Gianluca Paniz

Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE The aim of this clinical research on implant-supported restorations is to analyze, through spectrophotometric digital technology, the influence of the abutment material on the color of the peri-implant soft tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty patients received an endosseous dental implant in the anterior maxilla. At the time of each definitive prosthesis delivery, an all-ceramic crown has been tried on gold, titanium and zirconia abutment. After the insertion of each single abutment, the peri-implant soft tissue color has been measured through a spectrophotometer. Also, the thickness of the facial peri-implant soft tissue was measured at the level of the implant neck through a caliper. A specific software has been utilized to identify a specific tissue area and to collect the data before the statistical analysis in Lab* color space. The normality of the quantitative variables was verified by means of the Shapiro-Wilk test. Simple linear correlation between quantitative variables was evaluated by using Pearsons coefficient. The results on the performance of the abutment materials with regard to the color measurements and the overall measurement ΔE were described by computing the least-square means. The significance of differences among types of abutment was verified by means of the Scheffe test for multiple comparisons. RESULTS For all the abutments used, the color of the peri-implant soft tissue appeared to be significantly different from the one of the contra-lateral tooth (ΔE>8.5). Significantly higher (P<0.05) difference were present with the use of titanium abutments (11 ± 0.4) when compared with the results of gold (8.9 ± 0.4) and zirconia (8.5 ± 0.4) abutments. No correlation has been demonstrated between soft tissue thickness and degree of color difference (P>0.25). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitation of the present study, the peri-implant soft tissue color appears to be different from the soft tissue color around natural teeth, no matter which type of restorative material is selected. When titanium abutment was selected, significantly higher differences were present than those obtained with gold or zirconia abutments. The thickness of the peri-implant soft tissue did not appear to be a crucial factor in the abutment impact on the soft tissue color.

The precision of fit of cast and milled full-arch implant-supported restorations.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the marginal precision of computer numeric control-milled frameworks fabricated of grade 4 commercially pure titanium or cobalt-chrome alloy through digital technology and to compare them with conventional cast frameworks. MATERIAL AND METHODS A titanium cast of a mandibular arch with six implant analogs was used as a master. The master cast was measured with a coordinate measuring machine. Fifteen rigid anatomic frameworks were created on the master cast in cast gold alloy and milled in titanium or cobalt-chrome material. The fifteen anatomic frameworks were measured in the same manner as the master cast. While the milled frameworks were measured once, at the end of the milling process, the cast anatomic frameworks were measured twice: immediately after the casting and divesting procedures and again after a technical adaptation procedure. Each anatomic framework was weighed. To compare the measurements obtained from each group of frameworks, descriptive statistics were calculated and one-way analysis of variance was performed, with values considered statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS The mean weight of the cast frameworks was 33.41 g, the cobalt-chrome frameworks weighed 18.12 g on average, and the titanium frameworks averaged 8.7 g. The mean values for three-dimensional deviation of the center point position for each group of frameworks were 261 μm (cast frameworks before adaptation), 49 μm (cast frameworks after adaptation), 26 μm (milled frameworks in cobalt-chrome), and 26 μm (milled frameworks in titanium). CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this in vitro study, absolute passive fit cannot be achieved, regardless of material and fabrication technique. Anatomic milled frameworks fabricated in titanium or cobalt-chrome presented reduced center point deviation compared to cast frameworks. Titanium frameworks weighed less than cobalt-chrome and cast gold alloy frameworks.

Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of peri‐implant soft tissue color

