Gianfranco Ciaramitaro

ICD implantation in noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium: a case report.

Isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium (INVM) is an uncommon cardiomyopathy characterized by the persistence of fetal myocardium with prominent trabecular meshwork and deep intertrabecular recesses, often associated with systolic dysfunction and ventricular dilatation. A 23‐year‐old man from Burkina Faso was referred to our operative unit with a diagnosis of INVM, made with echocardiogram and magnetic resonance imaging and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The literature reports the incidence of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in as many as 47% of the patients and sudden cardiac death in almost 50% of them and this supported our decision to perform implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators implantation.

Role of rate control and regularization through pacing in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and preserved ventricular function : The VRR study

Aim: High heart rates in chronic atrial fibrillation (CAF) is one of the factors responsible for hemodynamic alterations and may lead to tachycardiomyopathies. The ventricular rate regulation (VRR) study evaluates the effect of ventricular rate regularization in CAF patients with preserved ventricular function, marked ventricular rate variability, and indications for pacemaker (PM) implantation owing to symptomatic pauses. Rate regularization was achieved using VRR algorithm (INSIGNIA® pacemakers, Guidant Corp., St. Paul, MN, USA).

Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Insights from multimodality imaging and electrocardiography. A brief review

BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a successful strategy for heart failure (HF) patients. The pre-requisite for the response is the evidence of electrical dyssynchrony on the surface electrocardiogram usually as left bundle branch block (LBBB). Non-response to CRT is a significant problem in clinical practice. Patient selection, inadequate delivery and sub-optimal left ventricle lead position may be important causes. OBJECTIVES In an effort to improve CRT response multimodality imaging (especially echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance) could play a decisive role and extensive literature has been published on the matter. However, we are so far from routinary use in clinical practice. Electrocardiography (with respect to left ventricle capture and QRS narrowing) may represent a simple and low cost approach for early prediction of potential non-responder, with immediate practical implications. CONCLUSION This brief review covers the current recommendations for CRT in HF patients with particular attention to the potential benefits of multimodality imaging and electrocardiography in improving response rate.

Magnitude of QRS duration reduction after biventricular pacing identifies responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND Several studies have investigated the association between native QRS duration (QRSd) or QRS narrowing and response to biventricular pacing. However, their results have been conflicting. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the relative change in QRS narrowing index (QI) and clinical outcome and prognosis in patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS We included 311 patients in whom a CRT device was implanted in accordance with current guidelines for CRT. On implantation, the native QRS, the QRSd and the QI during CRT were measured. After 6months, 220 (71%) patients showed a 10% reduction in LVESV. The median [25th-75th] QI was 14.3% [7.2-21.4] and was significantly related to reverse remodeling (r=+0.22; 95%CI: 0.11-0.32, p=0.0001). The cut-off value of QI that best predicted LV reverse remodeling after 6months of CRT was 12.5% (sensitivity=63.6%, specificity=57.1%, area under the curve=0.633, p=0.0002). The time to the event death or cardiovascular hospitalization was significantly longer among patients with QI>12.5% (log-rank test, p=0.0155), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.3 [95%CI: 0.11-0.78]. In the multivariate regression model adjusted for baseline parameters, a 10% increment in QI (HR=0.61[0.44-0.83], p=0.002) remained significantly associated with CRT response. CONCLUSIONS Patients with a larger decrease in QRSd after CRT initiation showed greater echocardiographic reverse remodeling and better outcome from death or cardiovascular hospitalization. QI is an easy-to-measure variable that could be used to predict CRT response at the time of pacing site selection or pacing configuration programming.

Midventricular dyskinesia during clozapine treatment

This is the case of a young man suffering from schizophrenia and treated with clozapine. He developed acute heart failure associated with pericardial effusion and midventricular dyskinesia with severe systolic dysfunction and left ventricular dilatation at echocardiogram, readily resolved after the suspension of clozapine therapy. The segmental wall motion abnormalities observed at echocardiogram in this case are peculiar and have never been described before. The possible cardiotoxic effects of clozapine have been reported previously in the literature. Because of its serious potential side effects this drug is not considered the first choice for treatment of schizophrenia. Before beginning treatment, patients should undergo a cardiac evaluation, and they should also be periodically followed up with echocardiograms.

