Giampaolo Cerisano

Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications.

Background—We prospectively evaluated the prevalence, pattern, and prognostic impact of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) successfully treated with primary PTCA. The prevalence, course, and prognostic value of LV remodeling after primary PTCA are still to be clarified. Methods and Results—In 284 consecutive patients with AMI treated with primary PTCA, serial echocardiographic and angiographic studies, within 24 hours (T1), at 1 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after AMI were performed. Long-term (61±14 months) clinical follow-up data were collected for 98.6% patients enrolled in the study. Overall, 85 (30%) patients showed LV dilation (>20% end-diastolic volume increase) at T3 as compared with T1. Early (from T1 to T2), late (from T2 to T3), and progressive dilation patterns (from T1 to T2 to T3) were detected in 42 (15%), 41 (14%), and 36 (13%) patients, respectively. Cardiac death and combined events rate was significantly higher among patients with than among those without LV dilation (P =0.005 and P =0.025, respectively). The pattern of LV dilation during 6 months did not significantly affect survival. Cox survival analysis identified end-systolic volume at T1 and age as baseline predictors and end-systolic volume at T3 and age as 6-month predictors of cardiac death, respectively. Conclusions—LV remodeling after successful PTCA occurs despite sustained patency of the infarct-related artery and preservation of regional and global LV function. LV dilation at 6 months after AMI but not the specific pattern of LV dilation is clearly associated with worse long-term clinical outcome.

Impact of Microvascular Dysfunction on Left Ventricular Remodeling and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Primary Coronary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background—We hypothesized that preserved microvascular integrity in the area at risk would favorably influence left ventricular (LV) remodeling and long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results—Before and after successful primary angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]), 124 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent intracoronary myocardial contrast echo (MCE). An MCE score index (MCESI) was derived by averaging the single-segment score (0=not visible, 1=patchy, 2=homogeneous contrast effect) within the area at risk. An MCESI ≥1 was considered adequate reperfusion. Mean follow-up was 46±32 months. After PTCA, 100 patients showed adequate reperfusion (no microvascular dysfunction, NoMD), whereas 24 did not (MD). MD patients had a higher mean creatine kinase (4153±2422 versus 2743±1774 U/L; P =0.002) and baseline wall-motion score index (2.61±0.31 versus 2.25±0.42; P <0.001) and a lower baseline ejection fraction (33±8% versus 40±7%; P <0.001). From day 1 on, LV volumes progressively increased in the MD patients (n=19) and were larger than those of NoMD patients (n=85) at 6 months (end-diastolic volume 170±55 versus 115±29 mL; P <0.001). MCESI was the most important independent predictor of LV dilation (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.71, P <0.000001). By Cox analysis, MD represented the only predictor of cardiac death (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.72, P =0.010) and combined events (cardiac death, reinfarction, and heart failure; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85, P =0.014). MD patients showed worse survival in terms of cardiac death (P <0.0001) and combined events (P <0.0001). Conclusions—In reperfused acute myocardial infarction, MD within the risk area is an important predictor of both LV remodeling and unfavorable long-term outcome.

Left Ventricular Remodeling After Primary Coronary Angioplasty

Background— We prospectively evaluated the prevalence, pattern, and prognostic impact of left ventricular (LV) remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) successfully treated with primary PTCA. The prevalence, course, and prognostic value of LV remodeling after primary PTCA are still to be clarified. Methods and Results— In 284 consecutive patients with AMI treated with primary PTCA, serial echocardiographic and angiographic studies, within 24 hours (T1), at 1 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after AMI were performed. Long-term (61±14 months) clinical follow-up data were collected for 98.6% patients enrolled in the study. Overall, 85 (30%) patients showed LV dilation (>20% end-diastolic volume increase) at T3 as compared with T1. Early (from T1 to T2), late (from T2 to T3), and progressive dilation patterns (from T1 to T2 to T3) were detected in 42 (15%), 41 (14%), and 36 (13%) patients, respectively. Cardiac death and combined events rate was significantly higher among patients with than among those withou...

Relation between ST-segment changes and myocardial perfusion evaluated by myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with direct angioplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between myocardial perfusion and ST-segment changes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with successful direct angioplasty. Thirty-seven patients, successfully treated with direct angioplasty, underwent myocardial contrast echocardiography before and after angioplasty. The sum of ST-segment elevation divided by the number of the leads involved (ST-segment elevation index) was calculated at 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after restoration of a Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial grade 3 flow. After recanalization, myocardial reperfusion within the risk area was observed in 26 patients, whereas a no-reflow phenomenon occurred in 11. In patients with myocardial reperfusion, the ST-segment elevation index progressively declined, whereas in patients with no reflow, no significant change was observed. Reduction of > or = 50% in the ST-segment elevation index occurred in 20 of the 26 patients with reflow and in 1 of the 11 with no reflow (p = 0.0002). An additional increase of > or = 30% in the ST-segment elevation index occurred in 3 patients with reflow and in 7 with no reflow (p = 0.003). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the reduction in the ST-segment elevation index for predicting microvascular reflow were 77%, 91%, 95%, 62%, and 81%, respectively. The corresponding values of the increase in ST-segment elevation index for predicting no reflow were 64%, 88%, 70%, 85%, and 81%, respectively. In conclusion, after successful angioplasty, different patterns of myocardial perfusion are associated with different ST-segment changes. Analysis of ST-segment changes predicts the degree of myocardial reperfusion.