PURPOSE While extensive references are present in the literature dealing with the correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of tooth shade, there is a lack of information on this correlation regarding the soft tissue color. The purpose of this experimental study was to verify whether a correlation between the objective and subjective evaluation exists in analyzing soft tissue color. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 39 patients with at least one implant-supported restoration in the anterior maxilla were included in the study. The shade of the peri-implant mucosa was compared with the shade of the gingiva at the adjacent tooth in a subjective and in an objective manner. The subjective evaluation was performed by five dental professionals (prosthodontist, periodontist, general dentist, dental hygienist, and dental assistant) in a subjective scale (ranging from 1 to 4). The objective evaluation was obtained by means of a spectrophotometer in a CIELAB* Color Scale, and the differences were evaluated through formula ΔE=[(ΔL)²+(Δa)²+(Δb)²]¹/². To correlate the subjective and the objective evaluation, for each arithmetical median value of the subjective evaluation, a mean value of objective evaluation has been calculated, and the Spearmans rank correlation coefficient has been used. The differences have been also analyzed for thin and thick tissue biotypes. RESULTS The mean ∆E value for the subjective evaluation between peri-implant soft tissue and adjacent tooth gingival tissue was ∆E = 9.74. Also, mean ∆E values of 10.35 and 7.54 have been reported for thin and thick biotypes, respectively. Mean values of ∆E = 6.63, 8.54, and 15.54 were presented by median values of 1 (perfect matching), 2 (good matching), and 3 (clinically distinguishable), respectively. The threshold for the distinction of differences of mucosal color by the human eyes between perfect or good matching and distinguishable values has been calculated in ∆E = 8.74. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitation of this study, a correlation between the subjective and the objective evaluation of the peri-implant soft tissue exists and the threshold for the distinction of mucosal color differences between perfect or good matching and distinguishable subjective values has been calculated in ∆E = 8.74 in the objective evaluation.

Periodontal response to two different subgingival restorative margin designs: a 12-month randomized clinical trial

ObjectivesSubgingival margin placement is sometimes required due to different reasons and is often associated with adverse periodontal reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine if a single restoration with subgingival margin on a tooth, in the maxillary anterior zone, would affect its periodontal soft tissue parameters, and whether or not a deep chamfer preparation has a different influence in the periodontium when compared to a feather edge preparation.Material and methodsPlaque and gingival indexes, periodontal probing depth, bleeding on probing, and patient’s biotype were registered. One hundred six teeth were prepared with a deep chamfer, while 94 were prepared with a feather edge finishing line. Twelve months after the restoration delivery, the same parameters were evaluated. Repeated measure one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05) was used.ResultsA statistically significant difference between the baseline and the 12-month follow-up is present in regard to plaque index, gingival index, and periodontal probing depth, but no statistically significant difference between chamfer and feather edge finishing lines. There is a statistically significant difference between the baseline and the 12-month follow-up in regard to bleeding on probing. Feather edge preparation presents significantly more bleeding on probing and less gingival recession than the chamfer.ConclusionsSubgingival margins do influence the periodontal soft tissue response. Statistically significant difference exists between feather edge and chamfer finishing lines in regard to bleeding on probing and gingival recession.Clinical relevanceSubgingival margins should be carefully selected, especially when feather edge finishing line is utilized.

Influence of framework design on the cervical color of metal ceramic crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The replication of natural teeth, especially for single tooth restorations in patients with high esthetic needs, represents a challenge. PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to analyze the color of the cervical portion of single metal ceramic crowns fabricated with different metal framework designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS The color, as measured on the CIELAB color scale, of 3 different groups of restorations (n=10) fabricated with a high noble metal alloy (V-Deltaloy) and feldspathic porcelain (Noritake Super Porcelain) was analyzed with a colorimeter. Conventional metal ceramic crowns with metal facial margins were compared to metal ceramic crowns with porcelain facial margins and a horizontal reduction of the metal framework (1.0 mm reduction) or an additional vertical reduction (1.0 mm reduction). In all specimens, the finish line was positioned at a subgingival or equigingival level. The 6 groups obtained by the combination of the levels of the 2 factors (framework extension and finish line location) were examined with an ANOVA Fishers F-test and a post hoc Tukeys HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS The mean color difference for all the groups was clinically acceptable (ΔE<3.7). Conventional metal ceramic crowns showed higher differences in relation to finish line location (ΔE=2.34), while a vertical reduction of the framework was related to lower values (ΔE=0.96). Mean Lab* values were reported for all the groups of crowns. Statistically significant differences were present for L*, a*, and b* values when related to framework extension. Considering each value in relation to the interaction between framework extension and finish line location factors, significant differences were present only for L* and a* values. CONCLUSIONS No significant differences in base shade were present among the investigated crowns. Nevertheless metal ceramic crowns with vertical cut-back and porcelain facial margins presented more consistent results that tended to be closer to those of natural teeth.

