Gianna Waldrich Bisca

Simple Lower Limb Functional Tests in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the characteristics and available evidence on the measurement properties of the gait speed (GS) test, timed Up and Go test (TUG), sit-to-stand (STS) test, and step test; to investigate their relation with clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); and to provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research. DATA SOURCES Studies were systematically identified from a literature search using PubMed, PEDro, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases and the reference lists of the included articles. STUDY SELECTION Studies including ≥1 of these 4 lower limb functional tests (GS test, TUG, STS test, and step test) as an outcome in patients with COPD were selected. No limits were applied for language and study design. DATA EXTRACTION Two researchers independently performed data extraction and, by using the COnsensus-based standards for the Selection of health status measurement INstruments, assessed the quality of those studies that described measurement properties. DATA SYNTHESIS Forty-two articles met the selection criteria. GS test, STS test, and step test are valid, reproducible, and responsive tests, especially the 4-meter GS, 5-repetition STS test, and 6-minute step test (6MST). The TUG is reliable; however, studies on other measurement properties of this test are lacking. Outcomes of these tests are correlated with mortality, physical activity in daily life, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Simple and functional lower limb tests provide information about important clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. The 4-meter GS, 5-repetition STS test, and 6MST are tests with well-established psychometric properties, whereas the properties of the TUG need to be studied further.

Minimal detectable change of the London chest activity of daily living scale in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea and fatigue frequently impair the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Questionnaires and scales have been used to assess limitations in ADL. The London Chest Activity of Daily Living (LCADL) scale is responsive to intervention to a higher extent when compared with other tools. However, the minimal detectable change (MDC) for this scale remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the MDC for functional status improvement measured by the LCADL scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: Forty patients (20 men, 66 ± 7 years, forced expired volume in 1 second 44 ± 16% predicted) participated in a 3-month high-intensity exercise training program. Before and after the protocol, participants complete the LCADL scale and the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire. To calculate the MDC, we used the standard error of measurement and the effect size (distribution-based estimates). RESULTS: There was improvement in the LCADL self-care, domestic and leisure domains, and total score after the training program, with a strong trend for improvement in the physical activity domain. The MDC estimated for the LCADL were 0.89, 2.60, 0.44, 0.58, and 3.88 points for self-care, domestic, physical, and leisure domains, and total score, respectively. Correlations between changes in LCADL and in the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire were weak (r < 0.4 for all). CONCLUSION: This study provided the MDC for the domains and total score of the LCADL. A change of 4 points in the total score of the LCADL can be interpreted as a meaningful change.