kidney, 9.0% of liver, 4.7% of heart and 5.3% of lung transplants performed in 2005. The absolute number of retransplants has grown most notably in kidney transplantation, increasing 40% over the last 10 years; the relative growth of retransplantation was most marked in heart and lung transplantation, increasing 66% and 217%, respectively. The growth of liver retransplantation was only 11%. Unadjusted graft survival remains significantly lower after retransplantation in the most recent cohorts analyzed. Even with careful case mix adjustments, the risk of graft failure following retransplantation is significantly higher than that observed for primary transplants.

Targeting Signal 1 Through CD45RB Synergizes with CD40 Ligand Blockade and Promotes Long Term Engraftment and Tolerance in Stringent Transplant Models

The induction and maintenance of allograft tolerance is a daunting challenge. Although combined blockade of CD28 and CD40 ligand (CD40L)-costimulatory pathways prevents allograft rejection in some murine models, this strategy is unable to sustain engraftment in the most immunogenic allograft and strain combinations. By targeting T cell activation signals 1 and 2 with the novel combination of anti-CD45RB and anti-CD40L, we now demonstrate potent enhancement of engraftment in C57BL/6 recipients that are relatively resistant to costimulatory blockade. This combination significantly augments the induction of tolerance to islet allografts and dramatically prolongs primary skin allograft survival. Compared with either agent alone, anti-CD45RB plus anti-CD40L inhibits periislet infiltration by CD8 cells, B cells, and monocytes; inhibits Th1 cytokines; and increases Th2 cytokine expression within the graft. These data indicate that interference with activation signals one and two may provide synergy essential for prolonged engraftment in situations where costimulatory blockade is only partially effective.

Cutting Edge: Transplantation Tolerance through Enhanced CTLA-4 Expression

Knockout and blocking studies have shown a critical role for CTLA-4 in peripheral tolerance, however, it is unknown whether augmenting CTLA-4 expression actually promotes tolerance. Here we demonstrate a specific and requisite role for CTLA-4 and its up-regulation in tolerance through anti-CD45RB. First, long-term murine islet allograft survival induced by anti-CD45RB is prevented by CTLA4-Ig, which interferes with B7:CTLA-4 interactions. Second, anti-CD45RB is ineffective in recipients lacking CTLA-4, B7-1, and B7-2. In contrast, CTLA4-Ig, which targets B7 on allogeneic cells, promotes long-term engraftment in these mice. Moreover, anti-CD45RB was effective in B7-deficient controls expressing CTLA-4. Finally, in wild-type mice, CTLA-4 expression returned to baseline 17 days after receiving anti-CD45RB, and was refractory to further increase. Transplantation and anti-CD45RB therapy at this time could neither augment CTLA-4 nor prolong engraftment. These data demonstrate a specific role for CTLA-4 in anti-CD45RB-mediated tolerance and indicate that CTLA-4 up-regulation can directly promote allograft survival.

The rationale for the new deceased donor pancreas allocation schema.

Background. To ensure the continued success of whole organ pancreas and islet transplantation, deceased donor pancreas allocation policy must continue to evolve. Methods. To assess the existing system, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Committee retrospectively analyzed the disposition and outcomes of deceased donor pancreata in the United States between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2003. Results. During the time period studied, consent was obtained but the pancreas was not recovered in 48% (11,820) of organ donors. The most common reasons given for nonrecovery were poor quality of the pancreas and difficulty in placement. Of whole organ pancreata that were transplanted, 90% were from donors with a body mass index (BMI) ≤30 kg/m2 and age ≤50 years. Pancreata from older and more obese donors were used more often for islet transplantation or research. For simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, the 1- and 3-year pancreas graft survival was lower when the donor was age >50 years (P=0.04), and there were trends toward lower graft survival with donor BMI >30 (P=0.06) and increasing cold-ischemia time. Conclusions. Based on these data, the OPTN adopted a new allocation algorithm in which pancreata from donors >30 kg/m2 or >50 years of age are, unless accepted for a local whole organ pancreas transplant candidate, preferentially allocated for islet transplantation. These data also suggest that many good quality pancreata are not procured, emphasizing the need for improved communication and cooperation between organ procurement organizations and pancreas and islet transplant programs.