Influence of coping design on the cervical color of ceramic crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The replication of natural teeth, especially with single-tooth restorations, represents a challenge. Similar to metal ceramic crowns, different designs of zirconia substructures have been suggested to improve the esthetic results of zirconia ceramic crowns. PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of the study was to analyze the color of the cervical portion of single zirconia ceramic crowns fabricated with different zirconia coping designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS The color, measured on the CIELAB color scale, of 3 different groups of restorations (n=10) fabricated with zirconia coping (Lava) and feldspathic porcelain (Noritake Super Porcelain) was analyzed with a spectrophotometer. Conventional zirconia crowns with zirconia facial margins were compared with ceramic crowns with porcelain facial margins and either a horizontal reduction of the zirconia coping (1.0 mm reduction) or an additional vertical reduction (1.0 mm additional reduction). The 3 groups, each with a different coping extension, were examined with a 1-way ANOVA and the Fisher exact test, and the differences of the groups were evaluated by applying ΔE thresholds (α=.05). RESULTS The mean color difference among all the groups was not clinically significant (ΔE<3.7). Reduced color differences were present between the 2 porcelain butt margin groups of crowns (ΔE=1.06, between group H and V). Increased differences were present between the zirconia margin group and the porcelain butt margin group (ΔE=2.54 between group C and H; ΔE=2.41 between group C and V). Lab* values were examined in all the groups of crowns to determine the clinical implications. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitation of the study, no significant differences were present among the tested groups of crowns. Nevertheless, although some differences were present between the zirconia margin group and the porcelain butt margin group, reduced differences were present between the 2 different cutback designs.

Clinical Periodontal Response to Anterior All-Ceramic Crowns with Either Chamfer or Feather-edge Subgingival Tooth Preparations: Six-Month Results and Patient Perception.

Subgingival margins are often required for biologic, mechanical, or esthetic reasons. Several investigations have demonstrated that their use is associated with adverse periodontal reactions, such as inflammation or recession. The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical study was to determine if two different subgingival margin designs influence the periodontal parameters and patient perception. Deep chamfer and feather-edge preparations were compared on 58 patients with 6 months follow-up. Statistically significant differences were present for bleeding on probing, gingival recession, and patient satisfaction. Feather-edge preparation was associated with increased bleeding on probing and deep chamfer with increased recession; improved patient comfort was registered with chamfer margin design. Subgingival margins are technique sensitive, especially when feather-edge design is selected. This margin design may facilitate soft tissue stability but can expose the patient to an increased risk of gingival inflammation.

A technique for immediate occlusal implant loading of a completely edentulous mandible: A clinical report

The protocols described are designed for immediate implant loading of the completely edentulous mandible and to provide the patient with a prosthesis that incorporates structural durability and esthetics in a time efficient manner. Incorporating appropriate diagnostic and surgical procedures, this clinical report describes the use of custom-fabricated transparent devices that help the clinician identify implant position, thereby reducing the procedural time and improving the structural durability and esthetics of the immediate prosthesis.

Interproximal Papilla Stability Around CAD/CAM and Stock Abutments in Anterior Regions: A 2-Year Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

The aim of this study was to compare the interproximal papilla stability of restorations supported by computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufacture (CAD/CAM) abutments to those supported by prefabricated stock abutments in anterior areas over a 2-year follow-up. Abutments were selected depending on implant inclination and thickness of buccal peri-implant soft tissues from the following: zirconia stock, titanium stock, zirconia CAD/CAM and titanium CAD/CAM. Differences between the height of the papilla tip were measured (REC). RESULTS REC values of titanium and zirconia CAD/CAM abutments were significantly lower than those of titanium and zirconia stock. The use of titanium and zirconia CAD/CAM abutments is related to better interproximal papillae stability.

Efficacy of an Anesthetic Gel in the Reduction of Pain During Impression Making

INTRODUCTION Gingival tissue displacement can be an uncomfortable procedure, often performed without injectable local anesthesia. The present study evaluated the efficacy of an anesthetic gel in reducing pain during this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty patients undergoing definitive dental impression, for fabricating full-coverage restorations, were evaluated for pain perception on displacement of the surrounding gingival tissues. All the participants were randomly divided into two groups. Five minutes before the insertion of the displacement cord, the anesthetic gel, a mixture of 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine, was applied in the sulcus of test group patients. Each patient was asked to complete the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). RESULTS In the two scales considered, test group patients showed a statistically significant pain reduction (VAS p=0.0002, VRS p=0.01054) compared to control group patients. CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this study, a clinically significant efficacy of the anesthetic gel was noticed during gingival displacement procedures.