Impact of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention on survival in patients with at least one chronic total occlusion

AIMS This study sought to determine the impact on survival of successful drug-eluting stent-supported percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO). METHODS AND RESULTS Comparison of long-term cardiac survival of consecutive patients who underwent PCI for at least one CTO and who were stratified into successful and failure procedures. From 2003 to 2006, 486 patients underwent PCI for 527 CTO. CTO-PCI was successful in 344 patients (71%) and 361 lesions (68%). Multivessel PCI was performed in 62% in the CTO-PCI failure group and in 71% in the CTO-PCI success group (P = 0.062). Cardiac survival rate was higher in the CTO-PCI success group compared with CTO-PCI failure group (91.6 +/- 2.0 vs. 87.4 +/- 2.9%; P = 0.025), in patients with multivessel disease and CTO-PCI success compared with CTO-PCI failure (91.4 +/- 2.2 vs. 86.6 +/- 3.1%; P = 0.021), and in patients with complete revascularization when compared to patients with incomplete revascularization (94.0 +/- 1.7 vs. 83.8 +/- 3.6%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Successful CTO-PCI confers a long-term survival benefit. Improvement in survival is driven by the differences in the outcome of patients with multivessel disease and who were completely revascularized.

Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Versus Dobutamine Echocardiography for Predicting Functional Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Coronary Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES We sought to compare myocardial contrast echocardiography with low dose dobutamine echocardiography for predicting 1-month recovery of ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND The relation between myocardial perfusion and contractile reserve in patients with acute myocardial infarction, in whom anterograde flow is fully restored without significant residual stenosis, is still unclear. METHODS Thirty patients with acute myocardial infarction treated successfully with primary coronary angioplasty underwent intracoronary contrast echocardiography before and after angioplasty and dobutamine echocardiography 3 days after the index infarction. One month later, two-dimensional echocardiography and coronary angiography were repeated in all patients and contrast echocardiography in 18 patients. RESULTS After coronary recanalization, 26 patients showed myocardial reperfusion within the risk area, although 4 did not. At 1-month follow-up, all patients had a patient infarct-related artery without significant restenosis. Both left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion score index within the risk area significantly improved in the patients with reperfusion ([mean +/- SD] 38 +/- 8% vs. 48 +/- 12%, p < 0.005; and 2.35 +/- 0.5 vs. 2 +/- 0.6, p < 0.001, respectively), but not in those with no reflow. Of the 72 nonperfused segments before angioplasty, 27 showed functional improvement at follow-up. Myocardial contrast echocardiography had a sensitivity and a negative predictive value similar to dobutamine echocardiography in predicting late functional recovery (96% vs. 89% and 89% vs. 93%, respectively), but a lower specificity (18% vs. 91%, p < 0.001), positive predictive value (41% vs. 86%, p < 0.001) and overall accuracy (47% vs. 90%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Microvascular integrity is a prerequisite for myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction. However, contrast enhancement shortly after recanalization does not necessarily imply a late functional improvement. Thus, contractile reserve elicited by low dose dobutamine is a more accurate predictor of regional functional recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction than microvascular integrity.

Influence of Infarct-Zone Viability on Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND The relation between residual myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ventricular remodeling has yet to be fully elucidated. We hypothesized that the presence of residual viability would favorably influence left ventricular remodeling after AMI and that serial changes in left ventricular dimensions might be related to the extent of myocardial viability in the infarct zone. METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-three patients with a first AMI successfully treated with primary coronary angioplasty underwent two-dimensional echocardiography within 24 hours of admission and low-dose dobutamine echocardiography at a mean of 3 days after AMI. Two-dimensional echocardiography and coronary angiography were obtained in all patients 1 and 6 months after coronary angioplasty. On the basis of dobutamine echocardiography responses, patients were divided in two subsets: those with (n=48; group I) and those without (n=45; group II) infarct-zone viability. There was no difference in minimal lesion diameter and infarct-related artery patency at 1 and 6 months between the two groups. Group II patients had significantly greater end-diastolic (76+/-18 versus 53+/-14 mL/m2; P<.0003) and end-systolic (42+/-17 versus 22+/-11 mL/m2; P<.0003) volumes at 6 months than did patients in group 1. The extent of infarct-zone viability was significantly inversely correlated with percent changes in end-diastolic volumes at 6 months (r=-.66; P<.000001) and was the most powerful independent predictor of late left ventricular dilation. CONCLUSIONS After reperfused AMI, the degree of left ventricular dilation, when it occurs, is inversely related to the extent of residual myocardial viability in the infarct zone. Thus, the absence of residual infarct-zone viability discriminates patients who develop progressive left ventricular dilation after reperfused AMI from those who maintain normal left ventricular geometry.

