Giancarlo Berni
University of Perugia
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Giancarlo Berni.
Circulation | 2000
Stefano Grifoni; Iacopo Olivotto; Paolo Cecchini; Filippo Pieralli; Alberto Camaiti; Gennaro Santoro; Alberto Conti; Giancarlo Agnelli; Giancarlo Berni
BACKGROUND The role of echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in predicting clinical outcome in clinically stable patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) is undefined. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and clinical outcome of normotensive patients with RV dysfunction among a broad spectrum of PE patients. METHODS AND RESULTS This prospective clinical outcome study included cohort of 209 consecutive patients (age, 65+/-15 years) with documented PE. Acute RV dysfunction was diagnosed in the presence of >/=1 of the following: RV dilatation (without hypertrophy), paradox septal systolic motion, and Doppler evidence of pulmonary hypertension. Four groups were identified: 28 patients presenting with shock or cardiac arrest (13%), 19 hypotensive patients without shock (9%), 65 normotensive patients with echocardiographic RV dysfunction (31%), and 97 normotensive patients without RV dysfunction (47%). Among normotensive patients with RV dysfunction, 6 (10%) developed PE-related shock after admission: 3 of these patients died, and 3 were successfully treated with thrombolytic agents. In comparison, none of the 97 normotensive patients without RV dysfunction developed shock or died as a result of PE. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion (31%) of normotensive patients with acute PE presents with RV dysfunction; these patients with latent hemodynamic impairment have a 10% rate of PE-related shock and 5% in-hospital mortality and may require aggressive therapeutic strategies. Conversely, normotensive patients without echocardiographic RV dysfunction have a benign short-term prognosis. Thus, early detection of echocardiographic RV dysfunction is of major importance in the risk stratification of normotensive patients with acute PE.
American Journal of Cardiology | 1998
Stefano Grifoni; Iacopo Olivotto; Paolo Cecchini; Filippo Pieralli; Alberto Camaiti; Gennaro Santoro; Alessandro Pieri; Simone Toccafondi; Simone Magazzini; Giancarlo Berni; Giancarlo Agnelli
The potential role of ultrasound techniques in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been investigated in severe cases with hemodynamic compromise, but is still unclear for the whole clinical spectrum of patients with suspected PE. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of an integrated bedside evaluation for PE based on the combination of a clinical score, 2-dimensional echocardiography, and color venous duplex scanning. A group of 117 consecutive patients with suspected PE was assessed using a clinical likelihood score, echocardiography, and venous duplex scanning in order to obtain a preliminary diagnosis of PE, which was subsequently compared with the final diagnosis obtained by lung perfusion scintigraphy and angiography. A preliminary diagnosis of PE was made in 70 patients; a final diagnosis of PE was made in 63 patients, of which 56 had and 7 did not have a preliminary diagnosis of PE. The preliminary diagnosis therefore showed 89% sensitivity and 74% specificity, with a total accuracy of 82%. In patients with massive PE, sensitivity and negative predictive values of the preliminary diagnosis were 97% and 98%, respectively. Echocardiography was poorly sensitive (51%) but highly specific (87%) for PE. Thus, the integration of clinical likelihood, echocardiography, and venous duplex scanning provides a practical approach to patients with suspected PE, allows the rapid implementation of appropriate management strategies, and may reduce or postpone the need for further instrumental evaluation of more limited access.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2002
Alberto Conti; Barbara Paladini; Magazzini S; Toccafondi S; Olivotto I; Maurizio Zanobetti; Camaiti A; Bini G; Stefano Grifoni; Pieroni C; Antoniucci D; Giancarlo Berni
In this study, we screened a total of 6723 consecutive patients with chest pain and ECG non-diagnostic for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) on presentation to the emergency department (ED). The aim of the study was to avoid missed AMI, improve safe early discharge and reduce inappropriate coronary care unit (CCU) admission. Chest pain patients were triaged using a clinical chest pain score and managed in a chest pain unit (CPU). Patients with a low clinical chest pain score were considered at very ‘low-risk’ for cardiovascular events and discharged from the ED; patients with a high chest pain score were submitted to CPU management. Observation and titration of serum markers of myocardial injury were obtained up to 6 hours. Rest or stress myocardial scintigraphy (SPECT) was performed in patients >40 years or with ≥2 major coronary risk factors. Exercise Tolerance Test (ETT) or Stress-Echocardiogram (stress-Echo) were performed in younger patients or with <2 coronary risk factor, or unable to exercise, respectively. We discharged directly from the ED the majority of patients (4454; 66%): in this group there was only a 0.2% final diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) at follow-up. The remaining 34% of patients, with non-diagnostic or normal ECG, were managed in the CPU. In this group, 1487 patients (representing 22% of the overall study group) were found positive for CAD, two-thirds because of delayed ECG or serum markers of myocardial injury, and one-third by Echo, SPECT or ETT. In conclusion, CPU based management allowed 22% early detection of myocardial ischaemia and 78% early discharge from the ED avoiding inappropriate CCU admission and optimizing the use of urgent angiography.