Is there a right place to pace the right ventricle? Evaluation of apical and septal positions in a pacemaker population: Study protocol for a prospective intervention-control trial

INTRODUCTION The main objective of research in pacemaker therapy has been to provide the best physiologic way to pace the heart. Despite the good results provided by right ventricular pacing minimization and by biventricular pacing in specific subsets of heart failure patients, these options present many limitations for standard pacemaker recipients. In these patients, pacing the right ventricle at alternative sites could result in a lower degree of left intraventricular dyssynchrony. Despite the lack of strong evidence and the difficulty in placing and accurately classifying the final lead position, pacing at alternative right ventricular sites seems to have become a standard procedure at many implanting centers. MATERIAL AND METHODS The RIGHT PACE study is a multi-center, prospective, single-blind, double-arm, intervention-control trial comparing right ventricular pacing from the apex and from the septal site in terms of left intraventricular dyssynchrony. A total of 408 patients with indications for cardiac pacing but without indications for ICD and/or CRT will be enrolled. Investigators will be divided on the basis of their prior experience of selective site pacing lead implantation and patients will be treated according to the clinical practice of the centers. After device implantation, they will be followed up for 24 months through evaluation of clinical, echocardiographic and safety/system-performance variables. DISCUSSION This study might provide important information about the impact of the right ventricular pacing on the left ventricular dyssynchrony, and about acute and chronic responses to selective site pacing, as adopted in current clinical practice. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID:NCT01647490). TRIAL REGISTRATION Right Ventricular Lead Placement in a Pacemaker Population: Evaluation of apical and alternative position. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01647490.

Right ventricular lead placement and ventricular dyssynchrony in a pacemaker population: An acute analysis from the evaluation of apical and non-apical position (right pace) study

Right ventricular lead placement and ventricular dyssynchrony in a pacemaker population: An acute analysis from the evaluation of apical and non-apical position (right pace) study☆☆☆ Carmine Muto, MD⁎, Valeria Calvi, MD, Giovanni Luca Botto, MD, Domenico Pecora, MD, LorenzoMaria Zuccaro,MD, Alessandro Costa, MD , Gianfranco Ciaramitaro, MD, Riccardo Airò Farulla, MD, Gerardo Nigro, MD , Bernardino Tuccillo, MD , Marco Racheli, MD, Alessio Lilli, MD , Albino Reggiani, MD, Maurizio Malacrida, MS, Sergio Valsecchi, PhD, Giampiero Maglia, MD

Effetti a breve termine della stimolazione in tratto di efflusso del ventricolo destro

INTRODUCTION Stimulation in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) showed better clinical and hemodynamic results at short, medium and long term than apical pacing. METHODS We enrolled 30 patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with positioning of electrocatheters in the high or low RVOT. All patients underwent clinical, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic evaluation after implantation and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS After 6 months of pacing, no significant changes in echocardiographic parameters were observed, whereas differences were found between the duration of spontaneous QRS and the duration of QRS stimulated at the time of implantation. Electrocatheter implantation in the high RVOT showed a particular benefit. CONCLUSIONS Chronic stimulation in RVOT, preferably in the high tract, can be considered a viable alternative to apical pacing in patients with likely high rates of stimulation, especially of young age.

Chronic Apical and Nonapical Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients with High-Grade Atrioventricular Block: Results of the Right Pace Study

Objective The aim of the study was to compare the two approaches to chronic right ventricular pacing currently adopted in clinical practice: right ventricular apical (RVA) and non-RVA pacing. Background Chronic RVA pacing is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, morbidity, and even mortality. Non-RVA pacing may yield more physiologic ventricular activation and provide potential long-term benefits and has recently been adopted as standard procedure at many implanting centers. Methods The Right Pace study was a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, nonrandomized trial involving 437 patients indicated for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with a high percentage of RV pacing. Results RV lead-tip target location was the apex or the interventricular septum. RVA (274) and non-RVA patients (163) did not differ in baseline characteristics. During a median follow-up of 19 months (25th–75th percentiles, 13–25), 17 patients died. The rates of the primary outcome of death due to any cause or hospitalization for heart failure were comparable between the groups (log-rank test, p = 0.609), as were the rates of the composite of death due to any cause, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥ 15% as compared with the baseline evaluation (secondary outcome, p = 0.703). After central adjudication of X-rays, comparison between adjudicated RVA (239 patients) and non-RVA (170 patients) confirmed the absence of difference in the rates of primary (p = 0.402) and secondary (p = 0.941) outcome. Conclusions In patients with indications for dual-chamber pacemaker who require a high percentage of ventricular stimulation, RVA or non-RVA pacing resulted in comparable outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01647490).

Focus sui non responder alla terapia di resincronizzazione cardiaca: orizzonti e prospettive

: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown as a successful strategy in the treatment of patients with heart failure and electrical dyssincrony. However, a significant proportion of implanted patients fails to respond sufficiently or in a predictable manner. Consequently, non response to CRT remains a valuable problem in clinical practice. In order to improve CRT response and long-term clinical benefits, the proper evaluation of patients global frialty, the technology improvement, the multimodality imaging approach and the use of simple and low cost electrographic parameters (to verify effective biventricular capture and QRS narrowing) could play a important role. Therefore, the integration of various medical expertises (clinical cardiology, cardiac advanced imaging, electrophysiology) is a crucial element in order to achive the maximal benefits from this promising tecnique. In the multistep process (from patients evaluation to results verification) the follow-up even from the earliest post implantation phase, should be managed with great attention having the potential for impact the prognosis. This brief review focus the problem of non responder to CRT, giving particular attention to the different variables that may play a role (comorbilities, improvement in the tecnology of device implantation, role of multimodality imaging and electrocardiographic parameters).