Gianclaudio Mecozzi

Clinical outcome in patients with 19-mm and 21-mm St. Jude aortic prostheses: comparison at long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND Small-sized prostheses for aortic valve replacement may result in residual left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Aim of the study was to verify whether implantation of 19-mm versus 21-mm St. Jude Medical standard prostheses (St. Jude Medical, Inc, St. Paul, MN) influences long-term clinical outcome. METHODS Two hundred twenty-nine patients who underwent aortic valve replacement with 19 mm (group 1, 53 patients) or 21-mm St. Jude Medical standard prostheses (group 2, 176 patients) were included in the study. Mean follow-up of current survivors was 10+/-4 years. RESULTS Operative mortality was 7.5% in group 1 and 8.5% in group 2. At discharge, an important patient-prosthesis mismatch (effective orifice area index < or = 0.60 cm2/m2) was present in 18% of group 1 versus 5% in group 2 (p = 0.004). Among patients with body surface area less than 1.70 m2, such mismatch was present in 15% of group 1 versus 2% of group 2 (p = 0.008). At last follow-up New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (p < 0.001), left ventricular mass reduction (p = 0.02), mean (p = 0.002) and peak transprosthetic gradients (p < 0.001), and effective orifice area index (p = 0.005) were significantly better in group 2. Freedom from sudden death (92%+/-5% vs 99%+/-1%, p = 0.01), valve-related death (84%+/-6% vs 90%+/-5%, p = 0.02), and cardiac events (56%+/-13% vs 86%+/-4%, p = 0.008), were significantly lower in group 1. Effective orifice area index was an independent predictor of late cardiac events. CONCLUSIONS Although long-term results after aortic valve replacement with small-sized St. Jude Medical standard prostheses are satisfactory, 19-mm valve recipients show a high prevalence of important patient-prosthesis mismatch with less evident functional improvement and higher rate of cardiac events, suggesting a very cautious use of this prosthesis.

Hemodynamic performance of stented and stentless aortic bioprostheses.

BACKGROUND This study compares the hemodynamic performance of stented and stentless bioprostheses used for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and small aortic root. METHODS Between 1995 and 1998, 37 patients with a 21-mm aortic annulus (group 1) underwent aortic valve replacement with either a 21-mm Edwards Perimount or a 23-mm St. Jude Toronto bioprosthesis whereas 47 patients with a 23-mm aortic annulus (group 2) received either a 23-mm Medtronic Mosaic or a 25-mm Edwards Prima bioprosthesis. In each group mean and peak gradients, effective orifice area index, and left ventricular mass index were compared during follow-up. RESULTS Group 1 patients showed a significant reduction of mean (p < 0.001) and peak gradients (p = 0.001) during follow-up, more evident for St. Jude Toronto versus Edwards Perimount (p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). Group 2 patients showed a significant reduction of mean and peak gradients (p < 0.001), more evident for Edwards Prima versus Medtronic Mosaic (p < 0.001 and p = 0.07, respectively). Effective orifice area index significantly increased only in group 1 (p = 0.005). Left ventricular mass index significantly decreased in all patients regardless of the type of valve (p < 0.001). Patients with Edwards Prima showed a trend to a higher regression of left ventricular mass index versus Medtronic Mosaic recipients (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS After aortic valve replacement, stented and stentless bioprostheses exhibited similar results with a more evident hemodynamic improvement during follow-up in the stentless valves. Stented bioprostheses of new generation, however, may parallel the hemodynamic performance of stentless valves and appear to be a valid alternative for aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with a small aortic annulus.

Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized Sorin Bicarbon prostheses

OBJECTIVE The Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis (Sorin Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) is a bileaflet valve with curved-profile leaflets, a rolling hinge mechanism, and a pyrolytic carbon-coated titanium alloy housing and sewing ring. Although the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis has been implanted in greater than 80,000 patients, and reference values on the hemodynamic performance of valve prostheses are needed to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch, few Doppler echocardiographic data are available on the prosthesis in the aortic position. The aim of this study is to provide a detailed echocardiographic evaluation of the hemodynamic performance and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis. METHODS The study included 182 patients who received a 21-mm (n = 61) or 23-mm (n = 121) Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis for pure or prevalent aortic stenosis who underwent serial echocardiograms at 3, 6, and 12 months after aortic valve replacement. RESULTS Mean and peak gradients significantly decreased (P <.001) during follow-up to values of 12 +/- 3 and 22 +/- 6 mm Hg for the 21-mm prosthesis and values of 11 +/- 4 and 19 +/- 6 mm Hg for the 23-mm prosthesis at 1 year. Left ventricular mass index showed a 17% decrease to 120 +/- 27 g/m(2) in recipients of the 21-mm prosthesis (P <.001) and a 21% decrease to 123 +/- 29 g/m(2) in recipients of the 23-mm prosthesis (P <.001). A larger prosthesis size was the only predictor of a higher left ventricular mass index regression. Among recipients of the 21-mm prosthesis, body surface area of greater than 1.85 m(2) was associated with a lower regression of left ventricular mass index. The effective orifice area index was 1.00 +/- 0.11 and 1.08 +/- 0.14 cm(2)/m(2) in recipients of the 21-mm and 23-mm prostheses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Size 21 mm and 23 mm Sorin Bicarbon prostheses show low transprosthetic gradients, with significant reduction of left ventricular mass index during the first postoperative year. The reported effective orifice areas might be useful for aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch.

Severe quadricuspid aortic valve stenosis after mediastinal irradiation.

Quadricuspid aortic valve is an uncommon cause of valve dysfunction, because it is usually found at necropsy or incidentally recognized at operation for severe aortic regurgitation. Severe aortic stenosis requiring valve replacement involving a quadricuspid aortic valve has not been reported. In the case presented here, stenosis in a quadricuspid aortic valve is likely to have been favored by previous mediastinal irradiation.