European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2008
Scott G. Weiner; Philip D. Anderson; Leon D. Sanchez; Riccardo Pini; Giancarlo Berni; Gian Franco Gensini; Peter Rosen; Kevin M. Ban
Objective To measure the effectiveness of a 9-month emergency medicine ‘train the trainers’ program in Tuscany, Italy. Methods A total of 81 physicians with emergency department experience completed a training course in Italy. The course included 120 h of didactic lectures, 700 h of clinical rotations and 30 h of practical workshops. The effect of the training course was measured by written multiple-choice and oral case-simulation examinations, and a precourse and postcourse self-assessment instrument using a four-point Likert scale, to describe the ability to care for different types of emergency medicine patients. Results Twenty-four physicians completed the course in 2003–2004 and 57 physicians completed the course in 2004–2005. A comparison of an identical examination given as a posttest to the first group and a pretest to the second group demonstrated significant improvement on a 75-question multiple-choice examination (38.7 vs. 46.2 points, P<0.001). Improvement was also seen in oral case examinations, in pediatrics (17.8 vs. 37.3 points, P<0.001) and neurology (24.8 vs. 34.5, P<0.001). In the self-assessment survey, when asked to describe the ability to diagnose and provide initial treatment for several types of patients before and after the course, significant improvement was reported by 13 of 20 participants (65%). When asked to describe the ability to perform a variety of procedures, significant improvement was seen in seven of sixteen (44%). Conclusions When measured by written examinations, oral examinations and physician self-assessment, a train the trainers program, designed as part of an international emergency medicine collaboration, was efficacious.
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2006
Scott G. Weiner; Kevin M. Ban; Leon D. Sanchez; Tiziana Tarasco; Stefano Grifoni; Giancarlo Berni; Gian Franco Gensini
ObjectiveThe Tuscan Emergency Medicine Initiative is an international collaboration designed to create a sustainable emergency medicine training and qualification process in Tuscany, Italy. Part of the program involves training all emergency physicians currently practicing in the region. This qualification process includes didactic lectures, clinical rotations and practical workshops for those with significant emergency department experience. Lectures in the didactic portion were given by both emergency medicine (EM) and non-EM faculty. We hypothesized that faculty who worked clinically in EM would give more effective lectures than non-EM faculty.MethodsFifty-one emergency physicians from the hospitals surrounding Florence completed the course, which included 48 one-hour lectures. Twenty lectures were given by practicing emergency physicians and 28 were given by non-EM faculty. Participants completed an evaluation at the end of each session using a 5-point Likert scale describing the pertinence of the lecture to EM, the efficacy and clarity of the presentation, the accuracy of the information and the didactic ability of the lecturer.ResultsA mean of 38.5 evaluations was completed for each lecture. Every factor was significantly higher for lectures given by EM faculty: the pertinence of the lecture to EM (4.46 vs 4.16, p<0.001), the efficacy of the faculty (4.10 vs 3.91, p<0.001), the accuracy of the lecture content (4.16 vs 3.96, p<0.001), and the didactic ability of the instructors (4.02 vs 3.85, p=0.001).ConclusionsWhen teaching EM, evaluations of lectures in this training intervention were higher for lectures given by EM faculty than by non-EM faculty.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2006
Filippo Pieralli; Iacopo Olivotto; Simone Vanni; Alberto Conti; Alberto Camaiti; Giacomo Targioni; Stefano Grifoni; Giancarlo Berni
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2001
Alberto Conti; Chiara Gallini; Egidio Costanzo; Paolo Ferri; Maria Matteini; Barbara Paladini; Cesare Francois; Stefano Grifoni; Angela Migliorini; David Antoniucci; Cesco Pieroni; Giancarlo Berni
American Heart Journal | 2002
Alberto Conti; Barbara Paladini; Simone Toccafondi; Simone Magazzini; Iacopo Olivotto; Ferdinando Galassi; Cesco Pieroni; Gennaro Santoro; David Antoniucci; Giancarlo Berni
European Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2002
Alberto Conti; Giancarlo Berni
Open Journal of Anesthesiology | 2013
Valentina Anichini; Giovanni Zagli; Hagos Goitom; Giovanni Cianchi; A Cecchi; L Perretta; Emanuele Bigazzi; Barbara Gazzini; Simone Proietti; Alessandro Di Filippo; Simone Toccafondi; Gian Franco Gensini; Giancarlo Berni; Adriano Peris