Doppler-Derived Mitral Deceleration Time An Early Strong Predictor of Left Ventricular Remodeling After Reperfused Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND The relation between remodeling and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function has not yet been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to determine whether early assessment of Doppler-derived mitral deceleration time (DT), a measure of LV compliance and filling, may predict progressive LV dilation after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-one patients (aged 61+/-11 years; 6 women) with anterior AMI successfully treated with direct coronary angioplasty underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations within 24 hours of admission, at days 3, 7, and 30 and 6 months after the index infarction. Mitral flow velocities were obtained from the apical 4-chamber view with pulsed Doppler. End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) were calculated with the Simpsons rule algorithm. Patients were divided according to the DT duration assessed at day 3 in 2 groups: group 1 (n=33) with DT >130 ms and group 2 (n=18) with DT </=130 ms. Patency and restenosis rate at 6 months were similar between the 2 groups (94% group 1 vs 89% group 2; P=0.52; 27% group 1 vs 33% group 2; P=0.64, respectively). LV volume indexes were similar in both groups at baseline (EDVI: 71+/-3 group 1 vs 70+/-3 mL/m2 group 2, P=0.42; ESVI: 43+/-3 group 1 vs 48+/-3 mL/m2 group 2, P=0.13, respectively). From day 3 on, LV volume indexes progressively increased in group 2 and were significantly larger than those of group 1 at 6 months (LVEDVI 61+/-3 group 1 vs 104+/-6 mL/m2 group 2, P=0.00001; LVESVI 31+/-3 group 1 vs 73+/-6 mL/m2 group 2, P=0.00001, respectively). A significant inverse correlation was found between DT and changes in EDVI at 6 months (r=-0.68; P<0.0000001). By stepwise multiple regression analysis among several clinical, demographic, angiographic, and echocardiographic variables, DT was the most powerful predictor of EDVI changes at 6 months (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that early estimation (day 3) of Doppler-derived mitral DT provides a simple and accurate mean to predict late LV dilation after reperfused AMI.

High Residual Platelet Reactivity After Clopidogrel Loading and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Drug-Eluting Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease

Background— No data exist about the impact of high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) after clopidogrel loading on long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main disease (ULMD). Methods and Results— Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ULMD had prospective platelet reactivity assessment by light transmittance aggregometry after a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel. The primary end point of the study was cardiac mortality, and the secondary end point was stent thrombosis. From January 2005 to September 2008, 215 consecutive patients were treated with DES for ULMD. The incidence of HRPR after clopidogrel loading was 18.6%. The median follow-up was 19.3 months. The overall estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year cardiac mortality rate was 3.9±1.3%, 7.5±2.2%, and 12.2±3.4%, respectively. The 3-year cardiac mortality rate was 8.0±3.1% in the low residual platelet reactivity (LRPR) group and 28.3±10.4% in the HRPR group (P=0.005). The 3-year stent thrombosis rate was 4.2±1.8% in the low residual platelet reactivity group and 16.0±7.3% in the HRPR group (P=0.021). By forward stepwise regression analysis, HRPR after clopidogrel loading was the only independent predictor of cardiac death (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval,1.38 to 10.54; P=0.010) and stent thrombosis (hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 12.09; P=0.031). Conclusions— HRPR after 600-mg clopidogrel loading is a strong marker of increased risk of cardiac death and DES thrombosis in patients receiving DES stenting for ULMD. Routine assessment of in vitro residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading in patients with ULMD potentially suitable for DES-supported percutaneous coronary intervention should be considered to guide patient care decisions.

Relation between preintervention angiographic evidence of coronary collateral circulation and clinical and angiographic outcomes after primary angioplasty or stenting for acute myocardial infarction

It is unknown if collateral circulation (CC) has a beneficial effect on outcomes of patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first hours after onset of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study analyzes the relation between CC and outcome in patients with AMI who underwent primary angioplasty or stenting within 6 hours of symptom onset. The analysis was performed in a series of 1,164 consecutive patients. The contribution of clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables to the angiographic and clinical outcomes was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model, respectively. Of 1,164 patients, 264 (23%) had angiographic evidence of CC. Patients with CC had a lower incidence of diabetes (11% vs 16%, p = 0.033), anterior AMI (41% vs 55%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9% vs 14%, p = 0.029), anterograde TIMI grade flow >1 (10% vs 21%, p <0.001), and a greater incidence of preinfarction angina (43% vs 32%, p = 0.001), multivessel disease (59% vs 47%, p = 0.001), and total chronic occlusion (20% vs 10%, p <0.001). At 6 months, the mortality rate was lower in patients with CC compared with patients without CC (4% vs 9%, p = 0.011), whereas there were no differences in the incidence of reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, and angiographic restenosis. After multivariate analysis, CC did not emerge as a significant variable in relation to 6-month clinical and angiographic outcomes. CC does not exert a protective effect in patients who undergo mechanical intervention in the first 6 hours of AMI onset.