Parameters of high bone-turnover predict bone loss in renal transplant patients: a longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is a serious complication of kidney transplantation. Various factors have been postulated to contribute to posttransplant bone loss, among them treatment with corticosteroids, the use of cyclosporine and cyclosporine-like agents, and persistent hyperparathyroidism. In a previous cross-sectional study of long-term renal transplant recipients, we observed that osteoporosis or osteopenia was present in 88% of patients. Because biochemical markers of bone formation (serum osteocalcin) and bone resorption (urine pyridinoline, PYD, and deoxypyridinoline, DPD) were elevated in the majority of study subjects, we hypothesized that elevated rates of bone-turnover contribute to posttransplant bone loss in long-term renal transplant patients. This study was performed to examine this hypothesis. METHODS The study population was composed of 62 patients who were more than 1-year postrenal transplantation and who had preserved renal function. They were followed prospectively for 1 year. Biochemical markers of bone-turnover were measured at study entry, and patients were classified as having high bone-turnover based on elevated urinary levels of at least one marker of bone resorption (i.e., PYD or DPD) and/or serum osteocalcin (group 1). If none of these were present, they were classified as having normal bone-turnover (group 2). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at time of entry into the study and again after 1 year of follow-up. The changes in BMD at the lumbar spine, hip, and wrist over the period of the study were compared between the high and normal bone-turnover groups. RESULTS Forty-three patients (69%) were classified as having high bone-turnover (Group 1), and 19 patients (31%) were classified as having normal bone-turnover (Group 2). There was a statistically significant difference in change in BMD between the two groups at the lumbar spine (-1.11+/-0.42%, high bone-turnover, vs. 0.64+/-0.54%, normal bone-turnover; P=0.02) and the hip (-0.69+/-0.38%, high bone-turnover, vs. 1.36+/-0.66%, normal bone-turnover; P=0.006). Whereas group 2 had stable bone mass, group 1 exhibited bone loss at these skeletal sites. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that bone loss is greater in renal transplant recipients with elevated biochemical markers of bone-turnover, suggesting that these markers may be useful in identifying patients at risk for continued bone loss. These data support the hypothesis that continued bone loss in long-term renal transplant recipients is associated with high bone-turnover. If accelerated bone resorption does play a role in posttransplant bone loss, this would provide a strong rationale for use of antiresorptive therapy for the prevention and treatment of this complication.

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia in Long-term Renal Transplant Patients with Alendronate

Bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone‐turnover were evaluated in a 2‐year study in 58 long‐term renal transplant recipients with good renal function. In the first year of study, data were collected and patients with osteoporosis and parameters of high bone turnover were classified as being at high risk for on‐going bone loss (Group A; n = 29). Patients with lesser degrees of bone loss or without biochemical parameters of high bone turnover were followed longitudinally (Group B; n = 29). Group A patients were then placed on alendronate 10 mg/day and both groups were followed for an additional year. Changes in regional BMD and bone‐turnover markers between the first and second year within each group were analyzed using paired tests. BMD in Group A, which had declined at the lumbar spine (− 1.6 ± 0.5%) and total femur (− 1.5 ± 0.4%) during the first year of the study, increased on alendronate therapy at both the lumbar spine (+ 3.4 ± 0.6%, p = 0.001) and total femur (+ 1.6 ± 0.6%, p < 0.001). These patients also experienced a significant decline in levels of serum alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, urinary levels of deoxypyridinoline and pyridinoline. In contrast, neither BMD nor biochemical markers changed significantly over 2 years in Group B. The current results demonstrate that renal transplant patients with osteoporosis and biochemical parameters of high bone turnover are at continued risk for bone loss. Therapy with a bisphosphonate can reverse this bone loss and even increase bone mass in these patients. Whether patients with lesser degrees of bone loss and/or patients without parameters of high bone turnover can also benefit from bisphosphonate therapy deserves further study.